## Context and problem statement <Describe the technical context, operational dilemma, or architectural friction. What forces are compelling this decision?> ## Decision drivers 1. **Driver 1:** <e.g., Eliminate native compilation failures across Node versions> 2. **Driver 2:** <e.g., Enforce deterministic replay without external network calls> 3. **Driver 3:** <e.g., Maintain fail-closed security invariants without loopback bypasses> ## Considered options - **Option A:** <Name of Option A> - **Option B:** <Name of Option B> - **Option C:** <Name of Option C> ## Evaluation and tradeoff matrix ### Option A: <name of option A> - **Good, because:** <Advantage 1> - **Good, because:** <Advantage 2> - **Bad, because:** <Drawback 1> - **Bad, because:** <Drawback 2> ### Option B: <name of option B> - **Good, because:** <Advantage 1> - **Bad, because:** <Drawback 1> ## Decision outcome **Chosen Option:** **Option A**, because <comprehensive justification referencing drivers>. ### Positive consequences - <Favorable outcome 1> - <Favorable outcome 2> ### Negative consequences and accepted tradeoffs - <Technical debt, limitation, or operational overhead incurred> ## Confirmation and verification strategy - **Verification Gate:** <Exact test suite or contract check enforcing this decision> - **Enforcement Mechanism:** <Linter, type-check, or CI rule that prevents regressions> ## Revisit conditions This decision should be formally re-evaluated if: 1. <Condition 1, e.g., Upstream Node.js deprecates the built-in API> 2. <Condition 2, e.g., Telemetry reveals unresolvable lock contention under 100+ concurrent workers>

--- schema: "kxm.doc.v1" id: "ADR-0001" type: "adr" title: "ADR-: " project: "kxm" status: "proposed" # proposed | accepted | superseded | deprecated | rejected owner: "@owner" created: "2026-09-08" updated: "2026-09-08" authority: "instruction" confidence: "verified" summary: "Short decision summary and primary technical consequence." tags: ["architecture", "decision"] related: [] details: decision_drivers: ["concurrency-safety", "dependency-minimization"] supersedes: null superseded_by: null --- # ADR-0001: ## Context and problem statement <Describe the technical context, operational dilemma, or architectural friction. What forces are compelling this decision?> ## Decision drivers 1. **Driver 1:** <e.g., Eliminate native compilation failures across Node versions> 2. **Driver 2:** <e.g., Enforce deterministic replay without external network calls> 3. **Driver 3:** <e.g., Maintain fail-closed security invariants without loopback bypasses> ## Considered options - **Option A:** <Name of Option A> - **Option B:** <Name of Option B> - **Option C:** <Name of Option C> ## Evaluation and tradeoff matrix ### Option A: <name of option A> - **Good, because:** <Advantage 1> - **Good, because:** <Advantage 2> - **Bad, because:** <Drawback 1> - **Bad, because:** <Drawback 2> ### Option B: <name of option B> - **Good, because:** <Advantage 1> - **Bad, because:** <Drawback 1> ## Decision outcome **Chosen Option:** **Option A**, because <comprehensive justification referencing drivers>. ### Positive consequences - <Favorable outcome 1> - <Favorable outcome 2> ### Negative consequences and accepted tradeoffs - <Technical debt, limitation, or operational overhead incurred> ## Confirmation and verification strategy - **Verification Gate:** <Exact test suite or contract check enforcing this decision> - **Enforcement Mechanism:** <Linter, type-check, or CI rule that prevents regressions> ## Revisit conditions This decision should be formally re-evaluated if: 1. <Condition 1, e.g., Upstream Node.js deprecates the built-in API> 2. <Condition 2, e.g., Telemetry reveals unresolvable lock contention under 100+ concurrent workers>