This is testing the soft ban feature. Firefishy is not really a bad chap.
Dear pfoten-weg,
\nyou have uploaded tens of thousands of objects to OSM without changing them. We believe that this must be a software malfunction on your side. Would you please explain to us what software you are using, so that we may help you to avoid such unnecessary uploads in the future. These uploads clutter the history and confuse other mappers - especially if you create changesets that span the whole planet!
\nThank you,\n
Frederik Ramm
This is testing the soft ban feature. Firefishy is not really a bad chap.
Dear pfoten-weg,
\nyou have uploaded tens of thousands of objects to OSM without changing them. We believe that this must be a software malfunction on your side. Would you please explain to us what software you are using, so that we may help you to avoid such unnecessary uploads in the future. These uploads clutter the history and confuse other mappers - especially if you create changesets that span the whole planet!
\nThank you,\n
Frederik Ramm
Dear GarryX3D,
\nit seems that you have created this account containing special characters on purpose in order to impersonate the existing user GarryX3D. Because the special characters in your user name are not visible in the web interface, you want everyone to believe that your changes are in fact his.
\nUser names, and based on these, communication among users, are important for the OpenStreetMap community, and we kindly ask you not to subvert them in the way you do. You are damaging the whole project with childish acts like that.
\nPlease change your user name to something that is not misleading.
\nPlease also immediately stop your edit war with GarryX3D, and use the mailing lists, forum or Wiki to settle your dispute. I will send a similar message to GarryX3D himself as well as the other users involved in the dispute.
\nBest regards\n
Frederik Ramm\n
Dear user harmagedon,
\nI sent the following to you on 14th December, but since the message has obviously not got through to you, I feel compelled to repeat it:
\nWe note that you have performed more than 100.000 edits in the past three weeks, most of them by removing \"created_by\" tags from existing objects.
\nFirst of all, let me say that there is probably a misunderstanding about the function of the \"changeset comment\" field on your part; this field is not meant for adding URLs to external web sites, but instead for documenting your edits so that others can see what you have done. In your case, a proper changeset comment would have been \"removed created_by tags\".
\nSecondly, while it is true that the use of \"created_by\" tags on nodes and ways is not encouraged any more, we have decided not to remove them automatically because this generates many unnecessary change events.
\nWe would thus ask you to reduce your editing activity to areas where you have valuable contributions other than removing existing tags.
\nThank you\n
Frederik Ramm
It looks like your doing some sort of import that has gone wrong - you have ways spanning multiple continents. See, for example:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/47478804
\nPlease stop the import and fix the data before trying again. There is a test API available at api06.dev.openstreetmap.org if you want to test your code. The imports working group would also be happy to help if this is an import.
\nIncidentally, it would be better to add nodes and ways in the same changeset rather than uploading the nodes first and then the ways.
Your attempts to clean up your previous edits seem to be doing just as much damage, if not more, as the original edits.
\nIn particular you seem to be removing nodes which weren't added by you, and modifying the ways which used them to remove the nodes in question. For example:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/47172597/history
\nhas been removed from:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/5865576/history
\ndespite the fact that neither object had previously been touched by you.
\nPlease seek help from the imports working group before you do any more of these bulk edits - they are causing serious damage.
\nThanks,
\nTom\n
You have been reported for making suspicious edits. I am placing a temporary block while we investigate.
\n/ Grant\n
DWG.\n
Dear user magellan,
\nyou have made a very large number of edits in Austria, many of which members of the Austrian community find questionable. You have removed the name=* tag from many highways and added addr:street=* instead. You have removed plan.at import tags in hundreds of changesets, making it more difficult to automatically clean up plan.at import data later. Members of the community have contacted you to discuss this, but you have not reacted and instead continue your work. Please stop it, read your messages, and discuss your work with the community before you continue.
\nI am not saying you are doing something wrong, but OpenStreetMap is a community project and if you make such large-scale edits as you do, then you must be in touch with the community working in the same area.
\n/ / /
\nLieber Benutzer magellan,
\nDu hast eine grosse Zahl Edits in Oesterreich gemacht, und die OSM-Community in Oesterreich ist nicht mit allem einverstanden. Du hast name:*-Tags enfernt und stattdessen addr:street=* gesetzt, und Du entfernst in grossem Stil die plan.at-Import-Tags und erschwerst dadurch eine spaetere automatische Verarbeitung. Verschiedene Leute haben versucht, Dich zu kontaktieren, doch Du antwortest nicht und machst weiter. Bitte halte ein, lies Deine Nachrichten, und diskutiere Dein Vorhaben mit den Leuten, bevor Du weitermachst.
\nIch sage nicht, dass Du irgendetwas falsch machst, aber OSM ist ein Community-Projekt, und wer so grossflaechige Aenderungen macht wie Du, der muss sich mit der Community ins Benehmen setzen, die den gleichen Bereich bearbeitet.
\nViele Gruesse\n
Frederik Ramm / \"woodpeck\"
Dear user j_cook, yesterday I asked user \"magellan\" on behalf of the Austrian community to stop his mass editing of data in Austria and discuss with them before he continues. Shortly after, your account has been created, and continues where magellan left off. What I said to magellan applies to you as well:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/blocks/8
\nI'm sure if you got on to talk-at and discussed your plans then an amicable solution could be found. Otherwise you risk that others revert all the changes you made which is undesirable.
\nIf you are the same person who controlled the magellan account then please be advised that the account block goes away after you have read this message. There is no need to create new accounts just to keep on editing, however people might view your edits in a less positive light if they see that you ignore continued requests to explain yourself.
\nBest regards\n
woodpeck / Frederik Ramm\n
Dear user vreimer,
\nyou have made a very large number of edits in Canada, many of which members of the Canadian OSM community find questionable. Some edits seem to bear a close resemblance to Google data. Members of the community have contacted you to discuss this, but you have not reacted and instead continue your work. Please stop it, read your messages, and discuss your work with the community before you continue.
\nI am not saying you are doing something wrong (I have insufficient information), but OpenStreetMap is a community project and if you make such large-scale edits as you do, then you must be in touch with the community working in the same area.
\nI am not saying you have to respond to each and every message you receive but completely ignoring the rest of the community will only alienate them and may even lead to the removal of all your changes by other members of the community, which all of us would find undesirable!
\nYour account is blocked until you log in to read this message; after that you can continue normally but I would really ask you to be more communicative about your actions. A very good place for this would be the talk-ca mailing list (see lists.openstreetmap.org).
\nBest regards\n
woodpeck a.k.a. Frederik Ramm
Dear user j_cook,
\nplease explain to me why you have disregarded my previous message. You can reach me through the OSM messaging system, or by email at frederik@remote.org.
\nLieber user j_cook,
\nbitte erklaere mir, warum Du meine vorige Nachricht ignoriert hast. Du kannst mich ueber das OSM-System erreichen, oder per E-Mail unter frederik@remote.org.
Your account has been temporarily blocked pending a response from you. Another OpenStreetMap user has alleged that you tampered with the data around Barnstaple and have added objects which are not on the ground and have renamed others. Please reply or send an email to data@openstreetmap.org with your response.
\nThis block will expire in 48 hours. Your account will be further monitored and if we do not hear from you during this time your edits made will be reverted.
\nIf you had good intentions and did not realise you were affecting the main openstreetmap database then please take time to review the edit help with the online editor or on the project wiki. There is also a newbies mailing list which you can use to get assistance.
\nData Working Group of the OpenStreetMap Foundation
Account blocked - Diary spam
Dear j_cook/magellan, you are again disregarding messages, and you continue to make changes in Austria which the Austrian community has asked you not to make (e.g. adding addr:* tags to highways). I have reason to believe that your account is being abused by someone else. I am sorry for the inconvenience but I have to block it again and ask you not to continue the kind of edits you have been making, respond to messages sent to you by community members, or take part in the discussions on the talk-at list.
Dear j_cook/magellan, you are again disregarding messages, and you continue to make changes in Austria which the Austrian community has asked you not to make (e.g. adding addr:* tags to highways). I have reason to believe that your account is being abused by someone else. I am sorry for the inconvenience but I have to block it again and ask you not to continue the kind of edits you have been making, respond to messages sent to you by community members, or take part in the discussions on the talk-at list.
Dear hasse_osm_korinthenkacker,
\nyou have started removing nodes created by other users even though these are correct; you have neither put a changeset comment that lets others see why you think they should be removed, nor have you explained yourself in any other way. If you remove the work of others in the future, please explain why you do it so that they understand.
\nI am using this method of blocking your account for 24 hours and requiring you to read this notice to make sure that you understand because you have not replied to personal messages in the past.
\nExamples:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/663306479/history\n
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/663302265/history\n
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/663305222/history
Bye\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
Your account has been temporarily blocked pending a response from you. Another OpenStreetMap user has alleged that you tampered with the data around Moscow and have been needlessly deleting objects. Please reply or send an email to data@openstreetmap.org with your response.
\nThis block will expire in 48 hours. Your account will be further monitored and if we do not hear from you during this time your edits made will be reverted.
\nIf you had good intentions and did not realise you were affecting the main openstreetmap database then please take time to review the edit help with the online editor or on the project wiki. There is also a newbies mailing list which you can use to get assistance. Alternatively try the Russian OSM Forum. http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21
\nData Working Group of the OpenStreetMap Foundation
Dear user pavlinux,
\nwe have been contacted by members of the Russian OSM community and they said that you were indiscrimnately deleting parts of Moscow and that they were unable to elicit a response from you. The have reverted your deletions, only for you to delete things again.
\nAre you doing this on purpose, or is this perhaps a software malfunction?\n
Please take care not to delete valuable data in the future. If you do delete something which is wrong or does not exist any more on the ground, simply put a proper changeset comment when uploading your changes, and people will understand what is happening.
Bye\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\n
OSM data working group
We have been contacted by members of the Australian OpenStreetMap community who say that you have been making edits that do not appear to reflect reality, and that you have not responded to their attempts to contact you. One example they gave was your creation of \"Charlie Sheen Highway\".
\nIf you had good intentions and did not realise you were affecting the main OpenStreetMap database then please take time to review the edit help with the online editor or on the project wiki. There is also a newbies mailing list which you can use to get assistance. Alternatively try the talk-au mailing list or the Australian forum where people will be happy to help.
\nTom Hughes\n
for the Data Working Group
Dear user pfoten_weg_!_,
\nit seems to me that your edits are detrimental to our project. You are, again, deleting objects and re-uploading them unchanged. I have tried to explain it to you and I have offered my help, with no effect; you have not even contacted me, nor replied to attempts at communication by other project members. Please understand that OpenStreetMap is a community project and you have to at least establish basic communications with the community if your edits are to be of value, ESPECIALLY if they are controversial like yours.
\nBye\n
woodpeck a.k.a Frederik Ramm
See block for user pfoten_weg_!_.
see block for user _pfoten_weg_!_
See block for pfoten_weg_!_
Dear user anti_bot-nonsense,
\nthe way in which you use your user profile and commit messages to express your political opinion and to offend others, and the way in which you constantly upload the same objects several times, make me think that you are another incarnation of the person who in the past used the accounts \"hasse_osm_korinthenkacker\", \"hasse_raubtierkapitalismus\", \"ramba_zamba\" and others. Please stop this behaviour; it is harming the project.
\nBye\n
woodpeck\n
a.k.a. Frederik Ramm\n
Dear user Juergenian,
\nthere have been complaints on the mailing lists about your edits in Russia. It seems that you are not following the on-the-ground rule, i.e. you are adding things which are not there. Also, you seem to have deleted the work of others without explaining why (the changeset comment is an ideal place for that). Other mappers have tried to contact you about your actions, but have not received a reply.
\nPlease explain your data sources, and respond to queries by community members. You are also welcome to join the \"talk\" list (see lists.openstreetmap.org) and answer questions there.
\nBest regards\n
Frederik Ramm\n
for the OSMF data working group.
Dear user Schorse,
\nI sent you a message this morning about your deletion of cycleways, asking you to discuss with the community before you continue. I see that you have continued deleting cycleways hours after I sent you that message, so I conclude that you may not have seen it. I have put a block on your account which requires you to log in to the API and read this message before you can continue to edit. The block will go away as soon as you have logged in. This does not mean that you have done something wrong - it is just a method to make sure that you have actually received the message. Please discuss your edits with the community, and revert them if the outcome of that discussion is that the edits were for the worse.
\nBye\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
Lieber User Schorse,
\nich habe Dir heute morgen geschrieben wegen der Loeschung von Radwegen, und Dich gebeten, Dich mit der Community ins Benehmen zu setzen, bevor Du fortf\u00e4hrst. Ich habe keine Antwort erhalten, und Du hast mit den L\u00f6schungen weitergemacht, daher nehme ich an, dass Du die Nachricht nicht bekommen hast. Ich habe Deinen Account gesperrt, so dass Du Dich einloggen musst und sichergestellt ist, dass Du diese Nachricht hier bekommst - danach kannst Du den Account sofort wieder benutzen. Es geht nicht darum, dass Du etwas falsch gemacht hast - es geht nur darum, sicherzustellen, dass Du die Nachricht bekommst. Bitte diskutiere Deine Aenderungen mit der Community, und nimm sie zurueck, falls das Ergebnis dieser Diskussion ist, dass Deine Aenderungen eine Verschlechterung darstellen.
\nBye\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
Dear User c710877,
\nyou seem to have made a lot of erroneous edits since you signed up to OpenStreetMap yesterday. You are using the Potlatch editor in \"live\" mode ( \u041f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0432\u0436\u0438\u0432\u0443\u044e) which means that anything you do will be written directly to the OpenStreetMap database! Others have cleaned up the problems caused by your edits, but please be more careful in the future - if you use Potlatch's \"edit with save\" mode (\u041f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043a\u0430 \u043e\u0444\u0444\u043b\u0430\u0439\u043d) then you can play around and discard your edits later.
\nThank you\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
Dear user ELadner,
\nyou are importing a lot of data into OpenStreetMap at the moment. Unfortunately the data has not been sufficiently preprocessed - you are adding a very large number of duplicate nodes to OSM, which unnecessarily bloats the database and causes additional work when removed later.
\nPlease discuss your plans with experienced OSMers before you continue, and ask them for help in preparing your data for uploading. You might for example try the imports or talk-us mailing list (see lists.openstreetmap.org for details).
\nBest wishes\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\n
for the OSM data working group.
Lieber Benutzer Oberf\u00f6rster,
\nich hatte Dich vor einigen Tagen gebeten, aufgrund Deiner oft kontroversen Edits das Changeset-Kommentar-Feld richtig zu befuellen, damit andere Benutzer leichter sehen koennen, was Du aenderst (und ggf. auch warum).
\nOffenbar hat Dich diese Nachricht nicht erreicht, denn Du verwendest nach wie vor den nichtssagenden Changeset-Kommentar \"korrigiert\". Daher sperre ich jetzt Deinen Account. In dem Moment, in dem Du diese Nachricht hier liest, ist die Sperre automatisch aufgehoben.
\nBitte halte Dich an das, was ich Dir geschrieben habe. OpenStreetMap ist ein Community-Projekt - wir arbeiten alle zusammen und nicht gegeneinander.
\nViele Gruesse\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
Blocked because of edit war on way 34981846. Please discuss before reverting the work of other mappers. \n
Dear User Caco0908,
\nOSM Data Working Group has removed your uploads from September 2010 because we believe they were from a copyrighted source. We were unable to reach you for a comment. Please refrain from uploading third-party data without clearing the license first.
\nBest wishes\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck\n
for the Data Working Group
We do not tolerate unsolicited and OSM-unrelated email messages.
Dear user h4ck3rm1k3,
\nyou seem to be importing CORINE landuse data in a rather crass violation of all our import guidelines. You haven't talked to the communities affected - the Italians seem to be pretty unhappy for one! - and you are importing without regard to already existing data, just slapping your polygons on top of what is already there.
\nPlease stop this immediately. The data you have already imported will likely have to be reverted. You are not helping OpenStreetMap with this, you are actually annoyig the very people on whose hard mapping work OSM's success is based.
\nYour account has been temporarily blocked to make sure you read this message; the block will be gone once you log in to OSM.
Dear user mk408,
\nI am writing to you on behalf of the OSMF data working group. We deal with disputes, vandalism, and copyright infringement. We have received a number of complaints about some of your edits, from different users.
\nThe core issue seems to be a dispute about you and a number of other users in the United States about what excatly constitutes a \"tertiary\" highway. We do not intend to get involved in the dispute; such disputes are generally, and should be, resolved by the community members through discussion.
\nWhat we object to is the fact that you seem to refuse to participate in the resolution of these disputes; instead you use automated edits to revert any change that does not match your personal opinion.
\nPlease understand that OpenStreetMap is a community effort. Only by working together, and amicably resolving our disputes, can we achieve our goals. There is no room in OpenStreetMap for people who believe that they are always right and stand above discussion.
\nWe urge you to discuss the matter of road classification with your peers in any of the available ways - e.g. on the talk-us mailing list. We expect you to refrain from reverting the edits of others until an the matter has been resolved.
\nThis message blocks your account, but only until you log in to www.openstreetmap.org; you will be able to edit normally afterwards. We sincerely hope that we will not take further measures, and that you and your fellow mappers manage to solve this issue like the grown-up people you are.
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\n
for the Data Working Group
Your edits seem to be damaging the map. I am placing a temporary block on your account for us to investigate.
Your recent changes have been reported as vandalism. If this is an error please let me know.
\nHelp is available:\n
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21\n
http://irc.openstreetmap.org/ #osm-ru
Blocked because of erroneous mass edits (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/24956989/history - making a track into a trunk road)
\nLieber Oberfoerster, ich weiss nicht, was Du Dir dabei gedacht hast, aber es ist gruendlich in die Hose gegangen. Du hast wieder eine Vielzahl von Edits durchgefuehrt, Du hast sie wieder nicht richtig dokumentiert, und Dir sind dabei wieder zahlreiche Fehler unterlaufen. Dies ist meine letzte Warnung, bitte unterlasse solche Aktionen in Zukunft.
Dear Edison Andrews,
\nI just had to revert the edits that you made to the Port of Spain area today. You probably overlooked that you were using the Potlatch editor in \"live\" mode, so everything you did was recorded on our map immediately and other mappers in the area were quite shocked to see all sorts of roads criss-crossing the city!
\nUnfortunately I was unable to sort your edits into \"good\" ones and \"bad\" ones, so I had to revert them all. I am sorry if this destroyed some of your contributions.
\nNext time when you edit the map, best choose the Potlatch2 editor (hover over the Edit tab to activate), or choose \"save mode\" in Potlatch 1; that way things are only saved to the database if you hit the save button.
\nYour account has been blocked to make sure you read this message; but you will be able to continue editing immediately after you have logged in on openstreetmap.org.
\nAnd: Welcome to OpenStreetMap ;)
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
Dear user dcs,
\nyou have made a number of large-scale mechanical edits without discussing them first. We would really ask you to first solicit the opinion of affected project members - e.g. via the talk mailing list - before doing so. Please revert your recent edits (McDonald's, Walmart and possibly others) because they contain errors (see discussion on talk mailing list). If you are not confident that you can revert your edits yourself, please ask for help and someone else will do it.
\nThis message blocks your account until you have logged in to read it. This is just to make sure that the message reaches you before you make any more edits.\n
I notice that you appear to be doing a major import of land parcel data.
\nI also understand that you started a discussion about this on the imports mailing list and were advised that parcel data was generally felt not to be appropriate. You were also asked for more information about the technical approach that you planned to take and the the tools you planned to use.
\nAs far as I can see from the archives you did not respond to these comments at all.
\nFurther it appears that your import is being done in a highly suboptimal way in that you are uploading vast numbers of nodes before uploading any ways, thus running the risk that the nodes you have uploaded may be deleted before you come back to add the ways.
\nPlease discuss this matter further on the imports list before resuming the upload.
\nThanks for your co-operation in this matter,
\nTomH
Dear Al Pacual,
\nplease stop your import of parcel data, and read the relevant discussions on the talk-us and imports mailing lists first. The community has some reservations about such imports and you should definitely not do that without coming to an agreement.
\nI'm blocking your account for 12 hours just to make sure you don't accidentally overlook this message; your account will function normally after that but that doesn't mean you should continue without prior discussion.
\nThank you for your consideration.\n
woodpeck a.k.a Frederik Ramm
Dear User serge56,
\nyou have contributed a lot of data over the past months. This is great, and of course it does not go unnoticed. Since nobody can possibly survey that much, the community is wondering about the source that you are using.
\nCould you kindly add a \"source\" tag to your changesets in the future indicating where the data is from, so that other community members can satisfy themselves that the data is sourced in keeping with OpenStreetMap's license and the licenses of other mapping services? As you will certainly know, OSM mappers must be very cautious in selecting their sources and must not trace from copyrighted material.
\nAlso, community members have tried to contact you about this in the past and you have not answered. Of course we cannot force you to respond to each and every email but if a fellow mapper has legitimate queries about your work, then you should not simply ignore that.
\nThis message blocks your account until you have read it; afterwards, you can continue normally.
\nThank you\n
Frederik Ramm (aka woodpeck) \n
for the Data Working Group
Dear User Q4004,
\nI have contacted you in the past about some questionable edits you made, asking you to specify a source. You have never replied, and you are now continuing to make edits of which others say they are wrong (e.g. in changeset 7823155 you removed a natural reserve, way #45241340, that others say is still there).
\nI am trying to find out if these are mistakes that you have made accidentally, or if you are working from sources unknown to others.
\nPlease be reminded that this is a community project and while you are not forced to talk to everybody, if there are legitimate doubts about your mapping activity then it is *not* ok to just ignore everyone's questions and carry on.
\nPlease respond.
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\n
for the Data Working Group
Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
\nWhilst I appreciate that you may find your username, your first diary entry and your first map edit hilarious they really aren't.
\nI have reverted your map edit, and would suggest that any further edits you make should be a bit more constructive.
\nThanks,
\nTom
Your robot appears to be warring with itself:
\nhttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2011-May/085836.html
\nPlease don't run it again until you have fixed this.
\nThanks,
\nTom
You appear to be making highly implausible edits that create ways spanning large chunks of the globe. See for example the list of your changes, and their bounding boxes, here:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user/GEO%20PMF%20NIS%20VLASOTINCE/edits
\nIf this is some sort of import then it seems that there is something wrong and in any case you need to stop whatever you are doing and seek help from the community on how to do it properly.
\nThanks,
\nTomH
Dear users DaanWi and owenpoepen1,
\nI am writing to you on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group who deal with vandalism problems.
\nYou have made a number of edits to OpenStreetMap that were plain wrong and broke the map (you randomly moved nodes etc.) - please be aware that you are actually changing the map on our live servers. This is not a sandbox; this is the real thing. Other users had to clean up your edits afterwards.
\nPlease refrain from doing that in the future. Only save an edit if it is correct to the best of your knowledge.
\nBest wishes\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck\n
OSM Data Working Group
Dear users DaanWi and owenpoepen1,
\nI am writing to you on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group who deal with vandalism problems.
\nYou have made a number of edits to OpenStreetMap that were plain wrong and broke the map (you randomly moved nodes etc.) - please be aware that you are actually changing the map on our live servers. This is not a sandbox; this is the real thing. Other users had to clean up your edits afterwards.
\nPlease refrain from doing that in the future. Only save an edit if it is correct to the best of your knowledge.
\nBest wishes\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck\n
OSM Data Working Group
Dear user DestinyBieber,
\nyour edits are not funny. You are vandalising the good work by users in the Netherlands. Please stop.
\nData Working Group\n
Frederik Ramm
Blocked for continued vandalism despite warning.
repeated vandalism.
repeated vandalism
repeated vandalism
Blocked for vandalism. Please consider that while your edits may seem a harmless prank to you, they could cost other people lots of nerves. Please play elsewhere.
Vandalism
vandalism
vandalism
vandalism
Dear user red_avenger,
\nthere seems to be a conflict in naming the street \u041a\u043e\u043c\u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u043d\u0443 \u0432\u0443\u043b\u0438\u0446\u044f, or \u0421\u0438\u043c\u043e\u043d\u0430 \u041f\u0435\u0442\u043b\u044e\u0440\u0438 \u0432\u0443\u043b\u0438\u0446\u044f, in Kiev. Please stop renaming the street, and instead discuss the issue with the local community (see e.g. the forum, http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=12694) to reach consensus.
\nWhen in doubt, apply the \"on the ground rule\" - OSM maps what we see on the ground, on road signs and so on.
\nYour account is temporarily blocked until you log in to read this message; you are free to continue editing afterwards.
\nBest wishes\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\n
for the OSMF Data Working Group.
Placing a temporary block on your account to investigate some suspect tracing.
Games are best left in the playground. Please do not vandalise the map.\n
This account does NOT belong to Frederik Ramm.
lieber Benutzer Ich-aus-m\u00fcnden,
\nin Deinen ersten Bearbeitungen bei OSM hast Du fast ausschliesslich Daten geloscht. Es sieht aus, als ob das eventuell unabsichtlich passiert sein koennte, denn andere Mapper sagen, dass es keinen Grund gibt, diese Daten zu loeschen. Eventuell war Dir nicht klar, dass Deine Edits gleich \"live geschaltet\" werden. Bitte achte kuenftig darauf, dass Du nur noch Edits abspeicherst/hochlaedst, die auch wirklich die Karte verbessern - das Loeschen korrekter Daten gehoert nicht dazu ;)
\nBye\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
lieber Benutzer Ich-aus-m\u00fcnden,
\nin Deinen ersten Bearbeitungen bei OSM hast Du fast ausschliesslich Daten geloscht. Es sieht aus, als ob das eventuell unabsichtlich passiert sein koennte, denn andere Mapper sagen, dass es keinen Grund gibt, diese Daten zu loeschen. Eventuell war Dir nicht klar, dass Deine Edits gleich \"live geschaltet\" werden. Bitte achte kuenftig darauf, dass Du nur noch Edits abspeicherst/hochlaedst, die auch wirklich die Karte verbessern - das Loeschen korrekter Daten gehoert nicht dazu ;)
\nBye\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
There have been a number of complaints recently about you deleting other people's work and replacing it with poor quality work of your own where the roads don't join up properly. See this talk-gb thread for more information:
\n\nYou will see that several people in that thread say they have tried to make contact with you to seek a solution, but that you haven't replied to any of them.
\nCan I ask you to please engage with the community and discuss what you are doing before you continue, especially where you are planning to remove large chunks of data.
\nThanks for your cooperation,
\nTom
It has come to my attention that, as a new user on OpenStreetMap, you have been deleting a lot of data - your first 12 changesets appear to be nothing but deletes. Do you have some reason to think all this data is incorrect and needs to be deleted?
\nEven your most recent changeset, which did contain some edits that weren't deletes, has removed a lot of tags from some of the objects you touched.
\nYou will be able to edit again now you have read this message, but please reconsider what you are doing and if you feel that these large deletes are warranted then please discuss them with the local community.
\n[ and in Georgian, via Google Translate ]
\n\u10d8\u10d2\u10d8 \u10db\u10dd\u10d5\u10d8\u10d3\u10d0 \u10e9\u10d4\u10db\u10d8 \u10e7\u10e3\u10e0\u10d0\u10d3\u10e6\u10d4\u10d1\u10d0, \u10e0\u10dd\u10db, \u10e0\u10dd\u10d2\u10dd\u10e0\u10ea \u10d0\u10ee\u10d0\u10da\u10d8 \u10db\u10dd\u10db\u10ee\u10db\u10d0\u10e0\u10d4\u10d1\u10da\u10d8\u10e1 \u10e8\u10d4\u10e1\u10d0\u10ee\u10d4\u10d1 OpenStreetMap, \u10d7\u10e5\u10d5\u10d4\u10dc \u10ec\u10d0\u10e8\u10da\u10d8\u10e1 \u10d1\u10d4\u10d5\u10e0\u10d8 \u10db\u10dd\u10dc\u10d0\u10ea\u10d4\u10db\u10d4\u10d1\u10d8 - \u10d7\u10e5\u10d5\u10d4\u10dc\u10d8 \u10de\u10d8\u10e0\u10d5\u10d4\u10da\u10d8 12 changesets \u10e9\u10d0\u10dc\u10e1 \u10d0\u10e0\u10d0\u10e4\u10d4\u10e0\u10d8 \u10ec\u10d0\u10e8\u10da\u10d8\u10e1. \u10d2\u10d0\u10e5\u10d5\u10d7 \u10e0\u10d0\u10d8\u10db\u10d4 \u10db\u10d8\u10d6\u10d4\u10d6\u10d8\u10d7 \u10e4\u10d8\u10e5\u10e0\u10dd\u10d1\u10e1, \u10e7\u10d5\u10d4\u10da\u10d0 \u10d4\u10e1 \u10db\u10dd\u10dc\u10d0\u10ea\u10d4\u10db\u10d4\u10d1\u10d8 \u10d0\u10e0\u10d0\u10e1\u10ec\u10dd\u10e0\u10d8\u10d0 \u10d3\u10d0 \u10e3\u10dc\u10d3\u10d0 \u10ec\u10d0\u10d8\u10e8\u10d0\u10da\u10dd\u10e1?
\n\u10d9\u10d8 \u10d7\u10e5\u10d5\u10d4\u10dc\u10d8 \u10d1\u10dd\u10da\u10dd changeset, \u10e0\u10dd\u10db\u10d4\u10da\u10d8\u10ea \u10d0\u10e0 \u10e8\u10d4\u10d8\u10ea\u10d0\u10d5\u10e1 \u10e0\u10d0\u10db\u10dd\u10d3\u10d4\u10dc\u10d8\u10db\u10d4 \u10e0\u10d4\u10d3\u10d0\u10e5\u10e2\u10d8\u10e0\u10d4\u10d1\u10d8\u10e1 \u10e0\u10dd\u10db \u10d0\u10e0 \u10ec\u10d0\u10e8\u10da\u10d8\u10e1, \u10d0\u10e5\u10d5\u10e1 \u10d0\u10db\u10dd\u10e6\u10d4\u10d1\u10e3\u10da \u10d1\u10d4\u10d5\u10e0\u10d8 tags \u10d6\u10dd\u10d2\u10d8\u10d4\u10e0\u10d7\u10d8 \u10dd\u10d1\u10d8\u10d4\u10e5\u10e2\u10d8 \u10d7\u10e5\u10d5\u10d4\u10dc \u10e8\u10d4\u10d4\u10ee\u10dd.
\n\u10d7\u10e5\u10d5\u10d4\u10dc \u10e8\u10d4\u10eb\u10da\u10d4\u10d1\u10d7 \u10e0\u10d4\u10d3\u10d0\u10e5\u10e2\u10d8\u10e0\u10d4\u10d1\u10d0 \u10d9\u10d5\u10da\u10d0\u10d5 \u10d4\u10ee\u10da\u10d0 \u10ec\u10d0\u10d5\u10d8\u10d9\u10d8\u10d7\u10ee\u10d4 \u10d4\u10e1 \u10e8\u10d4\u10e2\u10e7\u10dd\u10d1\u10d8\u10dc\u10d4\u10d1\u10d0, \u10db\u10d0\u10d2\u10e0\u10d0\u10db \u10d2\u10d7\u10ee\u10dd\u10d5\u10d7, \u10d2\u10d0\u10d3\u10d0\u10ee\u10d4\u10d3\u10dd\u10e1, \u10d7\u10e3 \u10e0\u10d0\u10e1 \u10d5\u10d0\u10d9\u10d4\u10d7\u10d4\u10d1\u10d7 \u10d3\u10d0 \u10d7\u10e3 \u10d2\u10e0\u10eb\u10dc\u10dd\u10d1\u10d7, \u10e0\u10dd\u10db \u10d4\u10e1 \u10d3\u10d8\u10d3\u10d8 \u10ec\u10d0\u10e8\u10da\u10d8\u10e1 \u10d0\u10e0\u10d8\u10e1 \u10d2\u10d0\u10e0\u10d0\u10dc\u10e2\u10d8\u10e0\u10d4\u10d1\u10e3\u10da\u10d8, \u10db\u10d0\u10e8\u10d8\u10dc \u10d2\u10d7\u10ee\u10dd\u10d5\u10d7, \u10d2\u10d0\u10dc\u10d8\u10ee\u10d8\u10da\u10d0\u10d5\u10d4\u10dc \u10db\u10d0\u10d7 \u10d0\u10d3\u10d2\u10d8\u10da\u10dd\u10d1\u10e0\u10d8\u10d5 \u10e1\u10d0\u10d6\u10dd\u10d2\u10d0\u10d3\u10dd\u10d4\u10d1\u10d0\u10e1.
\n[ and in Russian, via Google Translate ]
\n\u0414\u0435\u043b\u043e \u0434\u043e\u0448\u043b\u043e \u0434\u043e \u043c\u043e\u0435\u0433\u043e \u0432\u043d\u0438\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f, \u0447\u0442\u043e, \u043a\u0430\u043a \u043d\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c \u043d\u0430 OpenStreetMap, \u0432\u044b \u0431\u044b\u043b\u0438 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0431\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0448\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043a\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 - \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0438 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0432\u044b\u0435 12 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439, \u043a\u0430\u043a \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f, \u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0433\u043e, \u043a\u0440\u043e\u043c\u0435 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439. \u0423 \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u0435\u0441\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u043e\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0430\u0433\u0430\u0442\u044c, \u0432\u0441\u0435 \u044d\u0442\u0438 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043d\u0435\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043d\u044b \u0438 \u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u043d\u044b \u0431\u044b\u0442\u044c \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u044b?
\n\u0414\u0430\u0436\u0435 \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0438 \u0441\u0430\u043c\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u0441\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u0441\u043e\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u043d\u0435 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f, \u0441\u043d\u044f\u043b \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0442\u0435\u0433\u043e\u0432 \u0438\u0437 \u043d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0445 \u043e\u0431\u044a\u0435\u043a\u0442\u043e\u0432, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u0432\u044b \u0437\u0430\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u0443\u043b\u0438.
\n\u0412\u044b \u0441\u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0440\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c, \u0441\u0435\u0439\u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0441\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u0432\u044b \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u044d\u0442\u043e \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435, \u043d\u043e, \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0441\u043c\u043e\u0442\u0440\u0435\u0442\u044c \u0442\u043e, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0432\u044b \u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435, \u0438 \u0435\u0441\u043b\u0438 \u0432\u044b \u0447\u0443\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u0435\u0442\u0435, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u044d\u0442\u0438 \u043a\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043e\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0434\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0442\u043e, \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043e\u0431\u0441\u0443\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0438\u0445 \u0441 \u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043d\u044b\u043c \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c.
Dear user hint,
\nI am writing to you on behalf of OSMF's data working group which deals with edit wars and license violations.
\nYou have done a lot of mass edits in the past days with a comment of \"copyright violation rollback\". Please stop these rollbacks, and explain to us why you think they are necessary.
\nThank you\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\n
for the OSMF data working group.
Please stop deleting data while we investigate the situation.
Hallo Fidibus21,
\nes gibt Beschwerden ueber angeblich willkuerliche Datenloeschungen durch Dich, zum Beispiel heute morgen hier:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/9277803
\nBei einigen dieser Objekte sieht man, dass Du schon seit geraumer Zeit einen \"Edit war\" mit anderen Usern fuehrst. Solche Edit Wars sind kontraproduktiv. Bitte hoere mit diesen Loeschungen auf und erklaere mir, was es damit auf sich hat.
\nDie anderen beteiligten User werde ich ebenso anschreiben.
\nViele Gruesse\n
Frederik Ramm
Lock for investigation.
\nMore info please.
Dear Q4004,
\nyou have not responded to my last inquiry about your sources. Yet you continue to make changes that are, again, questioned by other community members, e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/48503555/history and other yet-unbuilt changes. Please explain your sources and do not make any changes to the map before you have replied to this message.
\nThank you\n
Frederik Ramm \n
for the Data Working Group\n
Please stop removing created_by tags from objects - this is completely unnecessary and just wastes space by creating additional objects in the database.
\nIt is fine to remove them when you are editing an object for other reasons but there is no need to make special edits just do do that.
\nThanks,
\nTom
\n[ and in Russia, via Google Translate ]
\n\u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043f\u0440\u0435\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 created_by \u0442\u0435\u0433\u0438 \u0438\u0437 \u043e\u0431\u044a\u0435\u043a\u0442\u043e\u0432 - \u044d\u0442\u043e \u0441\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0448\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u043d\u0443\u0436\u043d\u043e \u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043e \u043e\u0442\u0445\u043e\u0434\u044b \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430 \u043f\u0443\u0442\u0435\u043c \u0441\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0434\u043e\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u043e\u0431\u044a\u0435\u043a\u0442\u043e\u0432 \u0432 \u0431\u0430\u0437\u0435 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445.
\n\u042d\u0442\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0435\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e, \u0447\u0442\u043e\u0431\u044b \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0438\u0445, \u043a\u043e\u0433\u0434\u0430 \u0432\u044b \u0440\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0440\u0443\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u044a\u0435\u043a\u0442 \u043f\u043e \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u043c \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0447\u0438\u043d\u0430\u043c, \u043d\u043e \u043d\u0435\u0442 \u043d\u0435\u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0441\u043f\u0435\u0446\u0438\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043a\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043e \u0441\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u0442\u044c \u044d\u0442\u043e.
\n\u0421\u043f\u0430\u0441\u0438\u0431\u043e,
\n\u0422\u043e\u043c
Dear user FK270673,
\nwe have had a complaint about your edits in Sydney (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/9803159). You seem to have deleted and re-mapped a number of ways from Bing, but in the process it seems that while you may have traced geometries from Bing, you have copied the tags from the original ways.
\nThis would not normally be a problem but in this case you have deleted a number of ways that were not ODbL compliant and re-created them as ODbL compliant under your account; by copying the non-ODbL compliant tags you are violating the copyright of the original authors.
\nPlease do the following:
\n1. Be more careful in the future; if you copy tags from other objects, make sure these are ODbL compliant first.
\n2. Either revert your above changeset in full, or ask us to do it, or check every single object you have deleted and re-created for possible license problems and revert only those where you have copied data from a non-compliant object.
\nIf you should have an independent and ODbL compliant source for your street names etc. (and not have copied these from existing OSM data) then that is of course permissible but we would like to know what that source is then.
\nThank you\n
Frederik Ramm\n
(for the data working group)
You emailed user Beelsebob re streets in Elgin. He was concerned that you said \".. I will be updating the names of the streets in Elgin\n
I will be checking the names using google streetview....\"
Can you confirm please that you have not at any time derived data from Google products and also if not please engage with the local mappers before you edit an area that is being actively mapped by others to avoid conflict or misunderstanding.
\nCheers\n
Andy Robinson\n
(Blackadder)
Dear user dhuuni,
\nwe have received a complaint about your recent edits in the Denver area. It seems that you have uploaded fictional road network data to OpenStreetMap, and we have reverted these edits.
\nPlease be aware that anything you upload will appear on our main map without further checks - this is not a sandbox, this is the real thing!
\nYou may continue to use your account after you have logged in, and we welcome further contributions from you as long as they represent things that are actually there!
\nRegards\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck\n
for the Data Working Group
Hallo Katzenz\u00fcchter,
\nOpenStreetMap ist keine kostenlose Werbeplattform. Bitte h\u00f6re sofort damit auf, Aussichtspunkte mit Werbe-URLs Deines Unternehmens zu versehen, dein Unternehmen in die Namen von Bushaltestellen einzubringen und \u00e4hnliches.
\nGern akzeptieren wir objektive Verbesserungen an der Karte, aber die meisten Deiner bisherigen \u00c4nderungen mussten wir r\u00fcckg\u00e4ngig machen.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
Dear user Supt_of_printing,
\nwe have had complaints about your edits of intersections in Australia. It seems that you edits are guided by a desire to make an intersection look nice on the map, rather than accurately reflect reality.
\nIn OSM, looking nice on the map is not the data editor's business - when we edit data, we try and make it as precise as possible. This includes, for example, setting the oneway property even if it is obvious on the ground that a section of road is oneway; it includes properly joining roads even if this might lead to a name printed more frequently, and so on. Making this look nice on the rendered map is the business of the renderer, and data must not be misrepresented just to look nice - remember that there are tons of different renderers, and there are also routing engines for which certain aspects of the data are of critical importance to navigate the junction.
\nAlso, you have been made aware of the problems with your edits and you have reacted in a defiant way; but OSM is a community project where we all have to work together. If you find that a significant number of users disagree with your work, you cannot just ignore them and continue. You must enter a dialogue and search for a solution together.
\nYour account is not blocked and you can continue editing normally after you have logged in. I must ask you, however, to refrain from your way of visually \"polishing\" junctions in the future, and discuss the matter with your fellow mappers on the talk-au mailing list.
\nIf you continue with this kind of edits, we will have to block your account.
\nRegards\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\n
for the Data Working Group\n
Dear user APPMASTER.
\nyou seem to have accidentally deleted a number of streets in Central London yesterday. It may have been a mistake - you may have thought that you remove these objects only for yourself but you removed them for everyone!
\nDo you have an explanation how this happened?
\nPlease be more careful in the future.
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck\n
for the OSMF data working group\n
Lieber User HawkPat,\n
\n
Du hast in den verganenen Tagen besonders viele Relationen quer in Europa editiert/repariert, L\u00fccken geschlossen und so weiter. Leider gibtst Du in Deinen Changesets keinerlei Informationen an, wie Du zu diesen Daten kommst; deswegen und aufgrund der grossen Zahl von Beitr\u00e4gen fragen sich einige Nutzer, ob Du vielleicht einfach automatisch oder im \"Rate-Modus\" vorgehst, anstatt tats\u00e4chlich handfeste und erlaubte Quellen zu haben.
Einige dieser Nutzer haben Dich angeschrieben, doch Du hast ihnen nicht geantwortet (und trotzdem weiter gemappt).
\nBitte verstehe, dass OSM ein Community-Projekt ist. Wir muessen alle zusammenarbeiten. Dafuer ist der Changeset-Kommentar in JOSM gedacht, dass man den anderen Projektmitgliedern sagen kann, was man hier gerade getan hat. Man muss nicht auf jede Nachricht von anderen Mappern antworten, aber wenn es offenbar begruendete Fragen zur eigenen Mapping-Arbeit gibt, dann ist Kommunikation wichtig.
\nBitte verwende k\u00fcnftig den Changeset-Kommentar, um Deine Aenderungen kurz zu beschreiben. Wenn du z.B. in einem Changeset Wanderwege quer durch Europa ergaenzt, dann sollte der Kommentar einen Hinweis darauf enthalten, wo Du diese Informationen herhast. Und bitte ignoriere andere Mapper nicht, wenn Sie Fragen zu Deiner Arbeit im Projekt haben.
\nIch habe Deinen Account gesperrt, um sicherzustellen, dass Du diese Nachricht liest, bevor Du weiter mappst. Er wird sofort automatisch wieder entsperrt, sobald Du Dich auf www.openstreetmap.org einloggst.
\nBitte missverstehe das nicht - wir sind froh um jeden, der mithilft, unsere Karte besser zu machen, und niemand will Dich loswerden. Die anderen Mapper wuerden bloss gern nachvollziehen koennen, was Du tust.
\nViel Spass weiterhin\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\n
fuer die Data Working Group
Dear kane123,
\nwe have received a complaint about your recent edits in the London area. It seems that you have uploaded fictional road network data to OpenStreetMap, and we have reverted these edits.
\nPlease be aware that anything you upload will appear on our main map without further checks - this is not a sandbox, this is the real thing!
\nYou may continue to use your account after you have logged in, and we welcome further contributions from you as long as they represent things that are actually there!
\nRegards\n
Grant aka Firefishy\n
for the Data Working Group
Hallo Oberf\u00f6rster,
\nDeine Edits sorgen immer wieder f\u00fcr Beschwerden der OSM-Community. Bitte unterlasse in Zukunft jegliche Verwendung des \"motorroad\"-Tags sowie jegliche \u00c4nderung von Strassentypen, ohne dies vorher (!) einvernehmlich (!) in der Mailingliste oder im Forum besprochen zu haben. Deine Edits der vergangenen Tage werde ich revertieren.
\nBye\n
Frederik
Dear anas1307,
\nyou have just removed a sizable portion of London on our production database!
\nI'm sure this must have been a mistake; maybe you didn't know that the production database would be altered, and you assumed that you were just making changes for yourself.
\nPlease familiarize yourself with OpenStreetMap, ideally by reading the beginner documentation available through our Wiki (wiki.openstreetmap.org) or participating in Forums or mailing lists, and be a little more careful next time ;)
\nI have reverted your edit and restored London to its former glory.
\nBye\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
You appear to be deleting a large number of objects without providing any explanation. Please engage with the local community before continuing with your activities.
\nThanks,
\nTom
(automated translation below)
\nDear user fmgcvk,
\nI am blocking you again for large-scale deletion of features near Molina in Chile. You have been asked to consult with the community before you do something like that, and you have ignored the request.
\nIf you find data in OpenStreetMap that is wrong, you are free to correct it. Deleting large areas without providing an improvement is not something that we usually do. But you can discuss the matter on the talk-cl mailing list (see lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cl) if you want.
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck\n
Data Working Group
-----
\nEstimado usuario fmgcvk,
\nsu acceso est\u00e1 bloqueado. Se han eliminado una vez m\u00e1s muchas caracter\u00edsticas cerca de Molina de Chile. Le pregunt\u00e9 a hablar con la comunidad, pero que no lo han hecho.
\nSi usted encuentra los datos de OpenStreetMap lo que est\u00e1 mal, se puede corregir. No debe eliminar grandes \u00e1reas. Se puede discutir el asunto en la lista de correo talk-cl (ver lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cl) si lo desea.
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck\n
Data Working Group\n
Dear user Geograff,
\nwelcome to OpenStreetMap!
\nWe are always happy about new users helping to improve the map. However some of your first edits in Vilnius were problematic, introducing incorrect information, spelling mistakes, or they were simply duplicates of something that was already there!
\nThis forces other users to revert your work, causing unnecessary work for all involved. Please listen to what others have to say, or maybe even subscribe to the talk-lt list where other Lithuanian users will be happy to help you getting started with OSM: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lt
\nPlease do not continue to edit OSM before you have read and understood the messages you have received, and have taken the necessary steps not to repeat these mistakes.
\nThank you\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\n
(for the Data Working Group)
Dear user Bilal1101,
\nI am writing to you on behalf of the OSMF data working group which deals with vandalism.
\nWe have had complaints about your repeated and long-ongoing creation of multiple \"fantasy\" bus routes in Oslo which drastically reduce the usefulness of OpenStreetMap based applications and harm the project and its community.
\nYou have politely been asked to stop but you continue to abuse OpenStreetMap as a playground. Please understand that OpenStreetMap is meant to depict reality. We welcome your contributions if they are based in fact; there's no place for fiction in our project.
\nIf you want to play, or try something out, you can do that on the development server at api06.dev.openstreetmap.org, where your data will not be added to the main map.
\nBe advised that any further \"fantasy\" edits you make to OpenStreetMap under this or any other account will be considered to be active acts of vandalism. What you are doing is not only harming the project but it is also against the law in Norway (cf. http://www.lovdata.no/all/tl-19020522-010-018.html#151b, \n
http://www.lovdata.no/all/tl-19020522-010-028.html#261).
Best regards\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck \n
for the Data Working Group
Hello
\nPlease refrain from renaming streets in OpenStreetMap before they are renamed on the ground. When the time comes that this roads are renamed, we of course will welcome the update!
\nMikel
Lieber Benutzer changchun_1,
\nDu hast in den letzten Tagen massiv alte Daten aus OSM geloescht und mit dem Kommentar \"Remapping mit Bing\" neu angelegt. Es ist aber offensichtlich, dass Du diese Daten nicht wirklich neu erfasst, sondern einfach nur kopiert hast.
\nDas ist weder zulaessig noch erwuenscht; Du laedst damit praktisch eine Raubkopie von eigentlich nicht freigegebenen Daten zu OSM hoch.
\nBitte hoere sofort damit auf; Du schadest damit dem Ansehen des Projektes und verursachst unter Umstaenden massive rechtliche Probleme fuer Dich selbst und das Projekt.
\nBitte nenne mir alle Changesets, in denen Du auf diese Art Daten kopiert hast, dann revertiere ich die gezielt.
\nBye\n
Frederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\n
Account blocked. Please contact data@osmfoundation.org
Hello,
\nThe Russian community has noticed that you are changing admin_level tags on relations that are supposed to be admin_level=6 to admin_level=4, for example relation 901019 (http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=901019 or http://osm.org/browse/relation/901019/history)
\nBefore changing admin_levels of borders please consult with the Russian community. I am advised that the forum (http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21) is more active than the mailing list.
\nAdditionally, have you been changing the admin_level of boundaries in other countries?
\nYour account is not blocked and you can continue editing after logging in, but please consult with the community before continuing with boundary edits.
\nPaul Norman\n
for the Data Working Group
Dear REAKTOR,
\nYou appear to be importing a large number of nodes with the changeset name forests f_1_1_5 testing. These changesets consist entirely of nodes and have no ways.
\nPlease review the import guidelines at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
\nPlease consult with the imports@ mailing list or the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org
\nIf you wish to test scripts you can use the dev API api06.dev.openstreetmap.org
You are continuing to import only nodes in what appear to be test edits with tens of thousands of nodes per changeset. Imports must follow the guidelines at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
\nPlease contact data@osmfoundation.org before continuing with imports.
You appear to be deleting large areas of Coimbra.
\nIf this is an accident then please stop what you're doing and seek assistance to learn how to use the available tools to edit the map.
\nIf it is deliberate then you should really discuss what you are doing with the local community before deciding to remove large amounts of data which other people have added.
Temporary block for investigation.
\nYou appear to be importing the same data multiple times on top of itself with http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/11370456 (and other changesets)
\nImports need to follow the import guidelines at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
\nAs you have not consulted with the community before importing please revert your imports.
\nIf you wish to import something, please follow the process in the guidelines and consult with the talk-us@ mailing list at http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
\nYou appear to be doing mechanical edits to places of worship. I'm not sure if you were aware but there is a mechanical edit policy at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy which requires that mechanical edits be documented and only be done after discussion with the community.
\nPlease do not conduct any more mechanical edits unless they are done in accorance with the policy.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nDear user cgu66,
\nit seems that you are making a series of edits to places of worship but it is unlikely that you have been to all of them. It seems that this is a mechanical edit and before you embark on such large-scale \"corrections\" it is required that you discuss your plans, and the rules you want to use for making these corrections, on a suitable mailing list (the \"tagging\" or \"talk\" lists would be suitable).
\nPlease do not continue with these edits until you have done that and people have approved of your plans.
\nBecause a community member has already written to you and received no response, I make this a blocking message; after you have logged in to the web site you will be able to continue using your account as normal.
\nThank you for your understanding,\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\nfor the OSMF data working group.
\nYou seem to be duplicating imported data, via a report in #osm on irc.
\nPlease pop into #osm http://irc.osm.org/ so that we can discuss.
\nHello,
\nI noticed that you imported 31k nodes in the changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/11415806 which appears to be a broken import of just untagged nodes. I have placed this block to ensure that you read this message before uploading any more data.
\nIf this is part of the import of the National Land Survey of Finland data proposed on imports@ on Jan 23, 2012, that import is still in a consultation phase. There were questions raised by Frederik Ramm that needed discussion but that discussion never occurred. Imports in OSM should follow the import guidelines at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines which include consultation with the imports@ mailing list.
\nI also noticed that you have conducted other broken imports\nSome examples of these are
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/11415178\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/11410589
\nIf you need help reverting these mistakes, let me know.
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
\nDear FMS,
\nwhen I contacted you a while ago about peak heights you sent me a sensible reply and it seemed that you understood the matter.
\nBack then, those who alerted DWG had tried to talk to you directly, but they only received standard replies which basically said \"leave me alone\".
\nToday, I am writing for the same reason. Two users have complained about your edits, which seem to disregard on-the-ground information in favour of outdated aerial imagery. Such errors are not a problem in themselves, they happen quite often; but in our project we must work as a community. You must talk to your fellow mappers. Just like you, they want to improve the map and they will not write to you without a reason. You must respect them and discuss the matter and find an amicable solution for all of you.
\nInstead, you are auto-replying to your fellow mappers with a standard message, ignoring them.
\nI don't doubt that you are doing good and helpful work for the project. But this is a community project and if you cannot work as a member of the community, if you cannot talk to your peers in this project because you believe that you are somehow above them, then maybe this project is not right for you.
\nPlease get your act together and try to be a good community member. The others are not there to upset you; they have the same goals that you have - a good map for all of us!
\nPlease do not bother to reply with a detailed explanation of the situation. I don't know you, I don't know the others, I don't know the area. You will have to engage with the other community members even if (or especially if) you think they are wrong. You will have to convince them, not me.
\nBye\nFrederik
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were importing Spanish Cadastre data in http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/11434520
\nThere are a few problems with this. The first is that the problems with many multipolygons have not been fixed. These problems were that too many multipolygons were being generated for what was a simple geometry.
\nThe second problem is that you are importing features other than highways and leisure=park. As pointed out http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2012-March/001313.html only those features were consulted on with the imports@ list. If you want import more data you need to propose a new import.
\nThis block is set to last until you log on to read the message. When you have done that, please revert your imports. If you do not feel able to revert your import let me know and I can do it for you.
\nUpdate:
\nAs you have not logged in to clear this block or sent a message, I will go ahead and revert the problematic changesets
\nHello,
\nYou appear to be importing a large number of points with building=yes in the http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.497028&lon=-73.179053&zoom=18&layers=M area
\nI have placed this block to interrupt this broken import.
\nImports in OSM need to follow the import guidelines at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
\nI know that you did some consultation, but when you have revised your process to fix the issues present with these uploads, can you please resubmit it to the imports@ and talk-us@ mailing lists. It would be useful if you included a link to a .osm of sample data.
\n\u041c\u0435\u0445\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0432\u043e\u0434 \u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u043c
\nDear eXmajor,
\nMembers of the OpenStreetMap community have complained about your edits in UAE and Abu Dhabi. Specifically:
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative geodata project and engaging with the community on important matters is required.
\nYou've deleted a large number of objects in such as this changeset \nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=24.43726&lon=54.41217&zoom=17&layers=M\nThis requires explanation and repair.
\nSome of your tagging and mapping approaches are unusual in the extreme. It is important to map within the reasonable expectations of other mappers in the area.
\nNonsense changeset text is equivalent to deceit and is unacceptable. In future, use proper descriptive changeset comments.
\nYou must engage with other mappers when they make good faith inquiries about your mapping. Please join with others in the community to resolve the issues in your contributions immediately. Please advise the data working group when you have complied with the requirements above.
\nBest regards,\nRichard Weait, on behalf of\nData Working Group
\n\u041c\u0435\u0445\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0432\u043e\u0434 \u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u043c
\n\u0423\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0435 eXmajor,
\n\u0427\u043b\u0435\u043d\u044b \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430 OpenStreetMap \u0436\u0430\u043b\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0441\u044c \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043a\u0438 \u0432 \u041e\u0410\u042d, \u0410\u0431\u0443-\u0414\u0430\u0431\u0438. \u0412 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438:
\nOpenStreetMap \u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0441\u043e\u0432\u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043d\u044b\u043c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0435\u043a\u0442\u043e\u043c \u0433\u0435\u043e\u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0438 \u0441\u043e\u0432\u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0430 \u0441 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c \u043f\u043e \u0432\u0430\u0436\u043d\u044b\u043c \u0432\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0430\u043c, \u043d\u0435 \u0442\u0440\u0435\u0431\u0443\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f.
\n\u0412\u044b \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0431\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0448\u043e\u0435 \u043a\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e \u043e\u0431\u044a\u0435\u043a\u0442\u043e\u0432 \u0432 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043e\u0431\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=24.43726&lon=54.41217&zoom=17&layers=M\n\u042d\u0442\u043e \u0442\u0440\u0435\u0431\u0443\u0435\u0442 \u043e\u0431\u044a\u044f\u0441\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0438 \u0440\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043d\u0442\u0430.
\n\u041d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u0438\u0437 \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0438\u0445 \u0442\u0435\u0433\u043e\u0432 \u0438 \u043e\u0442\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043f\u043e\u0434\u0445\u043e\u0434\u044b \u043d\u0435\u043e\u0431\u044b\u0447\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432 \u043a\u0440\u0430\u0439\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438. \u0412\u0430\u0436\u043d\u043e \u0441\u043e\u043f\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0432 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0443\u043c\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u043e\u0436\u0438\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0445 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u0444\u043e\u0432 \u0432 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u0439 \u043e\u0431\u043b\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438.
\n\u0415\u0440\u0443\u043d\u0434\u0430 \u0442\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0442 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u044d\u043a\u0432\u0438\u0432\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0442\u043d\u043e \u043a \u043e\u0431\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0443 \u0438 \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043f\u0443\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043c\u0430. \u0412 \u0434\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0435\u0439\u0448\u0435\u043c, \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0430\u0434\u043b\u0435\u0436\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u0440\u043e\u0431\u043d\u044b\u043c\u0438 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0438\u044f\u043c\u0438 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439.
\n\u0412\u044b \u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u043d\u044b \u0432\u0437\u0430\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0441 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u043c\u0438 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u0444\u0430\u043c\u0438, \u043a\u043e\u0433\u0434\u0430 \u043e\u043d\u0438 \u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u044e\u0442 \u0445\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0448\u0438\u0435 \u0432\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044b \u043e \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0435\u0439 \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0435 \u043e\u0442\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f. \u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0441\u043e\u0435\u0434\u0438\u043d\u044f\u0439\u0442\u0435\u0441\u044c \u0441 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u043c\u0438 \u0447\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0432\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0432 \u0432 \u0432\u0430\u0448 \u0432\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0434 \u043d\u0435\u043c\u0435\u0434\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e. \u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0435\u0439 \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u044b, \u043a\u043e\u0433\u0434\u0430 \u0432\u044b \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0442\u0440\u0435\u0431\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0432\u044b\u0448\u0435.
\n\u0421 \u0443\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c,\n\u0420\u0438\u0447\u0430\u0440\u0434 Weait, \u043e\u0442 \u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0438\n\u0414\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0435\u0439 \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u044b
\nUser eXmajor,
\nYour previous reply failed to address the questions
\nYour changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/11365513 deleted 300+ ways in Abu Dhabi. Your changeset appears to be vandalism. How is this changeset a benefit to the OpenStreetMap data base?
\nThat same changeset has the comment, \"998901858344\" Your changeset comment appwears to be evasive. How does that changeset comment aide the OpenStreetMap community in understanding this changeset?
\nRespectfully,\nRichard
\nplease contact us to discuss details about your changesets
\nHello kps ukr,
\nPlease contact data@openstreetmap.org to discuss your edits.
\nDear eXmajor,
\nYour tagging / mapping selections continue to puzzle the community.
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/161658161\n- highway = path as an outline of an area is incorrect\nUse highway = path for a constructed path from one place to another.
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/161655302\n- self intersecting polygon is incorrect.\nJoining distinct polygons with thin \"channels\" is incorrect. Either use distinct polygons, or a larger simple polygon.
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/161655311\n- highway = *_link form incorrect\n- dual carriageway incorrect\n- highway = tertiary unlikely\nThe _link form is for short connectors, not entire ways. \nA single carriageway is modeled as a single way, not two one-way ways.\nThis road, and many of your others are inappropriately promoted to tertiary or above. Use highway = service for alleys / driveways. use highway = unclassified / residential for the least prominent public road network. Use tertiary and above only for roads more substantial than those.
\nYou must engage with the OpenStreetMap community and map by consensus rather then attempting to impose your own idiosyncratic style on the map.
\nIf you don't like the way that data appears when rendered, learn how to use other rendering tools to fix the appearance for yourself. Do not break that data to meet your rendering expectations.
\nOthers may have already created a rendering that you prefer.
\nBest regards,\nRichard.
\neXmajor has been blocked, again, for failing to communicate with other community members in good faith.
\nAll contributions by eXmajor and related accounts are subject to reversion without further discussion.
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were importing Spanish Cadastre data in http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/11502848 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/11503887
\nThere are a few problems with this. The first is that the problems with many multipolygons appear to have not been fixed. These problems were that too many multipolygons were being generated for what was a simple geometry.
\nThe second problem is that you are importing features other than highways and leisure=park. Although the tags have not yet been uploaded, this is evident from where the nodes are. As pointed out http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2012-March/001313.html only those features were consulted on with the imports@ list. If you want import more data you need to propose a new import.
\nThis block is set to last until you log on to read the message. When you have done that, please revert your imports. If you do not feel able to revert your import let me know and I can do it for you.
\nIf you have questions please contact me via a message or the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
\nDear user WorstFixer,
\nplease stop doing large-scale edits. You are violating our policy for mechanical edits.
\nYou have to discuss such edits with the community before you do them.
\nOSM is a community project. You cannot make such edits across the worlds without talking to people BEFORE. \"Will not discuss with trolls\" is not an acceptable response.
\nAn appropriate forum to discuss such edits is the talk list, at listinfo.openstreetmap.org/talk.
\nThank you\nFrederik Ramm\n(for the OSMF data working group)
\nPlease read the comment I added to your diary and adhere to our policies.
\nDear User ZeGermanata,
\nwe saw that you added a number of imaginary roads, railroads, and other features to the OpenStreetMap database in the Menominee area.
\nPlease be aware that you are editing the live database in OSM. Your edits will directly go up on the main page, on people's GPS maps, and numerous other web pages. This is not a place for play!
\nWe will remove the problematic edits but in the future, please only add information to the OSM database that is indeed correct.
\nThank you\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\nfor the OSMF data working group
\nDear user chicago-buildings,
\nas you probably know, data imports have to be discussed (and agreed upon) before they are started (usually on the \"talk\" list or a regional variant and the \"imports\" list), and we also request that imports are documented properly on the Wiki. From my perusal of the mailing list and Wiki I could not find the required documentation for your import. Please update the account's user page with information pointing the discussion of your import, and outlining your methods.
\nPlease do not continue your import until you have done so. If a discussion has not taken place yet, then start a discussion and stop your import for the time being.
\nWe will have to revert your import wholesale if you disregard these rules.
\nThank you\nFrederik Ramm\n(for the Data Working Group)
\nI noticed you importing MGC data in http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/11753610
\nI wanted to remind you about the import guidelines at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines which, among other things, call for imports to be done from an account dedicated to only imports, not from your normal account, and consultation to be done with imports@ and the local community (talk-us@ in this case).
\nI sent you a message a day ago or so but you have not responded and continued to import, so I've placed this block until log on to ensure that you check your messages before continuing to import.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the DWG
\nHallo day33,
\nwillkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
\nLeider hast Du bei deinen ersten Edits gleich ein paar Dinge kaputt gemacht; eventuell haben Dir deswegen schon andere Nutzer geschrieben.
\nAm besten meldest Du mal im OSM-Forum, hier:
\nhttp://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=246363
\nDann kannst du mit den anderen \u00fcber Deine Edits reden und sie k\u00f6nnen dir erkl\u00e4ren, was das Problem ist.
\nBitte kl\u00e4re das mit den anderen, bevor Du weiter arbeitest, damit nicht die ganze Arbeit umsonst ist und r\u00fcckgangig gemacht werden muss!
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nHallo day33,
\nleider sind Deine Edits in OSM weiterhin grob falsch, und Du hast es vers\u00e4umt, auf berechtigte Hinweise der Community einzugehen. Deine Changeset-Kommentare sind nichtssagend. Deine Edits geben nicht den tats\u00e4chlichen Zustand wieder und sind daher f\u00fcr OSM so nicht geeignet.
\nBitte \u00fcberdenke Dein Handeln, und sprich in Forum oder Mailingliste oder auf einem Stammtisch mit Leuten \u00fcber das Projekt, um zu verstehen, wie Du sinnvoll beitragen kannst.
\nBitte sei Dir dessen bewusst, dass absichtlich verf\u00e4lschende Edits keineswegs ein Scherz sind, sondern einen Verstoss gegen unsere AGB und gegen geltende Gesetze in den meisten L\u00e4ndern darstellen.
\nBye\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nDear aya21,
\nyou are obviously the same person who created the \"day33\" account a few days ago. I am writing to you in English this time because it seems that you did not understand the messages I sent to \"day33\" in German.
\nThe edits you are making to our database are out of touch with reality and they are in violation of our terms. Your edits are harming our project, they are not helpful and not wanted. You are reducing the usability of OpenStreetMap for many users.
\nPlease be advised that what you are doing is not only a nuisance, it is also illegal in most countries. If you continue to have fun at our expense, we will be forced to contact your internet provider and request that they reveal your identity.
\nThank you for your understanding.
\nFrederik Ramm\nfor the OSMF data working group
\nBlocked - same user as day33/aya21. Please stop this IMMEDIATELY.
\nBlocked for repeated vandalism (previous accounts \"day33\", \"gda33\")
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12196661. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found at http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2012-July/063456.html
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nWhen the redaction process is finished please fix any partial imports that are left in the database. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines suggests that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines including documentation, consultation and other technical requirements can be found at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12197822. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found at http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2012-July/063456.html
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nWhen the redaction process is finished please fix any partial imports that are left in the database. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines suggests that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines including documentation, consultation and other technical requirements can be found at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12203625. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found at http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2012-July/063456.html
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nWhen the redaction process is finished please fix any partial imports that are left in the database. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines suggests that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines including documentation, consultation and other technical requirements can be found at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12203583. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found at http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2012-July/063456.html
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nWhen the redaction process is finished please fix any partial imports that are left in the database. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines suggests that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines including documentation, consultation and other technical requirements can be found at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12203602. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found at http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2012-July/063456.html
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nWhen the redaction process is finished please fix any partial imports that are left in the database. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines suggests that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines including documentation, consultation and other technical requirements can be found at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12203600. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found at http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2012-July/063456.html
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nWhen the redaction process is finished please fix any partial imports that are left in the database. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines suggests that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines including documentation, consultation and other technical requirements can be found at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12204333. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found at http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2012-July/063456.html
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nWhen the redaction process is finished please fix any partial imports that are left in the database. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines suggests that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines including documentation, consultation and other technical requirements can be found at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12207785. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found at http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2012-July/063456.html
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines suggests that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines including documentation, consultation, imports being from a dedicated account and other technical requirements can be found at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12207820. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found at http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2012-July/063456.html
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines suggests that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines including documentation, consultation, imports being from a dedicated account and other technical requirements can be found at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines suggests that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nYou have ignored the last block that was placed on you to stop your imports while the redaction bot is running.
\nThis block will expire in 1 hour, but continued ignoring of the sysadmin's request that imports be stopped while the redaction takes place will result in longer blocks.
\nTo contact me or sysadmins you can contact us on on IRC at #osm on irc.oftc.net
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nYou have ignored the last block that was placed on you to stop your imports while the redaction bot is running but you have continued to import
\nThis block will expire in 6 hours, but continued ignoring of the sysadmin's request that imports be stopped while the redaction takes place will result in longer blocks.
\nTo contact me or sysadmins you can contact us on on IRC at #osm on irc.oftc.net
\nEdit: Corrected time value
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting a mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nYou have ignored the last block that was placed on you to stop your imports while the redaction bot is running but you have continued to import.
\nThis block will expire in 24 hours, but continued ignoring of the sysadmin's request that imports be stopped while the redaction takes place will result in longer blocks.
\nTo contact me or sysadmins you can contact us on on IRC at #osm on irc.oftc.net
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nYou have ignored the last block that was placed on you to stop your imports while the redaction bot is running but you have continued to import.
\nThis block will expire in 24 hours, but continued ignoring of the sysadmin's request that imports be stopped while the redaction takes place will result in longer blocks.
\nTo contact me or sysadmins you can contact us on on IRC at #osm on irc.oftc.net
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nBlocked for vandalism (tracing out messages with roads in the water)
\nYour edits don't appear to agree with any recognized sources.
\nThis account will not be re-activated.
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nYou have ignored the last block that was placed on you to stop your imports while the redaction bot is running but you have continued to import.
\nThis block will expire in 24 hours, but continued ignoring of the sysadmin's request that imports be stopped while the redaction takes place will result in longer blocks.
\nTo contact me or sysadmins you can contact us on on IRC at #osm on irc.oftc.net
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nYou have ignored the last block that was placed on you to stop your imports while the redaction bot is running but you have continued to import.
\nThis block will expire in 24 hours, but continued ignoring of the sysadmin's request that imports be stopped while the redaction takes place will result in longer blocks.
\nTo contact me or sysadmins you can contact us on on IRC at #osm on irc.oftc.net
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nDear user _sev,
\nI am contacting you in my role as a member of the OSMF data working group which deals with mapping disputes.
\nWe have received a complaint about your replacing Russian with Ukrainian names in the Crimea, where Ukrainian is the official language but Russian is the language spoken on the ground.
\nPlease explain your actions.
\nUntil this matter is resolved, we must ask you not stop editing names (or reverting edits) in the Crimea.
\nThank you\nFrederik Ramm\nfor the OSMF data working group.
\nYou have ignored the last block that was placed on you to stop your imports while the redaction bot is running but you have continued to import.
\nThis block will expire in 24 hours, but continued ignoring of the sysadmin's request that imports be stopped while the redaction takes place will result in longer blocks.
\nTo contact me or sysadmins you can contact us on on IRC at #osm on irc.oftc.net
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\n(edit: pasted the wrong message)
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nYou have ignored the last block that was placed on you to stop your imports while the redaction bot is running but you have continued to import.
\nThis block will expire in 24 hours, but continued ignoring of the sysadmin's request that imports be stopped while the redaction takes place will result in longer blocks.
\nTo contact me or sysadmins you can contact us on on IRC at #osm on irc.oftc.net
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset (e.g. this way). The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nDear user jcb1281,
\nI'm unsure if you are aware of that but you are making fictional changes to our live database which is viewed and used by hundreds of thousands of people around the world.
\nYour changeset comments say \"please do not use\" but there is no private copy of OSM just for you with your fictional changes - these changes affect the one, central, database that everyone is using.
\nPlease refrain from uploading fictional edits in the future. You can edit an OSM file locally on your computer and then make a map from that - but don't upload it for the world to use.
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\nfor the OSMF data working group.
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nYou have ignored two previous blocks yet continue to import in
\nSince your two blocks you have not contacted me to explain why or to say that they are not imports.
\nTo have this block lifted before expiry, please contact me.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nEdit: Formatting
\nTemporary Block during vandalism investigation.
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nYou have ignored the last block that was placed on you to stop your imports while the redaction bot is running but you have continued to import.
\nThis block will expire in 24 hours, but continued ignoring of the sysadmin's request that imports be stopped while the redaction takes place will result in longer blocks.
\nTo contact me or sysadmins you can contact us on on IRC at #osm on irc.oftc.net
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nYou have ignored the last block that was placed on you to stop your imports while the redaction bot is running but you have continued to import.
\nThis block will expire in 24 hours, but continued ignoring of the sysadmin's request that imports be stopped while the redaction takes place will result in longer blocks.
\nTo contact me or sysadmins you can contact us on on IRC at #osm on irc.oftc.net
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nYou have ignored the last block that was placed on you to stop your imports while the redaction bot is running but you have continued to import.
\nAs you continue to import bad data and have ignored the last block and private messages, this block will last 96 hours.
\nTo contact me or sysadmins to get the block lifted you can contact us on on IRC at #osm on irc.oftc.net or send me a message.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nDear user olehz,
\nI am writing to you on behalf of OSMF data working group which deals with editing disputes and vandalism.
\nWe have had comlaints about your changing of street names in the Ukraine.
\nPlease stop changing street names from Russian to Ukrainian immediately.
\nAlso, you seem to be using a buggy script or buggy procedure, that uploads new versions of streets even though nothing has changed (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/128162023/history).
\nThank you\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck\nfor the OSMF data working group.
\nDear Vetrov,
\nplease stop making any name changes in the Crimea for now while DWG tries to come up with a solution.
\nBye\nFrederik
\nYou have ignored the last block that was placed on you to stop your imports while the redaction bot is running but you have continued to import.
\nThis block will expire in 24 hours, but continued ignoring of the sysadmin's request that imports be stopped while the redaction takes place will result in longer blocks.
\nTo contact me or sysadmins you can contact us on on IRC at #osm on irc.oftc.net
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you were conducting an import or mechanical edit with this changeset. The OSM Sysadmins have requested that all imports, automated edits, bulk edits and bots be stopped until the redaction process has ended.
\nMore information can be found on the mailing lists.
\nThis block will last until you log on to osm.org to ensure you read it.
\nI've checked with the sysadmins about the server load from fixing broken imports and please go ahead and revert this one if it is in anyway incomplete. If help is needed, contact the imports@ mailing list and/or talk@, but the import guidelines say that if you do not know how to fix an import you do not import, so please keep that in mind for future imports.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nAdditionally best practice is to indicate a source tag on any import changesets
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with these changesets
\namong others
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account which these were not.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nappropriate documentation
consultation with the local community and the imports@ mailing list
having a plan to fix an mistakes in case of a broken upload
other technical requirements
If this block has resulted in a broken upload of an import, please go ahead and fix it, by reverting if necessary. If you do not know how to revert a changeset let me know; however if you cannot revert you should not be importing.
\nThis block will last until you log on to OpenStreetMap.org to ensure you read it. Once you have read it it will clear itself.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nEdit: spelling
\nWhen you were previously blocked for importing during the redaction period I asked if your import had been discussed with the local community (talk-us@) and the imports@ mailing list. It appears that it has not.
\nAs you are continuing with what appears to be an import without consultation and messages were ineffective I have no options but to block you. Please contact me to get this block lifted if you want it lifted before the 48 hours are up.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHellow
\nI noticed you conducting an import with these changesets
\namong others
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nappropriate documentation
consultation with the local community and the imports@ mailing list
having a plan to fix an mistakes in case of a broken upload
other technical requirements
If this block has resulted in a broken upload of an import, please go ahead and fix it, by reverting if necessary. If you do not know how to revert a changeset let me know
\nThis block will last until you log on to OpenStreetMap.org to ensure you read it. Once you have read it it will clear itself.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the [data working group](mailto:data@osmfoundation.org]
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHellow
\nI noticed you conducting an import with these changesets
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12527766 (50k nodes in one changeset)
among others
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nappropriate documentation
consultation with the local community and the imports@ mailing list
having a plan to fix an mistakes in case of a broken upload
other technical requirements
If this block has resulted in a broken upload of an import, please go ahead and fix it, by reverting if necessary. If you do not know how to revert a changeset let me know
\nThis block will last until you log on to OpenStreetMap.org to ensure you read it. Once you have read it it will clear itself.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the [data working group](mailto:data@osmfoundation.org]
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nBlocked for repeated, and illegal, vandalism with various accounts. We have your IP addresses logged and we will now have to explore ways to have your identity discovered by the police.
\nDear user jermboy27,
\nyou have created a lot of fictional entries in the OSM database in the past weeks. I don't know if this has been deliberate or accidental. Please understand that when you make edits with the Potlatch editor, they will be saved to our real database and everyone else will see them. So please only map things that really exist.
\nAlso, please use the \"changeset comment\" to describe what you have mapped and what your sources are when you save a changeset, so that others can see what you were up to.
\nThank you\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nThis is your fourth block for importing without consulting the local community. See your previous blocks for an explanation.
\nContact me if you want this to be lifted.
\nHallo Drachenburg,
\nich hatte Sie am 16. Juli gebeten, L\u00f6schungen in OSM zu unterlassen oder, wo sie sich tats\u00e4chlich auf nicht existierendende Wege beziehen, im Kommentar des \u00c4nderungssatzes auf den Sachverhalt hinzuweisen.
\nAm 23. und 24. Juli haben Sie erneut hiergegen verstossen und es auch nicht f\u00fcr n\u00f6tig befunden, sich zu erkl\u00e4ren. Ich fordere Sie hiermit letztmalig auf, solchen Vandalismus zu unterlassen.
\nFrederik Ramm\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nBlocked for continued vandalism.
\nHellow
\nI noticed you conducting an import with these changesets
\namong others
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and the imports@ mailing list and be documented on the wiki.
\nThis import appears to violate these three requirements.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nI reviewed my archive of the imports@ mailing list and was not able to find where this import was proposed.
\nA search for INEGI found no documentation.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nhaving a plan to fix an mistakes in case of a broken upload
other technical requirements
If this block has resulted in a broken upload of an import, please go ahead and fix it, by reverting if necessary. If you do not know how to revert a changeset let me know
\nThis block will last until you log on to OpenStreetMap.org to ensure you read it. Once you have read it it will clear itself.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Your edits to OpenStreetMap appear to be causing more damage than good. Can you explain if you were intentionally deleting data of if it was an accident? Please contact me at blackadderajr@gmail.com to clarify please.
\nThanks\nAndy Robinson
\nDear user Torrington,
\nYou have created a lot of fictional entries in the OSM database in the past days. I don't know if this has been deliberate or accidental. Please understand that when you make edits with the Potlatch editor, they will be saved to our real database and everyone else will see them. So please only map things that really exist.
\nAlso, please use the \"changeset comment\" to describe what you have mapped and what your sources are when you save a changeset, so that others can see what you were up to.
\nThank you
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Dear user Torrington,
\nI am writing to you in my capacity as a member of OSMF's data working group which deals with vandalism and disputes in OpenStreetMap.
\nYou have been making a series of non-factual edits in the vicinity of Wilmington, Delaware. This is not a computer game or a sandbox; all your edits go live into our database. Please stop making such edits.
\nThank you\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group.
\nHallo Phrank_GIS und huber_osm,
\nbitte importiert keine Daten, ohne dies zuvor auf den einschlaegigen Mailinglisten diskutiert und im Wiki besprochen zu haben. Euer SaGIS-Import verletzt gleich mehrere unserer Richtlinien und hat technische Maengel. Siehe Diskussion auf talk-at!
\nViele Gruesse\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nHallo Phrank_GIS und huber_osm,
\nbitte importiert keine Daten, ohne dies zuvor auf den einschlaegigen Mailinglisten diskutiert und im Wiki besprochen zu haben. Euer SaGIS-Import verletzt gleich mehrere unserer Richtlinien und hat technische Maengel. Siehe Diskussion auf talk-at!
\nViele Gruesse\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nDear user Jordy Vaca,
\nyou have made a number of fictional edits to the OpenStreetMap database. Please understand that this is not your private map to play with - everyone else sees your edits, and we can only allow edits grounded in fact. In the future, please refrain from making ficitional edits, and in the \"changeset comment\" please add a short message about what you were doing in that specific edit.
\nBest\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck\nfor the OSM data working group.
\nHallo 8Eight8,\nim deutschen Forum hast du davon geschrieben, dass du wohl aus versehen Google als Quelle verwendet hast. Ebenso deutet ein Changeset Kommentar darauf hin.
\nZum einen Bitte ich dich, in Zukunft nur die erlaubten Quellen zu nutzen und zum anderen alle Edits, die du auf Basis von Google maps gemacht hast wieder zu l\u00f6schen. Wenn du dies nicht selber schaffst, teile mir oder im Forum Leuten mit, welche Daten gel\u00f6scht werden m\u00fcssen.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe,
\nHenning Scholland \nDataWorkingGroup
\ntest block
\nPlease stop vandalising OpenStreetMap. You are not authorized to make non-factual edits like the ones you have been making, and your actions are suitable to impair the OSM computer system.
\nComputer sabotage is a criminal offence in most countries (including the UK, see computer misuse act 1990). If you continue to use OSM as a playing field then we will have no choice but to initiate legal proceedings against you. This means your internet provider will be forced to reveal your identity and you will receive nasty letters from our attorneys. If you're lucky you only have the legal fees to pay; if you're unlucky, you'll have to pay a fine or you might even be jailed.
\nWe really don't want to do that but we will do it if we have to.
\nSo don't be a dick, and don't ruin your own life for cheap online kicks.
\nGreetings\nFrederik Ramm\nData Working Group\nOSM Foundation.
\nHellow
\nI noticed you conducting an import with these changesets
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and the imports@ mailing list and be documented on the wiki.
\nThis import appears to violate these three requirements.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nI previously reminded you about the consultation requirement yet you persisted in importing.
\nThis block will last at least 1 hour and until you log on to OpenStreetMap.org to ensure you read it. Once you have read it it will clear itself.
\nI will go ahead and revert the partial upload.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the [data working group](mailto:data@osmfoundation.org]
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
You have continued to upload after I reminded you that the proposed LINZ import is still undergoing consultation. Please do not continue to upload while consulting.
\nThis block will last until login to ensure that it is read.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the DWG
Dear user Rudolf,
\nyour recent mass edits are not acceptable. They have not been sufficiently discussed, and objections have been ignored. Edits on such a large scale must follow our \"mechanical edits\" guidelines. You cannot change tens of thousands of objects just because you personally think it is better.
\nPlease don't do that again. We might have to revert your edit, and also your previous \"lean_to\" edit.
\nBye\nFrederik
\nDear user jermbox27,
\nI have already told you not to add fictitious countries and other data to OSM but you continue to do it.
\nPlease be advised that you are violating our terms of use and disrupting our service by doing so. Computer vandalism is illegal in most countries and we sincerely ask you to reconsider before you get yourself into trouble.
\nOSM is a sincere effort and not a sandbox for people to play in.
\nRegards\nFrederik Ramm\nData Working Group
\nDear s-o-f,
\nyou have been making a lot of changesets in the recent past where you placed misleading or nonsensical changeset comments, making it harder for third parties to understand what exactly you did and why. For example, \"\u03a1\u03bf\u03b2\u03b9\u03ad\u03c2\" is not an appropriate description for this changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12790591.
\nSince you often seem to make changesets that affect large areas, and you often delete the work of others, it is important that you use proper changeset comments.
\nPlease use the language and alphabet of the region you are editing in, or use English.
\nThank you.\nFrederik Ramm\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nHellow
\nI noticed you conducting an import with these changesets
\namong others
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and the imports@ mailing list and be documented on the wiki.
\nThis import appears to violate these three requirements.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nThe import guidelines have more information about documentation.
\nYou need to consult with the local community and the imports@ mailing list.
\nThis block will last until you log on to OpenStreetMap.org to ensure you read it. Once you have read it it will clear itself.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Temporary block during (potential) vandalism investigation.
\nDear user CoolDude16501,
\nI am writing to you in my capacity as a member of OSMF's data working group which deals with vandalism and disputes in OpenStreetMap.
\nYou have been making a series of non-factual edits in New South Wales, Australia. This is not a computer game or a sandbox; all your edits go live into our database. Please stop making such edits.
\nThank you Grant Slater a.k.a. Firefishy for the OSMF Data Working Group.
\nHello,
\nI noticed you conducting an import with http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12828292 that broke.
\nPlease revert this.
\nAlso, remember that the import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account.
\nThis block will last until you log on to OpenStreetMap.org to ensure you read it. Once you have read it it will clear itself.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Blocked for repeated vandalism.
\nDear user medvediyc,
\nYour new account and recent edits appear to operate against the community decision regarding naming in that area. Please respond to the community emails on this matter and follow community guidelines.
\nIf you are unaware of the previous discussions on these matters, please engage with other mappers in the area to learn the history and how to resolve this matter without conflict.
\nBest regards,\nRichard Weait, for the \nData Working Group
\nHi abramilx,
\nYou have been reported for making suspicious edits. I am placing a temporary block while we investigate.
\nRegards\n Grant
\nDear kr12,\nwhile editing some data in Granada you deleted the hole island. I think it was not your intention to do that. So I ask you to stop editing in this region till the previous data is restored.
\nPlease be careful if you upload data to OSM-server.
\nBest regards,\nHenning Scholland DataWorkingGroup
\nHello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with these changesets
\namong others.
\nThese imports were broken as they consist of only nodes. Please revert them.
\nAdditionally, the import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and be documented on the wiki.
\nThese imports were not done from a dedicated account.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nappropriate documentation
consultation with the local community and the imports@ mailing list
having a plan to fix an mistakes in case of a broken upload
other technical requirements
To contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nPlease let me know when you have reverted these.
\nThis block will last until you log on to ensure you have read it.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Please stop vandalism!
\nPlease stop vandalism!
\nHenning Scholland
\nFor DataWorkingGroup
\nHallo,\nes ist schon, dass ihr bei eurem Projekt auf OpenStreetMap (OSM) setzen wollt.
\nJedoch ist mir aufgefallen, dass eure Edits nicht ganz dem Entsprechen, wie es in OSM \u00fcblich ist. Ich geh mal davon aus, dass dies nicht eure Absicht war. Hier einige Beispiele:
\nEin Objekt ist bereits in der Datenbank von OSM vorhanden und ihr setzt das Objekt noch ein zweites Mal in die Datenbank rein.
\nEin Editor sollte im Changeset mitteilen, mit welchem Editor die Daten hochgeladen wurden ( created_by= ) ebenso w\u00e4re ein aussagekr\u00e4ftiger Changesetkommentar w\u00fcnschenswert.
\nDer Key opening_hours hat auch ein vorgegebenes Schema, nach dem die Werte eingetragen werden und ist kein Freitextfeld. Ohne die Einhaltung des Schemas k\u00f6nnen die Informationen nicht sinnvoll ausgewertet werden und haben dann auch keinen Nutzen.
\nEs w\u00e4re sch\u00f6n, wenn ihr mit der OSM-Community in Kontakt treten w\u00fcrdet und \u00fcber die Probleme sprechen w\u00fcrdet.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe,
\nHenning Scholland\nf\u00fcr die DataWorkingGroup
\nBlocked for vandalism - mass-deletes of objects in a region with islands between mainland Korea and Japan.
\nYou appear to of deleted an island in OpenStreetMap. OSM is a live map, not a sandbox.
\nPlease contact data@osmfoundation.org if you have any questions
\nDear Hugolucas,
\nMembers of the OpenStreetMap community have expressed concern about the method and results of your recent building imports. Please check your email, on your OSM user page, and discuss the issues that they have raised so that you can come to an agreement before continuing.
\nAlso, please see and follow the community guidelines including the specific guidelines for the cadastre and the general guidelines that require collaboration for all imports and bulk edits.
\nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
\nI see that you are a relatively new OpenStreetMap user and may not have been aware of the expected procedure for imports. Once you have logged in and read this message, your account will be active again. Please engage with the others in the community to resovle their concerns before continuing with your building imports.
\nBest regards,\nRichard Weait for the Data Working Group.
\nPlease stop vandalism
\nHenning Scholland
\nfor DataWorkingGroup
\nDear user \u044d\u0434\u0438\u0442\u043e\u0440
\nI am writing to you in my capacity as a member of OSMF's data working group which deals with vandalism and disputes in OpenStreetMap.
\nYou have done multiple edits where you have deleted significant amounts of data with no cause. This is not a computer game or a sandbox; all your edits go live into our database. Please stop making such edits.
\nThe deletions you did do are being undone.
\nThanks,
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
The import\nguidelines are clear about the need to use a dedicated account. The DWG feels that the need to use a dedicated account is a sound policy and is supported by our experiences in editing in areas with imports, cleaning up imports and the recent redaction experience, particularly in Poland.
\nThe importing you are doing is not a small local import. I have my database reloading but a quick estimate gives me well over 2.5 million changes that you have made during imports.
\nIf you have any questions about this block you are best off emailing the entire\nDWG.
\nThis block will last for one day as you have had previous notice of this.
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working\nGroup
Hello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13113781. This import is of nodes with no normal OSM tags, just texto1, texto2 and texto3.
\nImports in OpenStreetMap need to follow the import guidelines.
\nThis block will last until you log on to ensure you have read it.
\nI will go ahead and revert your import.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
blocked for vandalism
\nDear user pachenkorashid,
\nyou have repeatedly deleted borders in Nagorno-Karabakh without previous discussion, without using a changeset comment, and without responding to users who wish to discuss the issue with you.
\nPlease note that OSM is a community project in which we all work together to make a good map; it is not ok for you to unilaterally express your political views through OpenStreetMap. You have to discuss the matter with other mappers in the same region and find a common agreement.
\nIf you continue to delete borders we will treat this as vandalism and block your account.
\nBest regards\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\nfor the Data Working Group.
\nblocked for vandalism
\nBlocked for vandalism.
\nBlocked for vandalism.
\nPlease stop vandalism!
\nHenning Scholland
\nfor DataWorkingGroup
\nYou are continuing to import from a non-dedicated account. As you may of not of read my message earlier this block will last until you log on to make sure you read it.
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and be documented on the wiki.
\nThese imports were not done from a dedicated account.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nappropriate documentation
consultation with the local community and the imports@ mailing list
having a plan to fix an mistakes in case of a broken upload
other technical requirements
To contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Temporary hold on edits during vandalism investigation. Message me if any issue.
\nOn thursday morning I sent you a message informing you of the need for imports to be done from a dedicated account. This message also stated \"Ignoring this may lead to a user block.\"
\nYou have ignored this message and continued to import.
\nThis block will last until you have logged on to ensure that you have read it.
\nAdditionally you appear to of imported the same data four times, for example \nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/182002197\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/181997248\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/181990521\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/181997419
\nPlease contact the French community about fixing these mistakes. cquest may be able to help you.
\nDear abduroman,
\nIn viewing your recent changeset
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13189290
\nI see that you have signed the map with your user name \"ABDUROMAN\" written in large letters in a field. This is not the accepted practice in OpenStreetMap.
\n\nI have blocked your account until you read this message. You may continue to edit normally once you have read this message. Please do not add fictional objects to OpenStreetMap in future.
\nBest regards and happy mapping,
\nRichard Weait, for OpenStreetMap Foundation, Data Working Group.
\nBlocked for vandalism
\nBlocked for vandalism
\nBlocked for probable vandalism. If you believe this to be in error contact the Data Working Group
\nBlocked for probable vandalism. If you believe this to be in error contact the Data Working Group
\nBlocked for probable vandalism. If you believe this to be in error contact the Data Working Group
\nYou appear to be conducting an import with http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13193155 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13193776
\nPlease read the import guidelines before importing. This import consists of two changesets of untagged nodes with no ways.
\nI will revert the first changeset but please revert http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13193776 yourself
\nThis block will last until you log on to ensure you have read it.
\nYou are uploading two large changesets of purely nodes (75k nodes so far) with http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13203104 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13202943
\nIf this is an import, it needs to follow the \n(import guidelines)[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines] and (be done from a dedicated account](http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Use_a_dedicated_user_account)
\nIf it is not an import something has gone badly wrong.
\nThis block will remove itself when you have read it.
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
Dear user qwertzuiop\u0151\u00fa,
\nI am writing to you in my role as a member of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group which deals with edit conflicts and vandalism.
\nYou have been creating fictional towns across the OpenStreetMap database.
\nPlease stop this! All your edits go live into our map database and will sooner or later show up on the map that is seen by all users.
\nIf you want a \"sandbox\" where you can experiment, use the server \"api.dev.openstreetmap.org\" where you can create any fake data you want.
\nThank you\nFrederik
\nYou have been doing multiple broken imports (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13255864 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13260515). Please stop your current imports and contact the French community to figure out how to correctly import and fix the existing mistakes. I've asked them to contact you too.
\nAlso, any future imports need to be done from a dedicated account
\nHello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with these changesets
\namong others
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and be documented on the wiki.
\nThese imports were not done from a dedicated account.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nAdditionally I can't find a any consultation that was done over this import with the imports@ mailing list. Can you provide me a pointer to it?
\nLastly this import was dumped in on top of existing data, leading to a mess of duplicate forests. Because of this I'm going to go ahead and revert them.
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nappropriate documentation
consultation with the local community and the imports@ mailing list
having a plan to fix an mistakes in case of a broken upload
other technical requirements
To contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nThis block will last until you log on to ensure you have read it.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
I also see that you have been editing around these islands where the status is disputed.
\nDo not engage in edit warring over the status of these islands. If another user changes the status do not change it back but contact myself or the DWG and we will revert it. Your changes are being reverted.
\nIf you are unhappy with the current tagging of them and cannot come to an agreement with the other users involved you can contact the Data Working Group and ask it to resolve it.
\nTo reiterate, do not edit the boundaries of these islands to change their status. Doing so will lead to account blocks.
\nThis block will last until you log on to ensure you have read it.
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
Hello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with these changesets
\namong others
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and the imports@ mailing list and be documented on the wiki.
\nThis import appears to violate these three requirements.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nThe import guidelines have more information about documentation.
\nYou need to consult with the local community and the imports@ mailing list.
\nThis block will last until you log on to ensure you have read it.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Dear Jaxcoffee,
\nBlocked for possible spam / over-reaching marketing. If you believe this to be an error, contact the Data Working Group.
\nRichard Weait,\nOSM Foundation Data Working Group.
\nHello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with these changesets
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and be documented on the wiki.
\nThese imports were not done from a dedicated account.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nappropriate documentation
consultation with the local community and the imports@ mailing list
having a plan to fix an mistakes in case of a broken upload
other technical requirements
This block will remove itself when you have logged in and read it. It is only placed to ensure that you read the message before continuing to upload. Additionally, I have asked the French community to contact you.
\nIgnoring this block and continuing to import from your main account may lead to a longer block.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Hello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and be documented on the wiki.
\nThese imports were not done from a dedicated account.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nappropriate documentation
consultation with the local community and the imports@ mailing list
having a plan to fix an mistakes in case of a broken upload
other technical requirements
Ignoring this block and continuing to import from your main account may lead to a block.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Hallo IENC-Import,
\nDu hast in der letzten Zeit einige Importe durchgefuehrt, die nicht unseren Import-Guidelines entsprechen. Insbesondere hast Du Deinen Import nicht vorher auf den relevanten Mailinglisten (http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports) diskutiert und nicht im Wiki dokumentiert.
\nAusserdem wurden auf der Liste talk-de auch technische Probleme mit Deinem Import gemeldet (doppelte Nodes).
\nBitte setze diesen Import auf keinen Fall fort, bevor Du nicht ganz detailliert mit der OpenStreetMap-Community ueber Deine Datenquellen und Deine Methoden diskutiert hast. Ich werde den Import anderenfalls komplett revertieren.
\nBye\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\nData Working Group
\nDear user koeienentulpen,
\nit seems that you have deleted a large number of nodes from the OSM map in various places.
\nAs you have likely already been told in other messages, this is the \"live map\" you're editing, the map that everybody else sees as well. It is not your private copy - all the changes you make become effective for everyone.
\nSo please use the delete function sparingly - delete only things that really don't exist.
\nWe will repair your deletions.
\nBye\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
\nThis account has been blocked after creating an imaginary town, Angus Ontario, near http://osm.org/go/cC4s5Ui
\nPlease be advised that all edits to the editing API must be real mapping that is verfiable and from first person surveys or sources that explicitly permit inclusion in OpenStreetMap. The creation of imaginary maps can be done with OpenStreetMap tools, but must be restricted to local files.
\nPlease contact the Data Working Group to have this account reinstated. data@osmfoundation.org
\nDear user abramilx,
\nplease immediately stop deleting data from OpenStreetMap.
\nIf you find data that you believe does not match the real situation on the ground, please write to data@osmfoundation.org and let us investigate the issue.
\nYour deletions of not only borders but also natural features in Karabakh is vandalism and violates our terms of use.
\nThank you\nFrederik Ramm\nfor the OSMF data working group.
\nDear user fredtz,
\nyour first edits to the OpenStreetMap database are wildly inappropriate (renaming places to \"This is an Azerbaijan territory\" etc.) - please stop that.
\nWith regard to the \"name\" tag, OSM observes the \"on the ground rule\", i.e. it doesn't count what the world knows something under - the name used locally, on signs etc., should be used. Other, alternative names may be placed in the \"name:languagecode\" tags.
\nBest wishes\nFrederik Ramm\nOSMF Data Working Group.
\nHello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and be documented on the wiki.
\nThese imports were not done from a dedicated account. I had previously reminded you of this need.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nAs a general reminder, the other import guidelines can be found on the wiki. These include
\nappropriate documentation
consultation with the local community and the imports@ mailing list
having a plan to fix an mistakes in case of a broken upload
other technical requirements
This block will disappear when you log on.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Dear user Manson_Smith_359,
\nyou have recently deleted and replaced, or renamed, a number of Mormon churches in OSM, and named them \"LDS cult\".
\nI understand that this is not how these churches advertise themselves to the passer-by. OpenStreetMap generally observes the \"on the ground\" rule, i.e. we map things as they are seen on the ground, and not according to someone's personal political/religious world view.
\nYou are free to express your opinion that these churched form part of a \"cult\" but you are not free to change their description on, or even remove them from, the OpenStreetMap database.
\nWe will revert your edits shortly.
\nPlease do not do this again, as it violates our terms of use.
\nThank you for your understanding.
\nFrederik Ramm\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group.
\n\u0423\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c bobrik1505,
\n\u0423\u0436\u0435 \u043d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0432\u044b \u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u043e \u0438\u043c\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0440\u0443\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0432 \u041e\u0421\u041c \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0438\u0437\n\u043d\u0435\u0438\u0437\u0432\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430. \u041f\u043e\u043f\u044b\u0442\u043a\u0438 \u0447\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043e\u0432 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430 \u0432\u044b\u044f\u0441\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c\n\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0441\u0445\u043e\u0436\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u044d\u0442\u0438\u0445 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0431\u044b\u043b\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0433\u043d\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u044b \u0441 \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0435\u0439 \u0441\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043d\u044b. \u042d\u0442\u043e\n\u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043d\u0430\u0440\u0443\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u0441\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0430\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043f\u043e \u0438\u043c\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044e, \u0432\u0430\u043c \u043d\u0435\u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u043e\n\u0441\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0438 \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u044f \u0441 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c \u0441\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u044f\u0442\u044b\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0446\u0435\u0434\u0443\u0440:
\nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_guidelines
\n\u041a\u0440\u043e\u043c\u0435 \u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e, \u0432\u044b \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0441\u0445\u0435\u043c\u0443 \u0442\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f, \u043d\u0435\u0441\u043e\u0432\u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043c\u0443\u044e \u0441 \u041e\u0421\u041c.
\n\u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0432\u044b\u0439\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u044c \u0441 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c, \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u0432 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0432 \u0444\u043e\u0440\u0443\u043c\nhttp://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=40, \u043e\u0431\u044a\u044f\u0441\u043d\u0438\u0432\n\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0441\u0445\u043e\u0436\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445, \u043b\u0438\u0446\u0435\u043d\u0437\u0438\u044e, \u0438 \u0432 \u0441\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0430\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0436\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0439\n\u0434\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0451\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0441 \u0447\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430 \u043e \u043d\u0435\u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0438\u0445 \u0438\u043c\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u043e\u0432\n\u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0446\u0435\u0434\u0443\u0440\u0435 \u0438\u043c\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0430, \u0430 \u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e, \u0437\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0446\u0443 \u0432 \u0412\u0438\u043a\u0438,\n\u043d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0432 \u0441\u043f\u0438\u0441\u043e\u043a \u0440\u0430\u0441\u0441\u044b\u043b\u043a\u0438 import@, \u0438 \u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0438\u043c\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442 \u0438\u0441\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e \u0441\n\u0432\u044b\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0443\u0447\u0451\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0437\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0438.
\n\u041d\u0430 \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0443 \u0443\u0447\u0451\u0442\u043d\u0443\u044e \u0437\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c \u043d\u0430\u043b\u0430\u0433\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0431\u043b\u043e\u043a\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u043a\u0430 \u0434\u043e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u044d\u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f.
\n\u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0415\u0432\u0433\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439\n\u041e\u0442 \u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0438 Data Working Group
\nDear user bobrik 1505,
\nFor some time you are actively importing to OSM data from an unknown\nsource. Attempts of the community to find out the source of these data\nwere ignored from your side. It is a violation of the accepted\nagreement on import, and you have to agree your actions with the\ncommunity in accordance with the procedures:
\nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_guidelines
\nMoreover, you are using tagging schema which is incompatible with OSM.
\nPlease, contact the community by writing a message to the forum\nhttp://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=40 and explain source\nof your data, its license, and in case of positive agreement with the\nmembers of the community about necessity of your imports, follow the\nimport procedure, namely, create a Wiki page, write to imports@\nmailing list and perform the import from a dedicated account.
\nYour account is blovked until you read this message.
\nEugene Sandulenko\nIn behalf of Data Working Group
\nDear users Kom\u044fpa and Willi2006,
\nwe notice that you have been involved in something that looks like a starting edit war in Thailand.
\nKom\u044fpa seems to have:
\nWilli2006 seems to have been enraged by this incursion into his home turf, and performed a wholsale revert of all edits.
\nI have reverted Willi2006's revert but this is not intended to be the last word on the issue.
\nI would ask BOTH parties to stop edit warring and explain yourselves.
\nAbout the buildings:
\nKom\u044fpa, I think everybody may trace buildings from Bing anywhere, and Willi2006 is wrong to ask you for \"proof that these buildings really exist\" - instead, someone DELETING a building should have proof the these buildings don't exist. However, I think an armchair mapper should also respect the will of the local community and if the local community says \"we don't want armchair traced buildings in our area\" then please don't do it. Willi2006, do other members of the local community back up your request of \"no armchair tracing of buildings\", or is it you alone?
\nAbout the changes in highway types:
\nKom\u044fpa, I do not believe that aerial imagery is good enough to distinguish an unclassified road from a highway=track. I think you should not make such changes based on aerial imagery alone, especially if you don't know the area.
\nAbout the service areas:
\nKom\u044fpa, if there are service areas not recognized by OSRM, which therefore lead to \"islands\", then maybe OSRM is in need of fixing. I am currently unsure whether it is usual to have actual service lanes across areas tagged highway=services; in any case this is something that the local community should decide.
\nAbout the reverts:
\nWilli2006, what you did was not ok; you completely reverted lots of edits into which others have invested quite some time. Thailand is not yours alone. Have you conferred with other members of the local community or at least others who frequently edit in Thailand? The JOSM reverter plugin should not be used on a large scale like you did without discussing the issue in a larger group first. I am also very unhappy that you used a misleading changeset tag on all your reverts.
\nI am copying this message to Russ and Stefan who both seem to have made prior edits in the area as well. I would be happy if you could find an amicable solution to this. As I said, Kom\u044fpa, I believe that nobody should be \"nannying\" an area but still someone who lives there trumps those who armchair-map from Bing; I know you made your edits with the best intentions but if the people on the ground don't want your help then maybe it would be ok to just help elsewhere.
\nBye\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck\nfor the OSMF data working group.
\nDear user gdal,
\nit has come to our attention that you seem to be importing place names from another data source.
\nOur data import policy requires that imports be discussed on the appropriate mailing list before they are performed, and that the import be properly documented (source, license, technique used for converting, etc.etc.): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
\nWe also ask people to create a separate account for imports.
\nPlease stop your current import, and discuss the matter on the \"imports\" mailing list before you continue: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
\nThank you\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck \nfor the OSMF data working group.
\nYou have been importing data into OSM
\nImports into OSM need to be from a dedicated account and must be discussed with the local community and the imports@ mailing list.
\nThis import did not do so. It consists of ways with no meaningful tags.
\nI'll go ahead and revert the uploads. What license was the data obtained under?
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group.
\nIgnoring this may lead to a user block.
\n\nfor the Data Working Group
\nDear user \u05d9\u05e0\u05d9\u05d1
\nSome of your recent edits to OpenStreetMap were problematic for the mapping community in Israel and had to be reverted.
\nThe community has made attempts to contact you and discuss the matter, but has not heard back from you.
\nPlease check your OSM inbox for messages, and read the forum discussion here:
\nhttp://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=286864#p286864
\nPlease do not continue your edits until you have understood the problems and replied to the community members who have contacted you about this. I am placing a short-time block on your account to make sure that you read this message, but the block will be lifted automatically as soon as you have.
\nThank you\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\nfor the OSMF data working group
\nPlease contact the data working group at data@osmfoundation.org.
\nHello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account.
\nThese imports were not done from a dedicated account.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nIgnoring this and continuing to import from your main account may lead to a block.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nJ'ai remarqu\u00e9 que vous avez effectu\u00e9 une importation avec les changesets \nsuivants :
\nLes r\u00e8gles actuelles sur les importations de donn\u00e9es n\u00e9cessitent qu'elles \nsoient faites \u00e0 partir d'un compte d\u00e9di\u00e9 (s\u00e9par\u00e9 de votre compte habituel), \napr\u00e8s consultation avec la communaut\u00e9 locale et \u00eatre document\u00e9s sur le wiki.
\nVos importations n'ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 faites \u00e0 partir d'un compte d\u00e9di\u00e9.
\nJe vous sugg\u00e8re que ce compte d\u00e9di\u00e9
\net
\nPour me contacter, vous pouvez r\u00e9pondre \u00e0 ce message ou envoyer un courriel \u00e0 \ndata@osmfoundation.org
\nPs: Notez que je ne parle pas fran\u00e7ais et que ce message a \u00e9t\u00e9 traduit par un \nautre contributeur. Pour toute remarque (en fran\u00e7ais) concernant mon message, \nvous pouvez prendre contact avec la communaut\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise ici : \nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Contact
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nAs you are ignoring the previous instructions not to import without following the requirement for a dedicated account I have no options but to place a longer block.
\nThis block will last 6 hours or until you log in, whichever comes later.
\n(note: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13766502)
\nHello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account.
\nThese imports were not done from a dedicated account.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nIgnoring this and continuing to import from your main account may lead to a block.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nJ'ai remarqu\u00e9 que vous avez effectu\u00e9 une importation avec les changesets \nsuivants :
\nLes r\u00e8gles actuelles sur les importations de donn\u00e9es n\u00e9cessitent qu'elles \nsoient faites \u00e0 partir d'un compte d\u00e9di\u00e9 (s\u00e9par\u00e9 de votre compte habituel), \napr\u00e8s consultation avec la communaut\u00e9 locale et \u00eatre document\u00e9s sur le wiki.
\nVos importations n'ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 faites \u00e0 partir d'un compte d\u00e9di\u00e9.
\nJe vous sugg\u00e8re que ce compte d\u00e9di\u00e9
\net
\nPour me contacter, vous pouvez r\u00e9pondre \u00e0 ce message ou envoyer un courriel \u00e0 \ndata@osmfoundation.org
\nPs: Notez que je ne parle pas fran\u00e7ais et que ce message a \u00e9t\u00e9 traduit par un \nautre contributeur. Pour toute remarque (en fran\u00e7ais) concernant mon message, \nvous pouvez prendre contact avec la communaut\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise ici : \nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Contact
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nEdit: Expanded links.
\n\u0423\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c \u043e\u043b\u044f\u0432\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0430!
\n\u0412\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u043d\u0435\u0434\u0430\u0432\u043d\u043e \u0431\u044b\u043b \u0441\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u043d \u0440\u044f\u0434 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a \u0432 OpenStreetMap, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u0440\u0430\u0441\u0446\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0432\u0430\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043a\u0430\u043a \u0432\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0437\u043c, \u0438 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u043c \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044f\u043c \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0448\u043b\u043e\u0441\u044c \u0432\u043e\u0441\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0438\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0443.
\n\u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0432\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0438\u0442\u0435\u0441\u044c \u043e\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043e\u0431\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0439 \u0432 \u0434\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0435\u0439\u0448\u0435\u043c.
\n\u0412\u044b \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0433\u043b\u0430\u0448\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435\u0441\u044c \u0432 \u0432\u0435\u0442\u043a\u0443 \u0444\u043e\u0440\u0443\u043c\u0430, \u0433\u0434\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u0443\u0436\u0434\u0430\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0438 \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u044f, \u0438 \u0433\u0434\u0435 \u0432\u044b \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u044a\u044f\u0441\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0441\u0432\u043e\u044e \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0438\u0446\u0438\u044e:
\nhttp://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=290867#p290867
\n\u0410 \u043f\u043e\u043a\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u043d\u0430\u043b\u043e\u0436\u0435\u043d\u043e \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u043e \u0440\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044e \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u044b \u041e\u0421\u041c.
\n\u0421 \u0443\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c,
\nEugene Sandulenko
\n\u041e\u0442 \u043b\u0438\u0446\u0430 Data Working Group
\nDear user \u043e\u043b\u044f\u0432\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0430,
\nRecently you created several changesets in OpenStreetMap which could be considered as vandalism, and other users had to restore the map.
\nPlease abstain from such activity in the future.
\nYou are invited to a forum thread where your actions are being discussed, and where you may explain your position:
\nhttp://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=290867#p290867
\nIn the meantime a block was put on you which will prevent you from editing the OSM map.
\nRegards,
\nEugene Sandulenko
\nIn behalf of Data Working Group
\nHello\nAs this is your second block and I have also sent messages with no response this block will last for 12 hours.
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account.
\nThese imports were not done from a dedicated account.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nIgnoring this and continuing to import from your main account may lead to a block.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nJ'ai remarqu\u00e9 que vous avez effectu\u00e9 une importation avec les changesets \nsuivants :
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13954911\nLes r\u00e8gles actuelles sur les importations de donn\u00e9es n\u00e9cessitent qu'elles \nsoient faites \u00e0 partir d'un compte d\u00e9di\u00e9 (s\u00e9par\u00e9 de votre compte habituel), \napr\u00e8s consultation avec la communaut\u00e9 locale et \u00eatre document\u00e9s sur le wiki.
Vos importations n'ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 faites \u00e0 partir d'un compte d\u00e9di\u00e9.
\nJe vous sugg\u00e8re que ce compte d\u00e9di\u00e9
\net
\nPour me contacter, vous pouvez r\u00e9pondre \u00e0 ce message ou envoyer un courriel \u00e0 \ndata@osmfoundation.org
\nPs: Notez que je ne parle pas fran\u00e7ais et que ce message a \u00e9t\u00e9 traduit par un \nautre contributeur. Pour toute remarque (en fran\u00e7ais) concernant mon message, \nvous pouvez prendre contact avec la communaut\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise ici : \nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Contact
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nDear user nodekiller,
\non 12th November we have sent you a message asking to discuss your mass simplifications with the community before you execute them. You have ignored that request and continued to mass-simplify (e.g. changesets 13988575, 13988493, 13988335, 13988256, 13988153, 13988010, 13987866, 13987731). Your changeset comment \"Simplify to +/-0.8m = ~1 pixel @ z18\" indicates that you believe that zoom level 18 was for some reason the maximum resolution used in OSM. This is wrong.
\nPlease stop these unilateral mass simplifications now, or we will have to revert them and block your account.
\nThank you\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group.
\nDear user k11,
\nIn recent changesets you were mass-removing objects from the OSM map.
\nOpenStreetMap is a community-created map and is not a proper place for harmful experiments.
\nPlease refrain from this activity.
\nEugene Sandulenko\nOn behalf of Data Working Group
\nAutomated translation into Polish follows:
\nDrogi u\u017cytkowniku k11,
\nW ostatnich zestawienia zmian by\u0142e\u015b masowe usuwanie obiekt\u00f3w z OSM mapie.
\nOpenStreetMap to mapa stworzona przez spo\u0142eczno\u015b\u0107 i nie jest w\u0142a\u015bciwym miejscem dla szkodliwych eksperyment\u00f3w.
\nProsz\u0119 powstrzyma\u0107 si\u0119 od tej dzia\u0142alno\u015bci.
\nEugene Sandulenko\nW imieniu Data Working Group
\nExtending http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/284 for vandalism.
\nPlease either send a message or email the data working group to get this lifted.
\nHello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with these changesets
\n\namong others
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and the imports@ mailing list and be documented on the wiki.
\nThis import violates the first two of these three requirements.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nThe import guidelines have more information about documentation.
\nYou need to consult with the local community and the imports@ mailing list.
\nThis block will last until you log on to ensure you have read it.
\nDo not continue importing until you have done the required consultation.
\nHello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\n\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account.
\nThese imports were not done from a dedicated account.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nIgnoring this and continuing to import from your main account may lead to a longer block.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nJ'ai remarqu\u00e9 que vous avez effectu\u00e9 une importation avec les changesets \nsuivants :
\n\nLes r\u00e8gles actuelles sur les importations de donn\u00e9es n\u00e9cessitent qu'elles \nsoient faites \u00e0 partir d'un compte d\u00e9di\u00e9 (s\u00e9par\u00e9 de votre compte habituel), \napr\u00e8s consultation avec la communaut\u00e9 locale et \u00eatre document\u00e9s sur le wiki.
\nVos importations n'ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 faites \u00e0 partir d'un compte d\u00e9di\u00e9.
\nJe vous sugg\u00e8re que ce compte d\u00e9di\u00e9
\net
\nPour me contacter, vous pouvez r\u00e9pondre \u00e0 ce message ou envoyer un courriel \u00e0 \ndata@osmfoundation.org
\nPs: Notez que je ne parle pas fran\u00e7ais et que ce message a \u00e9t\u00e9 traduit par un \nautre contributeur. Pour toute remarque (en fran\u00e7ais) concernant mon message, \nvous pouvez prendre contact avec la communaut\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise ici : \nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Contact
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello Detailo,
\nyou seem to be making a number of mechanical changes without having discussed them (nursing_home->social_facility, drinking_water->watering_place etc.)\nYou have been asked by at least one other mapper to stop but you are still continuing, therefore I am sending you this message which blocks your account until you have read it (your account will function normally after you have read the message).
\nPlease stop re-tagging things that you have no first-hand knowledge of. It has been pointed out to you that a \"watering_place\" is something else than \"drinking_water\", and a \"nursing_home\" is something else than a \"social_facility\". You are damaging our database by making these edits.
\nPlease tell me why you thought that you can (or should) make these changes, so that we can have the tools/wiki pages/... fixed.
\nThank you\nFrederik Ramm\nfor the OSMF data working group.
\nExtending http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/284 for vandalism.
\nPlease either send a message or email the data working group to get this lifted
\nDear welier,
\nI don't know, if it was intended by you, but you are deleting many buildings in Ahaus. Is there a reason for it?
\nI ask you to stop mass-deletings and get in contact with local community.
\nBye
\nHenning Scholland for DataWorking Group
\n===============================================================
\nHallo welier,\nIch wei\u00df nicht, ob es deine Absicht war, aber du hast in Ahaus viele Geb\u00e4ude gel\u00f6scht. Gibt es daf\u00fcr einen Grund?
\nIch bitte dich mit gro\u00dffl\u00e4chigen L\u00f6schungen aufzuh\u00f6ren und die lokale Community zu kontaktieren.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe
\nHenning Scholland f\u00fcr die DataWorking Group
\nDear user welier,
\nData Working Group has received complaints about your editing activity. Please get in touch with data@osmfoundation.org before you continue.
\nThanks\nFrederik Ramm
\nYou appear to be importing data into OSM. Imports into OSM need to be from a dedicated account and must be discussed with the local community and the imports@ mailing list.
\nThis import did not do so.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nThis block has been placed to interrupt your upload. It will expire when you log in to read it.
\nIgnoring this may lead to a longer block.
\n\nfor the Data Working Group
\nYou've been blocked for spam.
\nDear Jermboy27,
\nThis account has been blocked while reports of vandalism are investigated. If you beleive that this block is in error, please contact the Data Working Group data@osmfoundation.org
\nRichard Weait, \non behalf of the Data Working Group
\nLieber Benutzer Radeln,
\nDeine grossflaechigen Aenderungen der letzten Tage (bicycle=yes entfernt usw.) verstossen gegen unsere Regeln zu mechanischen Edits, nach denen Du solche Aenderungen vorher in der Community diskutieren musst:
\nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy
\nIm Grund darg jeder bei OSM alles mappen, aber die Freiheit hoert da auf, wo man sich per Xapi/Overpass alle Objekte geben laesst, die einer bestimmten Bedingung genuegen, und sie en bloc aendert, ohne je seinen Fuss in die Gegend gesetzt zu haben - Edits dieser Art muessen auf jeden Fall den Segen der Community haben.
\nBitte stelle diese Art von Edits so lange ein, bis Du die Unterstuetzung der Community dazu hast. Geeignete Wege, um diese Unterstuetzung nachzusuchen, waeren z.B. ein Posting auf der talk-de-Liste oder im deutschen Forum.
\nBye\nFrederik a.k.a. woodpeck
\nMatheus Eduardo,
\nPlease log in and check your messages from other mappers. They have been trying to contact you.
\nThis temporary blcok does not indicate that you have necessarily done anything wrong. Just that you have been non-responsive. This block will clear automatically when you log in to osm.org and read this message.
\nSincerely,\nRichard Weait for the \nData Working Group
\nVCastillo363,
\nThis account has been blocked temporarily.
\nPlease check your OSM account for incoming email from other contributors. Thay have concerns that should be addressed before you continue editing.
\nThis block does not mean that you have necessarily done anything wrong. If you have any concerns about this message, please contact the Data Working Group data@osmfoundation.org
\nSincerely,\nRichard Weait for the OpenStreetMap Foundation\nData Working Group.
\n(re-sending previous message in Spanish)
\nEsta cuenta ha sido bloqueada temporalmente.
\nPor favor revisa tu cuenta de OSM en busca de nuevos mensajes de otros contribuyentes. Ellos tienen preocupaciones que deben ser resueltas antes de que contin\u00faes editando.
\nEste bloqueo no quiere decir que necesariamente hayas hecho nada malo. Si tienes cualquier pregunta sobre este mensaje, por favor contacta al Data Working Group data@osmfoundation.org
\nHallo r-michael,
\nbitte h\u00f6re damit auf, Edits von anderen zu revertieren und in den Changeset-Kommentar nur \"Korrektur\" oder gar schlimmeres (\"so nicht...\") zu schreiben. Wenn Du die Aenderung von jemand anderem revertierst, erwarte ich, dass Du mindestens so viel Respekt vor seiner Arbeit hast, dass Du Deine Haltung begruendest. Also: \"Aenderung revertiert, 'Dammvorstadt' ist nach QUELLE nicht der deutsche Name\". Oder: \"Aenderung revertiert, STRASSE ist eine reine Anwohner- und keine Durchfahrtsstrasse, daher residential\" oder sowas.
\nDanke\nFrederik
\nDear user Christphorus,
\nI noted that you are engaged in a mini edit war with user r-michael over the node 26433240 - you always add \"name:de=Dammvorstadt\" and r-michael removes it again. Please stop this immediately. If you and r-michael cannot get an agreement over the right tagging, escalate the issue to a suitable public forum but don't simply edit things back and forth!
\nThank you\nFrederik Ramm (for the OSMF Data Working Group)
\nYou appear to be importing data into OSM. Imports into OSM need to be from a dedicated account and must be discussed with the local community and the imports@ mailing list.
\nThis import did not do so. It so far consists of 46k nodes.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nThis block has been placed to interrupt your upload. It will expire when you log in to read it.
\n\nfor the Data Working Group
\nLieber r-michael,
\nim Changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/14749170 hast Du die \u00c4nderung von jemand anders revertiert und dabei eine sehr unklare Begr\u00fcndung angegeben. Bitte suche in solchen F\u00e4llen die Diskussion, bevor Du eine \u00c4nderung r\u00fcckg\u00e4ngig machst; die \u00c4nderung von -jha- scheint oberfl\u00e4chtlich betrachtet den Gepflogenheiten bei OSM zu entsprechen.
\nDu hast ausserdem als Kollateralschaden eine Anzahl neu eingezeichneter H\u00e4user gel\u00f6scht. Bitte verwende in Zukunft nicht mehr das JOSM-Reverter-Plugin, sondern wenn Du die \u00c4nderung von jemand anders r\u00fcckg\u00e4ngig machen willst, tu das nur objektbezogen (und, sofern die \u00c4nderung nicht die Korrektur eines offensichtlichen Fehlers darstellt, nach Diskussion).
\nDanke\nFrederik Ramm (fuer die OSMF DWG)
\nHello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\n\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and be documented on the wiki.
\nThese imports consisted of ways without any OSM tags.
\nI've gone ahead and started reverting the import.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
PLEASE CONTACT data@osmfoundation.org BEFORE YOU CONTINUE TO EDIT.
\n\u0423\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c OKKO_ua!
\n\u0423\u0436\u0435 \u043d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0432\u044b \u043d\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043a\u0438 \u041e\u041a\u041a\u041e \u043d\u0430 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0443 \u041e\u0421\u041c. \u0421\u0442\u043e\u0438\u0442 \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0442\u0438\u0442\u044c, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043e\u0431\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043c\u0430\u0441\u0441\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0435 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u0443\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0432\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e \u043e\u0431\u0441\u0443\u0436\u0434\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0441 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c.
\n\u0412 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438, \u0441\u0445\u0435\u043c\u0430 \u0442\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0439 \u0432\u044b \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443\u0435\u0442\u0435\u0441\u044c \u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043d\u0435\u0441\u043e\u0432\u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0439 \u0441 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u044f\u0442\u043e\u0439 \u0432 \u041e\u0421\u041c, \u0438 \u0431\u041e\u043b\u044c\u0448\u0430\u044f \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0442\u043e\u0447\u0435\u043a \u043d\u0443\u0436\u0434\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0432 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u043a\u0435.
\n\u0422\u0430\u043a \u043a\u0430\u043a \u0432\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u0440\u0435\u0430\u0433\u0438\u0440\u0443\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0442\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a \u0432\u0430\u043c \u0447\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0437 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0430\u0439\u0442\u0435, \u043d\u0430 \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u043d\u0430\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0434\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0431\u043b\u043e\u043a\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u043a\u0430 \u0434\u043e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0432\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c\u043c\u0430.
\n\u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0432\u044b\u0439\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u044c \u043d\u0430 \u0444\u043e\u0440\u0443\u043c\u0435 \u0443\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0438\u043d\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430 \u041e\u0421\u041c \u043f\u043e \u0430\u0434\u0440\u0435\u0441\u0443: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=40
\n\u0421 \u0443\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c,\n\u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0415\u0432\u0433\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439\n\u0427\u043b\u0435\u043d Data Working Group
\nDear user OKKO_ua!
\nFor a while you are mapping OKKO fuel stations on OSM. Such mass changes have to be discussed with the community upfront.
\nParticularly, your tagging schema is not compatible with the one used in OSM, and majority of your nodes require rework.
\nSince you are not reacting to numerous attempts to approach you via message system on the site, a temporary block is being put on you until you read this message.
\nPlease connect with the ukrainian OSM community at the following address: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=40
\nRegards,\nEugene Sandulenko\nMember of Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nImports in OSM need to be in accordance with the import guidelines.\nIn particular there is a need to consult with the imports@ list is before importing. Posting a message and then importing 6 hours later is not adequate consultation.
\nUser nmixter,
\nThis account is block from editing during an investigation by the Data Working Group. If you beleive this block to be in error, please contact the Data Working Group data@osmfoundation.org
\nSincerely,\nRichard Weait for the OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group.
\nSecond notice. Other mappers have been trying to reach you regarding their concerns about your edits. Please engage these mappers in discussion and come to a mutually acceptable resolution before further mapping.
\nIf you believe that your account has been blocked in error, please contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nSincerely,
\nRichard Weait for the OpenStreetMap Foundation, Data Working Group.
\nEstimado usuario VCastillo363,
\nTenemos razones para creer que puedes estar agregando datos desde una fuente no permitida. Por favor contactanos en Ingles o Espa\u00f1ol para discutir este asunto. Este es nuestro ultimo mensaje antes de vernos forzados a remover tus contribuciones.
\nGracias\nFrederik Ramm (OSMF Data Working Group)
\nDear user VCastillo,
\nwe have reason to believe that you might be adding data from an unsuitable source. Please contact us in English or Spanish to discuss the matter. This is our last message before we will be forced to remove your contributions.\nThank you\nFrederik Ramm (OSMF Data Working Group)
\nDear Asari Garifullina,
\nyou have recently deleted a lot of data from OpenStreetMap in Kazakhstan, and after the damage had been repaired, you repeated your deletion. Are you aware of the fact that you are deleting data from the OpenStreetMap database, and others have to repair the damage? Please stop deleting data, and explain what you want to achieve.
\nBest wishes\nFrederik Ramm\nfor the OSMF data working group.
\nHello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and be documented on the wiki. This was not done here.
\nThese imports consisted of some nodes tagged as trees, but many that weren't.
\nPlease do not upload it again without first consulting with the local community and the imports@ mailing list.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\u0423\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c,
\n\u0412\u0430\u0448\u0438 \u043d\u0435\u0434\u0430\u0432\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043a\u0438 \u0432 \u041e\u0421\u041c \u043d\u043e\u0441\u044f\u0442 \u043e\u0442\u043a\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e \u0432\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u0445\u0430\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0435\u0440, \u0440\u0430\u0432\u043d\u043e \u043a\u0430\u043a \u0438 \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0447\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f, \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0441 \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0435\u0439 \u0443\u0447\u0451\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0437\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c\u044e.
\n\u0422\u0430\u043a\u0438\u043c \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0437\u043e\u043c, \u043d\u0430 \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u043d\u0430\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0434\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043d\u0430 96 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u043e\u0432 \u0441 \u0442\u0440\u0435\u0431\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f.
\n\u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0432\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0438\u0442\u0435\u0441\u044c \u043e\u0442 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0438 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0440\u0443\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u044b, \u0430 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u0443\u0431\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043e\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0440\u0431\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0447\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0438\u0437 \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0435\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0444\u0430\u0439\u043b\u0430.
\n\u0412 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u043e\u043c \u0441\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0430\u0435 \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0430 \u0443\u0447\u0451\u0442\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0437\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c \u0431\u0443\u0434\u0435\u0442 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0430.
\n\u0421 \u0443\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c,\n\u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0415\u0432\u0433\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439\nData Working Group
\nDear user,
\nYour recent edits in OSM are obviously vandalism, as well as textual notes which are connected with your user profile.
\nAs such, a permanent block for 96 hours is being put on you with requirement to log in to the site.
\nPlease abstain from your practice of damaging the map, and please remove offensive texts from your profile.
\nOtherwise your user account will be permanently removed.
\nBest Regards,\nEugene Sandulenko\nData Working Group
\nThis account has been blocked due to vandalism
\nTemporary block during investigation
\nDear Themegamaster9000,
\nThis account has been blocked while reports of vandalism are investigated. If you beleive that this block is in error, please contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nPaul Norman, on behalf of the Data Working Group
\nDear user Themegamaster9000,
\nwe have again had complaints about fictional edits from your account.\nYou have to understand that this is not a game or an editing sandbox; any edits you make show up live, for all to see, on the OpenStreetMap web site and database.
\nPlease refrain from making fictional edits in the future.
\nBest wishes\nFrederik
\nHello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and be documented on the wiki. This was not done here.
\nThese imports consisted of a bunch of untagged nodes that were not part of ways.
\nPlease do not upload it again without first consulting with the local community and the imports@ mailing list.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group.
\nI will go ahead and revert these imports.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Hello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\namong others
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and be documented on the wiki. This was not done here.
\nThese imports made a bunch of duplicate nodes.
\nPlease do not upload it again without first consulting with the local community and the imports@ mailing list.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group.
\nI will go ahead and revert these imports
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Blocked for continued vandalism.
\nHello,
\nBack in November I contacted you telling you that you need to stop importing and read the guidelines.
\nYou have continued to import. You need to consult with imports@ and the local community before importing. This was not done in this case.
\nAny future imports you do need to comply with the guidelines, including the consultation requirements.
\nPlease contact me to discuss what to do with your current imports.
\nDear user WeatherMan13,
\nyou are adding a lot of new roads in the Phoenix area over, or parallel to, existing roads, and not connecting these with the road network properly. This is not helpful - it will damage routing applications which now cannot find a route from one of \"your\" roads to elsewhere. The magenta lines on this map show the extent of the problem:
\nhttp://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-112.14038&lat=33.49926&zoom=11
\nI am writing you this message which blocks your account and only allows you to continue editing after you have read it because other mappers have already tried to alert you of the problem but you have continued your practice, which lets me believe that you may not be receiving messages sent through the normal channels.
\nPlease learn how to make correct contributions to OpenStreetMap before you continue. There's a wealth of material out there, some of which was pointed to in your welcome email, or you can meet up with other mappers in your area who will be more than happy to get you going in the right direction.
\nPlease do not continue to draw un-connected roads like you did because we'd have to remove all of that again, and the whole thing would be a waste of time for you and us.
\nBest wishes\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
\nBlocked for repeated vandalism.
\nTemporary block during investigation.
\nHello SimMoonXP,
\nYou have been deleting tracks in the Nevada desert without regards for if they are physically present or not. Please do not do this. Deleting a track which does not exist is okay, but deleting tracks which exist is unacceptable.
\nYou can contact me by private message or by emailing the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nIf you have any suggestions for how to undo your deletions, please let me know.
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
This account has been blocked due to an investigation of vandalism. If this is your account and you believe that the block is in error, contact the Data Working Group of the OpenStreetMap Foundation.
\nHello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account.
\nThese imports were not done from a dedicated account.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nIgnoring this and continuing to import from your main account may lead to a longer block.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nJ'ai remarqu\u00e9 que vous avez effectu\u00e9 une importation avec les changesets \nsuivants :
\nLes r\u00e8gles actuelles sur les importations de donn\u00e9es n\u00e9cessitent qu'elles \nsoient faites \u00e0 partir d'un compte d\u00e9di\u00e9 (s\u00e9par\u00e9 de votre compte habituel), \napr\u00e8s consultation avec la communaut\u00e9 locale et \u00eatre document\u00e9s sur le wiki.
\nVos importations n'ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 faites \u00e0 partir d'un compte d\u00e9di\u00e9.
\nJe vous sugg\u00e8re que ce compte d\u00e9di\u00e9
\net
\nPour me contacter, vous pouvez r\u00e9pondre \u00e0 ce message ou envoyer un courriel \u00e0 \ndata@osmfoundation.org
\nPs: Notez que je ne parle pas fran\u00e7ais et que ce message a \u00e9t\u00e9 traduit par un \nautre contributeur. Pour toute remarque (en fran\u00e7ais) concernant mon message, \nvous pouvez prendre contact avec la communaut\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise ici : \nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Contact
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nYou are continuing to import while not replying to messages on OSM.org.
\nYou are continuing to import without doing the required consultation with imports@. I have told you you need to do this. Continuing to ignore this requirement will lead to increasing blocks.
\nHello,
\nYou are continuing to ignore the requirements for imports with changesets 15864423 and 15864029 after being informed of the requirements.
\nContinuing to ignore the requirements and disregard these messages will lead to further blocks.
\nI have attempted to contact you previously about deleting tracks but you have not replied. An example of this is way 14326476 located http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.789&lon=-115.946&zoom=18.
\nThe way clearly exists on the imagery, but you have deleted it.
\nTo get this block lifted, contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org.
\nEdit: continued block during investigation
\nHi Evulon,\nI told you some days ago, that you are working on a live-database. Today you did it in changeset 15979780 again. Please stop drawing words with ways.
\nBye
\nHenning Scholland for DataWorkingGroup
\nThemegamaster9000,
\nyou have once again changed the \"place\" tag of a couple of very small settlements to \"city\". You have send me personal messages saying \"Don't Change Into United States No More\" and you have created a changeset comment of \"Don't change anything\" (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/16022766).
\nIt seems that there is a deep misunderstanding here.
\nOpenStreetMap is a collectively created database of facts (not fiction).
\nThe common use of the \"place\" tag is documented on our Wiki here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place. For \"place=city\", the page says: \"The largest urban settlements in the territory, normally including the national, state and provincial capitals.\"
\nYou have applied place=city, among other things, to a hamlet by the name of \"Grappes Bluff\" in Louisiana, which is certainly not among the largest urban settlements in its area.
\nPlease understand that what you contribute to OSM has to be based in fact. OSM is not for fiction, and if you want to invent cities you will have to do that elsewhere.
\nAs you have disregarded the last message from me and continue to ignore the requirements for imports, the next option is a block. This block will last until you have logged on and read it.
\nHello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account.
\nThese imports were not done from a dedicated account.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nIgnoring this and continuing to import from your main account may lead to a longer block.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nJ'ai remarqu\u00e9 que vous avez effectu\u00e9 une importation avec les changesets \nsuivants :
\n\nLes r\u00e8gles actuelles sur les importations de donn\u00e9es n\u00e9cessitent qu'elles \nsoient faites \u00e0 partir d'un compte d\u00e9di\u00e9 (s\u00e9par\u00e9 de votre compte habituel), \napr\u00e8s consultation avec la communaut\u00e9 locale et \u00eatre document\u00e9s sur le wiki.
\nVos importations n'ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 faites \u00e0 partir d'un compte d\u00e9di\u00e9.
\nJe vous sugg\u00e8re que ce compte d\u00e9di\u00e9
\net
\nPour me contacter, vous pouvez r\u00e9pondre \u00e0 ce message ou envoyer un courriel \u00e0 \ndata@osmfoundation.org
\nPs: Notez que je ne parle pas fran\u00e7ais et que ce message a \u00e9t\u00e9 traduit par un \nautre contributeur. Pour toute remarque (en fran\u00e7ais) concernant mon message, \nvous pouvez prendre contact avec la communaut\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise ici : \nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Contact
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nBlocked for repeated vandalism
\nTemporary block during investigation of some mechanical edits.
\nHello,
\nThere have been a number of complaints about edits that you are conducting mechanical edits retagging various water features.
\nBefore doing a mechanical edit like this you need to consult with the relevant communities, which in the case of world-wide tag changes would include the world-wide talk@ list. This was not done.
\nSome example nodes are:
\n303929471\n1228536949\n2135416681\n495494055
\nIn particular there appears to be a mass-retagging from harbour=yes to seamark:type=harbour. These will need to be reverted but do not do so yet because we need to figure out what else needs reverting.
\nWere the majority of your \"Update harbour tags\" changesets changes of this type?
\nPlease do not do any more edits of this type until you have consulted and the current edits are resolved.
\nYou can contact me through OSM messages or the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org.
\nThis block will last until you have logged on and read it.
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group.
Hi Evoluon,\nI told you several times, that you should stop vandalism. You're breaking the law while doing so.
\nHenning Scholland for DataWorkingGroup
\nHello,
\nYou appear to be adding addr:city, addr:country, is_in:city, and is_in:country tags to every object in Porto Alegre. Please do not do so.
\nThese tags do not belong on every single object. They absolutely do not belong on otherwise untagged nodes.
\nAdditionally, this is a mechanical edit which requires.
\nI've begun to revert the changesets.
\nThis block will last until you log on to openstreetmap.org to read it.
\nHello,
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and imports@ and be documented on the wiki. This was not done here.
\nI was unable to find any consultation done with imports@. As was pointed out on talk-gb@, the consultation with the local community was inadequate.
\nYour import consists of nodes with the only normal OSM tags of name=* and boundary=planning. A node is a point and not a boundary.
\nPlease do not continue to upload it without first consulting with the local community and the imports@ mailing list.
\nI have begun to revert this broken import.
\nThis block will last until you log on to ensure you have read it.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Final block for repeated vandalism. Contact data@osmfoundation.org to discuss.
\nHello,
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and imports@ and be documented on the wiki. This was not done here.
\nIn your last communication with imports@ you said you would be cleaning up and not importing more data. Additionally concerns were raised about the tagging and the clear mistakes have not been fixed and the other concerns were not addressed, you were told to not continue importing.
\nPlease do not continue to upload it without first consulting with the local community and the imports@ mailing list.
\nI have begun to revert this broken import. Please provide a list of all changesets in this import.
\nThis block will last until you have logged on to read it.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Do not add fictious data to OpenStreetMap.\nOnly map what really exists on the ground.
\nOnly map what really exists on the ground.\nFictitious Mapping is not allowed. It is misuse of our computer systems.
\nOpenStreetMap Foundation (United Kingdom) reserves the right to seek resolution with your ISP (Poland).
\nOnly map what really exists on the ground.\nFictitious Mapping is not allowed. It is misuse of our computer systems.
\nOpenStreetMap Foundation (United Kingdom) reserves the right to seek resolution with your ISP (Poland).
\nOnly map what really exists on the ground.\nFictitious Mapping is not allowed. It is misuse of our computer systems.
\nOpenStreetMap Foundation (United Kingdom) reserves the right to seek resolution with your ISP (Poland).
\nWe have received a complaint about your recent edits. It seems that you have uploaded fictional data to OpenStreetMap, and we have reverted these edits.
\nPlease be aware that anything you upload will appear on our main map without further checks - this is not a sandbox, this is the real thing!
\nOpenStreetMap Foundation (United Kingdom) reserves the right to seek resolution with your ISP if vandalism continues.
\nA decision has been reached on the turn restriction dispute referred \nto the DWG by yourself, Paul Johnson, and multiple other members of \nthe community. This decision took an extended amount of time due to \nthe investigation and multiple bodies the decision went through. The \nfinal decision has been endorsed by the OSMF board.
\nThe decision has been made to ban you. This is not a decision that was \ntaken lightly. This is an indefinite ban.
\nThe full text of the DWG recommendation to the board is available at \nhttp://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/File:DWG_NE2_Turn_Restriction_dispute.pdf \nbut the executive summary is as follows:
\n\n\nNE2 is a user in Florida who tends to be in edit wars with others \nand is involved in many arguments. There was an edit war over a turn \nrestriction earlier this year, which was referred to the DWG by NE2, \nthe other person involved in the dispute, and other members of the \nUS community. NE2's behavior in this dispute was consistent with \nhis past behavior and shows an inability to work with others on what \nis a crowd-sourcing project. The DWG has recommending/requesting an \nindefinite (not infinite) ban. This covers both his NE2 and NE3 \naccounts.
\n
-- \nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
A decision has been reached on the turn restriction dispute referred \nto the DWG by yourself, Paul Johnson, and multiple other members of \nthe community. This decision took an extended amount of time due to \nthe investigation and multiple bodies the decision went through. The \nfinal decision has been endorsed by the OSMF board.
\nThe decision has been made to ban you. This is not a decision that was \ntaken lightly. This is an indefinite ban.
\nThe full text of the DWG recommendation to the board is available at \nhttp://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/File:DWG_NE2_Turn_Restriction_dispute.pdf \nbut the executive summary is as follows:
\n\n\nNE2 is a user in Florida who tends to be in edit wars with others \nand is involved in many arguments. There was an edit war over a turn \nrestriction earlier this year, which was referred to the DWG by NE2, \nthe other person involved in the dispute, and other members of the \nUS community. NE2's behavior in this dispute was consistent with \nhis past behavior and shows an inability to work with others on what \nis a crowd-sourcing project. The DWG has recommending/requesting an \nindefinite (not infinite) ban. This covers both his NE2 and NE3 \naccounts.
\n
-- \nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
Hello,
\nThere have been a number of complaints about edits involving creating highways which are not yet under construction or proposed and not responding to messages.
\nCould you please check your inbox?
\nAdditionally, can you please use good changeset comments? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments explains why these are helpful and what a good comment is.
\nThis block will automatically remove itself when you have logged on and read it.
\nThanks,
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group.
Dear user Sorein,
\nI am writing to you in my role as a member of the OSMF data working group. You are engaged in an edit war with user razor74 about the naming of streets. This must stop.
\nPlease immediately stop reverting the edits of others, and stop renaming streets unless there's a consensus in the Romanian OSM community.
\nPlease also add suitable changeset comments to your edits so that others can more easily see what you are doing.
\nrazor74 has received a similar message.
\nThis account block lifts itself after you have read this message.
\nBye\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck \nfor the OSMF data working group
\nDear user razor74,
\nI am writing to you in my role as a member of the OSMF data working group. You are engaged in an edit war with user sorein about the naming of streets. This must stop.
\nPlease immediately stop reverting the edits of others, and stop renaming streets unless there's a consensus in the Romanian OSM community.
\nPlease also add suitable changeset comments to your edits so that others can more easily see what you are doing.
\nsorein has received a similar message.
\nThis account block lifts itself after you have read this message.
\nBye\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck \nfor the OSMF data working group
\nHello user b3rogers,
\nYou appear to of been deleting streets in Windsor, Ontario. You may of not been aware that you were editing the live database, but to delete streets that exist like these with no explanation if vandalism. Please do not continue.
\nThis block will last until you have logged on to read it.
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
\u0423\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c Localknowledge!
\n\u0423\u0436\u0435 \u043d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0412\u044b \u0430\u0442\u043a\u0438\u0432\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0443 \u0421\u0430\u043d\u043a\u0442-\u041f\u0435\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0431\u0443\u0440\u0433\u0430, \u0432 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438, \u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u044b \u0433\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0430. \u041f\u0440\u0438 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u043c \u0412\u044b \u043b\u043e\u043c\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0443\u0436\u0435 \u0441\u0443\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0435 \u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u044b, \u0432\u0432\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e \u0434\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u0440\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0445\u0441\u044f \u043e\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0440\u0430\u0441\u0446\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043a\u0430\u043a \u0432\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0437\u043c.
\n\u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0432\u044b\u0439\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u044c \u0441 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c, \u0438 \u043e\u043f\u0438\u0448\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0441\u0432\u043e\u0438 \u0446\u0435\u043b\u0438 \u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u0445\u043e\u0434\u044b (http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=336915#p336915). \u041f\u043e\u0434\u0440\u043e\u0431\u043d\u0435\u0435 \u043e \u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u044f\u0442\u043e\u0439 \u0441\u0445\u0435\u043c\u0435 \u0442\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u043e\u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0430 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043f\u043e \u043d\u0438\u0436\u0435\u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0435\u0439 \u0441\u0441\u044b\u043b\u043a\u0435:
\n\n\u041d\u0430 \u0412\u0430\u0441 \u043d\u0430\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0434\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0435 \u0441\u043d\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u044d\u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f.
\n\u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0415\u0432\u0433\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439\n\u0427\u043b\u0435\u043d Data Workin Group
\nDear user Localknowledge,
\nFor some time you are actively mapping map of St-Petersburg, particularly public transportation routes. While doing this you are breaking existing routes, add numerous duplicated relations which is considered as vandalism.
\nPlease connect with the community and describe your goals and approaches (http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=336915#p336915). Also you may read in more details current schema for tagging public transportation routes at the following link:
\n\nYou are being put under a temporary block which will be lifted once you read this message.
\nEugene Sandulenko\nMember of Data Working Group
\n\u0423\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c Localknowledge!
\n\u0423\u0436\u0435 \u043d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0412\u044b \u0430\u0442\u043a\u0438\u0432\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0443 \u0421\u0430\u043d\u043a\u0442-\u041f\u0435\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0431\u0443\u0440\u0433\u0430, \u0432 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438, \u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u044b \u0433\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0430. \u041f\u0440\u0438 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u043c \u0412\u044b \u043b\u043e\u043c\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0443\u0436\u0435 \u0441\u0443\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0435 \u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u044b, \u0432\u0432\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e \u0434\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u0440\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0445\u0441\u044f \u043e\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0440\u0430\u0441\u0446\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043a\u0430\u043a \u0432\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0437\u043c.
\n\u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0432\u044b\u0439\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u044c \u0441 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c, \u0438 \u043e\u043f\u0438\u0448\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0441\u0432\u043e\u0438 \u0446\u0435\u043b\u0438 \u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u0445\u043e\u0434\u044b (http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=336915#p336915). \u041f\u043e\u0434\u0440\u043e\u0431\u043d\u0435\u0435 \u043e \u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u044f\u0442\u043e\u0439 \u0441\u0445\u0435\u043c\u0435 \u0442\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u043e\u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0430 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043f\u043e \u043d\u0438\u0436\u0435\u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0435\u0439 \u0441\u0441\u044b\u043b\u043a\u0435:
\n\n\u041d\u0430 \u0412\u0430\u0441 \u043d\u0430\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0434\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0435 \u0441\u043d\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u044d\u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f.
\n\u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0415\u0432\u0433\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u0427\u043b\u0435\u043d Data Workin Group
\nDear user Localknowledge,
\nFor some time you are actively mapping map of St-Petersburg, particularly public transportation routes. While doing this you are breaking existing routes, add numerous duplicated relations which is considered as vandalism.
\nPlease connect with the community and describe your goals and approaches (http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=336915#p336915). Also you may read in more details current schema for tagging public transportation routes at the following link:
\n\nYou are being put under a temporary block which will be lifted once you read this message.
\nEugene Sandulenko Member of Data Working Group
\n\u0423\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c Localknowledge,
\n\u0412\u044b \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0438\u0433\u043d\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0437\u0430\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044b \u043e\u0442 Data Working Group, \u0438 \u043d\u0435 \u0432\u044b\u0445\u043e\u0434\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u044c \u0441 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0443.
\n\u041d\u0430 \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u043d\u0430\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0434\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0431\u043b\u043e\u043a\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u043a\u0430 \u043d\u0430 96 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u043e\u0432. \u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043e\u0442\u043f\u0438\u0448\u0438\u0442\u0435\u0441\u044c \u0432 \u0442\u0435\u043c\u0435 \u043e \u0421\u0430\u043d\u043a\u0442-\u041f\u0435\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0431\u0443\u0440\u0433\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u0444\u043e\u0440\u0443\u043c\u0435 \u041e\u0421\u041c.
\n\u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0415\u0432\u0433\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439\nData Working Group
\nDear user Localknowlege,
\nYou are continuing to ignore requests from Data Working Group, and without connecting with the community continue to damage the map.
\nYou are being blocke for 96 hours. Please, write in St-Petersburg thread on OSM forums.
\nEugene Sandulenko\nData Working Group
\nHello,
\nThere have been complaints that you have made multiple imports, ignoring the import guidelines which require consultation with the local community and the imports@ list.
\nWhat sources did you use for your recent New Jersey Public Transit edit?
\nHave you ignored previous complaints about your imports?
\nThis block will last until you have read it on the website.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group.
\n-- \nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Hi ananth06,
\nit was reported to DataWorkingGroup of OpenStreetMap, that you have changed a lot of highway-classes from residential and unclassified to tertiary. Can you explain your edits to the DataWorkingGroup. Maybe you misunderstood some explanaition of highway classes. Also I ask you to stop changing highway classes til we solved this issue.
\nBye Henning Scholland for DataWorkingGroup
\nHi anand 2013,
\nit was reported to DataWorkingGroup of OpenStreetMap, that you have changed a lot of highway-classes from residential and unclassified to tertiary. Can you explain your edits to the DataWorkingGroup. Maybe you misunderstood some explanaition of highway classes. Also I ask you to stop changing highway classes til we solved this issue.
\nBye Henning Scholland for DataWorkingGroup
\nHi SathyaV,
\nit was reported to DataWorkingGroup of OpenStreetMap, that you have changed a lot of highway-classes from residential and unclassified to tertiary. Can you explain your edits to the DataWorkingGroup. Maybe you misunderstood some explanaition of highway classes. Also I ask you to stop changing highway classes til we solved this issue.
\nBye Henning Scholland for DataWorkingGroup
\nHi sen73,
\nit was reported to DataWorkingGroup of OpenStreetMap, that you have changed a lot of highway-classes from residential and unclassified to tertiary. Can you explain your edits to the DataWorkingGroup. Maybe you misunderstood some explanaition of highway classes. Also I ask you to stop changing highway classes til we solved this issue.
\nBye Henning Scholland for DataWorkingGroup
\nHi kumarsenthil,
\nit was reported to DataWorkingGroup of OpenStreetMap, that you have changed a lot of highway-classes from residential and unclassified to tertiary. Can you explain your edits to the DataWorkingGroup. Just write a mail to me or to data@osmfoundation.org. Maybe you misunderstood some explanaition of highway classes. Also I ask you to stop changing highway classes til we solved this issue.
\nBye Henning Scholland for DataWorkingGroup
\nHello BumperJK
\nI am writing to you in my role as a member of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group which deals with edit conflicts and vandalism.
\nYou have been creating roads in the OpenStreetMap database.
\nPlease stop this! All your edits go live into our map database and will sooner or later show up on the map that is seen by all users.
\nThanks,
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
Hello,
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/16783639\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and imports@ and be documented on the wiki. This was not done here.
I can find no record of consultation with the imports@ mailing list. Where is it?
\nThis import was not done from a dedicated account
\nAdditionally your import is overlapping different data (e.g. near http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.11447&lon=12.05148&zoom=16). Please contact the imports@ list immediately. A revert may be necessary to clean up the overlapping landuses.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Hello,
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and imports@ and be documented on the wiki. This was not done here.
\nI can find no record of consultation with the imports@ mailing list. Where is it?
\nThis import was not done from a dedicated account
\nAdditionally your import is overlapping different data (e.g. near http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.11447&lon=12.05148&zoom=16). Please contact the imports@ list immediately. A revert may be necessary to clean up the overlapping landuses.
\nThis block will last until you have logged on to read it.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
[Note: This block duplicates the other due to a mistake]
\nDear new user,
\nI am contacting you on behalf of OSMF's data working group. We have received a number of complaints about your edits; people were concerned about your changing of streets to wrong names, and adding data that does not exist in reality.
\nIt is possible that this is a misunderstanding, and you falsely believed that you were editing a private copy of the map.
\nPlease:
\nUnderstand that you are editing a live map used by many people - not a private copy where you can do what you want!
When you submit edits, please apply a \"changeset comment\" so that other users can see what you wanted to achieve with that particular edit.
When other users contact you about your edits, do not ignore them.
Choose an user name that makes sense. OpenStreetMap is a social project and you are participating in a large community by contributing; surely you do not want to do that under the name \"hdfgdfgbdfd\".
Please write back to data@osmfoundation.org and explain which of your edits, if any, were actually based in fact and should be kept in OpenStreetMap; if we don't hear from you we might have to revert all your edits because they contain a high proportion of inacceptable edits.
\nThank you\nFrederik Ramm
\nVandalism is not permitted / Vandalismo non \u00e8 permesso.
\nExtend block during continued vandalism. See previous message.
\nAfter your last block I contacted you with some questions, which you have never answered. You are now continuing with edits similar to your previous ones.
\nBefore doing any further such edits, please reply to the questions in the message I sent.
\nDear user padeshahekhoban,
\nwe noticed that you were making excessive use of the OpenStreetMap messaging facility to send messages to other mappers inviting them to participate in your online survey. We have had complaints of people who felt \"spammed\" by what you do.
\nPlease note that the user-to-user messaging functionality is meant to be used for communication between mappers about their work - not for mass-distributin (mostly) unwanted survey invitations to mappers.
\nThank you for your understanding.\nFrederik Ramm (for the OSMF data working group)
\nContinuation of http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/368 until you respond to the questions in the last message.
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
\nBlocked for repeated detrimental edits & non-communication. Please contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\n\u0423\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c Localknowledge,
\n\u041d\u0435\u0441\u043c\u043e\u0442\u0440\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0447\u0438\u0441\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u043f\u044b\u0442\u043a\u0438 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \u0441 \u0432\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u0438 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0447\u0438\u043b\u0441\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044b \u043f\u0440\u0435\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043c\u0443\u0441\u043e\u0440\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u043e\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043d\u0430 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0443, \u0432\u044b \u0432\u0441\u0451 \u0435\u0449\u0451 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u044d\u0442\u043e \u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u0442\u044c.
\n\u0412\u0430\u0448\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u043d\u044f\u044f \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043a\u0430, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u0435\u0434\u0451\u043d\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0441\u0435\u0433\u043e\u0434\u043d\u044f, \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0430 11 \u043e\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u0441 \u043e\u0434\u043d\u0438\u043c \u0447\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043e\u043c.
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/16970415
\n\u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0432\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0438\u0442\u0435\u0441\u044c \u043e\u0442 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0440\u0443\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u044b \u0438 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0436\u0438\u0442\u0435\u0441\u044c \u0441 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c \u0432 \u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0435\u0439 \u0432\u0435\u0442\u043a\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u0443\u0436\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f:
\nhttp://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=6574
\n\u041d\u0430 \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u043d\u0430\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0434\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0431\u043b\u043e\u043a\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u043a\u0430, \u0434\u043e \u0442\u0435\u0445 \u043f\u043e\u0440, \u043f\u043e\u043a\u0430 \u0432\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u0432\u044b\u0439\u0434\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u044c \u0441 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c.
\n\u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0415\u0432\u0433\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439,\nData Working Group
\nDear user Localknowledge,
\nRegardless of numerous attempts to talk to you and requests to stop adding garbage relations to the map, you still continue doing this.
\nYour last edit was performed today and you added 11 one-member relations:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/16970415
\nPlease abstain from damaging the map and contact the community in the following forum thread:
\nhttp://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=6574
\nA block is being put on you until you contact the community.
\nEugene Sandulenko\nData Working Group
\nDear user erickdeoliveiraleal,
\nyou have deleted a large amount of data in Gama, Brazil. When contacted by users, you wrote to them:
\n\"I have a team working on conversion tools, is being finalized, which will import a lot of data that already exist in our country. In a format called GTM.\"
\nPlease note:
\nIt is never acceptable to delete data from other mappers just because you want to import data.
If you want to import data, you need to discuss this in advance on the \"imports\" mailing list. You cannot simply do it without talking to people.
I am reverting your recent deletions now. You can subscribe to the imports mailing list at http://lists.geofabrik.de/listinfo/imports.
\nUnder no circumstances must you run any automated software against the OSM database without making contact with the community first, and discussing what exactly you are planning to do.
\nThank you \nFrederik Ramm\nfor the OSMF data working group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and imports@ and be documented on the wiki. This was not done here.
\nI can find no record of consultation with the imports@ mailing list. Where is it?
\nThis import was not done from a dedicated account
\nAs this is not the first issue you have had with the requirements for imports I have placed this as a block which remove itself when you log on to the website.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
PLEASE STOP YOUR SPAMMING IMMEDIATELY.
\nYou have been warned 12 days ago and ignored the warning.
\nDo not use the OSM mail system for your survey.
\nHallo Action85,
\nDu hast einige Daten bei OSM geloescht und bist daraufhin von anderen Benutzern angeschrieben worden; hast aber nicht reagiert und daraufhin noch weitere Daten geloescht.
\nDaher sende ich Dir diese Nachricht nun als Block-Nachricht, die Du lesen musst, bevor Du weiterarbeiten kannst - um sicherzustellen, dass sie nicht uebersehen wird.
\nBitte verstehe, dass Du bei OSM an der fuer alle \"gueltigen\" Kartendatenbank arbeitest und nicht an einer privaten Kopie; wenn Du etwas loeschst, fehlt es allen. Loesche nur, was tatsaechlich nicht mehr existiert.
\nUnd bitte benuzte auch den Changeset-Kommentar, um anderen Mappern mitzuteilen, was Du geaendert hast - das reduziert Missverstaendnisse.
\nDanke\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck\nfuer die OSMF Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nyou have imported 75000+ untagged nodes without any ways or relations.
\nI've placed this block to interrupt your import script and give you a chance to fix it.
\nHallo Wolmatinger
\nDu hast einige Fl\u00e4chen bei OSM ge\u00e4ndert und bist daraufhin von anderen Benutzern angeschrieben worden; hast aber nicht reagiert und weitere Daten ge\u00e4ndert. Zu diesen \u00c4nderungen geh\u00f6ren unter anderem Fl\u00e4chen, die nach deiner \u00c4nderung \u00fcberlappen.
\nDaher sende ich Dir diese Nachricht nun als Block-Nachricht, die Du lesen musst, bevor Du weiterarbeiten kannst - um sicherzustellen, dass sie nicht \u00fcbersehen wird.
\nBitte setze dich entweder mit der DWG (data@osmfoundation.org) und den anderen Mitgliedern in der Community in Verbindung, die dich bisher versucht haben zu kontaktieren.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe
\nHenning Scholland f\u00fcr die OSMF Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\n\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and imports@ and be documented on the wiki. This was not done here.
\nI can find no record of consultation with the imports@ mailing list. Where is it?
\nThis import consists of ways with no normal OSM tags. I have started to revert it.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Hello,
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and imports@ and be documented on the wiki. This was not done here.
\nI can find no record of consultation with the imports@ mailing list. Where is it?
\nYou need to use a dedicated account
\nThe imported data has a number of non-OSM tags
\n__ The data has meaningless tags__
\nWhat is the license on the data you imported?
\nThis block has been placed to ensure that you read this message before editing again. It will disappear when read.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
You have been reported on the OSM talk-za@ list for creating \"highway graffiti\"
\nDo not add fictitious or planned roads.\nOnly add what exists on the ground.
\nRegards\n Grant
\nHello,
\nYour import appears to be importing about 70k nodes with no ways. This block is placed to interrupt it.
\nAdditionally, imports need to follow the Import Guidelines, which require consultation with the imports@ list, which was not done here.
\nDo not resume the import without meeting the requirements.
\nBlocked for repeated problematic edits and refusal to communicate. Please contact data@osmfoundation.org to discuss your edits.
\nDear user kijlhfvcj,
\nwe suspect that you are the same person who used the account \"hdfgdfgbdfd\", and that you have created this account to circumvent the block we have put on the other one.
\nThe correct way to get rid of the block is to talk to us, instead of creating new accounts. We're hearing complaints from other users about your mapping, and if you continue your behaviour we will have to treat it as vandalism.
\nPlease:
\nThank you\nFrederik Ramm, for the OSMF Data Working Group
\nHello user innocensiaenugu_import
\nyou appear to of uploaded test data to the OSM database. The live API is not for uploading test data.
\nPlease stop your data import and discuss on the imports@ list before.
\nPlease stop your data import and discuss on the imports@ list before.
\nHello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\namong others
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account.
\nThese imports were not done from a dedicated account.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nIgnoring this and continuing to import from your main account may lead to a block.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nJ'ai remarqu\u00e9 que vous avez effectu\u00e9 une importation avec les changesets \nsuivants :
\nLes r\u00e8gles actuelles sur les importations de donn\u00e9es n\u00e9cessitent qu'elles \nsoient faites \u00e0 partir d'un compte d\u00e9di\u00e9 (s\u00e9par\u00e9 de votre compte habituel), \napr\u00e8s consultation avec la communaut\u00e9 locale et \u00eatre document\u00e9s sur le wiki.
\nVos importations n'ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 faites \u00e0 partir d'un compte d\u00e9di\u00e9.
\nJe vous sugg\u00e8re que ce compte d\u00e9di\u00e9
\net
\nPour me contacter, vous pouvez r\u00e9pondre \u00e0 ce message ou envoyer un courriel \u00e0 \ndata@osmfoundation.org
\nPs: Notez que je ne parle pas fran\u00e7ais et que ce message a \u00e9t\u00e9 traduit par un \nautre contributeur. Pour toute remarque (en fran\u00e7ais) concernant mon message, \nvous pouvez prendre contact avec la communaut\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise ici : \nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Contact
\nThis block will automatically clear after you have read it. It is placed to interrupt your current import, which I will revert because it will be partially complete.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
\u0428\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043d\u0456\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0443\u0432\u0430\u0447 RiderUA,
\n\u0412\u043e\u0441\u044c\u043c\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0442\u0430 \u0434\u0435\u0432'\u044f\u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0441\u043d\u044f 2013 \u0440\u043e\u043a\u0443 \u0432\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u0431\u0443\u043b\u043e \u0437\u0440\u043e\u0431\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043e \u0440\u044f\u0434 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a \u0443 \u041e\u0421\u041c \u0437 \u0432\u043d\u0435\u0441\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f\u043c \u0440\u0435\u043a\u043b\u0430\u043c\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0456\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0456\u0457. \u0414\u043e\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0434\u043d\u0456\u0448\u0435, \u0432\u0438 \u0432\u043d\u0435\u0441\u043b\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043a\u0438 \u0443 \u0442\u0435\u0491\u0438 name \u0456 \u0434\u043e\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0442\u0430\u043a\u0442\u043d\u0438 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u0456 \u0444\u0456\u0440\u043c\u0438, \u044f\u043a\u0430 \u043e\u0447\u0435\u0432\u0438\u0434\u043d\u043e \u0437\u0430\u0439\u043c\u0430\u0454\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \u0437\u0435\u043c\u043b\u0435\u0443\u043f\u043e\u0440\u044f\u0434\u043d\u0438\u0446\u044c\u043a\u043e\u044e \u0434\u0456\u044f\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0456\u0441\u0442\u044e.
\n\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u0438\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0434:
\nlanduse = farm\n name = \u0421\u0422\"\u041f\u0440\u043e\u043b\u0456\u0441\u043e\u043a\" \u041f\u0440\u0438\u0441\u0432.\u043a\u0430\u0434\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0440.\u043d\u043e\u043c\u0435\u0440\u0443 \u041c\u041a\u0411\u041f\"\u0413\u0435\u043e\u0440\u0430\u0434\" (044)501-55-97
\n\u0422\u0430\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0440\u043e\u0434\u0443 \u0456\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0456\u044f \u043d\u0435 \u0454 \u043d\u0430\u043b\u0435\u0436\u043d\u043e\u044e \u0443 \u041e\u0421\u041c, \u043e\u0442\u0436\u0435 \u0432\u0435\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0445\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0434\u043e \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u0432\u0438\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0442\u0438 \u0446\u0456 \u0442\u0435\u0491\u0438 \u043d\u0430\u0439\u0431\u043b\u0438\u0436\u0447\u0438\u043c \u0447\u0430\u0441\u043e\u043c, \u0442\u0430 \u0432\u0438\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0442\u0438 \u0440\u0435\u043a\u043b\u0430\u043c\u0443. \u0426\u0435 \u0431\u0430\u0436\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0437\u0440\u043e\u0431\u0438\u0442\u0438 \u044f\u043a \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0456 \u043d\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043d\u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043a\u0438.
\n\u0426\u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043a\u0438 \u0440\u0435\u043a\u043b\u0430\u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0445\u0430\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0443 \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0438\u043d\u0430\u044e\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \u0437 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/17727773 \u0442\u0430 \u0437\u0430\u043a\u0456\u043d\u0447\u0443\u044e\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/17749611
\n\u0404\u0432\u0433\u0435\u043d \u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\n\u0412\u0456\u0434 \u0456\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0456 Data Working Group
\nDear user RiderUA,
\n8th and 9th of September you performed series of changes in OSM and added advertisement information. To be specific, you altered name tags and added contact information of a firm which apparently is involved in cadastre registration.
\nFor example:
\nlanduse = farm\n name = \u0421\u0422\"\u041f\u0440\u043e\u043b\u0456\u0441\u043e\u043a\" \u041f\u0440\u0438\u0441\u0432.\u043a\u0430\u0434\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0440.\u043d\u043e\u043c\u0435\u0440\u0443 \u041c\u041a\u0411\u041f\"\u0413\u0435\u043e\u0440\u0430\u0434\" (044)501-55-97
\nSuch information does not belong to OSM, so please fix the tags in nearest time and remove the advertisement. It is preferable to do it as your next edits.
\nThese changes start with http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/17727773 and end at http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/17749611
\nEugene Sandulenko\nFor the Data Working Group
\n\u0428\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0443\u0432\u0430\u0447 NexUrs!
\n\u0412\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0454\u0434\u043d\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0441\u044f \u0434\u043e \u0441\u043f\u0456\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0442\u0438 \u041e\u0421\u041c, \u0456 \u0446\u0435 \u0434\u0443\u0436\u0435 \u0447\u0443\u0434\u043e\u0432\u043e!
\n\u0410\u043b\u0435 \u0432\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u0441\u0432\u043e\u044e \u0440\u043e\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0443 \u0437 \u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e, \u0449\u043e \u0432\u0438 \"\u0432\u0438\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0454\u0442\u0435\" \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0443 \u043f\u0456\u0434 \u0441\u0443\u043f\u0443\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0456 \u0437\u043d\u0456\u043c\u043a\u0438. \u0426\u0435 \u043d\u0435 \u0454 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0438\u043c, \u0446\u0438\u043c \u0432\u0438 \u043f\u0441\u0443\u0454\u0442\u0435 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0443 \u0456 \u0446\u0435 \u0440\u043e\u0437\u0446\u0456\u043d\u044e\u0454\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \u044f\u043a \u0432\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0456\u0437\u043c. \u0411\u0443\u0434\u044c-\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043a\u0430, \u043f\u0440\u0438\u043f\u0438\u043d\u0456\u0442\u044c.
\n\u0411\u0456\u043b\u044c\u0448\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e \u0437\u043c\u0456\u0449\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0437\u043d\u0456\u043c\u043a\u0456\u0432 \u0432\u0438 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0443 \u0437\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043d\u0438\u043c \u043f\u043e\u0441\u0438\u043b\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f\u043c:
\nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Imagery_Offset_Database
\n\u0422\u0430\u043a\u043e\u0436 \u0437\u0430\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0448\u0443\u044e \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u0432\u0438\u0439\u0442\u0438 \u043d\u0430 \u0437\u0432'\u044f\u0437\u043e\u043a \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0444\u043e\u0440\u0443\u043c\u0456:
\nhttp://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=40
\n\u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0404\u0432\u0433\u0435\u043d,\n\u0412\u0456\u0434 \u0456\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0456 Data Working Group
\nDear user NexUrs,
\nYou joined OSM community and it is a great thing!
\nHowever you started your work with moving objects to match satellite imaginery. This is not correct, and you're damaging the map by this and it is considered as vandalism. Please stop this.
\nMore about the imaginery offset could be read at the following link:
\nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Imagery_Offset_Database
\nAlso I invite you to connect with the community on the ukrainian forum:
\nhttp://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=40
\nEugene Sandulenko\nIn behalf of Data Working Group
\n\u0423\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c NexUrs,
\n\u041a\u0430\u043a \u0431\u044b\u043b\u043e \u0443\u043a\u0430\u0437\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0432 \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u044b\u0434\u0443\u0449\u0435\u043c \u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c\u043c\u0435, \u0432\u044b \u043d\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u0434 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0435, \u043c\u0430\u0441\u0441\u043e\u0432\u043e \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435\u0449\u0430\u044f \u043e\u0431\u044a\u0435\u043a\u0442\u044b. \u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043d\u0435 \u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u0439\u0442\u0435 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0438 \u0432\u044b\u0439\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u044c \u0441 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c.
\n\u041d\u0430 \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u043d\u0430\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0434\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0431\u043b\u043e\u043a\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u043a\u0430 \u043d\u0430 48 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u043e\u0432. \u0412 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u0442 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0438\u043e\u0434, \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0436\u0438\u0442\u0435\u0441\u044c \u0441 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c \u043d\u0430 \u0444\u043e\u0440\u0443\u043c\u0435.
\n\u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0415\u0432\u0433\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439\nData Working Group
\nDear user NexUrs,
\nAs it was mentioned in the previous message, you're damaging the map by mass moving the objects. Please stop doing this and talk to the community.
\nA block for 48 hours is put on you. During this period please connect with the community on the forums.
\nEugene Sandulenko\nData Working Group
\n\u0423\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c OsVit, \u043e\u043d \u0436\u0435 NexUrs,
\n\u041f\u043e\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043d\u0430\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044c\u0431\u0430 \u043d\u0435 \u0434\u0432\u0438\u0433\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0431\u044a\u0435\u043a\u0442\u044b \u043f\u043e\u0434 \u041a\u0430\u0434\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0440. \u0423 \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u043d\u0435\u0442 \u043e\u0444\u0438\u0446\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u044d\u0442\u0438 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0432 \u041e\u0421\u041c, \u0430 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u0442\u043e, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0432\u044b \u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435, \u043d\u0435 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u0435\u0442 \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438.
\n\u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u044c\u0442\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0443.
\n\u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0415\u0432\u0433\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439\nData Working Group
\nHallo Donanob,
\nDu hast eine grosse Anzahl \"Notes\" als erledigt markiert, obwohl sie gar nicht erledigt waren. Eventuell war das ein Missverstaendnis - wenn Du diese Note als erledigt markierst, sind sie fuer alle \"erledigt\" und niemand wird sich mehr darum kuemmern. Das ist natuerlich nicht erwuenscht - erst derjenige, der einen Fehler behebt (oder feststellt, dass er bereits behoben ist), sollte den als \"erledigt\" markieren.
\nBitte achte in Zukunft darauf!
\nDanke
\nFrederik Ramm
\nF\u00fcr die OSMF Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nI previously contacted you to remind you about the requirement for imports in OSM to be done in consultation with the local community and the imports@ mailing list. You did not reply.
\nSince then you have begun to import again with badly converted data with tags like AREA_PLANE = 3.
\nI will go ahead and revert these latest imports and please follow the import guidelines.
\nThis block will last until you have logged on to ensure you have read it.
\nThe Data Working group can be contacted at data@osmfoundation.org
\nPaul Norman\nfor the Data Working Group
\nLong term block for repeatedly breaking existing data and not following DWG's request to stop.
\nLieber Benutzer Fidibus21,
\nDu hast zum wiederholten Male Wege, die von mir offiziell in meiner Rolle als Mitglieder der OSMF \"Data Working Group\" wiederhergestellt worden waren, wieder gel\u00f6scht. Gespr\u00e4chsangeboten der Community bist Du ausgewichen.
\nDies ist eine letzte Ermahnung: Bitte nimm zur Kenntnis, dass wir JEDE weitere Datenl\u00f6schung von Dir als Vandalismus behandeln und Deinen Account permanent sperren werden.
\nWenn Du der Ansicht bist, dass irgendwelche Daten gel\u00f6scht werden m\u00fcssen, dann setze Dich mit der Data Working Group unter data@osmfoundation.org in Verbindung. Wir entscheiden dann, ob die Daten gel\u00f6scht werden oder nicht. Unsere Entscheidung ist endg\u00fcltig.
\nBitte sieh in jedem Falle von jeglicher weiterer Datenl\u00f6schung ab. Die wiederholte L\u00f6schung von Daten gegen den erkl\u00e4rten Willen des Projektbetreibers kann in Deutschland ein Straftatbestand sein (\u00a7303a StGB).
\nF\u00fcr die Data Working Group\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nHello,
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and imports@ and be documented on the wiki. This was not done here.
\nThis data is severely broken in numerous ways. I have begun to revert it.
\nThis block has been placed to ensure that you read this message before editing again. It will disappear when read.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Dear dubf,
\nyour recent changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/18279179 looks like a data import.
\nOpenStreetMap has strict rules on data imports; you have to discuss and document them before you can make an import (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import).
\nWe can't find any discussion or documentation, nor any mention of the data source, for this changeset.
\nPlease explain.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group.
Dear Sverre Didriksen,
\nyour recent changesets http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/18302344 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/18302843 looks like data imports.
\nOpenStreetMap has strict rules on data imports; you have to discuss and document them before you can make an import (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import).
\nWe can't find any discussion or documentation, nor any mention of the data source, for this changeset.
\nPlease explain.
\nThank you\nPaul Norman
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group.
Dear Tyrfing,
\nyour recent changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/18309561 looks like a data import.
\nOpenStreetMap has strict rules on data imports; you have to discuss and document them before you can make an import (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import). This includes consulting the imports@ mailing list.
\nPlease explain.
\nThank you
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group.
Dear user Quercus1,
\ni am writing to you on behalf of OSMF's Data Working Group which deals with disputes and vandalism.
\nYou have made a number of unusual contributions to the map in the UK, often deleting correct and valuable information that had been added to the database by others before you. Your changeset comments often seem out of place (e.g. you label something \"this is an area of unused land\" when the edit that you made was in an inner-city area). Apart from deleting existing data, your edits often don't make sense in that you add objects but don't tag them so nobody knows what your edit is supposed to mean.
\nI am sure these problems arise from some kind of mistake or misunderstanding, and not from any malicious intent on your part.
\nI must however ask you to pause your edits now, and either read up on how OpenStreetMap is supposed to work, or seek help from those who contribute frequently. If you want you can read our beginner's guide on the Wiki, or you might want to ask questions on help.openstreetmap.org, or make contact with other UK mappers through the talk-gb mailing list - but please do one of these before you continue, as most of your past edits had to be reverted to repair the damage they did to our database.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
Dear user mdk,
\nyou have made several edits labelled as \"surface fixes\" which seem to violate our automated/mechanical edits policy.
\nYou are not allowed to make world-wide changes where you simply replace one tag with another (or make some other mass change) without discussing this on the relevant mailing lists before.
\nPlease explain what you did in this world-spanning changeset:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/18324696
\nI see that there are indeed a couple of surface fixes, but also something about chain-link fences and geometry changes?
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
Dear user Odiug,
\nyou have made several edits labelled as \"correzione tag telephon\" which seem to violate our automated/mechanical edits policy.
\nYou are not allowed to make world-wide changes where you simply replace one tag with another (or make some other mass change) without discussing this on the relevant mailing lists before.
\nPlease refrain from making such edits in the future, or propose and discuss your edit on the talk or imports list before.
\nI understand that this might seem an overly strict rule but mechanical edits can cause a lot of problems - that's why we don't wont people to simply do what they think is good, but instead talk to others before they run them.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
Dear user AHTOH,
\nyou have used Google imagery in your recent contributions with the iD editor. Please note that OpenStreetMap does not have permission to use Google imagery, and any changesets you contribute using that imagery will have to be removed!
\nPlease use the Bing imagery instead.
\nBest regards
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
Dear Jack Pham,
\nyou have imported a large city data set which duplicated existing OSM information and had to be removed again.
\nYou then proceeded to import large sets of un-used nodes, e.g. here
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/18400967
\nPlease stop doing any kind of automated imports like that, unless you discussed them in detail on the \"imports\" mailing list beforehand.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
This block has been placed to ensure you read the message sent about not importing without following the import guidelines. It will automatically be lifted when you have read it. My original message is reproduced below
\nHello,
\nI noticed you conducting an import with
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and imports@ and be documented on the wiki. This was not done here.
\nThis import was not done from a dedicated account
\nNeither the imports@ list nor talk-us@ were contacted
\nThere are obvious tagging problems
\nThere is no wiki documentation
\nBecause of these problems I'm going to go ahead and revert these imports.
\nYou may want to contact the imports-us@ mailing list who may be able to offer technical support to help you.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Blocked for repeated problematic edits without consultation. Please follow up on previous block.
\nTemporary block for investigation
\nAccountsperrung wegen Angek\u00fcndigung von Vandalismus.
\nGabe Marcus, you have created a large number of roads all over the Southern part of North America, as well as in the ocean. These roads do not exist, and therefore qualify as vandalism under (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism)
\nYou may or not be aware that OpenStreetMap only maps features which exist and are verifiable on the ground, which your edits do not qualify as, so they've been removed.
\nIn addition, I'm going to lock your account so that you have to read this (and the block message, which will be similar).
\nIf you continue to map with the project, please only map features which actually exist on the ground.
\nI am placing this block on you so that you read this message (as well as the one I sent to you privately), so that you can know what you should and should not be adding to OpenStreetMap.
\nThe block will last two days so that we have long enough to revert all your non-existing road edits. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to email the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org
\nHello virus_galymzhan,
\nYou recently deleted a large amount of data in Kazakhstan. Deleting data like this is vandalism and will need to be reverted.
\nCould you explain the reasons for their edits. Continued vandalism may lead to permanant account closure.
\nAdditionally, for any future edits use good changeset comments
\nIt would help if you participated in the Kazakhstan OSM community: http://www.gpsclub.kz/index.php?showtopic=1859&st=1460. Please discuss mass edits with them to avoid issues.
\n\u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u0439\u0442\u0435. \u041d\u0435\u0434\u0430\u0432\u043d\u043e \u0432\u044b \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0432 \u041a\u0430\u0437\u0430\u0445\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0435. \u041f\u043e\u0434\u043e\u0431\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043c\u0430\u0441\u0441\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0435 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u2014\u00a0\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0437\u043c, \u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0442\u0440\u0435\u0431\u0443\u044e\u0442 \u043e\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0442\u0430.
\n\u041d\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0438 \u0431\u044b \u0432\u044b \u043e\u0431\u044a\u044f\u0441\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0447\u0438\u043d\u044b \u0441\u0432\u043e\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a? \u0414\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0435\u0439\u0448\u0438\u0435 \u043d\u0435\u043e\u0431\u043e\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043a\u0438 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0445\u0430\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0430 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u0443\u0442 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u043a \u0431\u043b\u043e\u043a\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u043a\u0435 \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0435\u0439 \u0443\u0447\u0451\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0437\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0438 \u043d\u0430 \u043d\u0435\u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0451\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u0441\u0440\u043e\u043a.
\n\u0422\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435, \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443\u0439\u0442\u0435 \u0431\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0435 \u043e\u0441\u043c\u044b\u0441\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0438 \u043a \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0442\u0430\u043c \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments
\n\u0422\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u0445\u043e\u0442\u0438\u043c \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u0432 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e \u043a\u0430\u0437\u0430\u0445\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432 OpenStreetMap: http://www.gpsclub.kz/index.php?showtopic=1859&st=1460 \u0412\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044b \u043c\u0430\u0441\u0441\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a \u043b\u0443\u0447\u0448\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u0443\u0436\u0434\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0441 \u043d\u0438\u043c\u0438, \u0447\u0442\u043e\u0431\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u0432\u043e\u0437\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0437\u0438\u0438.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
You have imported buildings in NYC in a way that shows you are not reviewing the areas.
\nPart of the review process requires that you manually review each and every building against the imagery and do a sanity check for the addresses.
\nIn the future, please adhere to these requirements.
\nIf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact data@osmfoundation.org
\nDear user nuklearerWintersturm_import,
\nI note that you have been importing large amounts of CanVec data in the past two days. Could you please, before continuing, contact data@osmfoundation.org and explain what process you were using to do the import? Where did you download data from, what software did you use, how did you coordinate with others, etc.
\nThanks
\nFrederik Ramm
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
Dear user Minimalis_import,
\nwould you please, before continuing any of your imports, e-mail data@osmfoundation.org and explain how you have conformed to our import guidelines (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import)? I couldn't find any discussion about your proposed import on the imports@ list and the source of your data is unclear.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
You were asked about your review process of the NYC buildings via message and you have not responded.
\nYou are importing buildings faster than you could possibly be reviewing them. You need to manually review each building against the imagery and for address sanity before uploading to OSM.
\nIf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.
\nDear user ChristoffPretorius,
\nyour account has been temporarily blocked for un-discussed and erroneous mass imports which will be reverted. Please talk to data@osmfoundation.org before you make any further contributions.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group.
Dear user Angrycat,
\nI am writing to you in my function as a member of OSMF's data working group that deals with edit conflicts and vandalism.
\nSeveral mappers in Russia have complained about your edits which seem to remove or break valuable information. You are removing tags and breaking geometries.
\nPlease consult with the Russian community, or alternatively write to data@osmfoundation.org and explain what you're doing.
\nYou can also have a look at http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=381745#p381745 for more background.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
Hello
\nI noticed you conducting an import with http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/19188153
\namong others
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account.
\nThese imports were not done from a dedicated account.
\nI would suggest that the dedicated account
\nand
\nIgnoring this and continuing to import from your main account may lead to a block.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nJ'ai remarqu\u00e9 que vous avez effectu\u00e9 une importation avec les changesets \nsuivants http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/19188153
\nLes r\u00e8gles actuelles sur les importations de donn\u00e9es n\u00e9cessitent qu'elles \nsoient faites \u00e0 partir d'un compte d\u00e9di\u00e9 (s\u00e9par\u00e9 de votre compte habituel), \napr\u00e8s consultation avec la communaut\u00e9 locale et \u00eatre document\u00e9s sur le wiki.
\nVos importations n'ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 faites \u00e0 partir d'un compte d\u00e9di\u00e9.
\nJe vous sugg\u00e8re que ce compte d\u00e9di\u00e9
\net
\nPour me contacter, vous pouvez r\u00e9pondre \u00e0 ce message ou envoyer un courriel \u00e0 \ndata@osmfoundation.org
\nPs: Notez que je ne parle pas fran\u00e7ais et que ce message a \u00e9t\u00e9 traduit par un \nautre contributeur. Pour toute remarque (en fran\u00e7ais) concernant mon message, \nvous pouvez prendre contact avec la communaut\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise ici : \nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Contact
\nThis block will automatically remove itself when you have read it.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Hello, osmmaker
\nYou have ignored previous block messages and have continued importing. Please contact data@osmfoundation.org to explain why you are repeatedly disregarding the import requirements.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or email the data working group
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Dear Anarchiste F23,
\nI have removed a number of fictional edits that you made in Libya. Please note that all edits you make on OpenStreetMap are visible to everyone; we can only accept truthful edits that correspond to real things on the ground!
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
Lieber User bugsymelone,
\nDu hast in Berlin einen groesseren Datensatz Adressen hochgeladen. Erstens sind viele davon doppelt, zweitens gibt es Tagging-Fehler, drittens sind Datenimporte in OpenStreetMap nur nach vorheriger Diskussion des Vorhabens auf den einschlaegigen Mailinglisten oder in den Foren erlaubt - vor allem, damit technische und lizenzrechtliche Bedenken ausgeraeumt werden koennen.
\nBitte lies auf jeden Fall https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Import/Guidelines, bevor Du wieder einmal einen Import vornimmst.
\nEine Diskussion zum Import findest Du auch hier:
\nhttp://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=23516
\nDu bist schon frueher durch solche Aktionen aufgefallen (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/17907226), bei denen die Community hinter Dir \"aufraeumen\" musste.
\nAuch Dein gestriger Import muss wieder entfernt werden.
\nViele Gruesse
\nFrederik Ramm
\nfuer die OSMF Data Working Group
Hi fuztownsendseller
\nI am writing to you in my function as a member of OSMF's data working group that deals with edit conflicts and vandalism.
\nYou seem to be spamming OSM. OSM is not the place for non-factual self promotional data.
\nThank you\nGrant\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
\nDear user Manu1400
\nyou are making a large number of changesets that span the whole world, with what seems like mechanically changing some tags into others. Please contact data@osmfoundation.org about this; such large-scale changes require prior discussion. Do not continue until we have discussed the issue.
\nThank you\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck
\nfor the OSMF data working group
Hello,
\nI noticed you conducting an import with changesets like http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19487772
\nThe import guidelines require that imports be done from a dedicated account, after consultation with the local community and imports@ and be documented on the wiki. This was not done here.
\n** This import was not done from a dedicated account. **
\n** Neither the imports@ list nor talk-pl@ were contacted **
\n** There are obvious tagging problems (multiple houses in one multipolygon, house constructed out of many two-node ways, individual nodes tagged building=yes etc.) **
\n** There is no wiki documentation **
\nBecause of these problems I'm going to go ahead and revert these imports.
\nYou may want to contact the imports@ mailing list who may be able to offer technical support to help you.
\nTo contact me you can email the data working group.
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nfor the Data Working Group
Hello,
\nYou have been importing data into OSM
\nAlthough you may of thought that this was associated with an import that has been consulted on, there are substantial differences between what you have done and the UNICEF health facilities data import proposed in April 2013.
\nIn particular
\nYou are lacking changeset tags as described in the consultation
There are new tags not described in the proposal
Do not continue to import this data while these problems exist.
\nGabriel1221, you are continuing to create fictional data. This is vandalism and was explained in your previous block.
\nPlease contact the Data Working group at data@osmfoundation.org to explain why you continue to add fictional data.
\nLack of comments, appear to be a previously blocked user, questionable user, please contact data@openstreetmapfoundation.org
\nYou are performing an import without following the Import Guidelines. Please contact data@openstreetmapfoundation.org
\nYou are continuing to do imports even after being asked to stop by the DWG. Please contact data@openstreetmapfoundation.org.
\nGabriel1221, you are continuing to create fictional data. This is vandalism and was explained in your previous block.
\nPlease contact the Data Working group at data@osmfoundation.org to explain why you continue to add fictional data.
\n(refreshing http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/426)
\nYou are continuing to import despite being asked not to, having a block placed on you and having been explicitly told by not less than three DWG members.
\nStop importing data until any import has been approved by the community as per the Import Guidelines and send a list of your import changesets to data@openstreetmapfoundation.org
\nIf you do not, then the DWG will have to remove any changesets it deems suspicious of being involved in the import. In addition, if you continue to disregard these requests, you risk your account being locked.
\nYou are a well known, well regarded member of the community, so we would like to avoid needing to take these steps, so please comply with the import guidelines and help us resolve this situation.
\nWampcia, you have refused to respond to reasonable requests at communication from other mappers and the DWG.
\nPlease respond to our messages in an constructive and reasonable manner or contact the Data Working group at data@osmfoundation.org to explain your actions.
\nDear user Evoluon,
\nplease stop vandalising OpenStreetMap. Whatever your feelings towards this \"Rutte\", OpenStreetMap is not the proper place to express them. We collect verifiable facts, not emotions.
\nPlease understand that ways exist to trace your actions to who you are and where you live. Before you abuse OpenStreetMap next time, think about the consequences if your parents / school / employer starts receiving inquiries about OSM vandalism.
\nBest wishes
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
Dear User DoubleA,
\nI have to block you for repeated, world-wide tag \"corrections\" that you make without the necessary knowledge or discussion with the local community.
\nYou have been told by other users that your edits are not welcome, and I have explained this to you in October, but you do not seem to understand the issue at hand.
\nYou are not the tagging police; you have repeatedly made the situation worse by trying to \"correct\" something of which you knew nothing.
\nPlease stop these types of edits immediately.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
Dear gecho111,
\nyou seem to be importing Canvec data with a speed that is inhuman. Please understand that we expect people importing Canvec data to do at least a basic fact check which you can't be doing if you import as much as you do in as little time!
\nDon't just take Canvec data and dump it into OSM. Please take some time to verify it against imagery and your knowledge of the region. Take some time to make sure features are properly connected at the seams of Canvec tiles. Do it slowly and carefully. You have imported several hundred thousand objects in the past 24 hours - even if you're the best mapper in the world, this can't be right.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nFor the OSMF data working group
Dear user KurzerP/tutto,
\nI am writing to you in my role as a member of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group, which deals with disputes and vandalism in OSM. You have been with OSM for only 2 months and you have already made thousands of deletions, all without a comment.
\nFrom what I can see, the data you are deleting is valid.
\nPlease explain what you are doing and why.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\nOSMF Data Working Group
(Deutsch)
\nHallo KurzerP/tutto,
\nbitte erkl\u00e4re Deine L\u00f6schungen der vergangenen Monate.
\nVielen Dank\nFrederik Ramm\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nDear user Linusbolzano,
\nin a recent message I asked you to please add changeset comments to your edits because other mappers often don't understand your motivation or the reasoning behind your edits.
\nSince you continue to edit in the same vein, and without changeset comments, I repeat my request in this account-blocking message which you will have to read before you can continue mapping. Please comply with this request.
\nSecondly, in the future please respect the South Tyrol naming policy that the community has created, which is the following: The name tag should be \"Italian Name - German Name\" in regions with an Italian majority, and \"German Name - Italian Name\" in regions with a German majority. This is described on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Alto_Adige.2FS.C3.BCdtirol_.28South_Tyrol.29 together with a map showing which regions have which majorities. This map is mandatory until replaced by one based on newer official figures.
\nOf course you are welcome to add \"name:it\" tags to anything that has an Italian name - just the plain \"name\" tag inside South Tyrol must conform to that specification. A lot of your recent edits have violated these rules - changing the name to \"Italian Name - German Name\" even in regions with a German majority - and will be reverted. Under no circumstances should you change them back.
\nIf you would like to discuss this policy with other mappers from South Tyrol, please join the South Tyrol mailing list (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-southtyrol) where you can make your point (in Italian or German).
\nLocal knowledge is valued highly in OpenStreetMap and we welcome yours. However, in situations where your knowledge contradicts seemingly well-established facts, we must ask you to supply a suitable proof or at least explain why you are deviating from the standard. For example, in your edit to this node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2508795633/history you changed the name of the Bolzano city quarter from \"Don Bosco\" to \"San Giovanni Bosco\" even though the linked Wikipedia article clearly speaks of \"Don Bosco\", and the administration themselves use the email address \"donbosco@comune.bolzano.it\". This is the type of edit that absolutely requires an explanation in the changeset comment, or it will be reverted.
\nThere are a number of other edits where you have changed a street name from an Italian version frequently found on the web to a more obscure one; this is not necessarily wrong but you owe it to your fellow mappers to explain it to them instead of trying to \"overrule\" them.
\nPlease respect these rules. Your contributions about Italian names are a welcome and valuable addition to OpenStreetMap and they will improve the map of South Tyrol, but they must harmonise with the community or they will be lost.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
Hello,
\nYou appear to be doing an import of data with these changesets 20480259, 20285859, 20480259, 20481617. These changesets consist of nodes without any normal OSM tags.
\nI'm going to go ahead and delete this bad data. Please do not attempt to re-upload it
\nIf you wish to propose an import, please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines and make sure you follow them.
\nThis block will only last until you have read it by logging on to openstreetmap.org
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
\nHello RAWR,
\nYou have been blocked for vandalism and mechanical edits, apparently for the purpose of boosting your edit count.
\nMechanical edits must only be done after consultation with the community. This was not done here.
Some of your edits have removed meaningful data such as ref tags.
Please contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org to explain your actions
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
Gesperrt wegen kommentarloser L\u00f6schungen trotz vorheriger Aufforderung der DWG, diese zu unterlassen.
\nDear user robbief14,
\nI am sending you this \"blocking\" message because some of your edits are viewed as problematic by other members of the OSM community. On both the talk-au and talk-gb mailing lists, your edits have been questioned and some have even been called vandalism. Especially your re-establishing edits that have been reverted is viewed with concern.
\nSeveral mappers have tried to contact you about your edits and discuss things with you but you have not responded. Please check your OSM inbox, and visit the relevant mailing lists (lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb resp. lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tlak-au) to understand the problems and clear things up.
\nYou can continue editing immediately after you have read this message, and this message does not represent an assignment of blame - it is just becuae we're unsure if you are reading your messages at all.
\nPlease do not continue mapping without addressing the concerns of the community. Also, I must ask you to put a \"changeset comment\" into every edit that you upload from now, in order to improve communication with your fellow mappers.
\nIf you continue to map without respecting the community, we will have to block your account for longer.
\nFor the OSMF Data Working Group
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
Hi denjis,\nI asked you several times to stop uploading fake data. Please stop this behaviour.
\nHenning Scholland\nMember of DataWorkingGroup
\n\u0423\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c x-borz,
\n\u0412\u044b \u0441\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0448\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043c\u0430\u0441\u0441\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0435 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u0441\u0435\u043b\u0451\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u043f\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0442\u043e\u0432 \u0432 \u041a\u0440\u044b\u043c\u0443. \u0421\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u044f\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0441\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0430\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044e, \u0432 \u041e\u0421\u041c \u043c\u044b \u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u0443\u0435\u043c \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0443 \"\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043d\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0437\u0435\u043c\u043b\u0435\", \"truth on the ground\", \u0442.\u0435. \u043e\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043d\u0430\u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u043d\u044b \u0431\u044b\u0442\u044c \u0432\u044b\u0432\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438 \u0438 \u0443\u043a\u0430\u0437\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0438.
\n\u0412\u0432\u0438\u0434\u0443 \u0432\u044b\u0448\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0430\u0437\u0430\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e, \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442\u0435, \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043f\u043e\u044f\u0441\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0447\u0438\u043d\u0443 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439, \u0441\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0432\u0430\u043c\u0438?
\n\u0421 \u0443\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c, \u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0415\u0432\u0433\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439, \u0427\u043b\u0435\u043d Data Working Group
\nLieber User Ratz41,
\nich schreibe Dir in meiner Funktion als Mitglied der Data Working Group der OSMF. Die DWG soll \"Edit Wars\" verhindern und Konflikte zwischen Mappern l\u00f6sen helfen.
\nDu scheinst seit l\u00e4ngerem relativ unverzagt und ohne weitere Verifikation Wege aus der DTK10 abzuzeichnen, die oftmals - so behaupten Nutzer mit Ortskenntnis - gar nicht existieren. Im Forum gibt es dazu eine Diskussion
\nhttp://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=404662#p404662
\nund einige Nutzer haben Dich auch schon deswegen angeschrieben.
\nSicherlich willst Du mit Deiner Arbeit nur das Beste f\u00fcr OSM, aber wenn Du auf die z.T. berechtigten Einw\u00e4nde Deiner Mit-Mapper nicht eingehst und weiter \"blind\" Wege abzeichnest, die Du nicht anhand eigener Kenntnis oder einer anderen Quelle \u00fcberpr\u00fcfst, so ist es m\u00f6glich, dass alle Deine Beitr\u00e4ge im betroffenen Gebiet entfernt werden. Dann w\u00e4re die ganze Arbeit f\u00fcr die Katz.
\nBitte diskutiere, bevor Du mit dieser Art Mapping fortf\u00e4hrst, den Sachverhalt mit den anderen im o.g. Forums-Thread und einigt Euch auf das weitere Vorgehen.
\nDiese Nachricht hat blockierenden Charakter; Du musst Dich erst bei OSM einloggen und sie lesen, bevor Dein Account wieder zum Editieren freigegeben ist.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck\nOSMF Data Working Group
\n\u0423\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c q3137!
\n\u0412\u043d\u0438\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 Data Working Group \u0431\u044b\u043b\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u043b\u0435\u0447\u0435\u043d\u043e \u043a \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0438\u043c \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043a\u0430\u043c, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u043e\u0447\u0435\u043d\u044c \u043f\u043e\u0445\u043e\u0436\u0438 \u043d\u0430 \u0438\u043c\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442.
\n\u041c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442\u0435, \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043f\u043e\u044f\u0441\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0438\u043a\u043e\u043c \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0438\u0445 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445, \u0431\u044b\u043b\u043e \u043b\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0435\u043d\u043e \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u0438\u043c\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442 \u0432 \u041e\u0421\u041c. \u041e\u0447\u0435\u043d\u044c \u0432\u0430\u0436\u043d\u043e, \u0447\u0442\u043e\u0431\u044b \u043b\u044e\u0431\u043e\u0439 \u0438\u043c\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043b \u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u044f\u0442\u044b\u043c \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0430\u043c: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_guidelines
\n\u0415\u0441\u043b\u0438 \u043b\u0438\u0446\u0435\u043d\u0437\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0447\u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0442\u0430 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u043d\u0435 \u0431\u0443\u0434\u0435\u0442 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0430, \u043a \u0441\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044e, \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0434\u0451\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0438\u0437 \u0431\u0430\u0437\u044b \u041e\u0421\u041c \u0432\u0441\u0435 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u0432\u044b \u0437\u0430\u0433\u0440\u0443\u0437\u0438\u043b\u0438.
\n\u0415\u0432\u0433\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e Data Working Group
\nDear user q3137,
\nData Working Group attention was drawn to your edits which look like an import.
\nCould you please clarify the data source which you're using, did you receive permission for importing to OSM. Also it is very important to follow the guidelines: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_guidelines
\nIf the license will not be clarified for this import, unfortunately we will have to redact your data from OSM.
\nEugene Sandulenko\nData Working Group
\nDear user ingalls,
\nLooking at your most recent changesets from 20 days ago, you have been making mass edits of roads in the US, and as you have done so, you have removed TIGER tags from these roads. There is no reason to remove existing TIGER data tags from roads, and removing potentially useful data from OSM is not a generally accepted practice.
\nIn addition, the changeset comments for these edits (which can include hundreds of roads) is vague \"Fort Hood Traces & TIGER Corrections\".
\nChangset comments should be descriptive and explain what has been done. On smaller edits this matters less, when the work is obvious, but in your case, you are making dozens or hundreds of road changes at a time, it is difficult to understand what you have changed and why.
\nYour contributions are important, and your passion for contributing to New York City is particularly valuable, but you must refrain from making mass tag changes, and you must use helpful changeset commments in the future.
\nThank you\nSerge Wroclawski a.k.a. emacsen\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
\nDear User Linusbolzano,
\nyou are blocked from editing OpenStreetMap because you consistently ignore DWG messages. You're still not using changeset comments but you have not stopped making controversial edits - most of all, replacing German names with Italian ones without adhering to the local convention of keeping names bi-lingual.
\nPlease write to data@osmfoundation.org to discuss the matter before you continue mapping. If you continue without listening to us then we will have revert your edits.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nfor the OSMF data working group
\u0423\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c Gnork,
\n\u0412\u044b \u0441\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0448\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043c\u0430\u0441\u0441\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0435 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u0441\u0435\u043b\u0451\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u043f\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0442\u043e\u0432 \u0432 \u041a\u0440\u044b\u043c\u0443. \u0421\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u044f\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0441\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0430\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044e, \u0432 \u041e\u0421\u041c \u043c\u044b \u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u0443\u0435\u043c \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0443 \"\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043d\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0437\u0435\u043c\u043b\u0435\", \"truth on the ground\", \u0442.\u0435. \u043e\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043d\u0430\u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u043d\u044b \u0431\u044b\u0442\u044c \u0432\u044b\u0432\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438 \u0438 \u0443\u043a\u0430\u0437\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0438.
\n\u0412\u0432\u0438\u0434\u0443 \u0432\u044b\u0448\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0430\u0437\u0430\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e, \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442\u0435, \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043f\u043e\u044f\u0441\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0447\u0438\u043d\u0443 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439, \u0441\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0432\u0430\u043c\u0438?
\n\u0421 \u0443\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c, \u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0415\u0432\u0433\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439, \u0427\u043b\u0435\u043d Data Working Group
\nzhvlints,
\nYou are an older mapper on the project who has made hundreds of edits to OSM. For that the project thanks you, and I thank you, as senior members are highly valued in our communtinty.
\nUnfortunately, you continue to edit national boundaries such as:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171255708
\nYou have been warned about editing nation boundaries, and this boundary in particular, and have been asked to contact the DWG if you had any questions. Instead, you have decided to ignore my warning and edit the boundary anyway, despite several emails asking you not to.
\nThese kinds of edits can (and have in the past) created international incidents and put the project at risk. I am therefore placing a 24 hour block on your account.
\nRegarding international boundaries, see:\nhttp://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf
\nRegarding this particular boundary, see: \nhttp://shtosm.ru/all/chto-s-krymom/
\nIn addition, many of your changesets have no useful comments. In the future, please use meaningful changeset comments.
\nFailure to comply to these requests may result in further bans or more permanent action, which I think we would both like to avoid.
\nIf you have any questions, please contact data@osmfoundation.org
\nHello digital0533,
\nYou are conducting a mechanical edit. In OpenStreetMap mechanical edits can only be done after appropriate consultation, which was not done here.
\nPlease contact the data working group at data@osmfoundation.org before doing any more mechanical edits.
\nThis block will last at least 24 hours to give time to review all of the changesets involved and revert them.
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
\n\u0423\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c Dinamik
\n\u0412\u044b \u0443\u0436\u0435 \u0432 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0448\u043b\u043e\u043c \u0437\u0430\u043d\u0438\u043c\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0441\u044c \u0440\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0446 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0437\u043d\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0442\u0435\u0440\u0440\u0438\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0439. \u0425\u043e\u0447\u0443 \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u043f\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0432\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \u043e\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043e\u0431\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0439 \u043f\u043e \u043e\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044e \u043a \u041a\u0440\u044b\u043c\u0443 \u043f\u043e \u043a\u0440\u0430\u0439\u043d\u0435\u0439 \u043c\u0435\u0440\u0435 \u0434\u043e 1-\u0433\u043e \u0438\u044e\u043d\u044f.
\n\u041d\u0430 \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u043d\u0430\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0434\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0431\u043b\u043e\u043a\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u043a\u0430 \u043d\u0430 24 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0430. \u0412 \u0441\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0430\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439, \u043e\u043d\u0430 \u0431\u0443\u0434\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0430.
\n\u0421 \u0443\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c,\n\u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0415\u0432\u0433\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439\nData Working Group
\nDear user Dinamik
\nIn the past you already were editing border of partially recognized states. I would like to ask you to abstain from similar practices in regards of Crimea at least till 1st of June.
\nI'm putting a 24 hours block on you. In case of repeated actions in this regard, the block will be extended.
\nRegards,\nEugene Sandulenko\nData Working Group
\nDear user dbisping,
\nyou have received messages by other members of the OSM community about problems with your edits that, for example, break the connectivity of bus routes.
\nThe problems have also been discussed publicly, here: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2014-March/015924.html
\nHowever you have neither responded to these messages, nor have you stopped making these mistakes, so I am sending you this \"blocking\" message which you will be forced to read before you can continue editing.
\nPlease take heed of the messages that other community members send to you; they're usually not without reason.
\nIt would also greatly help if you could add \"changeset comments\" to your edits (see the Wiki page about changeset comments).
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear user HoloDuke,
\nplease stop making large-scale bulk edits. They violate our Mechanical Edit Policy - you must discuss such planned edits with the community before they can be executed.
\nBest
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
(In case you don't read french, please ask me for a translation)
\nBonjour Sertyma,
\nJe m'appel sylvain, et je suis membre du groupe DWG : http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group
\nJe suis en charge de la gestion des probl\u00e8mes entre utilisateurs et j'ai \u00e9t\u00e9 contact\u00e9 par un contributeur fran\u00e7ais m'indiquant que vous \u00e9tiez en train de fermer des \"notes\" de mani\u00e8re importante sans vraiment de justification ou sans en discuter d'abord.
\nOn peut tout \u00e0 fait consid\u00e9rer que de nombreuses notes ne sont pas vraiment utiles et qu'elles seraient mieux ferm\u00e9es, mais c'est quand m\u00eame pr\u00e9f\u00e9rable d'en discuter d'abord avec les autres utilisateurs.
\nMerci donc de prendre contact avec la communaut\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise avant de retirer de nouvelles \"notes\", soit sur le forum : http://forum.openstreetmap.fr soit sur la liste de diffusion https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
\nCordialement,
\njuste un test
\nDear user digital0533,
\ndespite a previous block from the Data Working Group, you are continuing to make un-discussed mass edits to OSM. You have recently imported large numbers of POIs without following the import guidelines - these imports will have to be reverted.
\nUnder no circumstances should you continue to make any automated edits in OSM, either modifications or imports without following the community guidelines. These are not welcome in OSM.
\nThank you\nFrederik Ramm \nOSMF Data Working Group
\nDear user bryanpiczon,
\nyou have recently made a number of questionable edits to OSM, mostly adding fictional data - examples:
\nOther mappers have contacted you about these problematic edits but you chose not to reply. Neither have you used changeset comments that would explain the nature of these edits if they are not vandalism.
\nPlease:
\nThis is a short term account block that serves just to make sure that you read this message before you continue; you are free to edit immediately after reading the message. However should we receive further complaints about you then we might have to consider a longer block.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group.
Dear user luisfelipevieirademedeiros,
\nplease stop deleting data without at least explaining, in your changeset comments, why you think the data must be deleted.
\nPlease also stop responding with profanities to messages sent by fellow mappers.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm
\nFor the OSMF Data Working Group
Dear user sorein,
\nplease stop your wanton downgrades of highway types in Romania. The community has made an effort to explain why you shouldn't do it but you seem to be unwilling to compromise. Your changes have been reverted.
\nThis is the third time that we have had complaints from the Romanian community about abusive behaviour on your part.
\nPlease be advised that if this continues, you could be blocked for a longer time, or excluded from OSM indefinitely. You have to learn to work with the mappers around you and if you cannot do that then your contributions to OSM are seriously diminished in value, no matter how \"correct\" they might be.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
PS: Any correspondence to my personal account will be disregarded. Please email data@osmfoundation.org if you have anything to say.
\nBlocked for repeated adding of fictional data.
\nDear User Janbolat,
\nyou have made a number of fictional edits to the area of Kyzylorda, Kazakhstan.
\nPlease understand that OpenStreetMap is only intended to map real things that exist on the ground.
\nWe had to remove your edits, along with those of these other people who seem to have edited in the same area, often creating fictional items as well:
\nYour contributions to OpenStreetMap are welcome but they must remain factual.
\nIf you are part of a school class or other learning project, please relay this message to your teacher/instructor, and ask them to contact data@osmfoundation.org for details.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Sorin,
\nAs per our email discussion through the DWG, your edits have been very contentious, and in addition, your behavior towards your fellow OpenStreetMap contributors has been unacceptable, including the use of name calling, personal insults, etc. These two factors are the cause of your current ban.
\nIn addition, any future edits you make must include a meaningful changeset comment related to the edit you are making. Failure to do so will cause your account to be blocked again, and possibly banned in the future.
\nIf you have any questions, you can contact the DWG.
\nSorin,
\nYou have been repeatedly asked to add comments to your changesets in order to allow others to see what you are editing and work collaboratively.
\nIn changeset 22298121 you made a large number of edits, including moving POIs, changing object geometries and removing a forest.
\nThese kinds of edits are exactly the edits that changeset comments would help on, by helping others understand why you have made the changes you have.
\nIn the future, you need to make meaningful changeset comments so that others who are looking at your edits can understand what has changed and why.
\nIf you have any further questions, you can contact the DWG.
\nYou continue, despite repeated requests, to not specify the object that your notes are about as per github ticket: https://github.com/osmlab/nycbuildings/issues/129
\nSince you are not importing as discussed, I am blocking your account until we can resolve this issue.
\nIf you have any questions, please contact the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org
\nRuben,
\nAs per github issue: https://github.com/osmlab/nycbuildings/issues/129
\nYou should be putting in more descriptive errors on your notes.
\nYou aren't, despite the request.
\nI'm putting a 24 hour block on your account until we can resolve this matter.
\nIf you have any questions, please contact the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org
\nHello,
\nYou have deleted a number of islands in Asia. If intentional, this is vandalism.
\nPlease contact me by message or email data@osmfoundation.org to explain what you were doing and why you deleted what you did.
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
Dear user MarkoIgnjat,
\nI noticed that you have made a number of edits/deletions to boundaries in the Kosovo area. These had to be reverted. Please do not edit these boundaries. If you find that there is something wrong with them, email data@osmfoundation.org and we will investigate it.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
Hello,
\nYou have been intentionally deleting valid data. Doing this is vandalism. If you have an issue you cannot resolve with another user you can contact the Data Working Group, but to go and delete valid data is wrong.
\nTo contact me you can send a message or [email the data working group](data@osmfoundation.org).
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Dear user atpl_pilot,
\njudging from your changeset comments you are using sources that are not compatible with OSM. Please make sure that you only use sources which are suitable - discuss things on the Berlin mailing list when unsure.
\nSadly your past edits will likely have to reverted, at least where these incompatible sources were involved.
\nBest regards
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear user MikeGargiulo,
\nI notice that three months ago, you have mapped something named \"YE OLDE GAMBUTI RESIDENCE\" and tagged as a brothel in Woodstock, New Jersey; and you also have drawn an area marked as swamp and named \"Swamp girl lives here\" (ways 263908488 and 263908486).
\nIt may seem like a harmless joke to you but such actions can tarnish OpenStreetMap as a whole - we are not for graffitti, we are for proper surveying. You have made many other edits that look good at first sight - but how am I to know that there's really a pizza place where you say when you're entering wrong information elsewhere? If we can't trust your edits then we might be forced to remove them all which would be a loss.
\nIn addition to all this, and while I'm not familiar with US laws, I should not be surprised if publicly claiming that someone's house was a brothel could actually incur legal proceedings against you. So don't do it.
\nPlease fix the two objects I have mentioned immediately, and if there are any others where you have taken a playful attitude towards reality, repair them as well.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Sorin,
\nYou have been repeatedly asked to add comments to your changesets in order to allow others to see what you are editing and work collaboratively.
\nIn changeset 22422981 you did not use a changeset comment, despite being asked to.
\nIn the future, you need to make meaningful changeset comments so that others who are looking at your edits can understand what has changed and why. Since this is the third time we have asked you officially to use changeset comments, I am placing a 48 hour block on your account.
\nIf you have any further questions, you can contact the DWG.
\nSerge on behalf of the DWG.
\nHello,
\nYou have ignored my previous message and continued to badly import data into OpenStreetMap.
\nPlease check your messages for more details on the problems.
\nHello jikeben,
\nYou have been repeatedly importing data into OpenStreetMap while ignoring the import guidelines. This has continued dispte my previous message, so I'm left with no option but to place a block.
\nPlease contact the data working group and stop any future imports.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Hello Kostik,
\nI had previously sent you the DWG statement on Crimea. You have ignored that, changing the status of the region contrary to it with a generic unhelpful changeset comment.
\nFor these reasons, I am placing a block on you. Please contact the data working group with an explanation.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Dear user Rovastar,
\njust now you proclaimed on IRC that because the mechanical edit policy was badly written you were ignoring it, and you proceeded to make a provocative edit after giving those currently on IRC 20 minutes to object, just to prove that you stand above the rules.
\nThis is not acceptable.
\nMechanical edits need proper prior discussion. Personally I have no idea if \"crazy golf\" and \"miniature golf\" are the same but it's not a change that you can decide by yourself, and certainly not just to make the point that you can do what you want.
\nAny mechanical edit - meaning an edit where you just look at the tags that something has and decide on a change based on these tags - must be suitably discussed beforehand. If you don't agree, don't make mechanical edits.
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck \nfor the OSMF DWG
\nDear user markmckaytnt,
\nyou - or someone using your account - have/has drawn a large cock and balls on the Chester race course in OpenStreetMap recently:
\n![\"cock](\"http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/cock.png\"/)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/23224139
\nSince your past edits seem legitimate I'll assume this was the puerile humour of someone who grabbed your keyboard while you weren't looking, but please ensure that stuff like that doesn't happen again.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
Sorin,
\nThe DWG has received yet another complaint about your editing in Romania, this time specifically addressing the issue of changeset comments. You have also been asked to use meaningful changeset comments by both the DWG, which, upon your request, was a request that was verified by the Management Team.
\nYet, despite this, and despite having been blocked about this issue in the past, your latest changesets 23415245, 23415198 and 23407726 do not contain any comments. The comments on 23405668 are also not very descriptive, and do not explain why the corrections exist or are an issue, or your source, or anything else to help the DWG sort out the editing conflicts that keep happening in Romania.
\nTherefore, since this is fourth time you have been asked to use meaningful changeset comments, I am placing a four day block on your account.
\nHallo Wulff Wulff,
\nda du auf meine Nachricht vom 23.06. nicht reagiert hast und weiterhin automatische Edits durchf\u00fchrst wurdest der Account erstmal gesperrt.
\nNimm Bitte mit der DataWorkingGroup auf (data@osmfoundation.org) oder aber erkl\u00e4re deine Edits mir in einer OSM-Nachricht.
\nNochmal hier der Hinweis: Solltest du irgendeine Software testen, so nutze bitte die Dev-API und belaste die API nicht mit deinen Testdaten.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe
\nHenning Scholland f\u00fcr die DWG
\nDear Wulff Wulff,\nthere was no reaction to my mail on 23.06. and you continued doing automatic edits. Thats why your account was blocked.
\nPlease get into contact with DataWorkingGroup (data@osmfoundation.org) or send me an mail via OSM and explain your edit.
\nAgain my advice: Do not use the main API for testing any scripts. Therefore you can use the dev-API.
\nRegards,
\nHenning Scholland on behalf of DWG
\nDear ettlohw,
\nplease reply to the message we sent you asking about your unusual mode of editing. You alone have created more changesets in the past month than all of OSM together, and none of them seems to contain any worthwile contribution.
\nBest
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Voruebergehende Sperre wegen falscher Aenderungen in OSM\n- bitte durch eine Aufsichtsperson Kontakt mit\ndata@openstreetmap.org aufnehmen
\nVoruebergehende Sperre wegen falscher Aenderungen in OSM\n- bitte durch eine Aufsichtsperson Kontakt mit\ndata@openstreetmap.org aufnehmen
\nVoruebergehende Sperre wegen falscher Aenderungen in OSM\n- bitte durch eine Aufsichtsperson Kontakt mit\ndata@openstreetmap.org aufnehmen
\nVoruebergehende Sperre wegen falscher Aenderungen in OSM\n- bitte durch eine Aufsichtsperson Kontakt mit\ndata@openstreetmap.org aufnehmen
\nVoruebergehende Sperre wegen falscher Aenderungen in OSM\n- bitte durch eine Aufsichtsperson Kontakt mit\ndata@openstreetmap.org aufnehmen
\nVoruebergehende Sperre wegen falscher Aenderungen in OSM\n- bitte durch eine Aufsichtsperson Kontakt mit\ndata@openstreetmap.org aufnehmen
\nVoruebergehende Sperre wegen falscher Aenderungen in OSM\n- bitte durch eine Aufsichtsperson Kontakt mit\ndata@openstreetmap.org aufnehmen
\nVoruebergehende Sperre wegen falscher Aenderungen in OSM\n- bitte durch eine Aufsichtsperson Kontakt mit\ndata@openstreetmap.org aufnehmen
\nVoruebergehende Sperre wegen falscher Aenderungen in OSM\n- bitte durch eine Aufsichtsperson Kontakt mit\ndata@openstreetmap.org aufnehmen
\nVoruebergehende Sperre wegen falscher Aenderungen in OSM\n- bitte durch eine Aufsichtsperson Kontakt mit\ndata@openstreetmap.org aufnehmen
\nVoruebergehende Sperre wegen falscher Aenderungen in OSM\n- bitte durch eine Aufsichtsperson Kontakt mit\ndata@openstreetmap.org aufnehmen
\nElliot,
\nAs we have discussed in the past, in absence of a clear community consensus in the Israeli community about mapping (or not mapping) military areas, eliminating correct data that others have contributed is considered by the DWG to be an act of vandalism of OSM.
\nYou and I discussed this issue in great length in the past, including bringing the general Israeli community in on the discussion. I discussed the matter with several Israeli mappers and posted on the Israeli forums and there was no consensus that your position was the general view of the community. Additionally there was no interest expressed by the Israeli community regarding the offer the OSMF put forth of getting an Israeli lawyer's opinion on the matter of the legality of mapping military areas (which was your argument for their removal).
\nTherefore I am placing this temporary block on your account (just until you log in and read this message). In addition, we will revert your deletions. In addition, I must warn you that if you continue to purposefully act in ways that we consider vandalism, that your account may be blocked in the future, possibly permanently. Therefore I urge you to stop deleting others contributions to the map.
\nIf you have any questions regarding this matter, please email data@osmfoundation.org
\nSincerely,
\nSerge\non behalf of the OSM Data Working Group
\nMr Massri,
\nAs we have discussed in the past, removing accurate data from OpenStreetMap is considered an act of vandalism. You have been warned about this behavior several times in the past, including receiving \na block recently for it. Because of that, we (the Data Working Group) have decided to block your account for four days and revert your deletions.
\nYour statement by message that you will continue this behavior, including resorting to illegal means, is equally disturbing. Please consider this an official warning by the DWG that if you continue this behavior that you may find yourself indefinitely blocked from OpenStreetMap.
\nWe value your contributions as an editor and hope that you can continue to be a part of the project- so please discontinue these deletions.
\nIf you have any questions, please contact data@osmfoundation.org
\nSincerely,
\nSerge\non behalf of the DWG
\nSorin,
\nAfter a great deal of debate and discussion, the DWG has come to the\ndecision that we feel that your pattern of edit wars with your fellow\nmappers, as well as your disrespectful language towards other mappers\nis disruptive to the project as a whole and we have no alternative\nother than to separate you from the project. Therefore we have placed\nan indefinite block on your account. An indefinite block does not\nhave a set time length.
\nWe do not take this decision lightly. We value your long history with\nthe project and the many contributions you have made, but ultimately\nwe believe that OSM is more than simply a data project, it is a\ncommunity, and as a community our members should expect and receive a\ncertain level of basic respect and politeness that you have\ncontinually refused to demonstrate.
\nThe DWG is open to reversing this decision, but you would need to\ndisplay a sincere desire to work harmoniously with the community, to\ndiscontinue the edit wars, and specifically to use respectful\nlanguage towards your fellow mappers.
\nYou can read the OSM Ban Policy at:\nhttp://www.osmfoundation.org/w/index.php?title=Ban_Policy
\nAnd you can read your the report that the DWG has made about this\ndecision at:
\nhttp://www.osmfoundation.org/w/images/8/8a/DWG_2014-07-10_Special_Romania.pdf
\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the Data Working Group
\nDear ntk80,
\nplease refrain from making political edits to names in China/Vietnam. You have accidentally renamed all of China to \"Vietnam\" and made a number of name changes to islands that are not in keeping with OpenStreetMap policies.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Mr Massri,
\nAs we have discussed before in your previous block, removing accurate data from OSM is considered vandalism. The DWG takes this issue quite seriously and have asked you to stop, and warned you to stop in the past. Specifically you were warned not to remove military areas from OSM, yet in changeset 24317093, you deleted a military area, so a new 4 day block is being placed on your account.
\nSerge\non behalf of the DWG
\nDear Amaroussi,
\nplease refrain from making world-spanning mechanical edits (pet shop, pharmacy, photo studio etc.) on a whim. Such changes require, at the very least, prior discussion on the tagging list.
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hi,
\nWe have recieved a complaint about your edits and after review it seems that your edits are not legitimate.
\nIf you feel this is incorrect please contact the DWG (data@osmfoundation.org) or start using useful changeset comments to help other mappers review your work.
\nThank you\nBen Abelshausen\nfor the OSMF data working group
\nDear user osmmaker,
\nyou have recently made mechanical edits to a number of Marks&Spencer stores. It is obvious that you did not look at the individual objects that you have changed, because you made edits like adding a web site tag to a Marks&Spencer parking garage.
\nAs you know, any kind of mechanical edit (where you do not look at the individual objects you change, but simply add tags to a large number of objects) needs to be discussed beforehand to avoid exactly these kinds of mistakes.
\nI am reverting your Marks&Spencer edits. Please refrain from making this sort of edit in the future. Also, please use proper changeset comments - all your large-scale Marks&Spencer edits had the comment \"update POI\" which is not helpful at all.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear user liyingben,
\nwe have had a complaint about an import that you did a few months ago (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20946274). This import had the following issues:
\nTherefore, I had to remove that import again. This does not mean that OpenStreetMap is not interested in your contributions in general, or the place name data that you have imported, but imports require diligence and care to get them right. If you are interested, you can join the \"imports\" mailing list (lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports) and discuss how to do a place name import properly.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
Dear user osmmaker,
\nAfter your previous block you continued to make mechanical edits to Marks and Spencer stores. This included adding the Marks and Spencer website to a bus stop.
\nIn your previous block, you were told not to do further mechanical edits and not to make edits of this type without meaningful changeset comments. You ignored this.
\nContinued mechanical edits or imports without the required consultation or ignoring block messages like this may result in a ban from the OpenStreetMap project.
\nTo discuss this block, please contact data@osmfoundation.org to explain why you are ignoring block messages and repeatedly conducting bad mechanical edits.
\nCher utilisateur osmmaker,
\nApr\u00e8s avoir \u00e9t\u00e9 bloqu\u00e9 une premi\u00e8re fois : \nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/498\nvous avez continu\u00e9 \u00e0 modifier de fa\u00e7on automatique les magazins \"Marks and \nSpencer\".\nCela inclus l'ajout du site web sur un arr\u00eat de bus :\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/node/565759860/history
\nDans ce pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent bloquage, ils vous avez \u00e9t\u00e9 demand\u00e9 de ne plus le faire et \n\u00e9galement de ne plus faire d'op\u00e9rations automatique sans un commentaire de \nchangeset qui puise clairement indiquer la teneur de vos modifications.\nMais vous avez ignorer cette demande.
\nContinuez vos \u00e9ditions sans en discuter pr\u00e9alablement avec la communaut\u00e9 et \nignorer les messages qui vous sont envoy\u00e9s pourrait vous conduire \u00e0 \u00eatre banni \ndu projet openstreetmap.
\nPour discuter de ce nouveau bloquage, merci de prendre contact avec \ndata@osmfoundation.org pour expliquer pourquoi vous ne tenez pas compte des \nmessages qui vous sont transmis et continuez malgr\u00e9 cela vos mauvaises \nmodifications automatiques.\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
Dear user Gavaasuren,
\nI have sent you a friendly message on 22nd July asking (in German) that you stop resolving \"routing errors\" by drawing arbitrary footpaths. You replied that you knew you made mistakes and you wouldn't repeat them.
\nIn reality however, you keep making the same kinds of \"corrections\" that have attracted criticism before. What's more, several users have tried to contact you about your edits and you have neither replied nor changed anything in your editing.
\n(By the way, if you make edits in England then, out of courtesy to your fellow English mappers, try to write your changeset comments in English as well.)
\nI am blocking your account now to make sure you get this message, and I will now have to revert your recent edits.
\nPlease, if you do intend to improve the mapping of footways in the UK, be in touch with UK mappers on the talk-gb mailing list. Simply ignoring messages from people in whose backyard you're editing is not acceptable in OSM.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm
\nfor the OSMF Data Working Group
Hello d1g,
\nYou have been deleting highway tags from roads which are veritably present on the ground because they lie within closed regions.
\nThere have been multiple complaints about this, and regardless of the complaints it is wrong to remove features that are physically present.
\nPlease stop these edits.
\nTo contact us, please email the data working group.
\nPaul Norman
\nfor the Data Working Group
Dear Eric Lozano,
\nyou have been adding fictional data to OpenStreetMap. Please understand that all data you add is not in a private sandbox, but it goes live on our main database immediately.
\nTherefore, please only add stuff that is correct and corresponds to the real world!
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
\u0423\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c \u0410\u0440\u0437\u0430\u043c\u0430\u0441-2014!
\n\u041a \u0441\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044e, \u0432\u044b \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0433\u043d\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0437\u044b\u0432 \u0432\u044b\u0439\u0442\u0438 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u044c \u0441 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c \u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0443\u0449\u0435\u0440\u0431 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0435.
\n\u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0436\u0438\u0442\u0435\u0441\u044c \u0441 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c \u043d\u0430 \u0444\u043e\u0440\u0443\u043c\u0435 http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=6129&p=86
\n\u041d\u0430 \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u043d\u0430\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0434\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0431\u043b\u043e\u043a\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u043a\u0430 \u043d\u0430 24 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0430 \u0438 \u0434\u043e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u044d\u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f.
\nEugene
\nDear user \u0410\u0440\u0437\u0430\u043c\u0430\u0441-2014,
\nUnfortunately you ignored the call to get connected with the community and continue to damage the mat.
\nPlease, get connected with the community on the forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=6129&p=86
\nYou are being blocked for 24 hours and until you read this message.
\nEugene
\nDear user SweetIQ,
\nyou have added a number of advertising messages to OpenStreetMap, both in actual object tags and in changeset comments.
\nThis is not welcome; OSM is a collection of facts and not a collection of unverifiable marketing claims.
\nWhat's more, you seem not even have invested enough time in OSM to find out how a dry-cleaning facility would normally be added, using tags like \"Category\" and \"Hours\" which are unheard of in OSM.
\nAlso, the uniformity of the entries you have made to OSM suggest that you must have taken them from some other list or directory but you did not specify where from and whether you have the permission of adding that data at all.
\nThe messages that you have added will be removed.
\nBest regards
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hallo Hibenny,
\nder Benutzer simon04 hat Dir k\u00fcrzlich eine Nachricht zukommen lassen wg. der Stra\u00dfenbahnen in Innsbruck; Du scheinst diese Nachricht nicht bekommen zu haben, daher sende ich Dir auf diesem Weg noch einmal eine Erinnerung, die nicht zu \u00fcbersehen ist (Du kannst erst weiter editieren, nachdem Du sie im Webinterface gelesen hast).
\nsimon04 wird Deine \u00c4nderungen wieder r\u00fcckg\u00e4ngig machen und ich w\u00fcrde Dich bitten, das diesmal auch so zu lassen und Dich bei Diskussionsbedarf auf der Mailingliste \"talk-at\" zu melden. Hier ist die Diskussion zu Deinen urspr\u00fcnglichen \u00c4nderungen: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/2014-August/006850.html
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear user medeveloper123,
\nyou have deleted a significant number of objects in London. This edit was reverted and you were told about your mistake, but you made another deletion shortly after. This tells us that either you're not reading your messages or there is some other problem. I'm blocking your account for 24 hours to ensure that you have the time to read this message before causing further damage.
\nPlease understand that all edits you make to OSM are on the live database shared by everyone. You do not have a private sandbox, and your deletions impact the map that everyone sees. Please be more careful in the future.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear user kozaksville,
\nwhen you edit OpenStreetMap, you edit a database shared by hundreds of thousands of users. At OSM we're collecting facts, not fantasy, and certainly we won't allow our map to be used as a canvas for transporting juvenile jokes or insults.
\nMany edits you have made have no basis in reality. There is no motorway named \"I-Andy sucks\", there's no Kozaksville police station, and no \"Super Secret Road\". Such edits are vandalism and they are not acceptable in OpenStreetMap.
\nPlease stop that.
\nBest wishes
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear user kozaksville,
\nyou are continuing to vandalize OSM data. Please understand that this is not a joke. Your edits damage the project and waste time and money on the part of those who have to repair the damage.
\nMost countries and most US states (including, for example, Utah), have laws against computer vandalism, and if you continue to have fun at the expense of the OpenStreetMap project, we will not hesitate to report you to the relevant authorities.
\nDepending on your age this can get you in trouble with your parents / kicked out of school / fired from your job and/or result in being ordered to pay a fine.
\nWe'd like to avoid any kind of escalation and hereby ask you one more time to stop your unauthorised edits.
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear user kozaksville,
\nClearly you did not understand our previous messages.
\nThe DWG takes issues like this quite seriously. This current block on your account will again last for 5 days but we will be considering a more permanent solution.
\nIf you feel this is unwarranted you still have the opportunity to contact us and explain your actions.
\nBen Abelshausen\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nAndrew,
\nYou were contacted yesterday about changeset 25081346 and general large scale editing and you have not responded. In addition, you were contacted this morning and have not replied, which makes us unsure if you are reading your messages.
\nTo ensure that you read and acknowledge this, a 0 hour block has been placed on your account.
\nIf you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org
\nHere is the original message:
\nAndrew,
\nIn reference to changeset 25081346, you have modified a large geographic region of UPS stores, changing them from copyshops to post_offices.
\nWhile not an automated edit, I would classify this as a mass edit. If you want to do this kind of mass tag editing in the future, you need to consult with the local community.
\nIn addition, claiming that this is a \"Fix\" (as per the changeset comment) is highly subjective. Please stick to objective facts when possible, such as \"Reclassifying UPS stores as post_offices\". In addition, setting the source to \"cleanup\" is also a bit misleading, since the source in this case is your opinion
\nThe US community seems generally unhappy with this edit, but I'm holding off reverting it either. Unfortunately this kind of situation is where edit wars happen, and so I strongly suggest you engage with the US community before making these kinds of edits again.
\nSerge on behalf of the DWG\nDear user,
\nI am contacting you in my role as a member of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group who deal with copyright issues and vandalism.
\nYou have been deleting a lot of data in the Himalayas. Please understand that you are damaging the map that is used and shared by everyone. Please be more careful in the future, and also take some time to fill out the \"changeset comment\" when you upload a change so that we know what you think you were doing.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear user TIGER_Clean,
\nyou are conducting imports into OpenStreetMap in disregard of our imports guidelines. These guidelines have been pointed out to you by other users, and after that you continued to disregard them, which leads me to assume that you might not be reading messages. Therefore I am blocking your account until you read this message.
\nYour import violated our guidelines in several ways; it was not discussed before, it was badly executed, and there are doubts about the source that you specified - does TIGER really carry building outlines?
\nPlease review the import guidelines and act accordingly. Your imports are being reverted.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hello afj3278d,
\nAfter a previous warning, you've again edited a number of disputed borders without any discussion and your edits have no changeset comments. This includes a number of deletions of data, and also deletion of names in some languages.
\nIf you think that something as currently mapped is incorrect, please do discuss with the wider community and the Data Working Group first. In particular, please don't make a series of edits that just remove data without any source or comment.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse),\non behalf of the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group
\nblocked for repeated and illegal vandalism.
\ncintiadepinhopinto,
\nYou are adding fictional objects to the map. This is not allowed. You are being blocked from editing for 48 hours.
\nOnce your block is lifted, you must firstly only change the map to reflect the ground truth, and you must use meaningful changeset comments. If you do not do this, you risk your account being blocked permanently.
\nIf you have any questions, you may contact the Data Working Group (DWG) at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThank you,\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the Data Working Group
\nRondale,
\nRecently the Data Working Group has received a complaint about your edits.
\nThe complaints are around the idea that you are adding fictional objects to the map and removing legitimate objects.
\nAfter doing an investigation, the DWG has come to the same conclusion, which is that you sometimes remove valuable data and also add or reclassify roads in a way that is inconsistent with the general community.
\nIt is possible that these edits are made by mistake. If that's the case, I'm going to ask that you take more care in editing, making sure that you aren't accidentally reclassifying or deleting objects from the map.
\nBecause of the contentious nature of some of your edits, I'm asking you to make meaningful changeset comments on your changesets. That is, when you hit Save, that you fill in that field with a description of what changed, and also ideally why. In addition, it would be great if you filled in the source tag on your changesets, to indicate any secondary data sources that you're using, such as Bing imagery. You can find that in Potlatch 2 under \"Advanced\" in your changeset comment.
\nI'm placing a 0 hour block on your account. That means that you just need to log in and read this message to continue editing. We take this action just to ensure that you've read and understood the complaint, and if you have any questions, you're able to address them with the DWG, which you can contact at data@osmfoundation.org
\nIf you do have any questions, please don't hesitate to write us.
\nThank you,
\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the DWG
\nRondale,
\nYou have been asked just this morning to make meaningful changeset comments because of your contentious edits.
\nSince then you have made several more changesets with no changeset comments.
\nI am placing a 48 hour block while I investigate these newest changesets.
\nI need to warn you that if we find continued edits of the nature that was discussed previously (deleting valid data, adding fake data), that we consider this vandalism and you may find yourself blocked again in the future, possibly permanently. In addition, because of the contentious nature of your edits, I am restating that I need you to make changeset comments in order to evaluate your edits.
\nIf you have any questions, please contact data@osmfoundation.org
\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the Data Working Group
\nBlocked for repeated boundary vandalism.
\nMme/M S Latourte bonjour,
\nJe m'appel sylvain, et je suis membre du groupe DWG : http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group
\nJe suis en charge de la gestion des probl\u00e8mes sur les donn\u00e9es au sein d'openstreetmap et j'ai \u00e9t\u00e9 contact\u00e9 par un contributeur fran\u00e7ais m'indiquant que vous aviez remplac\u00e9 le nom de lieu dans la base de donn\u00e9e par des noms fictifs qui ne se constatent pas sur le terrain alors que la r\u00e8gle OpenStreetMap en cas de litige est : \"c'est le terrain qui prime\".
\nVos modifications ont \u00e9t\u00e9 annul\u00e9es, et comme il s'av\u00e8re que vous avez plusieurs fois par le pass\u00e9 chang\u00e9 ces noms sans concertation avec les autres contributeurs (Guerre d'\u00e9dition) vous avez \u00e9t\u00e9 bloqu\u00e9 jusqu'a ce que vous lisiez ce message vous demandant de stopper ce changement de nom. Et \u00e9ventuellement venir en discuter sur la liste de diffusion francophone sur laquelle a \u00e9t\u00e9 discut\u00e9e vos modifications :\nhttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2014-November/073098.html
\nCordialement,
\nLieber User hazibuzi,
\nDu hast ohne ersichtlichen Grund in Mittelsachsen eine Reihe von Objekten aus der OSM-Datenbank gel\u00f6scht. Die Daten sind wiederhergestellt worden; bitte unterlasse solche L\u00f6schungen k\u00fcnftig, denn sie schaden OSM!
\nAusserdem w\u00e4re es gut, wenn Du im \"\u00c4nderungssatz-Kommentar\" (Changeset Comment) angibst, was Du ge\u00e4ndert hast und warum - wenn Du wirklich mal etwas l\u00f6schen musst, k\u00f6nnen andere daran dann erkennen, warum.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear user FreedSky,
\nyou have added disputed boundaries in the South China Sea despite being asked not to do so. Please refrain from making such edits in the future or your account will be blocked for longer.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Mme/M S Latourte bonjour,
\nMalgr\u00e9 mon premier message vous indiquant de cesser de renommer le nom du laboratoire de Bure, vous avez continu\u00e9, par 2 fois, \u00e0 changer son nom.
\nJe vous bloque donc \u00e0 nouveau et vous renvoi \u00e0 mon message d'explication :
\nJe m'appel sylvain, et je suis membre du groupe DWG : http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group
\nJe suis en charge de la gestion des probl\u00e8mes sur les donn\u00e9es au sein d'openstreetmap et j'ai \u00e9t\u00e9 contact\u00e9 par un contributeur fran\u00e7ais m'indiquant que vous aviez remplac\u00e9 le nom de lieu dans la base de donn\u00e9e par des noms fictifs qui ne se constatent pas sur le terrain alors que la r\u00e8gle OpenStreetMap en cas de litige est : \"c'est le terrain qui prime\".
\nVos modifications ont \u00e9t\u00e9 annul\u00e9es, et comme il s'av\u00e8re que vous avez plusieurs fois par le pass\u00e9 chang\u00e9 ces noms sans concertation avec les autres contributeurs (Guerre d'\u00e9dition) vous avez \u00e9t\u00e9 bloqu\u00e9 jusqu'a ce que vous lisiez ce message vous demandant de stopper ce changement de nom. Et \u00e9ventuellement venir en discuter sur la liste de diffusion francophone sur laquelle a \u00e9t\u00e9 discut\u00e9e vos modifications : https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2014-November/073098.html
\nCordialement,
\nPlease, no more spam in diary entries!
\nHi kozaksville,
\nYou've been blocked (again) for yet more vandalism.
\nYour recent edits consist of long straight lines and made-up name changes (e.g. to \"Trail of Zombies\" in Dundee).
\nOpenStreetMap is a shared resource - when you vandalise it you're breaking it for everyone who uses it. It's also illegal:
\nhttp://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1991/en/act/pub/0031/index.html
\nAddendum:
\nYou were contacted by the Data Working Group over a month ago asking you to get in contact explaining your edits. You have not done so yet, and if you do not do so your block will be extended again. You can do so by email to data@osmfoundation.org (or replying to any of the other messages from the DWG that you have received in the past).
\nAndy Townsend, on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group.
\nHi carlosgomesbarbosa,
\nYou've deleted a couple of residential areas in Sao Paulo:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26892665
\nThey've been restored, but you really do need to be more careful. Also, in a previous message we said how important it was to use meaningful changeset comments - you do need to do this.
\nIf you continue to edit without sources or changeset comments (especially deletions) you will be blocked more permanently.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (on behalf of the Data Working Group)
\n(em portugu\u00eas via Google Translate)
\nOi carlosgomesbarbosa,
\nVoc\u00ea apagou um par de \u00e1reas residenciais em S\u00e3o Paulo:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26892665
\nEles foram restaurados, mas voc\u00ea realmente precisa fazer para ter mais cuidado. Al\u00e9m disso, em uma mensagem anterior, dissemos o quanto era importante usar coment\u00e1rios da altera\u00e7\u00e3o significativas - voc\u00ea precisa fazer isso.
\nSe voc\u00ea continuar a editar sem fontes ou coment\u00e1rios da altera\u00e7\u00e3o (especialmente exclus\u00e3o) que voc\u00ea ser\u00e1 bloqueado de forma mais permanente.
\nAtenciosamente,
\nAndy Townsend (em nome do Grupo de Trabalho de Dados)
\njesseekling,
\nYou are being blocked until you read this message due to edits on the map which do not reflect ground truth.
\nIf you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact the OSM Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThank you,
\nHello LLAQWA,
\nYou appear to be performing a series of mechanical edits involving trees.
\nI've added a changeset discussion comment to http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26935404 noting that some information has been lost, and asking if you need help reverting the data.
\nPreviously (not \"wearing a Data Working Group hat\") I sent you a message via http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26796184 , to which I've not seen a reply - that seemed to assume that a \"mix of trees\" involved a \"mix of leaf types\" which doesn't seem valid to me (I can think of woodland near me that that is either all conferous or all non-coniferous yet still has a wide range of different sorts of trees in it).
\nIt's important that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy is followed so that these sorts of issues can be discussed and picked up before any changes are made.
\nI've sent this as a message that has to be read rather than a regular one because I didn't get a reply via http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26796184 (maybe you don't have a valid linked email address at the moment?) Please reply in either changeset discussion (or both), or to data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend, on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group
\nHello maphnsj,
\nYou have made a very large number of worldwide edits. Some of the edits, such as the one I commented on:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26967515
\nThese edits are quite suspicious and the Data Working Group is intervening. Clearly have a source that you are not mentioning (and your changeset comment is not clear).
\nPlease answer this post in the changeset discussion about the origin of your edit, and in the future, please specify where the source of your edits are from, along with making useful changeset comments that explain what you are changing.
\nI am placing a 0 hour block on your account so that you have to read this.
\nIf you continue to make these mass edits without specifying a source or useful changeset comment, then your edits may be reverted and your account may be locked.
\nIf you have any questions, please contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThank you,\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group
\nHello \u0422\u043e\u043c\u0438\u0446\u0430,
\nYou seem to be making a very large number of \"name\" changes to e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2885136501/history .
\nThe renaming of places within Kosovo has been reported to the Data Working Group and I would therefore ask you to not perform any further \"name\" changes until the matter has been discussed within the Data Working Group.
\nI'm sending this message as a message that has to be read before editing can continue to make sure that you read it.
\nIf you have any further questions you can discuss them by email to data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend, on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group.
\nDear iamsputnik,
\nYou are making mass worldwide edits that seem to be nothing but adding name:ru to objects that already exist. While this is not bad per se, please be aware of the OSM Mechanical Edit Policy:
\nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy
\nWhich restricts how mass editing must be done.
\nIn addition, your changeset comments are nothing more than \"changeset comment\". In the future, your changeset comments should be relevant to your edit and describe the change being made.
\nLastly, since translations of names need to be more than just your own translation, you need to specify a source for any name that you don't directly know the name of.
\nA 0 hour block is being placed on your account so that you are sure to read this mesage.
\nIn addition, I have translated this into Russian from the original English via Google Translate.
\nIf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThank you,
\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group
\n=========================================================================\n\u0423\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0439 iamsputnik,
\n\u0412\u044b \u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043c\u0430\u0441\u0441\u0430 \u043f\u043e \u0432\u0441\u0435\u043c\u0443 \u043c\u0438\u0440\u0443 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043a\u0438, \u043a\u0430\u0436\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f, \u043d\u0435 \u0431\u044b\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0433\u043e, \u043d\u043e \u0441 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0438: RU \u043a \u043e\u0431\u044a\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0430\u043c, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u0443\u0436\u0435 \u0441\u0443\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u044e\u0442. \u0425\u043e\u0442\u044f \u044d\u0442\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u043b\u043e\u0445\u043e \u0441\u0430\u043c\u043e \u043f\u043e \u0441\u0435\u0431\u0435, \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0431\u0443\u0434\u044c\u0442\u0435 \u043e\u0441\u0432\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043c\u043b\u0435\u043d\u044b \u043e OSM \u043c\u0435\u0445\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439 Edit \u041f\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0430:
\nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy
\n\u041a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430\u044f \u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0438\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442, \u043a\u0430\u043a \u043c\u0430\u0441\u0441\u0430 \u0440\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u043d\u043e \u0431\u044b\u0442\u044c \u0441\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u043d\u043e.
\n\u041a\u0440\u043e\u043c\u0435 \u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e, \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0438 \u043d\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0432 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0438 \u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043d\u0435 \u0431\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0435 \u0447\u0435\u043c \"\u043d\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0440\u0430 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0439\u00bb. \u0412 \u0431\u0443\u0434\u0443\u0449\u0435\u043c, \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0438 \u043d\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0432 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0438 \u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u043d\u044b \u0438\u043c\u0435\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043a \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0435\u0439 \u0440\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0438 \u043e\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f.
\n\u041d\u0430\u043a\u043e\u043d\u0435\u0446, \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u0443 \u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043b\u044f\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d \u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u043d\u044b \u0431\u044b\u0442\u044c \u0431\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0448\u0435, \u0447\u0435\u043c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043e \u0441\u0432\u043e\u0439 \u0441\u043e\u0431\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0432\u043e\u0434, \u043d\u0435\u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u043e \u0443\u043a\u0430\u0437\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0438\u043a \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043b\u044e\u0431\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0438, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u044b \u043d\u0435\u043f\u043e\u0441\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u0438\u0437\u0432\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043d\u043e \u0438\u043c\u044f.
\n0 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0439 \u0431\u043b\u043e\u043a \u0443\u0434\u0435\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0435\u0439 \u0443\u0447\u0435\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0437\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0438, \u0442\u0430\u043a \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0432\u044b \u043e\u0431\u044f\u0437\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0439\u0442\u0435 \u044d\u0442\u0443 \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043d\u043e\u043c \u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c\u043c\u0435.
\n\u041a\u0440\u043e\u043c\u0435 \u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e, \u044f \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0432\u0435\u043b \u044d\u0442\u043e \u043d\u0430 \u0440\u0443\u0441\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u0441 \u043e\u0440\u0438\u0433\u0438\u043d\u0430\u043b\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u0430\u043d\u0433\u043b\u0438\u0439\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043c \u044f\u0437\u044b\u043a\u0435 \u0441 \u043f\u043e\u043c\u043e\u0449\u044c\u044e Google Translate.
\n\u0415\u0441\u043b\u0438 \u0443 \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u0435\u0441\u0442\u044c \u043a\u0430\u043a\u0438\u0435-\u043b\u0438\u0431\u043e \u0432\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044b, \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043d\u0435 \u0441\u0442\u0435\u0441\u043d\u044f\u0439\u0442\u0435\u0441\u044c \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \u0441 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0420\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0443\u044e \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u0443 \u043f\u043e data@osmfoundation.org
\n\u0421\u043f\u0430\u0441\u0438\u0431\u043e,
\nSerge Wroc\u0142awski\non behalf of the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group
\nHallo wolf_ics,
\nSie sind von der OSM-Community angeschrieben worden, weil es R\u00fcckfragen zu Ihrer gro\u00dffl\u00e4chigen Hinzuf\u00fcgung des Tags \"bdouble\" gibt. Sie haben diese Anfragen bisher nicht beantwortet, aber dennoch weiter Tags hinzugef\u00fcgt.
\nBitte unterbrechen Sie jetzt Ihre Arbeit und nehmen Sie die Fragen der Community ernst. OpenStreetMap hat ein offenes Datenmodell, aber das heisst nicht, dass jeder einfach so ohne R\u00fcckprache oder Dokumentation beliebige Daten hinzuf\u00fcgen kann.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear huramtimur
\nWhether you use this account or the iamsputnik account as per http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/563 this behavior is still unacceptable and your accounts will be blocked and your changes revered.
\nIf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThank you,
\nSerge Wroclawski on behalf of the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group
\nWhether you use this account or the iamsputnik account as per http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/563 this behavior is still unacceptable and your accounts will be blocked and your changes revered.
\nIf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThank you,
\nSerge Wroclawski on behalf of the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group
\nWhether you use this account or the iamsputnik account as per http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/563 this behavior is still unacceptable and your accounts will be blocked and your changes revered.
\nIf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThank you,
\nSerge Wroclawski on behalf of the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group
\nWhether you use this account or the iamsputnik account as per http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/563 this behavior is still unacceptable and your accounts will be blocked and your changes reverted.
\nIf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThank you,
\nSerge Wroclawski on behalf of the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group
\nWhether you use this account or the iamsputnik account as per http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/563 this behavior is still unacceptable and your accounts will be blocked and your changes reverted.
\nAt this point you have made a large number of accounts to perform this vandalism on OSM and I believe that you owe the entire OSM community a large apology.
\nIf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThank you,
\nSerge Wroclawski on behalf of the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group
\nPerimex,
\nDWG zosta\u0142 poproszony o zbadanie konflikt odwzorowania w stosunku do klasyfikacji dr\u00f3g w Polsce.
\nPo zbadaniu sytuacji, doszli\u015bmy do wniosku, \u017ce twoje pogl\u0105dy r\u00f3\u017cni\u0105 si\u0119 zdecydowanie od innych we wsp\u00f3lnocie, i dlatego jeste\u015b retagging dr\u00f3g en masy, kt\u00f3re widzimy w Twoich edycji.
\nDWG nie zajmuje stanowiska w sprawie znakowania jest poprawne, ale jeste\u015bmy zobowi\u0105zani do procesu spo\u0142ecznej harmonii. Je\u015bli uwa\u017casz, \u017ce Tw\u00f3j pomys\u0142 klasyfikacji drogowej jest bardziej poprawne ni\u017c inne mappers w Polsce, trzeba ich przekona\u0107, \u017ce poprzez dialog, a nie dokonywania zmiany masowych.
\nJeste\u015bmy umieszczenie bloku 0 godzin na koncie, a nie jako kara, lecz zapewnienie, \u017ce czytasz t\u0119 wiadomo\u015b\u0107. W tym samym czasie, musimy ostrzec, \u017ce nadal przekwalifikowania obiekt\u00f3w wbrew woli spo\u0142eczno\u015bci mo\u017ce spowodowa\u0107 konta zosta\u0142y zablokowane w przysz\u0142o\u015bci.
\nCenimy sw\u00f3j wk\u0142ad w mapie i zach\u0119camy do wsp\u00f3\u0142pracy ze spo\u0142eczno\u015bci\u0105 Polski OpenStreetMap przyj\u015b\u0107 do uchwa\u0142y w tej sprawie, \u017ce ka\u017cdy zgodzi si\u0119.
\nPrzepraszam za m\u00f3j z\u0142y polski, u\u017cywam Google Translate przet\u0142umaczy\u0107 t\u0119 wiadomo\u015b\u0107 z angielskiego na polski.Oryginalna wiadomo\u015b\u0107 jest poni\u017cej.
\nJe\u015bli masz jakie\u015b pytania, prosz\u0119 nie wahajcie si\u0119 do e-mail do plik\u00f3w DWG w data@osmfoundation.org
\nDzi\u0119kujemy,
\nSerge Wroc\u0142awski\nw imieniu Grupy Roboczej danych OpenStreetMap
\nPerimex,
\nThe DWG has been asked to investigate a mapping conflict in relation to the classifications of roads in Poland.
\nAfter examining the situation, we have come to the conclusion that your views differ strongly from others in the community, and that is why you are retagging roads en mass, which we see in your edits.
\nThe DWG does not take a stance on which tagging is correct, but we are committed to a process of community harmony. If you believe that your idea of road classification is more correct than the other mappers in Poland, you need to convince them of that through dialog, rather than making mass edits.
\nWe are placing a 0 hour block on your account, not as a punishment, but to ensure that you read this message. At the same time, we need to warn you that continuing to reclassify objects against the wishes of the community could result in your account being blocked in the future.
\nWe value your contributions to the map, and we encourage you to work with the Polish OpenStreetMap community to come to a resolution on this matter that everyone agrees to.
\nI apologize for my bad Polish, I am using Google Translate to translate this message from English to Polish. The original message is below.
\nIf you have any questions, please do not hesistate to email the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThank you,
\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group
\nBlocked as a secondary account used to circumvent http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/563
\nBlocked as a secondary account used to circumvent http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/563
\nBlocked as a secondary account used to circumvent http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/563
\nDear user Perimex,
\nyou have been made aware of reservations that the Polish community has towards your edits. You have chosen to ignore not only those reservations, but also Data Working Group's strong recommendation to reconcile with the community before you make further edits.
\nThe edits you are now making are exactly of the kind that was causing problems with other Polish mappers in the past - unilaterally changing highway types.
\nPlease stop doing that until you can reach an agreement with the Polish OSM community. Your edits might seem correct to you but they are not helpful if they are not accepted by the community.
\nI will now block your account for 24 hours but if you continue your disputed edits after that block is over, you will be blocked for longer.
\nPlease do not write to me to explain that your edits are right. Whether or not your edits are right is not the issue here; the issue is that your edits cause unrest in the Polish community. Reach an agreement with them.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear user brianegge,
\nAs per the discussion posts on changesets:
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27113973\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27113853\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27113744\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27113648\nYou are making mass mechanical edits adding information about objects that you don't know.
\nIn addition, you have done so in smaller changesets.
\nAs per the discussion posts, this is against the Mechanical Edit Policy, in that it was not discussed with the community or documented.
\nI am not going to discuss whether or not the edits are factually correct, but only tell you that the edits are not allowed until it's been documented and discussed with the community, as per the policy. In addition, these edits should have better changeset comment tags that describe exactly what you're doing.
\nBecause of this, I'm placing a 0 hour block on your account. That means that you need to read this message in order to continue editing.
\nI'm also going to revert the changesets listed above.
\nPlease discuss these changes with the local community, which in this case appears to the entire US, so I'd suggest the talk-us mailing list.
\nIf you are adding data from another data source, then you will also need to follow the Import Guidelines on the wiki.
\nIf you continue to make these types of edits without going through these processes, your account may be blocked again in the future, this time for longer periods, or possibly even permanently, which no one would want. That's not this time, though- this is just a warning.
\nIf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact the OSM Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nSincerely,
\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the OSM Data Working Group
\nPerimex,
\nYou have been warned several times about your editing activity, specifically modifying roads, and you have been told what you need to do to work alongside your local community.
\nYou were blocked for 24 hours due to this bad mapping behavior, and you were warned that continuing this bad behavior could get you blocked in the future.
\nI am placing a 48 hour block on your account. In addition, I am explicitly telling you that if the DWG receives another complaint about your mapping that turns out to be sustained, we will begin the process for a permanent ban on your account.
\nIf you don't want that to happen, you need to do the following:
\nIf you have any questions, please contact the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org
\nSincerely,
\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group
\nPerimex,
\nYou have been warned and blocked several times about this editing behavior. You were also warned that continuing this same editing behavior could lead to longer term consequences.
\nAt this point, I am placing your account on a 4 day block while the DWG convenes and discusses how we want to handle this going forward.
\nSerge\non behalf of the DWG
\nAvnerR,
\nIt has come to the attention of the OSM Data Working Group (DWG) that you have begun mass editing
\nUsers have asked you to work with the community and stop doing this, such as in this changeset:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27170045
\nAnd you have not replied.
\nPlease do not modify objects in ways that are contrary to the local community.
\nTo ensure that you read this message, I am placing a 0 hour block on your account. That means to clear this block, you just need to log into www.openstreetmap.org
\nBut if you continue to modify objects in ways that are contrary to the local community, your account may be blocked again in the future.
\nIf you have any questions about this, please contact the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThanks,
\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf the OSM Data Working Group
\nDear user S-D,
\nyou are making questionable edits to the OSM database, continually reverting edits of another user, with misleading changeset comments. When sent an email in German by another mapper, you replied \"I don't understand you\", yet you seem to use a German localization of the JOSM editor.
\nPlease explain your actions using the discussion feature in this changeset
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27140047
\nPlease do not ignore this message.
\nBest
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Lieber FNSC,
\nDu bist offensichtlich der gleiche Nutzer, den wir als \"S-D\" gerade gesperrt haben. Wir wissen, dass Du Deutsch sprichst und dass Du in Deutschland lebst. Ich bitte Dich ein letztes Mal, Deine offensichtlichen Meinungsverschiedenheiten mit dem Benutzer \"atpl_pilot\" auf im Projekt \u00fcbliche Weise beizulegen - n\u00e4mlich durch Diskussion und Konsensfindung.
\nWas Du hier veranstaltest - die Verwendung verschiedener Wegwerf-Accounts und der Versuch, Deine Identit\u00e4t zu verschleiern - ist kindisch und geeignet, auch die \"guten\" Edits unter Deinem Hauptaccount in ein schlechtes Licht zu r\u00fccken. Vorallem aber ist es auch illegal (lies \u00a7303a StGB); es kann Anzeige gegen Dich erstattet werden, was zur beh\u00f6rdlichen Ermittlung Deiner Identit\u00e4t und anschlie\u00dfend weiteren unangenehmen Konsequenzen f\u00fchren k\u00f6nnte - je nach Alter \u00c4rger mit den Eltern, Beschlagnahme des Computers, oder sogar eine Geld- oder Gef\u00e4ngnisstrafe. \u00dcberlege Dir bitte, ob dir der Spass das wert ist.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hello RR81,
\n5 days ago I contacted you on behalf of the Data Working Group in a discussion on this changeset:
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27323769
\nThe concern there was that \"ref\" tags had been copied to OpenStreetMap from a copyrighted source (I'm familiar with the area and they're not visible on the ground there).
\nThere was no reply to that message, nor to a subsequent mapper-to-mapper message, nor to others sent previously. I'm sending this message as a \"0-hour block\" just in case there's some sort of \"mail interface problem\" - you'll be able to continue editing as soon as you've read this message.
\nHowever, I would ask that you please do the following:
\n1) Do explain where the \"ref\"s used in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27323769 came from. It's important that they came from a licence-compatible source. If they didn't, they'll have to be removed.
\n2) Explain the source of the changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27387562 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27167802 that I asked about in http://www.openstreetmap.org/message/read/473574 . As I said in that message, OSM is a collaborative project, and we have to work together to create \"the best map\". If people are saying continually that what you've mapped isn't right (see https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/36598/detours-removed for another example from a completely different part of the world, it probably isn't).
\n3) Using meaningful changeset comments explaining your edits (and the source of them). Also, when mappers contact you, via changeset discussion comments, messages, or other means, you owe them the courtesy of a reply.
\nIf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend, on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group
\nThe user profile description is a classic Search Engine Optimisation 'spam' example, with promotional links.
\nThere are no associated edits on the map.
\nI'm blocking this account to see what happens next to the subsequent search results and the profile page - presumably nothing?
\nSPAM.
\nBlocking pending deletion.
\nHello,
\nThere have been reports of you using or referencing Google Maps in your editing.
\nPlease be aware that copying from other maps is not allowed. I'm not accusing you of doing so, though your note here:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27562814
\nGives us some concern.
\nPlease be aware that copying from unauthorized data sources will get your edits reverted and your account potentially locked.
\nThis block will end as soon as you read this message.
\nIf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThank you,
\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the Data Working Group
\nzuppet is a sockpuppet account, being used by zool for user experience testing, to see what it feels like to receive different user blocks and if that could be made easier
\nThis time zool is looking at the effect of a 6 hour block in different editors
\nDear user Max Coine,
\nyou have recently made edits to disputed areas/objects and you have been told to stop (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27716889). Nonetheless you have repeated your edit and ignored that message.
\nI will revert your edit again, and block your account for 24 hours as a warning; should you however continue to make disputed edits, then your account may be blocked for longer.
\nIf you have issues with disputed boundaries, feel free to get in touch with data@osmfoundation.org and we can discuss the problem.
\nThank you for your understanding.
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Your account is being 0 hour locked due to spam and vandalism on changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/42443614 where you modify a traffic signal to advertise a business, and a changeset comment that doesn't discuss the changeset, but advertises a product or service.
\nIf you have any questions, please contact the DWG at data@openstreemapfoundation.org
\nDear user Franklin_,
\nI am writing to you in my capacity as a member of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group, who are responsible for handling vandalism and disputes among mappers.
\nWe have had complaints about you repeatedly deleting valid data from OpenStreetMap. People have tried to contact you to discuss these deletions via the messaging feature but you have not responded.
\nPlease:
\nIgnoring these requests may lead to your account being blocked and/or your edits being reverted.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear user Zartminthar,
\nI have asked you yesterday to explain why you are removing buildings that are clearly visible on Bing imagery. You have continued to delete thousands of buildings in Mandalay in the last couple of hours, and the only explanation you offer via the changeset comment is: \"removing graffiti\".
\nThis is not enough. These buildings are clearly there on the aerial imagery so why do you think they are \"graffiti\"? Please give us an explanation or we'll be forced to revert your changesets.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear user aisaeva,
\nyou are adding a lot of name:ru tags to places across the world. As you surely know, name:xx tags are not permitted for translations/transliterations, but should only be used where something really has a separate name in the language.
\nWhich sources are you using to determine Russian names of places, especially in South America and Africa?
\nThanks
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
SH17,
\nLooking at your recent edits, you are mass reclassifying roads in at least two major US cities. These kind of mass edits need to be discussed with the community.
\nIn addition, your changesets should have a useful changeset comment that describes the changes being made and why.
\nIn addition, you should specify a source for your edits.
\nYour edits are going to be reverted and this 0-hour block is being placed on your account, requiring you to log in and read this message before you are allowed to edit again.
\nPlease do not make mass edits again in the future without discussing them with the community.
\nIf you have any questions, please contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nolaf1000,
\nOn your recent changesets:\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28380237\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28373228
\nYou are making large scale mass edits without discussing it with the community, as per the guidelines at:
\nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy
\nTherefore I am reverting your changesets and placing a 0 hour block on your account, which means that in order to continue to edit OSM, you will need to read this message.
\nPlease do not make mass edits of OSM without following the guidelines listed.
\nIf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThank you,
\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the Data Working Group
\nHallo fhigeoq,
\nvor drei Tagen habe ich Dich hier
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28369564
\num eine Stellungnahme zu Deinen Edits gebeten. Seitdem hast Du weiter gemappt, aber nicht erkl\u00e4rt, wieso Du in gro\u00dfem Ma\u00dfe die Edits eines anderen Users revertiert hast. Bitte hole diese Erkl\u00e4rung jetzt umgehend nach, am besten gleich an der zitierten Stelle, so ist sie \u00f6ffentlich.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear user mitsurukikkawa,
\nyou are performing massive data imports to OSM in violation of our data import guidelines (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines).
\nYour imports have not been discussed, or documented, and they are buggy. A comment has been placed in your changeset
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28558528
\nwhich you ignored, and you continued to import nonetheless. I cannot see any discussion of your import in any OpenStreetMap mailing list; nor any verification of the validity of your source or process, and no records on the OSM wiki.
\nPlease understand that OpenStreetMap is not a place where anyone can simply import data. Read and follow the import guidelines. Stop the imports you are currently performing until you follow the rules.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Becker_MN_Import_Acc,
\nYou have been running a series of imports, at least some of which have not been discussed with the community, as per the Import Guidelines at: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
\nBecause of this, your account is being placed on a 0-hour lock, which simply requires you to read this message and acknowledge it before being able to edit OSM further. Once you do, you'll be able to edit normally.
\nIn addition to this, if I am mistaken, and your edits have been discussed as per the import policy, please let me know by the end February 6th UTC, or 7pm EST on February 6th. If I don't hear from you by then, I will assume that all the editing edits were done outside the import policy and revert them.
\nIf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the OSM Data Working Group
\nBitte melde dich bei data@osmfoundation.org wegen Deiner letzten Edits.
\nHello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
\nYou've registered an account, but your edits seem to be only deletions and changes to boundary relations. Can you please explain what it is that you're trying to do?
\nOpenStreetMap is a shared resource; we all edit the same map. Where you are editing things that affect a whole country it is only polite to discuss that with everyone in that country first.
\nI've sent this as a message that must be read before you can continue editing just to make sure that you read it. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to get in contact.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend, on behalf of the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group.
\n(via Google Translate)
\n\u041f\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432 \u0438 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043e\u0448\u043b\u0438 \u043d\u0430 \u041e\u043f\u0435\u043d\u0421\u0442\u0440\u0435\u0435\u0442\u041c\u0430\u043f.
\n\u0412\u0438 \u0441\u0442\u0435 \u0440\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438 \u043d\u0430\u043b\u043e\u0433, \u0430\u043b\u0438 \u0431\u0438 \u0441\u0435 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435 \u0438\u0437\u0433\u043b\u0435\u0434\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0430\u043c\u043e \u0431\u0440\u0438\u0441\u0430\u045a\u0430 \u0438 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435 \u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0445 \u043e\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0430. \u0414\u0430 \u043b\u0438 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u043e\u0431\u0458\u0430\u0441\u043d\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0448\u0442\u0430 \u0458\u0435 \u0442\u043e \u0448\u0442\u043e \u043f\u043e\u043a\u0443\u0448\u0430\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u0443\u0440\u0430\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435?
\n\u041e\u043f\u0435\u043d\u0421\u0442\u0440\u0435\u0435\u0442\u041c\u0430\u043f \u0458\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u0458\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0438\u0447\u043a\u0430 \u0440\u0435\u0441\u0443\u0440\u0441; \u0441\u0432\u0438 \u0443\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0438 \u0438\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0443. \u0413\u0434\u0435 \u043c\u0435\u045a\u0430\u0442\u0435 \u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430\u0440\u0438 \u043a\u043e\u0458\u0435 \u0443\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0443 \u043d\u0430 \u0446\u0435\u043b\u0443 \u0437\u0435\u043c\u0459\u0443 \u0458\u0435 \u0441\u0430\u043c\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0458\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0432\u043e \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0433\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438 \u0441\u0430 \u0441\u0432\u0438\u043c\u0430 \u0443 \u0442\u043e\u0458 \u0437\u0435\u043c\u0459\u0438.
\n\u041f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0430\u043e \u0441\u0430\u043c \u043e\u0432\u043e \u043a\u0430\u043e \u043f\u043e\u0440\u0443\u043a\u0443 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0440\u0430 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438 \u0434\u0430 \u0431\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0438 \u0434\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0441\u0430 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0430\u043c\u0430 \u0441\u0430\u043c\u043e \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u0443\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0435 \u0433\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043b\u0438. \u0410\u043a\u043e \u0438\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0435 \u0431\u0438\u043b\u043e \u043a\u0430\u043a\u0432\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u0438\u0442\u0430\u045a\u0430, \u043c\u043e\u043b\u0438\u043c\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0443\u0447\u0430\u0432\u0430\u0458\u0442\u0435 \u0441\u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0443 \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0442\u0430\u043a\u0442.
\n\u0421\u0440\u0434\u0430\u0447\u0430\u043d \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432,
\n\u0410\u043d\u0434\u0438 \u0422\u043e\u0432\u043d\u0441\u0435\u043d\u0434, \u0443 \u0438\u043c\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0442\u0430\u043a\u0430 \u0420\u0430\u0434\u043d\u0435 \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u0435 \u041e\u043f\u0435\u043d\u0421\u0442\u0440\u0435\u0435\u0442\u041c\u0430\u043f.
\nBlocked as a secondary account used to circumvent http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/598
\ngeozeisig,
\nAs per the discussion on changeset 28861610, I believe that this changeset represents a mechanical edit, which is covered under our mechanical edit policy: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy
\nTherefore I am placing a 0-hour block on your account, which simply means that you need to read this message and click that you've read it in order to continue to editing OSM again.
\nI hope that you don't do any further mechanical edits without following the guideline, especially in regards to consulting the OSM community.
\nIf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nSincerely,
\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the OSM Data Working Group
\nDear user Franklin_,
\nI have contacted you a month ago and requested that you stop deleting valid data in OSM, and that you use changeset comments so that your fellow mappers can see what you were up to.
\nYou have ignored both requests in the last few days and continued to make undesirable edits without any comments. The community had to invest considerable time, and will still have to invest time, in repairing the damage.
\nPlease don't do that; it is a waste of your time and ours since we will have to revert these edits. If you think something is wrong, take up the discussion with the OSM community in Argentina on the mailing list.
\nBest regards
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hello,
\nThe OSM Data Working Group has been informed that you have been making many edits which do not reflect the ground truth, especially around the issue of editing OSM object in order to make them appear more prominent for the renderer and not responding to messages or changeset discussions.
\nTherefore I am placing a 0-hour block on your account, which means that to continue editing, you must log into osm.org and acknowledge this message.
\nPlease be aware that your edits must reflect the ground truth. Additionally, I am requesting that you place meaningful changeset comments on your changesets (ie when you hit save, you must type something relevant and meaningful).
\nIf you don't do this, your account may be blocked in the future.
\nIf you have any questions, please email data@osmfoundation.org
\nThank you,
\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the OSM Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nYour edits (with changeset comments such as \"Perl script\") have been flagged by other users in changeset discussion comments as destroying data. See for example:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28995538
\nand
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28883313
\nIn particular, the last of these was 5 days ago and there seems to have been no reply from you in the discussion on the changeset - that's why I'm sending this message as one that you have to read before continuing editing. If you're changing data that other people have added, and they ask you about it, it's only polite that you answer their questions rather than continuing to perform the same sorts of edits.
\nThe changeset comments would also suggest that you are performing a series of mechanical edits. There is a policy in place describing how these must be carried out:
\nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy
\nThe very first requirement stated there is \"discuss\". You need to discuss your proposed changes with the rest of the OpenStreetMap community. If you have discussed these changes, can you please point to where? I don't remember seeing anything on the main \"talk\" list (the place that the policy says that they should have been discussed).
\nOne more thing, please do use meaningful changeset comments. The ones that you have used (such as \"Perl Script\", \"cancellation\" and \"corrections\") provide absolutely no information about what you changed, or why you changed it. In at least some cases you don't seem to have added any source either.
\nOf course - it's possible that there may be some misunderstanding here (i.e. you didn't quite understand the scope of the changes that you were making), and if you have any questions at all please do get in contact with us via data@osmfoundation.org . However, if you continue to perform mechanical edits without discussion, cause data problems as mentioned above or not use meaningful changeset comments then you will be blocked from editing for a longer period of time.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend, on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group
\n(and via automatic translation)
\nSveiki,
\nJ\u016bs\u0173 keitimus (su Pakeista komentarus, pavyzd\u017eiui, \"Perl Script\") buvo pa\u017eym\u0117tas kitiems vartotojams Pakeista diskusij\u0173 komentaruose kaip sunaikinti duomenis. \u017di\u016br\u0117ti, pavyzd\u017eiui:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28995538
\nir
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28883313
\nVis\u0173 pirma, paskutinis i\u0161 j\u0173 buvo prie\u0161 5 dienas ir atrodo, kad jau jokio atsakymo i\u0161 j\u016bs\u0173 d\u0117l Pakeista diskusijos - \u0161tai kod\u0117l a\u0161 siun\u010diant \u0161\u012f prane\u0161im\u0105 kaip vienas, kad j\u016bs turite perskaityti prie\u0161 t\u0119siant redagavim\u0105. Jei norite pakeisti duomenis, kad kiti \u017emon\u0117s, kurie laiko, ir jie paklausti apie tai, tai tik mandagus, kad jums atsakyti \u012f j\u0173 klausimus, o ne toliau atlikti pa\u010dios r\u016b\u0161ies keitimus.
\n\u012e Pakeista komentarai taip pat rekomenduojame, kad j\u016bs atliekate mechanini\u0173 keitimus serij\u0105. Yra vietoje politika apra\u0161oma, kaip jie turi b\u016bti atliekamas:
\nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy
\nPats pirmasis reikalavimas parei\u0161k\u0117 yra \"aptarti\". J\u016bs turite aptarti savo si\u016blomus pakeitimus su OpenStreetMap bendruomen\u0117s poilsio. Jei turite aptarti \u0161iuos poky\u010dius, galite pra\u0161ome atkreipti \u012f kur? Nepamenu matau nieko apie pagrindinio \"talk\" s\u0105ra\u0161\u0105 (vietoje, kad politika sako, kad jie tur\u0117jo b\u016bti aptarti).
\nDar vienas dalykas, atlikite naudojimo prasmingus Pakeista komentarus. Tie, kurie turite naudojamos (pavyzd\u017eiui, \"Perl Script\", \"anuliavimas\" ir \"pataisymai\") teikia absoliu\u010diai jokios informacijos apie tai, k\u0105 pakeisti, arba kod\u0117l Jums j\u012f pakeit\u0117. Bent kai kuriais atvejais jums neatrodo, kad \u012fk\u0117l\u0119s jokio \u0161altinio arba.
\n\u017dinoma - tai galimyb\u0117, kad gali b\u016bti \u0161iek tiek nesusipratim\u0173 \u010dia (ty tu ne visai suprasti poky\u010dius, kurie buvo padaryti taikymo sritis), ir, jei turite koki\u0173 nors klausim\u0173, pra\u0161ome visais gausite susisiekti su mumis per data@osmfoundation.org. Ta\u010diau, jei j\u016bs ir toliau atlikti mechanines keitimus be diskusij\u0173, sukelti duomen\u0173 problem\u0173, kaip min\u0117ta pirmiau, ar ne naudoti prasmingus Pakeista komentarus tada jums bus u\u017eblokuotas nuo redagavimo ilgesn\u012f laik\u0105.
\nNuo\u0161ird\u017eiausi link\u0117jimai,
\nAndy Townsend, vardu OSM Data Working Group
\nYou are continuing to make mechanical edits without discussion. In
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/603
\nyou were told \"if you continue to perform mechanical edits without discussion, cause data problems as mentioned above or not use meaningful changeset comments then you will be blocked from editing for a longer period of time.\"
\nYour edit in
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29015160
\ndoes not have a meaningful changeset comment, and is an edit to a node that had subject to a previously reverted mechanical edit by another user. You have not contacted the data working group to explain what's going on here.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (\"SomeoneElse\"), on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group.
\nwambacher,
\nYou have been asked several times to provide a more reasonable source for your changesets and or to provide a changeset comment that explains them.
\nTherefore I am placing a 0-hour block on your account, which means that to continue editing, you must log into osm.org and acknowledge this message.
\nWhile we don't normally have strict requirements for changing objects, you are modifying national boundaries, which are objects which are considered highly important and sensitive.
\nIn your future edits of important boundaries, please use a source tag which is accurate and or a chanegset comment that explains what it is that you're editing.
\nIf you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org.
\nThank you,
\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the OSM Data Working Group
\nHello andyb109,
\nSince you started editing OpenStreetMap six weeks ago you've added a lot of \"natural=peak\" data to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately quite a lot of them seem to be:
\nduplicates of existing data,
misnamed, or
in the wrong place
As an example, a few days ago you added:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3371183186/history#map=16/52.9431/-3.2090
\nThis is an almost exact duplicate of:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1860837217
\nwhich has been in the database for over two years. I'm sending you this message as one that you have to read before continuing editing because previous attempts at communication have failed. I've previously added to changeset discussions to the following changesets:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28284143\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28433302\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28503017\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28504411\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28506109\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28506129\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28508130\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28511355\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28651871\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28688379\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28735192\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28735244\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28735381
\nbut haven't heard anything back. It's possible that your email is misconfigured, which is why I'm sending this message like in this way.
\nOpenStreetMap is a shared database. We all collectively benefit from the data that we all individually add to it. Unfortunately, if people add duplicates, misnamed or misplaced things, it devalues the hard work of the people who have previously added valid data. I've deleted some of the duplicates above already; other mappers have deleted some of the others.
\nIt's therefore important that we all take care to get things right. It's not good enough to pick some text on an OS OpenData or out-of-copyright map, find a nearby area of high ground, and assign that name to it regardless of whether in real life it's likely to be called that or not. For example, at this location:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3295427561/history#map=16/52.9261/-3.5377
\nthere is a name \"Lily's Wood\" on both the OS OpenData and NLS 1:25k OOC maps. However, in this case it is likely that it applies to the wood in which the name occurs:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286819272
\nwhich was added to OpenStreetMap some time ago (the clue is in the word \"wood\").
\nThe NLS 1:25k contours do show a local maximum in the ground level within the wood, but no name distinct name appears to be assigned to it - and therefore no name should be made up for it within OSM. It's also important that meaningful changeset comments are used to help communicate to other mappers how the data was added and why it is valid. In this case (changeset comment \"Added new peak\") this was not done.
\nSo, once you've read this message please do continue editing OpenStreetmap, but please do make sure that:
\nYou don't duplicate existing data that has already been added.
You only add data that is valid, correctly named and in the correct location.
You don't make up names because you think \"this ought to be a named peak\" where in reality it is not.
You use meaningful changeset comments explaining how any why you know that the edits are valid. Not just something like \"Added peak name from OS data\", but: which OS data? OS OpenData or an out of copyright map? If an out of copyright map which one, and how do you know that that name is still valid now? If you don't abide by these rules you will be stopped from editing OpenStreetMap.
If you've got any questions please don't hesitate to contact me or anyone else in OSM's data working group by email to data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend, on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group.
\nDear user gergo211,
\nyou are making a large number of edits and the Romanian community has tried to reach out to you about these edits because they run counter to established tagging standards in the country. It seems that you have not received these messages because you are continuing with your edits without response or change.
\nPlease log in to OSM and read the messages, then review your tagging before you continue.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
dear user gergo211,
\nYesterday we applied what is known as a 0-hour block requesting that you log in to read a message before continuing to edit street names in Targu Mures.
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/607
\n\"you are making a large number of edits and the Romanian community has tried to reach out to you about these edits because they run counter to established tagging standards in the country. It seems that you have not received these messages because you are continuing with your edits without response or change.\"
\nWe are still getting complaints from others in the Romanian mapper community, so I'm applying a three-hour block for the duration of this morning, as you are breaking the work of others in what is considered to be a reference city.
\nPlease read back over the correspondance that has been started with you and reconsider your edits to OpenStreetMap.
\nFollow on block - same activities as noted earlier.
\nPlease do contact the local community before continuing to edit.
\nIf you have any questions, please email data@osmfoundation.org.
\nThis is a test block of 0 hours
\nDear BitcoinMaps,
\nit appears that your site allows anonymous users to add data to OpenStreetMap, against a Google Maps background.
\nThis is not acceptable for copyright reasons; firstly, we cannot know where the data comes from and whether the contributing user really is within their rights to add the data to OSM. (We also dislike data contributed under collective accounts beause it means we cannot contact the contributing user.) Secondly, by positioning the node on Google Maps we're deriving location information from their data set which isn't ok either.
\nPlease do not add further POIs to OSM without addressing these points.
\nBest wishes
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Please do not add ficitional data to OpenStreetMap. If you are editing as part of a learning assignment please ask your teacher to contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Please do not add ficitional data to OpenStreetMap. If you are editing as part of a learning assignment please ask your teacher to contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Please do not add ficitional data to OpenStreetMap. If you are editing as part of a learning assignment please ask your teacher to contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Please do not add ficitional data to OpenStreetMap. If you are editing as part of a learning assignment please ask your teacher to contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Please do not add ficitional data to OpenStreetMap. If you are editing as part of a learning assignment please ask your teacher to contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Please do not add ficitional data to OpenStreetMap. If you are editing as part of a learning assignment please ask your teacher to contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Please do not add ficitional data to OpenStreetMap. If you are editing as part of a learning assignment please ask your teacher to contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Please do not add ficitional data to OpenStreetMap. If you are editing as part of a learning assignment please ask your teacher to contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Please do not add ficitional data to OpenStreetMap. If you are editing as part of a learning assignment please ask your teacher to contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Please do not add ficitional data to OpenStreetMap. If you are editing as part of a learning assignment please ask your teacher to contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Blocked for repeated vandalism (see http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=30384).
\nDear mogeogis,
\nYou have been asked several times to provide a more reasonable source for your changesets and/or to provide a descriptive changeset comment. In addition, you continue to add new high-level administrative areas in the South China Sea.
\nI am placing a 0 hour block on your account, which means that to continue editing, you must log into the OSM site and acknowledge this message.
\nPlease identify the source used in your edits so we can confirm the information is from an OSM-compatible source. In addition, please provide descriptive changeset comments (here is a good source of information on this topic).
\nIf you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org.
\nThank you,\nEthan (FTA) on behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nHello rbuch703,
\nI've reverted a series of tag-deleting changesets that you've recently applied.
\nAll of those changesets deleted information that other mappers had previously added to the database. Taking http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29505495 as an example, You edited http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84209215/history so that it was no longer clear that the source of the \"atv\" tag was different to the source of the other tags. You also removed a source code for the IATA tag from http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185882029 .
\nI tried to discuss the problem with you in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29505495 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29495755 , but there you seem to be disregarding alternative views altogether. You say \"And this makes that tag worthless. Deletable.\", but you on your own aren't the tag police - changes such as this need to be discussed with the wider community and different people's views taken into account.
\nMany of the objects in these changesets were possibly created by new and inexperienced mappers, and it's likely that in many cases other local mappers may well decide to change the tagging used - and hopefully discuss how to tag things with them. However, just removing tagging that you don't understand means that there's no easy way for other mappers to improve it in the future - for example, it's very likely that it's possible to tag http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234050335 better , either based on the note as it stands, or by seeing the note and deciding to go and survey, but no-one will be able to do this if the tag is removed altogether.
\nI've sent this as a public message that you have to read before continuing editing not to stop you from editing OSM, but so that you have to read this before continuing to do so. Please do continue to edit OpenStreetMap, but don't just delete information that other people on the other side of the continent have added because you don't understand it. Please also do use meaningful changeset comments (\"removed invalid tags\" is not at all meaningful) that explain what changes you're making and what the source of those changes was. If you continue with edits such as this you WILL be blocked from editing.
\nIf you have any further questions please don't hesitate to contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group.
\nchatt980,
\nYou were asked on changeset 2960562 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29605652) about the source of your edits. It looks like from the edits you've been making that this is an import.
\nImports are required to go through the Import Guidelines (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines).
\nBecause you didn't respond to my changeset discussion post, I am sending you this Stop Message, which requires that you log onto osm.org and read this message before you are able to edit again.
\nPlease explain the source of the data in your recent changesets before you adding more data to OSM.
\nIf you have any questions, please contact the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org
\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the OSM Data Working Group
\nDaxeon,
\nOn changeset 29610762, I explained that you couldn't use Google as a source for your edits. Using Google Maps (or any other maps) as a source in OSM isn't allowed. For more information on this, please read the wiki page on Google data.
\nSince my changeset discussion message, you've made several more edits. I need to bring this issue to your attention quickly so we can resolve it (removing any Google derived data), so I'm putting this Stop Message in place, which requires that you log in and read this message before continuing to edit OSM.
\nPlease reply either on the changeset mentioned above, via OSM private message or by regular email to data@osmfoundation.org regarding the Google derived data, and please stop using Google as a reference on your future edits.
\nIf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to email or private message me, or the OSM Data Working Group, at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThank you,
\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the OSM Data Working Group
\nBlocked for repeated vandalism.
\nDear user Wikilux,
\nyou have added about a thousand street names to OpenStreetMap in the past weeks, many of them in Switzerland in places where there is no known legal source from which this data may be copied.
\nYou have not specified a source, or a meaningful changeset comment, with your edits (example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29552989).
\nHave you visited all these places yourself recently, or if not, what is the source of your information?
\nA mapper has written to you about this and not heard back from you, therefore I'm putting this blocking message in your account so that we can be sure that you read it before you continue.
\nBest wishes
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF data working group
Dear User nomatrix,
\nyou explained to me in a private message that you wanted to leave OSM and un-do all your edits, or at least those that people have complained about. I said don't worry we can take care of that. Now I see that you're executing large-scale deletions which have unwanted side effects. Please don't do that.
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Follow-on block from http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/624
\nSame problem; in this case an example is the undiscussed removal of tags from http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25191831/history
\nBlocked for repeated politically motivated distortion of boundaries in OSM.
\nJayCBR,
\nYou have made a number of reclassifications of roads that have caused several members of the Data Working Group some concern. We ask that you please coordinate with your local community members to ensure that the roads that you are reclassifying are in line with what local mappers believe they should be.
\nTherefore I am sending you this Stop Message, which requires that you log into your OSM account and acknowledge this message before being able to continue editing.
\nPlease do not reclassify any more roads until you have worked with the local community to resolve this matter and that you ensure that your edits make sense within a context of the local area.
\nIf you have any questions, please email the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThank you,
\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the OSM Data Working Group
\nHallo L\u00f6schomat,
\nbitte beherzige die Hinweise in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29870671. Danke.
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Helina,
\nOn the following changesets:
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30581704\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30581271
\nYou have performed an import without following the OSM Import Guidelines: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
\nBecause of the earthquake in Nepal, the mapper need the best data available, free of duplicates or other problematic issues that can arise during an unvetted import, which this appears to be.
\nI and other mappers have placed changeset discussion posts on these changesets asking for a source. I am placing this stop message on your account to ensure that you see this message and that you address these concerns of the community as quickly as possible. Normally we might not use a stop message, but in this case, due to the urgent nature of mapping in Nepal, we need to ensure that you see this message as quickly as possible.
\nOnce you log into your account on www.openstreetmap.org, you will be able to edit again.
\nIf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThank you,
\nDear user \u0393\u03b9\u03ac\u03bd\u03bd\u03b7\u03c2 4,
\nI'm afraid I will have to revert the edits you have made to OpenStreetMap, as they have been complained about by other users and at least those I can understand are clearly bogus - \"trying out\" different road types, etc.
\nIn the future, please make sure that you only upload factual data to OSM. Also, when you upload data, please use the \"commit comment\" that allows you to write a few words about what you just did, so that other mappers can understand why you made a certain change e.g. a highway re-classification.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear user Pujan Poudyal,
\nplease stop importing data into OSM. While we were deleting your first buggy imports, you already started new ones. The license of the data you're using is not compatible with OSM and you're not following the import guidelines.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Blocked for repeated vandalism and being uncooperative.
\nChangeset discussions and problematical edits:
\nOver the last few months I've asked you (as a local GB mapper) about a number of questionable edits in England and Wales. I have never had a reply to any of these changeset discussions from you.
\nThree months ago, on behalf of the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group, I sent this message:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/606
\nIn that I said \"OpenStreetMap is a shared database. We all collectively benefit from the data that we all individually add to it. Unfortunately, if people add duplicates, misnamed or misplaced things, it devalues the hard work of the people who have previously added valid data\". I also asked that \"You use meaningful changeset comments explaining how any why you know that the edits are valid\".
\nLast week I sent you another OSM message, asking the same thing, and also asked for clarification of a recent changeset:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31374414
\n(the http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/606 message contains a list of links to previous questions about edits)
\nNo reply was received.
\nIt is important that you don't just ignore other mappers as you have been doing. Please, when you start editing again, do follow all of the requests made in:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/606
\nIt's important that, as a community, OpenStreetMap mappers work together. This means that we need to communicate with each other and reply to each others messages. As I said before, if you don't abide by these rules you will be stopped from editing OpenStreetMap again.
\nIf you've got any questions please don't hesitate to contact me or anyone else in OSM's data working group by email to data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend, on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group.
\nDear Christopher,
\nthank you for contributing to OSM!
\nThere have been a few problems with your edits in the past which the community wanted to discuss with you (see e.g. comments on pages https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31416188 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31481743 ). However you either chose not to respond, or perhaps you have accidentally overlooked these issues.
\nPlease, be a team player and talk to your fellow mappers about these problems - otherwise your work might even have to be reverted because of problems and that would be a waste of time for you and others!
\nI have placed a short-term block on your account to make 100% sure that you read this message before you continue mapping. The block will be lifted automatically as soon as you log in to read the message.
\nBest wishes
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear *,
\non 28th May, more than 100 OSM accounts, all named after public transport stations in Verlin, started adding POIs to OpenStreetMap, obviously copying some sort of yellow pages directory, and obviously using some sort of bot or custom-made software.
\nWe must consider this an import, and we don't know anything about your sources and whether they are legal. The fact that you neglected prior discussion with the community and that you are using that many accounts raises a number of questions.
\nBefore you continue, please discuss your plans on either the German OpenStreetMap Forum, or the talk-de mailing list, or the imports mailing list.
\nThe edits you have already made will likely be reverted. Under no circumstances should you create new accounts to circumvent these blocks.
\nThank you for your consideration
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Blocked for repeated deletion of relations and ignoring DWG guidance.
\nBlocked for continued, automated addition of SEO spam.
\nDear user giannhs626,
\nyou seem to be adding fictional data to OpenStreetMap. Please note that OpenStreetMap is not the place for such; we only record facts on the ground. Your edits will be have to be reverted.
\nPlease stop making such fantasy edits in the future.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hello andyb109,
\nYou appear to have been adding invalid data to OSM, and not replying to questions about the legitimacy of it. The latest example is http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31841578 , which appears to be a \"natural=peak\" at the bottom of a quarry.
\nI've tried to get in touch many times over the last few months (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/606 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/638 for examples of changesets with discussions on them) but have received no reply.
\nPlease, when you start editing again, do follow all of the requests made in:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/606
\nIt's important that, as a community, OpenStreetMap mappers work together. This means that we need to communicate with each other and reply to each others messages. As I said before, if you don't abide by these rules you will be stopped from editing OpenStreetMap again.
\nPlease do contact me or anyone else in OSM's data working group by email via data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend, on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group.
\nOl\u00e1 User006,
\nParece haver algum desacordo com a classifica\u00e7\u00e3o de estradas ao redor Linhares. Por exemplo,
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328842747/history
\nfoi originalmente adicionado como \"highway = primary\". Voc\u00ea, ent\u00e3o, mudou para \"highway = trunk\", algu\u00e9m mudou de volta para \"highway = primary\", voc\u00ea, em seguida, mudou para \"highway = trunk\" novamente, e algu\u00e9m mudou de volta para \"highway = primary\". Claramente estes \"para tr\u00e1s e para a frente\" mudan\u00e7as n\u00e3o conseguir nada, ent\u00e3o eu sugiro tentar discutir essas mudan\u00e7as com a comunidade. Voc\u00ea pode fazer isso em um par de formas:
\nhttp://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=74
\n(F\u00f3rum dos usu\u00e1rios brasileiros)
\nhttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
\n(O \"talk-br\" mailing list)
\nUm n\u00famero de pessoas tem tentado entrar em contato com voc\u00ea via discuss\u00f5es changeset:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31943081\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31943127\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31943191\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31944263
\n\u00c9 poss\u00edvel que haja um problema com o seu e-mail, que \u00e9 por isso que eu estou enviando esta mensagem como um que voc\u00ea tem que ler antes de continuar a editar. Uma vez que voc\u00ea ler esta mensagem, voc\u00ea ser\u00e1 capaz de editar openstreetmap novamente, mas, por favor, tente conversar com outros mapeadores antes de fazer altera\u00e7\u00f5es de grande escala de classifica\u00e7\u00e3o estrada.
\nCumprimentos,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse), em nome do Grupo de Trabalho de Dados do OpenStreetMap.
\n(in English)
\nHello User006,
\nThere seems to be some disagreement with the classification of highways around Linhares. For example,
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328842747/history
\nwas originally added as \"highway=primary\". You then changed it to \"highway=trunk\", somebody changed it back to \"highway=primary\", you then changed it to \"highway=trunk\" again, and somebody else changed it back to \"highway=primary\". Clearly these \"backwards and forwards\" changes doesn't achieve anything, so I'd suggest trying to discuss these changes with the community. You can do that in a couple of ways:
\nhttp://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=74
\n(the Brazilian users' forum)
\nhttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
\n(the \"talk-br\" mailing list)
\nA number of people have tried to contact you via changeset discussions:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31943081\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31943127\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31943191\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31944263
\nIt's possible that there is a problem with your email, which is why I'm sending this message as one that you have to read before continuing to edit. Once you've read this message you'll be able to edit openstreetmap again, but please do try to talk to other mappers before making large scale road classification changes.
\nBest regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nDear BitcoinMaps,
\nYou still seem to be adding \"bookshops\" to the map such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3568168894 . Can you explain why this is a valid tagging in this case? It certainly does not look it at first glance.
\nI'm sending this as a message that must be read before edits continue because previous attempts at communication such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31724942 have failed.
\nIf you've got any questions please don't hesitate to contact me or anyone else in OSM's data working group by email to data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend, on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group.
\nDear user frutellake,
\nintroducing errors into OSM on purpose is vandalism. Performing vandalism for \"research\" reasons doesn't make it better.
\nPlease don't do this ever again, and I also suggest that you refrain from using the results of this \"research\" in a publication because otherwise that publication is likely to attract heavy criticism from the OpenStreetMap community.
\nBest regards
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
dear Farooq,
\nThank you for your recent attempts to contribute to OpenStreetmap.
\nHowever, you have been adding and resolving a lot of notes to the map, marking points of interest where they clearly already exist. Members of the osm-gb community have tried to get in touch via the OpenStreetmap message system, offering advice on how best to add to the map.
\nThis \"zero-hour block\" means that you must log in once and read your OpenStreetmap messages before you can continue to edit the map.
\nThanks
\nJo Walsh aka zool, on behalf of the Data Working Group
\nI've blocked again for repeatedly adding of duplicate / invalid data, in this case http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3611701986/history , which is clearly the same item as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/294114509 , and the imagery and footpaths suggest that the previous version was correctly placed and your new version is not.
\nSee http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/752 , http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/638 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/606 and links in those for details of previous issues.
\nAgain, please don't hesitate to contact me or anyone else in OSM's data working group by email to data@osmfoundation.org . It is important that as mappers within OSM we work together - I've never seen any communication from you in reply to requests from other mappers in changeset discussion comments, or received any email.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend, on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group.
\nHello CYM1988,
\nI've blocked you as a sock-puppet account of \"andyb109\".
\nThe reasoning behind this is that this account (like andyb109) has added duplicate and invalid data such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3605025495/history and has not replied to questions about problematical changesets such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32072897 .
\nIf you believe this is in error and the duplicates / hills at the bottom of quarries are actually valid, please email data@osmfoundation.org to discuss.
\nBest regards,
\nAndy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nDear user streetkeysmv,
\nthere have been questions regarding your recent import of German \"Stra\u00dfenschl\u00fcssel\", especially concerning the lack of previous discussion and the unclear legal situation for your data source. You have received messages about this but you are continuing your import, hence this \"blocking message\" that forces you to pause. The block will go away after 12 hours but I expect you to participate in the discussion on http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31618 before you do any further imports.
\nThank you for your understanding
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
dear szymon_m,
\nThank you for your recent attempts to contribute to OpenStreetMap.
\nHowever, you have been uploading some duplicate data without checking that it already exists. A couple of local mappers have been in touch with you, offering advice and corrections, but no-one has heard back.
\nOn behalf of the Data Working Group I am imposing this zero-hour block, which obliges you to log into OSM and read messages before you can continue to add to the map.
\nPlease try to add informative comments including data sources.
\nJo Walsh aka zool for the Data Working Group
\nDear user michaelis1888,
\nyou have made a number of edits that the Slovak community found needed an explanation, e.g.
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20486433\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29707792\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32036957\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32057091
\nbut you haven't replied to their comments. There's a public discussion about your edits here; https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/osm_sk/3k0tviCWaDk
\nPlease, before making further edits, try to understand the problems they see in your contributions, and reply to questions posed by your fellow mappers. OpenStreetMap is a community effort and we need to work together, not against each other, to make the best map!
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hello,
\nThere have been concerns raised about your adding what appears to be fictitious roads near http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/11.65377/78.16165
\nCould you please respond to these concerns, either in the changeset discussion at http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32398551, or by private message.
\nThanks,
\nPaul Norman\nFor the Data Working Group
\nDear chelyuskin4,
\nYou have made multiple edits in the South China Sea region adding very fine detail to some of the islands. This detail is far too fine compared to the available compatibly-licensed satellite imagery provided for OpenStreetMap use; you also directly identify incompatible sources from which you have copied.
\nI am placing a 0 hour block on your account, which means that to continue editing, you must log into the OSM site and acknowledge this message.
\nDo not continue to use commercial satellite imagery that is not compatible with OpenStreetMap. You may reference this page for more information. Because the data added is from incompatible sources, the changesets have been reverted. In the future, continue to identify the source of any added data...just be sure to use a proper source.
\nPlease do not hesitate to contact me or the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org if you have any questions.
\nSincerely,
\nEthan aka FTA on behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\ndear mapper szymon_m, excuse my writiing to you in English,
\nI regret to apply another block to your account, but some of your recent edits still look very doubtful - for example this pathway in the sea - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360146339#map=17/52.98398/15.22974
\nPlease map the world on the ground and respect the efforts of your fellow mappers to contact and correct you. I've reverted your most recent changeset; if you have problems with this and explanations for the changes, please get in touch at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThe block I am applying to your account will last for twelve hours. Please make an effort to reply to your fellow mappers comments' and changeset discussions; we are all trying to improve OpenStreetMap together.
\nJo Walsh aka zool, for the Data Working Group.
\nDear user dk_hk,
\nyou are adding a large amount of name:hu tags to objects around the world. Please stop that for a moment, and explain to the imports mailing list or to data@osmfoundation org what your data source is and how you are adding these names, and especially if you have the local knowledge that enables you to say whether the names you're adding are indeed the right names. Sadly, OSM has had a couple cases in the past where people were mass-copying data from unsuitable sources and we want to avoid such events in the future.
\n(Also, please use the changeset comment field to describe what you're doing - it is there for a reason.)
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear user ClaudDadur,
\nyou are adding a large amount of name:ru tags to objects around the world. Please stop that for a moment, and explain to the imports mailing list or to data@osmfoundation org what your data source is and how you are adding these names, and especially if you have the local knowledge that enables you to say whether the names you're adding are indeed the right names. Sadly, OSM has had a couple cases in the past where people were mass-copying data from unsuitable sources and we want to avoid such events in the future.
\n(Also, please use the changeset comment field to describe what you're doing - it is there for a reason.)
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Blocked for continued addition of name:hu tags without getting in touch as requested in previous block.
\nHello,
\nquestions have been raised about an import of Corine in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32191037.
\nCould you please make sure to reply to the changeset discussion comment?
\nThanks,
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
Hello,
\nI'm sending this as a \"message that has to be read\" before editing can continue to draw your attention to the discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32767835 and some of your other changesets. Some people have had problems receiving emails from osm.org, and have missed being notified about changeset discussion comments; I'm sending this just in case you have that problem too.
\nYou'll be able to continue editing normally as soon as you have read this message, though of course I would certainly suggest that you try and address the points raised in changeset discussions and answer the questions asked. We all edit the same map and it's important that we all work together and that the valuable contributions of mappers who go out and survey stuff isn't diluted by \"mechanical-turk-edits\" that simply change valid tags that they do not understand (though no-one, I suspect, is going to argue that changing \"color\" to \"colour\" requires a huge amount of discussion beforehand and causes data to be lost.
\nNote that the mechanical edit policy
\nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
\ncontains the following:
\n\"This includes ... use of find-and-replace functionality using a standard editor such as JOSM or using an XAPI service where the changes are not reviewed individually;\". I'd take \"reviewed individually\" to mean more here than just \"looking at the tags already on the object without looking at the context\".
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend aka SomeoneElse, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nIn https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25331879 I asked what the source of the changeset was, as it's claimed it's from Tracksource, a copyrighted source, but you haven't replied to the changeset comment.
\nCould you either reply there, email data@osmfoundation.org, or send me a message.
\nHello,
\nIn https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25331879 I asked what the source of the changeset was, as it's claimed it's from Tracksource, a copyrighted source, but you haven't replied to the changeset comment.
\nCould you either reply there, email data@osmfoundation.org, or send me a message.
\nOi
\nNo https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25331879 eu perguntei sobre o fonte do changeset, como fui denunciado do TrackSource, um fonte com restri\u00e7\u00f5es de copia, mas voc\u00ea n\u00e3o me respondeu
\nVoce pode responder ou no email data@osmfoundation.org, ou me manda um recado.
\nBlocked for adding more duplicate and invalid data. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/758 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/andyb109/blocks for the history on this.
\nOne example of new \"duplicate or invalid data\" is http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32496403 (there are a number of others too).
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32799118 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32798872 are examples where you've ignored recent messages from other mappers (although only 3 days ago you have edited since).
\nAs ever, if you believe this is in error and the duplicates are actually valid, please email data@osmfoundation.org to discuss.
\nBest regards,
\nAndy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nDear user RD1,
\nit appears that you might be the same person who has used the \"Rondale\" account until it was blocked 9 months ago (around the time the RD1 account was created).
\nIs that true?
\nBest
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear user \u0393\u03b9\u03ac\u03bd\u03bd\u03b7\u03c2 1,
\nyou seem to be adding fictional data to OSM, and deleting correct information. Furthermore your edits follow a pattern we've seen in two other blocked accounts.
\nIf you are a genuine user then perhaps there's a misunderstanding. I suggest that you use changeset comments to explain what you think you are doing so that others can better understand, and possibly help.
\nIf you are someone who thinks it is funny to vandalize OpenStreetMap data, let me tell you that in most European countries, including Greece, computer vandalism is against the law. I sincerely hope you'll not risk prosecution for this \"joke\".
\nBest
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear ddtuga,
\nI am placing a 0 hour block on your account, meaning you must log in and read this message to continue editing.
\nYou have been introducing many errors into OpenStreetMap with your edits, e.g. removing layer tags from objects, adding strange tags inside ways, and abbreviating already-correct street names. In addition, many members of the local OSM community have attempted to contact you through the OpenStreetMap messaging system and changeset comments offering help on how you can improve your contributions to OSM.
\nIf you have questions about how to map something properly, great resources to consult are the OSM wiki and OSM's Q&A--or feel free to ask for assistance from anyone, including those who have previously reached out. It would be helpful to reply to the changeset comments they have left so things can be resolved.
\nLastly, please remember to include descriptive changeset comments with every edit. These comments are a courtesy to help others understand what edits you have made.
\nFeel free to reach out to either me or the Data Working Group if you have any questions.
\nBest Regards,
\nEthan (FTA) on behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\n(tradu\u00e7\u00e3o aproximada da m\u00e1quina)
\nCaro ddtuga,
\nEu estou colocando um bloco 0 horas em sua conta, ou seja, \u00e9 necess\u00e1rio fazer login e ler esta mensagem para continuar editando.
\nVoc\u00ea foi a adi\u00e7\u00e3o de muitos erros em OpenStreetMap com suas edi\u00e7\u00f5es, por exemplo, remover marcas \"camada\" de objetos, adicionar objetos curioso em locais, e abreviar nomes de ruas. Al\u00e9m disso, muitos membros da comunidade OSM local tentou contat\u00e1-lo atrav\u00e9s do sistema de mensagens e coment\u00e1rios da altera\u00e7\u00e3o OpenStreetMap para oferecer ajuda em como voc\u00ea pode melhorar contribui\u00e7\u00f5es para o OSM.
\nSe voc\u00ea tiver d\u00favidas sobre como mapear algo corretamente, grandes recursos para consultar s\u00e3o o OSM wiki e do OSM Q & A - ou sinta-se livre para pedir a ajuda de ningu\u00e9m, incluindo aqueles que j\u00e1 estendeu a m\u00e3o. Seria \u00fatil para responder aos coment\u00e1rios das altera\u00e7\u00f5es que foram deixadas para que as coisas podem ser resolvidas.
\nFinalmente, lembre-se de incluir coment\u00e1rios descritivos para todas as mudan\u00e7as. Estes coment\u00e1rios s\u00e3o uma cortesia para ajudar os outros a entender o que voc\u00ea edita realizada.
\nSinta-se livre para chegar a mim ou o Data Working Group se voc\u00ea tiver quaisquer perguntas.
\nCumprimentos,
\nEthan (FTA) do OSMF Data Working Group
\nHello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
\nAs you'll no doubt be aware, OpenStreetMap is about mapping what's there in the real world, and we're all editing the same map, so \"mass deletions\" such as in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33149078 affect everyone.
\nI notice that local mappers have been in contact in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33152447 (comment \"This is a joke that I am playing on you\") and have also tidied up the problems, so hopefully everything's back to how it was before.
\nObviously it's possible that you didn't make these edits at all and someone guessed your password or got access to an unlocked PC, so I'm sending this message as one that has to be read before continuing to edit so that you're aware of it.
\nIf it was a \"PC unlocked\" accident I'd definitely reply to the changeset discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33152447 apologising and explaining what happened so everyone knows - as I said before, we're all editing the same map and need to work together to do that.
\nIf you're looking for some sort of \"test server\" then you'll find that http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ is exactly that (though I don't think that anyone renders tiles from the data there). If you want an place to map imaginary places, then http://opengeofiction.net/ may be for you.
\nHowever, if changes that need to be reverted continue you may need to be blocked from OpenStreetMap.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nPlease don't create garbage test data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363764256 in OpenStreetMap.
\nOpenStreetMap is a shared resource; everyone sees the same map. Adding this \"test\" data devalues the work of everyone else contributing to the project.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse), on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nBonjour hugo06, et bienvenue dans le projet.
\nJe vous relais ici le message de vincent car il semble que vous n'avez pas chang\u00e9 votre comportement malgr\u00e9 sa demande de rejoindre la discussion. Un blocage a donc \u00e9t\u00e9 plac\u00e9 sur votre compte afin de s'assurer que vous avez bien lu notre message et que vous en tiendrez compte.
\nIl appara\u00eet que tes premi\u00e8res contributions ont effac\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es \nvalides autour de Lons-le-Saunier. Il faut savoir qu'en utilisant \nl'\u00e9diteur en ligne iD, ce que tu effaces est r\u00e9ellement effac\u00e9 dans la \nbase OpenStreetMap. Merci donc de veiller \u00e0 ne pas effacer, par \ninadvertance, des donn\u00e9es lors de tes prochaines contributions.
\nN'h\u00e9site pas \u00e0 rejoindre le forum si tu souhaites poser des questions et \nobtenir des conseils : http://forum.openstreetmap.fr/viewforum.php?f=10
\nBonne continuation,
\nvincent
\nHallo Hala135,
\nbei der Data Working Group ist eine Beschwerde \u00fcber L\u00f6schungen von Dir in der Region von Cottbus eingegangen. Du hast in zahlreichen Changesets stra\u00dfenbegleitende Fu\u00dfwege entfernt mit dem Kommentar, sie seien stattdessen als \"sidewalk\" zu mappen. Zugleich hast Du aber die von Dir behauptete korrekte Situation (n\u00e4mlich ein Tagging unter Verwendung von \"sidewalk\") gar nicht hergestellt. Du hast also n\u00fctzliche Information gel\u00f6scht.
\nDu wurdest von Mitgliedern der Community in Changeset-Diskussionen darauf aufmerksam gemacht, hast aber nicht reagiert und die kritisierten \u00c4nderungen weiterhin durchgef\u00fchrt. Du h\u00e4ttest aber bei umstrittenen \u00c4nderungen einen Konsens suchen sollen, statt \"mit dem Kopf durch die Wand\" Deine Haltung durchzusetzen.
\nDu magst ja Gr\u00fcnde haben, und vielleicht sogar \u00fcberzeugende, aber Einw\u00e4nde einfach zu ignorieren, ist keine ad\u00e4quate Reaktion, um andere zu \u00fcberzeugen.
\nBitte diskutiere die Frage in einem geeigneten Forum, bevor Du weitere \u00c4nderungen an stra\u00dfenbegleitenden Wegen vornimmst.
\nDiese Nachricht sperrt Deinen Account nur so lange, bis Du sie gelesen hast, danach kannst Du wieder normal weiterarbeiten.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hello,
\nIt has come to the attention of the Data Working Group that you have been deleting or modifying controversial objects. Members of the local Italian community have contacted you, in addition to members of the DWG, through changeset discussions and private OSM messages, to which you haven't replied.
\nIn addition, the changesets in question do not have changeset comments.
\nIn order to work productively with the community as a whole, we ask that you please respond to changeset discussions around the topics in question to encourage discussion around your edits, and that you use changeset comments on your future changesets in order to let others in your local community understand not only what you are changing, but why.
\nBecause you haven't responded to any other communication medium, I am placing this Stop Message in place. That means that you will not be able to edit OSM until you have read and acknowledged this message by logging into osm.org.
\nOnce you do, you will be able to edit again normally.
\nIf you have any questions, please don't hesitate the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThank you,
\nSerge Wroclawski\non behalf of the OSM Data Working Group
\nHola Mar\u00eda Jimena,
\nOpenStreetMap es un proyecto colaborativo y cada aporte es bienvenido, pero no es un lugar para hacer pruebas de mapeamiento, tampoco puede ser usada como si fuera un mapa privado para trazar sus propias rutas. La \"ruta desde mi casa hasta CU\" no es una informaci\u00f3n que pertenezca al mapa general del mundo, creo lo entiendas. Tambi\u00e9n hay reglas y convenciones en el uso de los tags; highway=track representa a un camino rural, lo cual no viene al caso.
\nPor cierto, hay otras formas para trazar sus propias rutas y compartirlas en la web, este es un sitio que permete hacerlo de manera muy sencilla y que hace uso de OpenStreetMap: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nTu cuenta est\u00e1 suspendida hasta que leas este mensaje.
\nGracias\nUn saludo
\nPeda\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nHi Mar\u00eda Jimena,
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative project and every contribution is welcome, but keep in mind it is not a place to make tests, nor it is a private map to share your own routes. The \"route from my house to the university\" is not\nsomething you'd expect to see in a general world map, I think you will understand it. There are also rules and conventions behind OSM tagging; highway=track is meant to be a road for agricultural use, which is not the case here.
\nThere are other useful tools to trace your own routes and share them online, this is a user-friendly interface making use of OSM data as background: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nYour account is temporarily blocked until you read this message.
\nThanks,
\nPeda\non behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nHola JulesGaP,
\nOpenStreetMap es un proyecto colaborativo y cada aporte es bienvenido, pero no es un lugar para hacer pruebas de mapeamiento, tampoco puede ser usada como si fuera un mapa privado para trazar sus propias rutas. La \"ruta desde mi casa hasta CU\" no es una informaci\u00f3n que pertenezca al mapa general del mundo, creo lo entiendas. Tambi\u00e9n hay reglas y convenciones en el uso de los tags; highway=track representa a un camino rural, lo cual no viene al caso.
\nPor cierto, hay otras formas para trazar sus propias rutas y compartirlas en la web, este es un sitio que permete hacerlo de manera muy sencilla y que hace uso de OpenStreetMap: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nTu cuenta est\u00e1 suspendida hasta que leas este mensaje.
\nGracias\nUn saludo
\nPeda\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nHi JulesGaP,
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative project and every contribution is welcome, but keep in mind it is not a place to make tests, nor it is a private map to share your own routes. The \"route from my house to the university\" is not something you'd expect to see in a general world map, I think you will understand it. There are also rules and conventions behind OSM tagging; highway=track is meant to be a road for agricultural use, which is not the case here.
\nThere are other useful tools to trace your own routes and share them online, this is a user-friendly interface making use of OSM data as background: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nYour account is temporarily blocked until you read this message.
\nThanks,
\nPeda\non behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nHola GeoBrandon,
\nOpenStreetMap es un proyecto colaborativo y cada aporte es bienvenido, pero no es un lugar para hacer pruebas de mapeamiento, tampoco puede ser usada como si fuera un mapa privado para trazar sus propias rutas. La \"ruta desde mi casa hasta CU\" no es una informaci\u00f3n que pertenezca al mapa general del mundo, creo lo entiendas. Tambi\u00e9n hay reglas y convenciones en el uso de los tags; highway=track representa a un camino rural, lo cual no viene al caso.
\nPor cierto, hay otras formas para trazar sus propias rutas y compartirlas en la web, este es un sitio que permete hacerlo de manera muy sencilla y que hace uso de OpenStreetMap: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nTu cuenta est\u00e1 suspendida hasta que leas este mensaje.
\nGracias\nUn saludo
\nPeda\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nHi GeoBrandon,
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative project and every contribution is welcome, but keep in mind it is not a place to make tests, nor it is a private map to share your own routes. The \"route from my house to the university\" is not something you'd expect to see in a general world map, I think you will understand it. There are also rules and conventions behind OSM tagging; highway=track is meant to be a road for agricultural use, which is not the case here.
\nThere are other useful tools to trace your own routes and share them online, this is a user-friendly interface making use of OSM data as background: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nYour account is temporarily blocked until you read this message.
\nThanks,
\nPeda\non behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nHola Candelario Ju\u00e1rez,
\nOpenStreetMap es un proyecto colaborativo y cada aporte es bienvenido, pero no es un lugar para hacer pruebas de mapeamiento, tampoco puede ser usada como si fuera un mapa privado para trazar sus propias rutas. La \"ruta desde mi casa hasta CU\" no es una informaci\u00f3n que pertenezca al mapa general del mundo, creo lo entiendas. Tambi\u00e9n hay reglas y convenciones en el uso de los tags; highway=track representa a un camino rural, lo cual no viene al caso.
\nPor cierto, hay otras formas para trazar sus propias rutas y compartirlas en la web, este es un sitio que permete hacerlo de manera muy sencilla y que hace uso de OpenStreetMap: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nTu cuenta est\u00e1 suspendida hasta que leas este mensaje.
\nGracias\nUn saludo
\nPeda\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nHi Candelario Ju\u00e1rez,
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative project and every contribution is welcome, but keep in mind it is not a place to make tests, nor it is a private map to share your own routes. The \"route from my house to the university\" is not something you'd expect to see in a general world map, I think you will understand it. There are also rules and conventions behind OSM tagging; highway=track is meant to be a road for agricultural use, which is not the case here.
\nThere are other useful tools to trace your own routes and share them online, this is a user-friendly interface making use of OSM data as background: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nYour account is temporarily blocked until you read this message.
\nThanks,
\nPeda\non behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nHola Jacqueline Castell\u00f3n,
\nOpenStreetMap es un proyecto colaborativo y cada aporte es bienvenido, pero no es un lugar para hacer pruebas de mapeamiento, tampoco puede ser usada como si fuera un mapa privado para trazar sus propias rutas. La \"ruta desde mi casa hasta CU\" no es una informaci\u00f3n que pertenezca al mapa general del mundo, creo lo entiendas. Tambi\u00e9n hay reglas y convenciones en el uso de los tags; highway=track representa a un camino rural, lo cual no viene al caso.
\nPor cierto, hay otras formas para trazar sus propias rutas y compartirlas en la web, este es un sitio que permete hacerlo de manera muy sencilla y que hace uso de OpenStreetMap: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nTu cuenta est\u00e1 suspendida hasta que leas este mensaje.
\nGracias\nUn saludo
\nPeda\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nHi Jacqueline Castell\u00f3n,
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative project and every contribution is welcome, but keep in mind it is not a place to make tests, nor it is a private map to share your own routes. The \"route from my house to the university\" is not something you'd expect to see in a general world map, I think you will understand it. There are also rules and conventions behind OSM tagging; highway=track is meant to be a road for agricultural use, which is not the case here.
\nThere are other useful tools to trace your own routes and share them online, this is a user-friendly interface making use of OSM data as background: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nYour account is temporarily blocked until you read this message.
\nThanks,
\nPeda\non behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nHola leobardx,
\nOpenStreetMap es un proyecto colaborativo y cada aporte es bienvenido, pero no es un lugar para hacer pruebas de mapeamiento, tampoco puede ser usada como si fuera un mapa privado para trazar sus propias rutas. La \"ruta desde mi casa hasta CU\" no es una informaci\u00f3n que pertenezca al mapa general del mundo, creo lo entiendas. Tambi\u00e9n hay reglas y convenciones en el uso de los tags; highway=track representa a un camino rural, lo cual no viene al caso.
\nPor cierto, hay otras formas para trazar sus propias rutas y compartirlas en la web, este es un sitio que permete hacerlo de manera muy sencilla y que hace uso de OpenStreetMap: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nTu cuenta est\u00e1 suspendida hasta que leas este mensaje.
\nGracias\nUn saludo
\nPeda\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nHi leobardx,
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative project and every contribution is welcome, but keep in mind it is not a place to make tests, nor it is a private map to share your own routes. The \"route from my house to the university\" is not something you'd expect to see in a general world map, I think you will understand it. There are also rules and conventions behind OSM tagging; highway=track is meant to be a road for agricultural use, which is not the case here.
\nThere are other useful tools to trace your own routes and share them online, this is a user-friendly interface making use of OSM data as background: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nYour account is temporarily blocked until you read this message.
\nThanks,
\nPeda\non behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nHola Sharon Marlene,
\nOpenStreetMap es un proyecto colaborativo y cada aporte es bienvenido, pero no es un lugar para hacer pruebas de mapeamiento, tampoco puede ser usada como si fuera un mapa privado para trazar sus propias rutas. La \"ruta desde mi casa hasta CU\" no es una informaci\u00f3n que pertenezca al mapa general del mundo, creo lo entiendas. Tambi\u00e9n hay reglas y convenciones en el uso de los tags; highway=track representa a un camino rural, lo cual no viene al caso.
\nPor cierto, hay otras formas para trazar sus propias rutas y compartirlas en la web, este es un sitio que permete hacerlo de manera muy sencilla y que hace uso de OpenStreetMap: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nTu cuenta est\u00e1 suspendida hasta que leas este mensaje.
\nGracias\nUn saludo
\nPeda\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nHi Sharon Marlene,
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative project and every contribution is welcome, but keep in mind it is not a place to make tests, nor it is a private map to share your own routes. The \"route from my house to the university\" is not something you'd expect to see in a general world map, I think you will understand it. There are also rules and conventions behind OSM tagging; highway=track is meant to be a road for agricultural use, which is not the case here.
\nThere are other useful tools to trace your own routes and share them online, this is a user-friendly interface making use of OSM data as background: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nYour account is temporarily blocked until you read this message.
\nThanks,
\nPeda\non behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nHola Edgariz,
\nOpenStreetMap es un proyecto colaborativo y cada aporte es bienvenido, pero no es un lugar para hacer pruebas de mapeamiento, tampoco puede ser usada como si fuera un mapa privado para trazar sus propias rutas. La \"ruta desde mi casa hasta CU\" no es una informaci\u00f3n que pertenezca al mapa general del mundo, creo lo entiendas. Tambi\u00e9n hay reglas y convenciones en el uso de los tags; highway=track representa a un camino rural, lo cual no viene al caso.
\nPor cierto, hay otras formas para trazar sus propias rutas y compartirlas en la web, este es un sitio que permete hacerlo de manera muy sencilla y que hace uso de OpenStreetMap: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nTu cuenta est\u00e1 suspendida hasta que leas este mensaje.
\nGracias\nUn saludo
\nPeda\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nHi Edgariz,
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative project and every contribution is welcome, but keep in mind it is not a place to make tests, nor it is a private map to share your own routes. The \"route from my house to the university\" is not something you'd expect to see in a general world map, I think you will understand it. There are also rules and conventions behind OSM tagging; highway=track is meant to be a road for agricultural use, which is not the case here.
\nThere are other useful tools to trace your own routes and share them online, this is a user-friendly interface making use of OSM data as background: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nYour account is temporarily blocked until you read this message.
\nThanks,
\nPeda\non behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nHola Tonatzin Ortiz,
\nOpenStreetMap es un proyecto colaborativo y cada aporte es bienvenido, pero no es un lugar para hacer pruebas de mapeamiento, tampoco puede ser usada como si fuera un mapa privado para trazar sus propias rutas. La \"ruta desde mi casa hasta CU\" no es una informaci\u00f3n que pertenezca al mapa general del mundo, creo lo entiendas. Tambi\u00e9n hay reglas y convenciones en el uso de los tags; highway=track representa a un camino rural, lo cual no viene al caso.
\nPor cierto, hay otras formas para trazar sus propias rutas y compartirlas en la web, este es un sitio que permete hacerlo de manera muy sencilla y que hace uso de OpenStreetMap: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nTu cuenta est\u00e1 suspendida hasta que leas este mensaje.
\nGracias\nUn saludo
\nPeda\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nHi Tonatzin Ortiz,
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative project and every contribution is welcome, but keep in mind it is not a place to make tests, nor it is a private map to share your own routes. The \"route from my house to the university\" is not something you'd expect to see in a general world map, I think you will understand it. There are also rules and conventions behind OSM tagging; highway=track is meant to be a road for agricultural use, which is not the case here.
\nThere are other useful tools to trace your own routes and share them online, this is a user-friendly interface making use of OSM data as background: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nYour account is temporarily blocked until you read this message.
\nThanks,
\nPeda\non behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nHola Memozitro,
\nOpenStreetMap es un proyecto colaborativo y cada aporte es bienvenido, pero no es un lugar para hacer pruebas de mapeamiento, tampoco puede ser usada como si fuera un mapa privado para trazar sus propias rutas. La \"ruta desde mi casa hasta CU\" no es una informaci\u00f3n que pertenezca al mapa general del mundo, creo lo entiendas. Tambi\u00e9n hay reglas y convenciones en el uso de los tags; highway=track representa a un camino rural, lo cual no viene al caso.
\nPor cierto, hay otras formas para trazar sus propias rutas y compartirlas en la web, este es un sitio que permete hacerlo de manera muy sencilla y que hace uso de OpenStreetMap: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nTu cuenta est\u00e1 suspendida hasta que leas este mensaje.
\nGracias\nUn saludo
\nPeda\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nHi Memozitro,
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative project and every contribution is welcome, but keep in mind it is not a place to make tests, nor it is a private map to share your own routes. The \"route from my house to the university\" is not something you'd expect to see in a general world map, I think you will understand it. There are also rules and conventions behind OSM tagging; highway=track is meant to be a road for agricultural use, which is not the case here.
\nThere are other useful tools to trace your own routes and share them online, this is a user-friendly interface making use of OSM data as background: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nYour account is temporarily blocked until you read this message.
\nThanks,
\nPeda\non behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nHola aleami,
\nOpenStreetMap es un proyecto colaborativo y cada aporte es bienvenido, pero no es un lugar para hacer pruebas de mapeamiento, tampoco puede ser usada como si fuera un mapa privado para trazar sus propias rutas. La \"ruta desde mi casa hasta CU\" no es una informaci\u00f3n que pertenezca al mapa general del mundo, creo lo entiendas. Tambi\u00e9n hay reglas y convenciones en el uso de los tags; highway=track representa a un camino rural, lo cual no viene al caso.
\nPor cierto, hay otras formas para trazar sus propias rutas y compartirlas en la web, este es un sitio que permete hacerlo de manera muy sencilla y que hace uso de OpenStreetMap: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nTu cuenta est\u00e1 suspendida hasta que leas este mensaje.
\nGracias\nUn saludo
\nPeda\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nHi aleami,
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative project and every contribution is welcome, but keep in mind it is not a place to make tests, nor it is a private map to share your own routes. The \"route from my house to the university\" is not something you'd expect to see in a general world map, I think you will understand it. There are also rules and conventions behind OSM tagging; highway=track is meant to be a road for agricultural use, which is not the case here.
\nThere are other useful tools to trace your own routes and share them online, this is a user-friendly interface making use of OSM data as background: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nYour account is temporarily blocked until you read this message.
\nThanks,
\nPeda\non behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nHola Mireya Vazquez,
\nOpenStreetMap es un proyecto colaborativo y cada aporte es bienvenido, pero no es un lugar para hacer pruebas de mapeamiento, tampoco puede ser usada como si fuera un mapa privado para trazar sus propias rutas. La \"ruta desde mi casa hasta CU\" no es una informaci\u00f3n que pertenezca al mapa general del mundo, creo lo entiendas. Tambi\u00e9n hay reglas y convenciones en el uso de los tags; highway=track representa a un camino rural, lo cual no viene al caso.
\nPor cierto, hay otras formas para trazar sus propias rutas y compartirlas en la web, este es un sitio que permete hacerlo de manera muy sencilla y que hace uso de OpenStreetMap: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nTu cuenta est\u00e1 suspendida hasta que leas este mensaje.
\nGracias\nUn saludo
\nPeda\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nHi Mireya Vazquez,
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative project and every contribution is welcome, but keep in mind it is not a place to make tests, nor it is a private map to share your own routes. The \"route from my house to the university\" is not something you'd expect to see in a general world map, I think you will understand it. There are also rules and conventions behind OSM tagging; highway=track is meant to be a road for agricultural use, which is not the case here.
\nThere are other useful tools to trace your own routes and share them online, this is a user-friendly interface making use of OSM data as background: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nYour account is temporarily blocked until you read this message.
\nThanks,
\nPeda\non behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nHola miltonsan,
\nOpenStreetMap es un proyecto colaborativo y cada aporte es bienvenido, pero no es un lugar para hacer pruebas de mapeamiento, tampoco puede ser usada como si fuera un mapa privado para trazar sus propias rutas. La \"ruta desde mi casa hasta CU\" no es una informaci\u00f3n que pertenezca al mapa general del mundo, creo lo entiendas. Tambi\u00e9n hay reglas y convenciones en el uso de los tags; highway=track representa a un camino rural, lo cual no viene al caso.
\nPor cierto, hay otras formas para trazar sus propias rutas y compartirlas en la web, este es un sitio que permete hacerlo de manera muy sencilla y que hace uso de OpenStreetMap: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nTu cuenta est\u00e1 suspendida hasta que leas este mensaje.
\nGracias\nUn saludo
\nPeda\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nHi miltonsan,
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative project and every contribution is welcome, but keep in mind it is not a place to make tests, nor it is a private map to share your own routes. The \"route from my house to the university\" is not something you'd expect to see in a general world map, I think you will understand it. There are also rules and conventions behind OSM tagging; highway=track is meant to be a road for agricultural use, which is not the case here.
\nThere are other useful tools to trace your own routes and share them online, this is a user-friendly interface making use of OSM data as background: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nYour account is temporarily blocked until you read this message.
\nThanks,
\nPeda\non behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nHola arceare,
\nOpenStreetMap es un proyecto colaborativo y cada aporte es bienvenido, pero no es un lugar para hacer pruebas de mapeamiento, tampoco puede ser usada como si fuera un mapa privado para trazar sus propias rutas. La \"ruta desde mi casa hasta CU\" no es una informaci\u00f3n que pertenezca al mapa general del mundo, creo lo entiendas. Tambi\u00e9n hay reglas y convenciones en el uso de los tags; highway=track representa a un camino rural, lo cual no viene al caso.
\nPor cierto, hay otras formas para trazar sus propias rutas y compartirlas en la web, este es un sitio que permete hacerlo de manera muy sencilla y que hace uso de OpenStreetMap: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nTu cuenta est\u00e1 suspendida hasta que leas este mensaje.
\nGracias\nUn saludo
\nPeda\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nHi arceare,
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative project and every contribution is welcome, but keep in mind it is not a place to make tests, nor it is a private map to share your own routes. The \"route from my house to the university\" is not something you'd expect to see in a general world map, I think you will understand it. There are also rules and conventions behind OSM tagging; highway=track is meant to be a road for agricultural use, which is not the case here.
\nThere are other useful tools to trace your own routes and share them online, this is a user-friendly interface making use of OSM data as background: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nYour account is temporarily blocked until you read this message.
\nThanks,
\nPeda\non behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nHola diana gonzalez,
\nOpenStreetMap es un proyecto colaborativo y cada aporte es bienvenido, pero no es un lugar para hacer pruebas de mapeamiento, tampoco puede ser usada como si fuera un mapa privado para trazar sus propias rutas. La \"ruta desde mi casa hasta CU\" no es una informaci\u00f3n que pertenezca al mapa general del mundo, creo lo entiendas. Tambi\u00e9n hay reglas y convenciones en el uso de los tags; highway=track representa a un camino rural, lo cual no viene al caso.
\nPor cierto, hay otras formas para trazar sus propias rutas y compartirlas en la web, este es un sitio que permete hacerlo de manera muy sencilla y que hace uso de OpenStreetMap: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nTu cuenta est\u00e1 suspendida hasta que leas este mensaje.
\nGracias\nUn saludo
\nPeda\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nHi diana gonzalez,
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative project and every contribution is welcome, but keep in mind it is not a place to make tests, nor it is a private map to share your own routes. The \"route from my house to the university\" is not something you'd expect to see in a general world map, I think you will understand it. There are also rules and conventions behind OSM tagging; highway=track is meant to be a road for agricultural use, which is not the case here.
\nThere are other useful tools to trace your own routes and share them online, this is a user-friendly interface making use of OSM data as background: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nYour account is temporarily blocked until you read this message.
\nThanks,
\nPeda\non behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nHola davidismael,
\nOpenStreetMap es un proyecto colaborativo y cada aporte es bienvenido, pero no es un lugar para hacer pruebas de mapeamiento, tampoco puede ser usada como si fuera un mapa privado para trazar sus propias rutas. La \"ruta desde mi casa hasta CU\" no es una informaci\u00f3n que pertenezca al mapa general del mundo, creo lo entiendas. Tambi\u00e9n hay reglas y convenciones en el uso de los tags; highway=track representa a un camino rural, lo cual no viene al caso.
\nPor cierto, hay otras formas para trazar sus propias rutas y compartirlas en la web, este es un sitio que permete hacerlo de manera muy sencilla y que hace uso de OpenStreetMap: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nTu cuenta est\u00e1 suspendida hasta que leas este mensaje.
\nGracias\nUn saludo
\nPeda\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nHi davidismael,
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative project and every contribution is welcome, but keep in mind it is not a place to make tests, nor it is a private map to share your own routes. The \"route from my house to the university\" is not something you'd expect to see in a general world map, I think you will understand it. There are also rules and conventions behind OSM tagging; highway=track is meant to be a road for agricultural use, which is not the case here.
\nThere are other useful tools to trace your own routes and share them online, this is a user-friendly interface making use of OSM data as background: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
\nYour account is temporarily blocked until you read this message.
\nThanks,
\nPeda\non behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nThere is no room for SEO content on OpenStreetMap. Your edits have been reverted.
\nHello,
\nI'm sending this message to you as one that has to be read before you continue editing in case there's a problem with your email. You'll be able to edit again immediately after reading it, but please do take heed of the contents:
\nI (and at least one other user) have tried to get in touch with you about the large-scale edits that you are performing, some of which are plainly wrong.
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33438237
\nwas an example of that. You misunderstood the tag used, and because you did not understand it, changed the tag to one that was completely invalid for the feature.
\nThere is a clear code of conduct that must be followed by people making mechanical edits to OpenStreetMap data:
\nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
\nAmong the first things that should happen is to document the changes that you're planning to make and to discuss them with other OpenStreetMap mappers. It's important that this happens so that any misunderstandings that you may have can be resolved. This does not seem to have happened at all in the case of your edits - unless you can point out where you disucssed your proposed edits first?
\nPlease note that just because you change a value from a \"less common tag\" to a \"common tag\" it does not mean that it actually reflects what is physically present on the ground. Here's an example of that:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33506329
\nIn that changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322964225 (a hedge) was changed from \"natural=bushes\" to \"natural=scrub\". Of course, \"natural=bushes\" is an unusual tag but not a meaningless one, and in the context of a hedge makes perfect sense. A hedge made out of \"scrub\" makes very little sense.
\nI would therefore suggest that you go through all of your mechanical changesets and ask yourself whether the changes that you have made in each case are valid. Where people have commented on those changesets suggesting that something has gone wrong, it's important that you reply and explain what happened.
\nThere will, of course, always be cases where mappers, especially new mappers, \"get things wrong\". Rather than just changing the a tag to something that you are familiar with, it's important that you try and understand how things got to that point. Here's an example of that:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33514376
\nHere it looks to me like a mapper was trying to change \"place=locality\" to \"natural=fell\" and made a mistake. Rather than just changing it back to the wrong value (which you did) a better approach would have been to contact them with a polite changeset discussion comment, explain what the problem is, and offer to help fix it. If that doesn't work, you can add an OpenStreetMap note so that other local mappers who are familiar with the area can check and correct the data if necessary.
\nOpenStreetMap is a shared database - we all edit the same data. If data that people have surveyed is changed to something that is wrong by people who have not surveyed the area, it makes OpenStreetMap data as a whole less useful for everyone concerned. We have to work together to create a better map. Please, therefore, go through the changes that you have made and check that they're valid, and please explain them where questions have been asked in changeset discussion comments. Finally, you must use meaningful changeset comments. \"attrib correction\" is not a meaningful comment - it does not explain what you changed and why.
\nFailure to do this may result in you being prevented from editing OpenStreetMap for a short period of time, or even longer.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse), on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nIf you'd like to contact the DWG via email directly, you can always do so via data@osmfoundation.org .
\nHi Conor,
\nThree weeks ago people made complaints about a number of changes that you'd made to OpenStreetMap. As a result, we asked you to be more careful and (if the problems were accidental) explain what had happened.
\nUnfortunately since then there have been some more complaints, about http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33500805 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33646862 . OpenStreetMap isn't the place for experimenting with \"what if this road was like that\" - it's for recording things as they are.
\nOne more thing - please, on any edits, do use meaningful changeset comments explaining why you've made a certain change. For example, on a changeset like http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33646862 , you should have explained why you think that part of the R917 is called Station Road not Spencer Street (despite it being the continuation of Spencer Street towards Spencer Manor just to the southwest).
\nObviously we don't want to stop anyone from contributing to OpenStreetMap but if problematical changes that need to be reverted continue we may have to do so.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\n\u0423\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c Evhenio,
\n\u0421\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e \u043d\u0430\u0448\u0435\u0439 \u0440\u0430\u043d\u043d\u0435\u0439 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043f\u0438\u0441\u043a\u0435, \u0432\u0430\u043c \u0431\u044b\u043b\u043e \u0434\u043e\u043d\u0435\u0441\u0435\u043d\u043e, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0432\u044b \u0441\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438 \u043d\u0430\u0440\u0443\u0448\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u044f\u0442\u044b\u0435 \u0441\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0430\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0432 \u043e\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0438 \u043a\u043b\u0430\u0441\u0441\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0434\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0433 \u0432 \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0438\u043d\u0435, \u043e\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u0432\u0438\u043a\u0438: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:\u0412\u0456\u043a\u0456\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0435\u043a\u0442_\u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0430/\u041a\u043b\u0430\u0441\u0438\u0444\u0456\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0456\u044f_\u0434\u043e\u0440\u0456\u0433
\n\u041a \u0441\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044e, \u0432\u044b \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0433\u043d\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u043c\u043e\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044c\u0431\u044b \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \u0441 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c \u043d\u0430 \u0444\u043e\u0440\u0443\u043c\u0435, \u0432 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438, \u0432 \u0442\u0435\u043c\u0435 http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=6962 \u0438 \u0431\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0435 \u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043a\u0438, \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0440\u0443\u0448\u0430\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0435 \u0446\u0435\u043b\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u044b, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0440\u0430\u0441\u0441\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043a\u0430\u043a \u0432\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0437\u043c.
\n\u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0436\u0438\u0442\u0435\u0441\u044c \u0441 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c \u0438 \u043d\u0435 \u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u0439\u0442\u0435 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0447\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0435 \u0441\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0430\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\u043c.
\n\u041d\u0430 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043c\u043e\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442 \u043d\u0430 \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u043d\u0430\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0434\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0431\u043b\u043e\u043a\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u043a\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0440\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u044b \u043d\u0430 96 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u043e\u0432.
\n\u0415\u0432\u0433\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\nData Working Group
\nDear user Evhenio,
\nAccording to our previous correspondence you have been informed that you systematically violating the common agreements on road classification in Ukraine, described on the Wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:\u0412\u0456\u043a\u0456\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0435\u043a\u0442_\u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0430/\u041a\u043b\u0430\u0441\u0438\u0444\u0456\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0456\u044f_\u0434\u043e\u0440\u0456\u0433
\nUnfortunately, you ignored my call to get in touch with the community on the forum, particularly in topic http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=6962 and moreover, continue to make the changes on the map which destruct its continuity which is regarded as vandalism.
\nPlease get in touch with the community and stop making changes which contradict to the accepted agreement.
\nFor now you are being blocked for 96 hours.
\nEugene Sandulenko\nData Working Group
\nKostik,
\nyou have ignored guidance given by DWG member Paul Norman in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33364543 and re-created your private Ukraine relation in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33409586. We hereby ask you again to stop doing that. The correct Ukraine relation is http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/60199. If you feel there is a problem with that relation, please take it up with Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org.
\nDo not start, or participate in, edit wars about the relation and don't create your own versions of it.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
\nI'm sending this message as one that has to be read before continuing editing just in case you're not receiving emails for any reason. A couple of mappers have tried to get in touch via changeset discussion comments (see for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33802064 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33809000 ) and haven't had a reply. It looks as if you might be using some sort of out-of-date data source.
\nIf you have been receiving email messages from changeset discussions it's easy to reply - just click the \"changeset\" link at the bottom of the message and you'll be taken to the website where there's a text box with \"comment\" below it.
\nIf you haven't been receiving email messages you might want to sort your email out, but in the meantime you can see who's tried to get in touch by looking at the list at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/beatrice%20jones/history and seeing where there's a non-zero value to the right of the changeset information.
\nOne more thing - it's really helpful to other mappers to add a description of changes that you're making (it doesn't have to be a huge paragraph - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33631443 is one of mine, for example). That way people can see why changes were made and what the source was.
\nAnyway, hope you don't mind me mentioning this - just trying to help. Any questions just ask - you might find http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels helpful here. If you want to get in touch with other mappers in GB quickly you might also want to try the #osm-gb IRC channel - see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IRC for that.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse), on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
\nGesperrt wg wiederholter unberechtigter L\u00f6schungen
\nHello,
\nOpenStreetMap is for mapping the world as it exists. It's been claimed that you are mapping fictional data, not real data at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2015-September/015321.html
\nCan you please respond to this on the talk-us@ mailing list. You can get more information about the list at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
Dear user HomicideBaltimore,
\nyou have been asked to explain yourself on the mailing list, but you haven't done so, haven't responded to questions about your edits, and have continued to make detrimental edits to OSM since then. I am afraid I must block your account again until we can work out together why you are adding fictional data and break existing data in OSM. I cannot allow you to contiue damaging OSM.
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck\nOSMF Data Working Group
\nBlocked for attempting to evade http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/805
\nIf you believe this is in error, please contact data@osmfoundation.org
\nYou have been blocked under your other account \"BaltimoreHomicide\" and how you are continuing to vandalize the OSM map here. Please stop; you are causing real damage with your actions.
\nHi Beatrice Jones,
\nThis is following up from https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/802 .
\nIn there I mentioned that you were adding objects to OpenStreetMap from an out-of-date data source (objects that don't exist currently, such as \"The American Adventure\", near Heanor). I mentioned https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33802064 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33809000 as places where other mappers have tried to get in touch, but you still haven't explained what happened there.
\nSince then you are apparently adding more things that don't exist to OpenStreetMap - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33976849 .
\nPlease, before making any more changes to OpenStreetMap, add a reply to the changeset discussions explaining that you made a mistake and won't add non-existing data again. You can see which changesets other mappers have left comments on by looking at the list at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/beatrice jones/history .
\nWhen you do start editing again, please only add things that currently exist in their current use (i.e. if something was an airport but is no longer, don't add it to OSM as an airport). Also, please make sure that you always add a changeset comment to each change, so that other local mappers understand the changes being made.
\nIf you don't do these things you may be prevented from editing OpenStreetMap again.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group. To contact the Data Working Group at any time, email data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBlocked for attempting to evade http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/805 again.
\nIf you believe this is in error, please contact data@osmfoundation.org
\nFTA_dwg,
\nThis is a test ban to determine the effect of a ban on various editors.
\nBest,
\nEthan aka FTA
\nAs previously mentioned on e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33406535 , please don't use the main OSM server for test edits. If you want to test things in the editor, there's a test server available at http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org (it needs a separate login from the main OSM site but is otherwise similar)
\nYou can add any amount of test data you like there without it causing any problems on the live map.
\nCheers, Andy
\nHello,
\nDespite previous warnings (see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/808 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/802 ) you are still apparently adding things that don't exist any more to OpenStreetMap - see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2015-September/017789.html and the comments on the changesets mentioned there http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34126960 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34147883 .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group. To contact the Data Working Group at any time, email data@osmfoundation.org .
\nHello,
\nThe OpenStreetMap map you have been editing is for mapping the world, not private names. You appear to have been adding fictional names.
\nCan you please contact data@osmfoundation.org to explain what's been going on?
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
Follow-up block for the same reasons as described in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/812 , http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/808 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/802 .
\nAccording to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34271693 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34271693 old data is still being added.
\nDear users dataOne and Zain Ahmad Hasmi,
\nyou have made a number of edits in the past where you have\nsplit roads in OpenStreetMap claiming to add a height restriction\nbut you haven't ever added any.
\nYou have been asked what this was about but your replies were\nnot really useful (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34325458).
\nAlso you might falsely assume that it is ok to look at Google Street View\nfor making edits in OSM. This is not allowed.
\nPlease explain to us
\nIf we can't get truthful answers to these questions we may revert the\nedits that you have made because they do not seem to add any value to OSM.
\nFor your information, your edits have also been discussed on the talk-gb\nmailing list (see lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb), and you are\nwelcome to participate in that discussion.
\nThis is a short-term block message that you have to read before you can\ncontinue editing but as soon as you read it, the block is lifted.
\nBest wishes
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear users dataOne and Zain Ahmad Hasmi,
\nyou have made a number of edits in the past where you have\nsplit roads in OpenStreetMap claiming to add a height restriction\nbut you haven't ever added any.
\nYou have been asked what this was about but your replies were\nnot really useful (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34325458).
\nAlso you might falsely assume that it is ok to look at Google Street View\nfor making edits in OSM. This is not allowed.
\nPlease explain to us
\nIf we can't get truthful answers to these questions we may revert the\nedits that you have made because they do not seem to add any value to OSM.
\nFor your information, your edits have also been discussed on the talk-gb\nmailing list (see lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb), and you are\nwelcome to participate in that discussion.
\nThis is a short-term block message that you have to read before you can\ncontinue editing but as soon as you read it, the block is lifted.
\nBest wishes
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear user apcroads,
\nyou seem to have performed a data import to OSM that was not discussed and is not documented on the Wiki and therefore violating our data import policy. Most importantly, the source and hence the license of your data is unclear. Would you please join the imports mailing list (lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports) and explain your import and your sources/processes so that the community may scrutinize it? That would normally take place before importing.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
I am sorry but I have to block you again because after my last message you have continued to make the same types of edits without answering any of our questions. I will proceed to revert all your edits within 24 hours unless you manage to answer our questions raised in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/816.
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear user WJtW,
\nyou are adding tracks=n tags to railway lines across Europe, and you are doing this in a way that is at odds with what other mappers think the tag means. Many have tried to contact you about it and you haven't listened to them.
\nPlease stop making controversial edits. If you receive questions and complaints from many different mappers then this is a sign that you should re-think what you are doing, instead of continuing what you're doing.
\nYour track=n edits cost a lot of time to revert, and it is quite possible that some correct and useful edits that you have made will be damaged in the course of these reversions.
\nWe will have to block you for longer if you continue to create problems.
\nBest wishes
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear mapmap12,
\nThis is a 0 hour block on your account, meaning you must log in and read it to continue editing.
\nOver the past few days, you have been making many significant edits to country borders [e.g. 1,2], adding nonsense lines [3], and also adding random nodes with strange tag combinations [4].
\nOpenStreetMap is not a sandbox and all edits made are immediately applied to the database. Many fellow OSM mappers have attempted to contact you to sort out some of the edits you have made, but you have not responded.
\nPlease do not continue to make edits that break country boundaries or add fictional data. Additionally, please add descriptive changeset comments in the future so other mappers looking at the map can understand what changes you are making. Finally, it would be great if you could in engage in conversation with fellow mappers in the changeset discussions to help everyone understand your edits as well.
\nFeel free to contact the Data Working Group if you have any questions.
\nBest,
\nEthan aka FTA on behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\n\nHi mapmap12,
\nI am blocking you again because you have disregarded the previous block message and ignored discussions with other mappers. You are continuing to import empty ways and nodes into OSM. Please stop doing so. This is not a sandbox...every edit goes directly into the database.
\nIf you continue to do this, we will be required to block your account for an extended period of time to prevent this unnecessary data addition to the database. I will also be reverting all of the data you have uploaded since the previous block.
\nPlease contact the Data Working group at data@osmfoundation.org if you have questions.
\nSincerely,
\nEthan aka FTA on behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nLieber User Das Fantom,
\nDu bist in mehreren Diskussionsbeitr\u00e4gen zu Deinen \u00c4nderungss\u00e4tzen auf Fehler hingewiesen worden und hast auch pers\u00f6nliche Nachrichten von anderen Mappern dazu erhalten. Du hast aber bislang weder zu diesen Problemen Stellung genommen noch Dein Verha\u013aten ge\u00e4ndert. Es geht in den Kommentaren insbesondere um die fehlerhafte Verwendung von landuse=orachrd, aber auch um einige andere Kleinigkeiten. Ein Beispiel hier: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34491616
\nWir m\u00fcssen also annehmen, dass Du aus irgeneinem Grunde all diese Nachrichten nicht erh\u00e4ltst, eventuell wegen eines Mailproblems. Daher sperre ich Deinen Account jetzt so lange, bis du diese Nachricht gelesen hast. Danach erwarte ich, dass Du auf die Kommentare Deiner Mit-Mapper eingehst und reagierst, und nicht einfach so weiter machst wie bisher; es ist ja auch nicht in Deinem Interesse, st\u00e4ndig \u00c4nderungen zu machen, die von anderen dann wieder gel\u00f6scht werden.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hello,
\nearlier this month I contacted you to remind you of the need to respond to users raising concerns about problems in edits you made. Because you haven't responded to them, or my message, I'm placing a zero-hour block to make sure that you receive this message and it isn't lost in email.
\nPlease respond to changeset discussions before you go back to editing. You can find a list of them in the message I sent you.
\nHallo See-Schneider,
\ndu hast wiederholt kommentarlos einen Parkplatz gel\u00f6scht, den andere Mapper eingetragen haben. Du wurdest auch in 2 deiner Edits in der dazugeh\u00f6rigen Diskussion darauf hingewiesen. Derartige Editwars sind in OpenStreetMap nicht erw\u00fcnscht und auch nicht erlaubt.
\nDer fragliche Parkplatz wurde als privater Parkplatz getaggt. Falls es dennoch Gr\u00fcnde gibt, warum dieser Parkplatz gel\u00f6scht werden sollte, bitte ich dich, dies vorher mit den entsprechenden anderen Benutzern zu diskutieren. Ein kommentarloses L\u00f6schen ist nicht akzeptabel!
\nIch habe dich daher vor\u00fcbergehend geblockt, bist du diese Nachricht gelesen hast.
\nVielen Dank und viele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe,
\nPeter Barth aka Peda
\ni.A. OSMF Data Working Group
\nHallo user_13241413414,
\nich gehe davon aus, dass dies ein Zweitaccount des Benutzers See-Schneider ist. Als solcher wurdest du nun bereits mehrfach darauf hingewiesen, dass ein grundloses L\u00f6schen von Daten anderer in OpenStreetMap nicht akzeptabel ist. Es handelt sich dabei um Vandalismus den wir unterbinden werden. Wenn du valide Gr\u00fcnde f\u00fcr das L\u00f6schen vorbringen kannst, dann beteilige dich bitte an der Diskussion, ansonsten unterlasse es bitte, den Parkplatz zu l\u00f6schen.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe,
\nPeter Barth aka Peda
\ni.A. OSMF Data Working Group
\nHallo PeterDRS,
\nleider sehe ich mich gen\u00f6tigt, deinen Account vor\u00fcbergehend zu deaktivieren. Ich hatte dich unter anderem mehrfach aufgefordert, Beleidigungen und unsachliche Beitr\u00e4ge in Changeset-Diskussionen zu unterlassen. Dieser Forderung bist du leider nicht nachgekommen.
\nIch hoffe, dass dir diese Auszeit hilft etwas Abstand zu gewinnen um dich anschlie\u00dfend wieder produktiveren Dingen zuzuwenden.
\nPeter Barth aka Peda
\ni.A. OSMF Data Working Group
\nHello mustafa_geo,
\nI'm sending you this message because there seems to be a bit of a misunderstanding about OSM nodes and ways.
\nYou previously added a duplicate Interlink Express in Alfreton at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3773308357/history , which I deleted (see discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34448963 ) and you added it back as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3799210861/history .
\nThere should only be one thing in OSM for each thing in the real world - see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element . A duplication of things as both nodes and ways will mean that anyone counting things in OSM will end up with twice as many as there are in real life. When you're extracting data from OSM you'll need to consider ways as well as nodes (and also possibly relations - see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Elements ). If you're using a command-line based extraction, Osmconvert ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmconvert ) already supports an \"--all-to-nodes\" parameter to allow you to only worry about nodes downstream; if you're processing the data directly then just handle tags on ways in the same way as nodes.
\nI'm sending this as a message that must be read before continuing editing because it's possible (if there's a mail misconfiguration) that you might not have seen the email from the comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34448963 and those from other mappers. You can see other changesets with discussion comments on them by going to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mustafa_geo/history and looking for non-zero numbers. You'll be able to edit as normal immediately after reading this message.
\nA couple of other useful links:
\nhttps://help.openstreetmap.org/ has lots of \"data extraction\" questions on it - whatever you're trying to do, someone might have asked about it before.
\nhttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb is the \"talk-gb\" mailing list, one of the main places where GB discussion takes place. Northern Ireland is covered by https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie . People will be able to answer any questions you might have there.
\nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IRC is widely used: irc://irc.oftc.net/osm-gb usually has people in it during the daytime.
\nMore general contact information is at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels .
\nAny questions, please don't hesitate to ask - either using one of those options or via data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nDear Zain Ahmad Hashmi,
\nyour OpenStreetMap edits continue to cause consternation among UK mappers because you are not actually improving things, not explaining why you do what you do, and because you continue editing in auto-pilot without reacting to legitimate questions.
\nThe OSMF data working group have taken up the issue with PIE Mapping for whom I understand you perform these edits. Please do not make any further edits anywhere in the UK until the matter is resolved. We will let you know.
\nIf you have any colleagues working on similar edits in the UK for PIE Mapping, this decision applies to them too. Please inform them accordingly.
\nThank you for your understanding
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
(In case you don't read french, please ask me for a translation)
\nBonjour Sanrafeu2,
\nJe m'appel sylvain, et je suis membre du groupe DWG : http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group
\nJe suis en charge de la gestion des probl\u00e8mes entre utilisateurs et j'ai \u00e9t\u00e9 contact\u00e9 par un contributeur fran\u00e7ais m'indiquant que vous \u00e9tiez en train de fermer des \"notes\" de mani\u00e8re importante sans vraiment de justification ou sans en discuter d'abord.
\nOn peut tout \u00e0 fait consid\u00e9rer que de nombreuses notes ne sont pas vraiment utiles et qu'elles seraient mieux ferm\u00e9es, mais c'est quand m\u00eame pr\u00e9f\u00e9rable d'en discuter d'abord avec les autres utilisateurs.
\nMerci donc de prendre contact avec la communaut\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise avant de retirer de nouvelles \"notes\", soit sur le forum : http://forum.openstreetmap.fr soit sur la liste de diffusion https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
\nCordialement,
\nLieber User openmarcel,
\nes gab in der Vergangenheit einige Kommentare zu Deinen \u00c4nderungen bei OpenStreetMap, auf die Du allerdings in keinem einzigen Fall eingegangen bist, z.B.
\nNun hast Du offenbar begonnen, Daten von Google abzuzeichnen, z.B.
\nOffenbar sind Kommentare zu Deinen \u00c4nderungen in der Vergangenheit nicht bei Dir angekommen; vielleicht gibt es ein Problem mit der E-Mail. Daher sperre ich Deinen Account jetzt so lange, bis Du diese Nachricht gelesen hast, um sicherzugehen, dass sie Dich auch erreicht.
\nBitte versuche, in Zukunft auf R\u00fcckfragen und gutgemeinte Ratschl\u00e4ge zu Deinen \u00c4nderungen einzugehen und sie nicht zu ignorieren, und bitte entferne s\u00e4mtliche Daten, die Du von Google \u00fcbernommen hast (denn damit versto\u00dfen wir gegen deren Copyright).
\nDanke
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Re bonjour,
\nJe vous ai demand\u00e9 de discuter d'abord concernant les \"notes\" que vous fermez et vous ne m'avez ni r\u00e9pondu ni avez engag\u00e9 de discussion.
\nJe n'aime pas en arriver l\u00e0, mais nous ne pouvons pas continuer ce dialogue de sourds \u00e0 coup de \"j'ouvre je referme les notes\", merci de nous expliquer pourquoi vous pensez qu'il faut fermer ces notes avant de le faire !
\nVotre compte a \u00e9t\u00e9 bloqu\u00e9 pour 4 jours le temps de vous laisser nous r\u00e9pondre et mettre en pause cette guerre d'\u00e9dition.
\nDear TILO METER,
\nit seems that my changeset comment here
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35012087
\nhas not reached you for some reason; you continue to delete data that we have to repair. Please stop this.
\nBest
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hallo Peter,
\nes gibt leider wiederholt Probleme mit \u00c4nderungen und Reverts von dir, aber auch deine Umgangsformen sind f\u00fcr ein Projekt wie OpenStreetMap nicht akzeptabel. Neben der privaten Kommunikation zwischen uns sind dies zuletzt die beiden Changeset-Diskussionen https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33675202 und http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35023401.
\nDein Account wird daher vor\u00fcbergehend f\u00fcr 48 Stunden gesperrt. Ich bitte dich, diese Zeit zu Nutzen, dich auf einen vern\u00fcnftigen und vor allem sachlichen Umgangston zu besinnen, da ich dich ungern l\u00e4nger sperren m\u00f6chte.
\nPeda
\ni.A. OSM Data Working Group
\n(deutsche Version weiter unten)
\nDear user PeterDRS a.k.a. Kakaner,
\nin response to receiving a short-term account ban from one of the members of our Data Working Group, you have contacted their employer and complained about supposedly \"illegal activity\" on their part.
\nYou have crossed a line by attempting to personally intimidate those who volunteer their time for OSM(F). This is totally unacceptable and there can be no discussion about this.
\nWe will block your account for the remainder of this year, and we hope that you'll be able to make a fresh and friendly start in 2016. You have made good contributions in the past and we'd like to keep you as a contributor, provided that you can live in peace with the other contributors whom we value just as much.
\nWe will not hesitate to extend or renew this block if you should continue to harass, intimidate, or impersonate other project members. This includes, but is not limited to, creating accounts on GitHub or social media that are named like they were created by people you are in conflict with, writing derogatory mailing list posts or changeset comments, or interfering with the personal life of mappers and volunteers by demanding their residential address, threatening legal action, or badmouthing them to their employers.
\nWe also explicitly request that you do not use or create any other OSM account during the time of the block of your main account.
\nIf you believe that there is something wrong with this procedure, you can email the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org.
\nFor the OSMF Data Working Group:
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
Sehr geehrter PeterDRS a.k.a. Kakaner,
\nals Antwort auf eine vor\u00fcbergehende Accountsperrung durch eines der Mitglieder unserer Data Working Group haben Sie deren Arbeitgeber angeschrieben und ihm \u00fcber angebliche \"illegale Aktivit\u00e4ten\" seines Mitarbeiters berichtet.
\nSie haben eine Grenze \u00fcberschritten, indem Sie versucht haben, pers\u00f6nlichen Druck auf unsere Freiwilligen auszu\u00fcben. Das ist v\u00f6llig indiskutabel; wir k\u00f6nnen solches Verhalten auf keinen Fall billigen.
\nWir werden Ihren Account bis zum Ende des Jahres sperren, und wir hoffen, dass Ihnen 2016 ein neuer und friedlicher Start gelingt. Sie haben in der Vergangenheit wertvolle Beitr\u00e4ge zu OpenStreetMap geleistet, und wir w\u00fcrden Sie gern als Projektmitglied behalten, vorausgesetzt, Sie k\u00f6nnen in Frieden mit den anderen Projektmitgliedern leben, die uns ebenso viel wert sind.
\nWir werden nicht z\u00f6gern, diese Account-Sperrung zu verl\u00e4ngern oder erneuern, falls Sie weiterhin andere Projektmitglieder beleidigen, einsch\u00fcchtern oder sich als diese ausgeben, zum Beispiel, indem Sie auf Github oder sozialen Medien Accounts anlegen, die \u00e4hnlich heissen wie Nutzer, mit denen Sie einen Konflikt haben, indem Sie abf\u00e4llige Mailinglist-Beitr\u00e4ge oder Changeset-Kommentare schreiben, oder indem Sie in das Privatleben von Mappern und Freiwilligen eingreifen, die Preisgabe ihrer Adresse verlangen, rechtliche Schritte androhen oder sie bei deren Arbeitgebern verleumden.
\nWir fordern Sie ausdr\u00fccklich auf, w\u00e4hrend der Sperrzeit Ihres Haupt-Accounts keinen anderen OSM-Account zu nutzen oder anzulegen.
\nWenn Sie dieses Vorgehen f\u00fcr falsch halten, k\u00f6nnen Sie die Data Working Group unter data@osmfoundation.org anmailen.
\nF\u00fcr die OSMF Data Working Group:
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
This is a temporary block during the investigation of complaints.
\nBlocked for circumventing DWG block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/834
\nBlocked for circumventing DWG block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/834
\nBlocked for circumventing DWG ban
\ndear \u0393\u03b9\u03ac\u03bd\u03bd\u03b7\u03c2 4,
\nI am applying a zero-hour block to your account on behalf of the Data Working Group. This means you'll have to read this message before you can make further contributions to OSM.
\nThis is because you've recently been making fictitious edits to the map in Greece; we've asked you to explain these edits in the form of changeset discussions; and nobody has yet received a response from you.
\nOpenStreetMap is an effort to create an accurate map of the world. Please don't add features, junctions, etc which don't exist. Please don't remove data from the map unless you're sure it does not exist in the world.
\nPlease try to leave descriptive comments on your edits, as otherwise it is difficult for others to tell what your intentions are. I've reverted a series of your recent changesets which are causing upset to other editors in Greece, and may have to do more unless we hear an explanation from you.
\nIf you have problems with any of this, please contact me and / or email data@osmfoundation.org
\nJo Walsh aka zool, on behalf of the Data Working Group
\nBlocked secondary PeterDRS account that was used to circumvent a DWG block until 31st December.
\nHallo openmarcel,
\nvielen Dank f\u00fcr deine vielen \u00c4nderungen und dass du so flei\u00dfig mithillfst OpenStreetMap zu verbessern.
\nEs gibt bei deinen \u00c4nderungen aber auch immer wieder welche, die nicht den aktuellen Konventionen entsprechen, etwas kaputt machen oder potentiell das Urheberrecht missachten. Um Benutzer darauf aufmerksam zu machen, gibt es die Changeset-Diskussionen und einige deiner Changesets weisen einen Kommentar auf. Leider werden sie von dir aber nicht beantwortet. Damit das aber auch f\u00fcr andere nachvollziehbar ist, geh\u00f6rt es zum guten Ton, auf solche Kommentare zu reagieren in dem man mindestens signalisiert, dass man den Kommentar zur Kenntnis genommen hat.
\nIch w\u00fcrde dich daher darum bitten, dir die Kommentare durchzulesen und darauf zu reagieren. Sowohl durch Verbesserungen deiner \u00c4nderungen wo es angebracht ist, als auch durch Antworten durch dich.
\nBeispiele f\u00fcr solche Kommentare aus der letzten Zeit sind z.B.:
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35123065
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35148676
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35148779
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35149240
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35152056
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35174750
\nDieser Block ist nur solange aktiv, bist du diese Meldung gelesen hast. Danach kannst du sofort weiter editieren. Im \u00fcbrigen solltest du f\u00fcr jeden Changeset-Kommentar auch eine Email bekommen. Pr\u00fcfe das doch unter Umst\u00e4nden mal in deinem Mailprogramm, nicht, dass die in den Spamordner sortiert werden :-)
\nVielen Dank,
\nPeda aka Peter Barth
\ni.A. OSMF Data Working Group
\ndear \u0393\u03b9\u03ac\u03bd\u03bd\u03b7\u03c2 4,
\nPlease be advised that the Data Working Group is blocking your account due to the high volume of destructive and fictitious edits, and your lack of engagement with other mappers in the Greek community who have been reaching out in an attempt to help or to complain.
\nIf you have problems with this action, please contact data@osmfoundation.org
\nJo Walsh aka zool\nOn behalf of the Data Working Group
\nHallo micha4,
\nHerzlich Willkommen und vielen Dank f\u00fcr deine umfangreichen \u00c4nderungen und Erg\u00e4nzungen.
\nEs gibt jedoch eine Frage zur Quelle deiner Daten die du bislang noch nicht beantwortet hast:
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35160533
\nVermutlich hast du das einfach noch nicht bemerkt, daher habe ich dir eine kurze Sperre verpasst, die dich kurzzeitig am Editieren hintert, bist du dich einmal eingeloggt hast und diese Meldung hier gelesen hast. Es w\u00e4re daher nett, wenn du die Frage von Kumbumbus beantwortest, damit wir als Projekt sicherstellen k\u00f6nnen, dass nur legale Daten in unserer Datenbasis landen.
\nVielen Dank f\u00fcr dein Verst\u00e4ndnis, weiterhin viel Spa\u00df beim Mappen und viele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe,
\nPeda aka Peter Barth
\ni.A. OSMF Data Working Group
\nDear user Giorgi1967,
\nyou seem to have misunderstood how OSM works. A place can have many names in many different languages, that's what our \"name:xx\" (with xx being a language code) tags are for. For example, the town of \u10d1\u10d8\u10ed\u10d5\u10d8\u10dc\u10d7\u10d0 (Bichvinta) is called \"Pezonda\" in Italian. This was recorded in OSM, and you removed it, along with a host of other name tags on different objects.
\nAdditionally, your edits seem politically motivated (\"All toponyms in Georgia must be and will be in Georgian.\"); OpenStreetMap does not subscribe to that rule, but instead attempts to map what is on the ground in a specific place. This means that if you enter a town in Georgia and the city sign has a Russian name on it, then that's what'd OSM would map as the primary name.
\nPlease consult https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf for further details about naming.
\nYour edits amount to vandalism and will be removed. Please do [b]not[/b] attempt to recreate them without first arguing your case with the wider OSM community. If you should receive changeset comments from users, as happened in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35196194 for example, don't ignore them - they are a sign that you might be doing something wrong.
\nOSM has all the information to create a map with exclusively Georgian names, and if you wish to do that, I'm sure the community at help.openstreetmap.org will be willing to tell you how.
\nFor the OSMF Data Working Group:\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nHallo openmarcel,
\ndu wurdest ja jetzt schon zweimal auf offene Changeset-Kommentare hingewiesen auf die du nicht reagiert hattest. Zuletzt von mir vor wenigen Stunden.
\nOpenStreetMap ist ein soziales Projekt mit einer gro\u00dfen Community die gemeinsam an dem Ziel arbeitet, unsere Daten zu verbessern. Dabei k\u00f6nnen nat\u00fcrlich immer wieder auch Fehler passieren oder Daten aus gesch\u00fctzten Quellen eingetragen werden. Sei es aus Absicht, Versehen oder Unwissenheit. Solche Fehler und vor allem Urheberrechtsverst\u00f6\u00dfe m\u00fcssen aber dringend beseitigt werden da vor allem Urheberrechtsverst\u00f6\u00dfe das Projekt als ganzes bzw. die Nutzer unserer Daten vor unkalkulierbare Risiken stellen. Daher gibt es auch flei\u00dfige Mapper, die versuchen solche Fehler zu finden und zu beheben. Du kannst dir sicher auch denken, dass es daher wichtig ist, dass man in einem solch gro\u00dfen sozialen Projekt wie OpenStreetMap zusammen arbeitet und versucht, gemeinsam Probleme zu l\u00f6sen und anderen auch Hilfestellungen gibt. Daf\u00fcr brauchen wir aber nat\u00fcrlich auch deine Hilfe!
\nIch hatte dich in der letzten Sperre darum gebeten, auf Changeset-Diskussionen einzugehen und die offenen Fragen zu beantworten. Leider hast du bisher nicht eine der Fragen beantwortet sondern hast direkt weiter gemappt. Ich muss dich daher mit Nachdruck auffordern, die offenen Changeset-Diskussionen zu bearbeiten bevor du andere neue \u00c4nderungen hochl\u00e4dst. Ich erwarte nicht nur ein eventuelles Nachbearbeiten von angemerkten Fehlern sondern insbesondere die Beantwortung bzw. schriftliche Zurkenntnisnahe der Anmerkungen und Fragen! Solltest du dieser Forderung nicht nachkommen, werden wir leider Teile deiner \u00c4nderungen l\u00f6schen und deinen Account l\u00e4ngerfristig sperren m\u00fcssen.
\nBitte verstehe das nicht als Strafe sondern als Hilfestellung, dich besser mit dem Rest der Community zu arrangieren. Solltest du Fragen haben oder ein Problem mit dieser Sperre haben, darfst du dich auch gerne an die gesamte Data Working Group unter data@osmfoundation.org wenden.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe,
\nPeda aka Peter Barth
\ni.A. OSMF Data Working Group
\nDear ante44ante,
\nit appears as if you have been adding fictional data in many areas of OSM for a longer time. Some of that was deleted by others, some still remains in OSM.
\nPlease understand that OpenStreetMap only collects facts, not fiction. (You can draw fantasy maps in opengeofiction.net and meet others who have the same hobby there.)
\nIf there is anything among your contributions to OSM that is actually based on facts, please notify us at data@osmfoundation.org - else we'll remove all your data shortly.
\nBest wishes
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
dear \u0393\u03b9\u03ac\u03bd\u03bd\u03b7\u03c2 10,
\nI write on behalf of the Data Working Group at the OpenStreetMap Foundation. This account has been brought to our attention because it uses the same name and a similar pattern of edits to \u0393\u03b9\u03ac\u03bd\u03bd\u03b7\u03c2 4, which was blocked last week for destructive edits to OpenStreetMap centred around Proti in Greece.
\nI note that an account named \u0393\u03b9\u03ac\u03bd\u03bd\u03b7\u03c2_4 has also recently been blocked from Greek Wikipedia as a sockpuppet account.
\nPlease consider the effort and concern that you are causing to communities of volunteers in pursuing a personal agenda through open data projects. If you are controlling all these accounts then you are having a significant negative impact here.
\nI'm applying a 24 hour block with an obligation to log in and read this message. Here follows a version of this message in Greek, as the Google translation service automatically renders it.
\n\u0393\u03c1\u03ac\u03c6\u03c9 \u03b5\u03be \u03bf\u03bd\u03cc\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2 \u03c4\u03b7\u03c2 \u039f\u03bc\u03ac\u03b4\u03b1\u03c2 \u0395\u03c1\u03b3\u03b1\u03c3\u03af\u03b1\u03c2 \u0394\u03b5\u03b4\u03bf\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03c9\u03bd \u03c3\u03c4\u03bf \u038a\u03b4\u03c1\u03c5\u03bc\u03b1 OpenStreetMap. \u0391\u03c5\u03c4\u03cc\u03c2 \u03bf \u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03b1\u03c1\u03b9\u03b1\u03c3\u03bc\u03cc\u03c2 \u03ad\u03c7\u03b5\u03b9 \u03c5\u03c0\u03bf\u03c0\u03ad\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9 \u03c3\u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03b1\u03bd\u03c4\u03af\u03bb\u03b7\u03c8\u03ae \u03bc\u03b1\u03c2 \u03b5\u03c0\u03b5\u03b9\u03b4\u03ae \u03c7\u03c1\u03b7\u03c3\u03b9\u03bc\u03bf\u03c0\u03bf\u03b9\u03b5\u03af \u03c4\u03bf \u03af\u03b4\u03b9\u03bf \u03cc\u03bd\u03bf\u03bc\u03b1 \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03ad\u03bd\u03b1 \u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03cc\u03bc\u03bf\u03b9\u03bf \u03bc\u03bf\u03c4\u03af\u03b2\u03bf \u03c4\u03c9\u03bd \u03b5\u03c0\u03b5\u03be\u03b5\u03c1\u03b3\u03b1\u03c3\u03b9\u03ce\u03bd \u03bd\u03b1 \u0393\u03b9\u03ac\u03bd\u03bd\u03b7\u03c2 4, \u03b7 \u03bf\u03c0\u03bf\u03af\u03b1 \u03b1\u03c0\u03bf\u03ba\u03bb\u03b5\u03af\u03c3\u03c4\u03b7\u03ba\u03b5 \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03b1\u03c3\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03b7 \u03b5\u03b2\u03b4\u03bf\u03bc\u03ac\u03b4\u03b1 \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c4\u03b9\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u03c1\u03bf\u03c6\u03b9\u03ba\u03ad\u03c2 \u03b1\u03bb\u03bb\u03b1\u03b3\u03ad\u03c2 \u03c3\u03c4\u03bf OpenStreetMap \u03b5\u03c0\u03b9\u03ba\u03b5\u03bd\u03c4\u03c1\u03ce\u03bd\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9 \u03b3\u03cd\u03c1\u03c9 \u03a0\u03c1\u03ce\u03c4\u03b7 \u03c3\u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u0395\u03bb\u03bb\u03ac\u03b4\u03b1.
\n\u0395\u03c0\u03b9\u03c3\u03b7\u03bc\u03b1\u03af\u03bd\u03c9 \u03cc\u03c4\u03b9 \u03ad\u03bd\u03b1\u03c2 \u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03b1\u03c1\u03b9\u03b1\u03c3\u03bc\u03cc\u03c2 \u03c0\u03bf\u03c5 \u03bf\u03bd\u03bf\u03bc\u03ac\u03b6\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9 \u0393\u03b9\u03ac\u03bd\u03bd\u03b7\u03c2_4 \u03ad\u03c7\u03b5\u03b9 \u03b5\u03c0\u03af\u03c3\u03b7\u03c2 \u03c0\u03c1\u03cc\u03c3\u03c6\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1 \u03b1\u03c0\u03bf\u03ba\u03bb\u03b5\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03af \u03b1\u03c0\u03cc \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03b5\u03bb\u03bb\u03b7\u03bd\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae Wikipedia, \u03c9\u03c2 sockpuppet \u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03b1\u03c1\u03b9\u03b1\u03c3\u03bc\u03cc.
\n\u03a0\u03b1\u03c1\u03b1\u03ba\u03b1\u03bb\u03bf\u03cd\u03bc\u03b5 \u03bd\u03b1 \u03b5\u03be\u03b5\u03c4\u03ac\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9 \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03c3\u03c0\u03ac\u03b8\u03b5\u03b9\u03b1 \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03b1\u03bd\u03b7\u03c3\u03c5\u03c7\u03af\u03b1 \u03c0\u03bf\u03c5 \u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03ba\u03b1\u03bb\u03bf\u03cd\u03bd \u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03c2 \u03ba\u03bf\u03b9\u03bd\u03cc\u03c4\u03b7\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2 \u03c4\u03c9\u03bd \u03b5\u03b8\u03b5\u03bb\u03bf\u03bd\u03c4\u03ce\u03bd \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03b5\u03c0\u03b9\u03b4\u03af\u03c9\u03be\u03b7 \u03bc\u03b9\u03b1\u03c2 \u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03c3\u03c9\u03c0\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae \u03b1\u03c4\u03b6\u03ad\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1 \u03bc\u03ad\u03c3\u03c9 \u03b1\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9\u03ba\u03c4\u03ce\u03bd \u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03b3\u03c1\u03b1\u03bc\u03bc\u03ac\u03c4\u03c9\u03bd \u03b4\u03b5\u03b4\u03bf\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03c9\u03bd. \u0395\u03ac\u03bd \u03bf \u03ad\u03bb\u03b5\u03b3\u03c7\u03bf\u03c2 \u03cc\u03bb\u03c9\u03bd \u03b1\u03c5\u03c4\u03ce\u03bd \u03c4\u03c9\u03bd \u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03b1\u03c1\u03b9\u03b1\u03c3\u03bc\u03ce\u03bd, \u03c4\u03cc\u03c4\u03b5 \u03ad\u03c7\u03bf\u03c5\u03bd \u03c3\u03b7\u03bc\u03b1\u03bd\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc \u03b1\u03c1\u03bd\u03b7\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc \u03b1\u03bd\u03c4\u03af\u03ba\u03c4\u03c5\u03c0\u03bf \u03b5\u03b4\u03ce.
\n\u0395\u03af\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9 \u03b5\u03c6\u03b1\u03c1\u03bc\u03bf\u03b3\u03ae \u03b5\u03bd\u03cc\u03c2 \u03bc\u03c0\u03bb\u03bf\u03ba 24 \u03c9\u03c1\u03ce\u03bd \u03bc\u03b5 \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03c5\u03c0\u03bf\u03c7\u03c1\u03ad\u03c9\u03c3\u03b7 \u03bd\u03b1 \u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03b4\u03b5\u03b8\u03b5\u03af\u03c4\u03b5 \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03bd\u03b1 \u03b4\u03b9\u03b1\u03b2\u03ac\u03c3\u03b5\u03c4\u03b5 \u03b1\u03c5\u03c4\u03cc \u03c4\u03bf \u03bc\u03ae\u03bd\u03c5\u03bc\u03b1.
\nJo Walsh aka zool
\nfor the Data Working Group
\nHello,
\nYou seem to be reactivating meaningless notes (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/414030) and repeatedly opening and closing notes (http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/467751)
\nOpenStreetMap notes are for recording wrong or missing information to improve the map.
\nDear mapmap12,
\nI am placing an extended block on your account because you have continually disregarded the previous block messages and also ignored discussions with other mappers. I have also reverted your recently uploaded changesets.
\nPlease contact the Data Working group at data@osmfoundation.org so we can discuss why you are doing this.
\nSincerely,
\nEthan aka FTA on behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
\nHallo alivedualesata,
\ndu hast im Bereich Leipzig/Chemnitz/Dresden sehr viele \u00c4nderungen (vor allem Geschwindigkeitsanpassungen an Bahnstrecken) vorgenommen. Du wurdest in diesem Changeset gefragt, woher die Angaben stammen, hast darauf aber leider bislang keine Antwort gegeben.
\nDa wir gerade in diesem besagten Gebiet derzeit vermehrt Probleme mit Urheberrechtsverletzungen haben, muss auch ich mich nochmal gezielt nach der Quelle deiner \u00c4nderungen erkundigen. Ich bitte dich daher, innerhalb der n\u00e4chsten 4 Tage zu erkl\u00e4ren, woher deine Daten stammen. Du gibst zwar an, dass die Quelle \"knowledge\" sei, das ist bei der Menge an \u00c4nderungen aber nicht glaubhaft. Kannst du das irgendwie nachweisen? Andernfalls muss ich die Daten leider wieder aus OpenStreetMap entfernen.
\nIch bitte dich um dein Verst\u00e4ndnis f\u00fcr diese Vorgehensweise, sie ist aber leider derzeit n\u00f6tig.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe,
\nPeda
\ni.A. OSMF Data Working Group
\nDear user Moab2000,
\nare you the same person also running the account Giorgi1967? Both of you seem to edit place names in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, applying Georgian names although the Georgian language is rarely used in these areas and most signs will not be in Georgian.
\nPlease understand that OSM maps what is \"on the ground\". The fact that these regions are officially part of Georgia does not mean that all place names have to be Georgian in OSM.
\nI am afraid I will have to block your account and revert your edits for now. Please contact data@osmfoundation.org if you wish to discuss this. OpenStreetMap can certainly benefit from more Georgian names added in these regions but as far as we can see, putting them in the \"name\" tag is a political statement that we cannot accept.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Giorgi,
\nI'm sorry but we're seeing more unacceptable name tag edits from you in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Please contact data@osmfoundation.org to resolve the matter.
\nBest
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Blocked as a sock puppet circumventing a DWG ban (\"PeterDRS\"/\"Kakaner\").
\nThis is a test block of \"SomeoneElse2\", in order to see what happens to a user who has edits pending in iD at the time that a 0-hour block is applied.
\n(that account is currently editing using http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=67491592#map=19/53.07834/-0.80854 )
\nPlease, stop!
\nYou are carrying out a series of mechanical edits without giving any thought to the data that you are actually changing.
\nSeveral hours, several changesets and many thousands of object edits ago I suggested on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35588464 that you really shouldn't be changing shops that you have not surveyed.
\nTaking a single recent change as an example
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183385490
\nwhat does \"brand:wikidata=Q38076\"? How do you know that this restaurant is actually part of this brand, and not just similarly named?
\nSimilarly, you have added \"franchise:wikidata=Q38076\", but how do you know that this shop even is a franchise (McDonald's is roughly 75% franchise and 25% not if you believe wikipedia).
\nAs per http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct mechanical edits like this should be discussed beforehand before they take place. You have not done this.
\nYou will be able to continue editing once you have read this message, but please do not carry out any more undiscussed mechanical edits.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\n(par Google Translate)
\nS'il vous pla\u00eet arr\u00eate!
\nVous effectuez une s\u00e9rie de v\u00e9rifications m\u00e9caniques sans penser aux donn\u00e9es que vous \u00eates r\u00e9ellement en train de changer.
\nPlusieurs heures, plusieurs R\u00e9visions et plusieurs milliers d'objets \u00e9dite je l'ai sugg\u00e9r\u00e9 il ya sur http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35588464 que vous ne devriez pas \u00eatre en train de changer les magasins que vous ne l'avez pas interrog\u00e9s.
\nPrenant un seul changement r\u00e9cent comme un exemple
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183385490
\nqu'est-ce que \"brand:wikidata=Q38076\"? Comment savez-vous que ce restaurant est en fait une partie de cette marque, et non simplement nomm\u00e9 similaire?
\nDe m\u00eame, vous avez ajout\u00e9 \"franchise:wikidata=Q38076\", mais comment savez-vous que cette boutique is m\u00eame une franchise (McDonald est 75% de franchise et 25% pas si vous croyez wikipedia).
\nComme par http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct modifications m\u00e9caniques comme cela devrait \u00eatre pr\u00e9alablement discut\u00e9 avant qu'ils aient lieu. Vous ne l'avez pas fait.
\nVous serez en mesure de continuer l'\u00e9dition une fois que vous avez lu ce message, mais s'il vous pla\u00eet ne pas proc\u00e9der \u00e0 des modifications m\u00e9caniques plus indiscutables.
\nCordialement,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) au nom du Data Working Group de OpenStreetMap.
\nBlocked for the same reasons as https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/851 - please get in touch with data@osmfoundation.org before making these types of edits.
\nHello and welcome to OpenStreetmap!
\nA number of people in the Brazilian OSM community have tried to contact you about your edits (see for example http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34962790 ). You haven't replied, so they think that perhaps your email might be broken, so I'm sending this as a message that you have to read before you continue editing OpenStreetMap. Once you have read it, you will be able to continue editing OpenStreetMap.
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jsouza/history shows you your changes, and you can see which one people have asked you questions about. Please do try and answer their questions.
\nYou can also read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\n(em portugu\u00eas por Google Translate)
\nOl\u00e1 e bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap!
\nUm n\u00famero de pessoas na comunidade OSM brasileira t\u00eam tentado entrar em contato com voc\u00ea sobre suas edi\u00e7\u00f5es (ver, por exemplo http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34962790). Voc\u00ea n\u00e3o respondeu, ent\u00e3o eles pensam que talvez o seu e-mail pode ser quebrado, por isso estou enviando este como uma mensagem que voc\u00ea tem que ler antes de continuar editando OpenStreetMap. Uma vez que voc\u00ea l\u00ea-lo, voc\u00ea ser\u00e1 capaz de continuar editando OpenStreetMap.
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jsouza/history voc\u00ea mostra suas altera\u00e7\u00f5es, e voc\u00ea pode ver que um povo pediram-lhe perguntas sobre. Por favor, tente responder \u00e0s suas perguntas.
\nVoc\u00ea tamb\u00e9m pode ler http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil.
\nCumprimentos,
\nAndy Townsend, em nome do Grupo de Trabalho de Dados do OpenStreetMap.
\nHello LeTopographeFou,
\nYou are being blocked because you are continuing to perform mechanical edits despite users telling you that you are breaking data:
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35674018\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35653117
\nYou have been told about this by other mappers previously too:
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34478757\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34453739\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34453368
\nI have now reverted your most recent problematical edits. See the comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35653117 .
\nIf you would like to discuss this further, please email data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
\n(edited at 22:11 on 30/11/2015 to remove the remaining time outstanding on the block and just requiring the message to be read).
\nHallo openmarcel,
\nleider scheinen dich private Nachrichten nicht zuverl\u00e4ssig zu erreichen. So hast du z.B. auf meine private Nachricht an dich nicht reagiert und auch einige der neueren Changeset-Kommentare nicht beantwortet bzw. nicht darauf reagiert.
\nDas ist f\u00fcr andere Benutzer teilweise ein gro\u00dfes \u00c4rgernis, da sie diese Changesets dann l\u00e4ngerfristig \u00fcberwachen m\u00fcssen um auf eine Reaktion von dir zu warten bzw. auch deine Changesets regelm\u00e4sig kontrollieren und gegebenenfalls verbessern m\u00fcssen. So sehr ich deine guten und vielen \u00c4nderungen sch\u00e4tze, so sehr w\u00fcnsche ich mir, dass du nicht gleichzeitig andere durch deine Nicht-Reaktion demotivierst. Ich bitte dich, das dringend zu \u00e4ndern und die dir gegebenen Tipps und Hinweise anzunehmen und insbesondere auch dauerhaft umzusetzen oder, falls du mit einem Hinweis nicht einverstanden bist, ihn mit dem entsprechenden Benutzer zu diskutieren.
\nNoch wichtiger ist mir allerdings, dass du auf die folgenden vier Changesets reagierst, da mit ihnen unter Umst\u00e4nden urheberrechtlich gesch\u00fctzte Daten nach OpenStreetMap gelangt sind:
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35123065
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35121559
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34990866
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34977424
\nIch sperre dich daher erneut, bis du diese Nachricht gelesen hast und bitte dich, dich hier etwas mehr in die Gemeinschaft zu integrieren. Mappen bedeutet eben nicht nur, f\u00fcr sich alleine hinmappen, sondern auch mal gemeinsam zu arbeiten.
\nVielen Dank,
\nPeter Barth aka Peda
\ni.A. OSMF Data Working Group
\nHallo openmarcel,
\nleider muss ich nun zu h\u00e4rteren Ma\u00dfnahmen greifen:
\nIch habe das jetzt mehrfach erkl\u00e4rt, ich erkl\u00e4re es aber nochmal: Wir sind ein Communityprojekt, das unter anderem von der Gemeinschaft lebt. Ein Projekt, in dem es essentiell ist, auf Kommentare zu antworten und einzugehen, sonst funktioniert das langfristig nicht. Ein Projekt, in dem es auch wichtig ist, andere Mapper weder zu demotivieren, noch ihnen unn\u00f6tig Extraarbeit zu generieren. Ein Projekt in dem eben auch kommuniziert werden muss!
\nSolltest du ein Problem haben, deine Changesetkommentare zu finden, kannst du auch einfach deine \u00c4nderungsliste durchsehen. Alle mit einer gr\u00f6\u00dferen Zahl als 0 in der Sprechblase enthalten einen Kommentar an dich.
\nSolltest du das Gef\u00fchl haben unfair behandelt zu werden oder unfaire Komentare erhalten zu haben, steht es dir frei, dich bei mir oder direkt bei der Data Working Group zu melden. Keine Option ist es, einzelne oder alle Kommentare zu ignorieren und ohne vorherige vollst\u00e4ndige Kl\u00e4rung aller offenen Punkte weiter zu mappen.
\nSo leid es mir tut, dass ich nun doch h\u00e4rter durchgreifen muss, so wichtig ist diese Ma\u00dfnahme. Das hei\u00dft auch, dass ich bei weiteren Verst\u00f6\u00dfen deinen Account weiter bzw. l\u00e4ngerfristig sperren werde und im schlimmsten Fall sogar (gr\u00f6\u00dfere) Teile deiner \u00c4nderungen revertieren (entfernen) werde. Vielen Dank f\u00fcr dein Verst\u00e4ndnis.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe,
\nPeter Barth aka Peda
\ni.A. OSMF Data Working Group
\nHello ClaudDadur,\nA number of people within the Brazilian community have asked about your edits, for example about http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3791608326 within http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34715068 , and also about http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3756306252 within http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34213741 . I also asked about http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34491510 , which I noticed because https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3776562007/history had been added in the middle of the Atlantic.
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative community, and we have to work together to create the best map. Therefore, it's only polite to reply when other mappers ask questions. It's possible that you haven't seen these if your email is not set up properly, in which case you can go to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ClaudDadur/history and see where people have asked questions about changesets. Please do reply to them, and also (if you are not receiving email notifications of changeset discussions) try and sort out your email too.
\nI'm sending this as a message that has to be read before you continue editing, but once you've read it you'll be able to edit OpenStreetMap immediately.
\nAlso, could you please start using changeset comments and explain what the source of things that you are adding is? There's no information on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35730188 or on e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3874786533 .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\n(Em Portugu\u00eas via Google Translate)
\nOl\u00e1 ClaudDadur,\nUm n\u00famero de pessoas dentro da comunidade brasileira t\u00eam perguntado sobre suas edi\u00e7\u00f5es, por exemplo sobre http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3791608326 dentro http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34715068, e tamb\u00e9m sobre http: //www.openstreetmap.org/node/3756306252 dentro http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34213741. Eu tamb\u00e9m perguntei sobre http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34491510, que eu notei porque https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3776562007/history haviam sido adicionados no meio do Atl\u00e2ntico.
\nOpenStreetMap \u00e9 uma comunidade colaborativa, e n\u00f3s temos que trabalhar em conjunto para criar o melhor mapa. Portanto, \u00e9 apenas educado para responder quando outros mapeadores fazer perguntas. \u00c9 poss\u00edvel que voc\u00ea n\u00e3o tenha visto estes se seu e-mail n\u00e3o est\u00e1 configurado corretamente, caso em que voc\u00ea pode ir para https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ClaudDadur/history e ver onde as pessoas t\u00eam perguntas sobre changesets. Por favor, fa\u00e7a a resposta a eles, e tamb\u00e9m (se voc\u00ea n\u00e3o estiver recebendo notifica\u00e7\u00f5es por email de discuss\u00f5es changeset) tentar resolver tamb\u00e9m o seu e-mail.
\nEstou enviando esta como uma mensagem que tem de ser lido antes de continuar editando, mas uma vez que voc\u00ea l\u00ea-lo voc\u00ea vai ser capaz de editar OpenStreetMap imediatamente.
\nAl\u00e9m disso, voc\u00ea poderia come\u00e7ar a usar coment\u00e1rios da altera\u00e7\u00e3o e explicar o que a fonte de coisas que voc\u00ea est\u00e1 adicionando \u00e9? N\u00e3o h\u00e1 informa\u00e7\u00f5es sobre https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35730188 ou sobre, por exemplo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3874786533.
\nCumprimentos,
\nAndy Townsend (someoneelse), em nome do Grupo de Trabalho de Dados do OpenStreetMap.
\n(\u0432 \u0420\u043e\u0441\u0441\u0438\u0438)
\n\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0435\u0442, ClaudDadur.
\n\u041c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u0438\u0435 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0438 \u0438\u0437 \u0411\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0438\u043b\u044c\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430 \u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0448\u0438\u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u043e \u0412\u0430\u0448\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043a\u0430\u0445, \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440 \u043e \u0442\u043e\u0447\u043a\u0435 http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3791608326 \u0432 \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34715068, \u0430 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u043e \u0442\u043e\u0447\u043a\u0435 http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3756306252 \u0432 \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34213741. \u042f \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u0441\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0438\u043b \u043e \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34491510, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0439 \u044f \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0442\u0438\u043b, \u043f\u043e\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0442\u043e\u0447\u043a\u0430 http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3776562007/history \u0431\u044b\u043b\u0430 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0430 \u0432 \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0438\u043d\u0435 \u0410\u043d\u0442\u043b\u0430\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043e\u043a\u0435\u0430\u043d\u0430.
\nOpenStreetMap - \u044d\u0442\u043e \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e \u0438 \u043c\u044b \u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u043d\u044b \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0432\u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0435, \u0447\u0442\u043e\u0431\u044b \u0441\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0430\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043b\u0443\u0447\u0448\u0443\u044e \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0443. \u041f\u043e\u044d\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u043d\u0443\u0436\u043d\u043e \u0432\u0435\u0436\u043b\u0438\u0432\u043e \u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0447\u0430\u0442\u044c, \u043a\u043e\u0433\u0434\u0430 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0435 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0438 \u0437\u0430\u0434\u0430\u044e\u0442 \u0432\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044b. \u0412\u043e\u0437\u043c\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0412\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u0432\u0438\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0438 \u0438\u0445, \u043f\u043e\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0412\u0430\u0448\u0430 \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0430\u044f \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0430 \u043d\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0435\u043d\u0430 \u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u043d\u044b\u043c \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0437\u043e\u043c. \u0412 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u043c \u0441\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0430\u0435, \u0412\u044b \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0432\u043e\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \u0441\u0441\u044b\u043b\u043a\u043e\u0439\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ClaudDadur/history \u0438 \u0443\u0432\u0438\u0434\u0435\u0442\u044c, \u0433\u0434\u0435 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0438 \u0437\u0430\u0434\u0430\u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u0432\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044b \u043e \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0442\u0430\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a. \u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442\u044c\u0442\u0435 \u0438\u043c, \u0430 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 (\u0435\u0441\u043b\u0438 \u0412\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0443\u0432\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043c\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043f\u043e \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0435 \u043e\u0431 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u0443\u0436\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0438 \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0442\u043e\u0432 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a) \u043f\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0431\u0443\u0439\u0442\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0443 \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0443\u044e \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0443.
\n\u042f \u043f\u043e\u0441\u044b\u043b\u0430\u044e \u044d\u0442\u043e \u043a\u0430\u043a \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0435 \u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u043d\u043e \u0431\u044b\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0435, \u0447\u0435\u043c \u0412\u044b \u0441\u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0440\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435, \u043d\u043e \u043a\u0430\u043a \u0442\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u043e \u0412\u044b \u0435\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435, \u0412\u044b \u0441\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0443 \u0441\u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0440\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 OpenStreetMap.
\n\u0422\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u043d\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0438 \u0412\u044b \u043d\u0430\u0447\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0438 \u043a \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0442\u0430\u043c \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a \u0438 \u0443\u043a\u0430\u0437\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0438\u043a \u0438\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0445 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445? \u041d\u0435\u0442 \u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0438\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u043e\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35730188 \u0438\u043b\u0438, \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440, \u0442\u043e\u0447\u043a\u0438 http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3874786533.
\n\u0421 \u043d\u0430\u0438\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0448\u0438\u043c\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0435\u043b\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f\u043c\u0438,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) \u043e\u0442 \u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0438 \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0435\u0439 \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u044b \u043f\u043e \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u043c (Data Working Group) OpenStreetMap.
\ndear mapper abc26324,
\nI write on behalf of the Data Working Group of the OpenStreetMap Foundation.
\nThere has been some upset amongst the UK community of mappers regarding some of your edits to OpenStreetMap; particularly those edits adding relations to roads where it is generally agreed they are not needed - there are no roads in the UK with multiple reference numbers that need route relations.
\nA number of UK community members have tried to get in touch with you via changeset discussion to air their concerns and ask for further explanation, but haven't heard anything back from you. For example at http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35737307 there are several people asking for an explanation and pointing you at the relevant discussion on the talk-gb mailing list.
\nThus I am applying what is known as a zero-hour block to your account; this obliges you to log in to OpenStreetMap and read this message before you can continue to edit the map.
\nPlease make an effort to respond to the concerns of other mappers in the community via the form of changeset discussions or the mailing list forum. It would also be good if you could leave descriptive comments on your changesets, as the default \"(no comment)\" doesn't help other mappers to follow along and make sense of what you are doing ( as noted in this discussion here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35737381 )
\ncheers,
\nJo Walsh aka zool\nOn behalf of the Data Working Group
\nLieber User eagleeye_zh,
\ndie Schweizer Community ist ungl\u00fccklich mit dem Einzelspurmapping, das Du immer wieder in Z\u00fcrich durchzudr\u00fccken versuchst. Deine Art, zu mappen, entspricht nicht dem, wie die Community es macht. Das ist mit Dir in pers\u00f6nlichen Mails diskutiert worden und auch hier auf der Mailingliste:
\nhttp://lists.openstreetmap.ch/pipermail/talk-ch/2015-October/003429.html\nhttp://lists.openstreetmap.ch/pipermail/talk-ch/2015-December/003460.html
\nEs spielt keine Rolle, ob Deine Sicht \"richtig\" ist - es ist eine Minderheitenmeinung, die die anderen Mapper st\u00f6rt. Bitte suche k\u00fcnftig einen Konsens auf der Mailingliste, bevor Du solche \u00c4nderungen machst, und wenn kein Konsens erzielbar ist, dann verzichte auf solche \u00c4nderungen.
\nDies ist eine Kurzzeit-Sperre, die sich von selbst aufhebt, sobald Du sie gelesen hast.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Please don't use abusive language in changeset comments or changeset discussion comments, either specifically targetted (as you were previously warned about) or more general (such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35937742 ).
\nYou'll be able to continue editing once you've read this message, but If you continue with comments such as this you may be blocked from editing.
\nBest Regards,\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse), on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nBlocked for repeatedly adding spam notes to OSM.
\nOpenStreetMap is not a business directory. If you have a bricks-and-mortar business to add, please do so (provided that it is visible from the street and therefore verifiable by other mappers).
\nPlease do not include guff like \"... many customers have found out just how easy it can be to make sure that they are getting a simple and easy ...\". That's not a descriptive address or other details; it's just spam.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nIf you would like to get in contact with the DWG, you can do so by emailing data@osmfoundation.org
\nBlocked for repeatedly adding spam notes to OSM.
\nOpenStreetMap is not a business directory. If you have a bricks-and-mortar business to add, please do so (provided that it is visible from the street and therefore verifiable by other mappers).
\nPlease do not include guff like \"... No half measures will ever be taken from us ...\". That's not a descriptive address or other details; it's just spam.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nIf you would like to get in contact with the DWG, you can do so by emailing data@osmfoundation.org
\ntest block ignore
\nHello ClaudDadur.
\nAs previously said in http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/861 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/766 there are concerns about the source of the data that you are adding, and that you're not interacting with other members of the community.
\nPlease answer the questions asked in http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/861 by email to data@osmfoundation.org so that this block can be lifted.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
\nDear Alex-Berlin,
\ntwo hours ago I asked you to stop making mechanical edits (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36400873), yet you are continuing. Again: Please don't make large scale edits like these.
\nThis is a blocking message that you must read before you can continue editing. If you should continue to do un-discussed mass edits we might have to block you for longer.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a woodpeck\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hello crossmyloof,
\nI'm sending this message as one that has to be read before continuing editing just in case you're not receiving emails for any reason. A couple of mappers have tried to get in touch via changeset discussion comments (see for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36503610 ) and haven't had a reply, and you've carried on doing the same sort of edits without replying to the discussion.
\nIf you have been receiving email messages from changeset discussions it's easy to reply - just click the \"changeset\" link at the bottom of the message and you'll be taken to the website where there's a text box with \"comment\" below it.
\nIf you haven't been receiving email messages you might want to sort your email out, but in the meantime you can see who's tried to get in touch by looking at the list at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/crossmyloof/history and seeing where there's a non-zero value to the right of the changeset information. OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project - we need to work together if we want to create the best map. Please do reply to the questions that people are asking there.
\nAnyway, hope you don't mind me mentioning this - just trying to help. Any questions just ask - you might find http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels helpful here. If you want to get in touch with other mappers in GB quickly you might also want to try the #osm-gb IRC channel - see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IRC for that.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse), on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
\nHello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
\nOpenstreetMap is a project for mapping things as they exist in the real world. It's not for \"test edits\" so see how things show up on the map, or for things that you might like to exist. There's no motorway in Cornwall near the one that you added in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36529465 (I'm sure plenty of people in Cornwall would like a motorway that joins them to the rest of the world, although one that goes around in a circle wouldn't be much use).
\nYou're welcome to contribute to OSM but please do so positively:
\no Add things that do exist, not things that don't.
\no Do make sure that you explain the edits that you're making in changeset comments (\"dslfedsf \" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36529465 is not an explanation).
\no Do please reply to other mappers in changeset discussions when they ask you questions, for example in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36458698 .
\no Don't just close notes without any explanation, like you did with http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/312383
\nI'm sending this message as one that has to be read before continuing editing just in case you're not receiving emails for any reason. You'll be able to carry on mapping as soon as you've read it, but please do contribute positively (as described above) or you may be prevented from updating OpenStreetMap in the future.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group. To contact the Data Working Group at any time, email data@osmfoundation.org .
\nHallo JR1234,
\nseit kurzem scheint dein Account wieder aktiv zu sein, jedoch leider neuerdings mit nur unsinnigen \u00c4nderungen an den Daten, soweit ich das \u00fcberpr\u00fcft habe.
\nEs haben dich auch mehrere Benutzer direkt angeschrieben bzw. deine \u00c4nderungen kommentiert und diese anschlie\u00dfend wieder zur\u00fcckgesetzt. Ich habe daher deinen Account vor\u00fcbergehend gesperrt bis du diese Nachricht hier liest. Danach kannst du theoretisch weiter editieren. Ich fordere dich aber auf, diese destruktiven und fehlerhaften \u00c4nderungen zu unterlassen und zudem k\u00fcnftig auf Fragen, Kommentare und Hinweise anderer Benutzer zu reagieren. Andernfalls m\u00fcssten wir deinen Account l\u00e4ngerfristig sperren.
\nFalls du nicht wei\u00dft wovon ich spreche, habe ich dir ein paar Beispiele herausgesucht:
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36284898
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36340441
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36375231
Ich hoffe aber, dass wir dich k\u00fcnftig zu unseren aktiven Mappern z\u00e4hlen k\u00f6nnen und w\u00fcnsche dir schon mal viel Spa\u00df mit OpenStreetMap.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe,
\nPeter Barth aka Peda
\ni.A. OSMF Data Working Group
\nHi,
\nyou're making massive mechanical edits to religion/denomination tags. These are in violation of your guidelines which mandate that you have to discuss such edits before you proceed. Please review http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F.
\nThis is a zero-hour block message which means you're only blocked until you've read this message.
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hello h31l54,
\nI'm sending this message as one that has to be read before continuing editing just in case you're not receiving emails for any reason. A couple of mappers - including me - have tried to get in touch via changeset discussion comments (see for example http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36392589 ) and haven't had a reply.
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative community, and we have to work together to create the best map. Therefore, it's only polite to reply when other mappers ask questions. It's possible that you haven't seen these if your email is not set up properly, in which case you can go to http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/h31l54/history and see where people have asked questions about changes that you have made. Please do reply to them, and also (if you are not receiving email notifications of changeset discussions) try and sort out your email too.
\nOne more thing - it's really helpful to other mappers to add a description of changes that you're making (it doesn't have to be a huge paragraph - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33631443 is one of mine, for example). That way people can see why changes were made and what the source was. Just saying \"repair work\" every time doesn't explain what you're changing, why, or what the source of the change was.
\nBest Regards,\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behald of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nHello h31l54,
\nFollowing on from http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/874 ,
\n\"magic repair work\" is not a more meaningful changeset comment than \"repair work\". There is still no reply to the discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36392589 . You have been blocked from updating OSM for a short period because of this.
\nWhen this block expires, please immediately reply to the questions that you have been asked. If you would like to contact the Data Working Group at any time you can do so via email to data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards, Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behald of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nHello Ian,
\nA number of people have left comments in discussions on changesets (at least as far back as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34525261 ) and you don't appear to have replied to any of them.
\nMost recently there have been reports of problems (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36653757 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36640516 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36742099 , http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36742267 ).
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative community, and we have to work together to create the best map. Therefore, it's only polite to reply when other mappers ask questions. It's possible that you haven't seen these if your email is not set up properly, in which case you can go to http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Ian%20Haylock/history and see where people have asked questions about changesets. Please do reply to them, and also (if you are not receiving email notifications of changeset discussions) try and sort out your email too.
\nI'm sending this as a message that has to be read before you continue editing; once you've read it you'll be able to edit OpenStreetMap immediately.
\nAlso, (as suggested elsewhere) could you please start using meaningful changeset comments and explain what the source of changes that you are making is?
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\ndear cam98,
\nI write on behalf of the Data Working Group of the OpenStreetMap Foundation.
\nI am applying this \"zero-hour block\" to your account and to another, presumably linked account (cameronk1998). This just means you will have to log in and read this message before continuing to edit OpenStreetMap; it's a means of getting your attention.
\nAnother mapper has been in touch with DWG to point out that some of your edits are adding duplicate or dubious data to OpenStreetMap. I've left a comment on a couple of the more obvious changesets where this is happening. The map is a collaborative, wiki-style effort to produce an accurate map of the world; this means improving data rather than tracing over it, and keeping additions to features which can be observed \"on the ground\".
\nI see you haven't been editing for long and may still be getting the hang of OSM; thank you for your recent attempts to contribute, but we may have to revert (e.g. roll back) all your recent changes due to the effort involved in filtering useful additions from dubious data. It would help other mappers if you leave a descriptive comment when you contribute changes (they are currently showing up as the default \"no comment\").
\nbest regards,
\nJo Walsh aka zool on behalf of the Data Working Group
\ndear cam98,
\nI write on behalf of the Data Working Group of the OpenStreetMap Foundation.
\nI am applying this \"zero-hour block\" to your account and to another, presumably linked account (cam98). This just means you will have to log in and read this message before continuing to edit OpenStreetMap; it's a means of getting your attention.
\nAnother mapper has been in touch with DWG to point out that some of your edits are adding duplicate or dubious data to OpenStreetMap. I've left a comment on a couple of the more obvious changesets where this is happening. The map is a collaborative, wiki-style effort to produce an accurate map of the world; this means improving data rather than tracing over it, and keeping additions to features which can be observed \"on the ground\".
\nI see you haven't been editing for long and may still be getting the hang of OSM; thank you for your recent attempts to contribute, but we may have to revert (e.g. roll back) all your recent changes due to the effort involved in filtering useful additions from dubious data. It would help other mappers if you leave a descriptive comment when you contribute changes (they are currently showing up as the default \"no comment\").
\nbest regards,
\nJo Walsh aka zool on behalf of the Data Working Group
\nHi DAC LLM,
\nYou have repeatedly imported data into OpenStreetMap over the course of the past few months with no discussion or comment. Further, after you were warned about the community practices surrounding imports, you continued to ignore them.
\nI am placing a 0 hour block on your account, meaning you must physically log into the OSM website and read this message before you can continue editing.
\nOpenStreetMap relies on everyone to follow the community rules to provide consistently licensed and quality data. If you want to import data in the future, please follow the aforementioned guidelines--which includes proposing the comment, allowing for community comment, and using correct tags on your data.
\nIf you have further questions about this matter, please contact the data working group.
\nSincerely,
\nEthan (aka FTA) for the OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group
\nHello, after your previous block you are continuing with the problem edits.
\nFor all future edits, please use a good changeset comment and please contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org to explain what is going on.
\nPaul Norman
\nFor the Data Working Group
Dear user CartoCrazy,
\nyour current profile contains the single sentence: \"Please be advised.... any messages sent to me will be deleted without being read.\".
\nDWG has recevied complaints about you not replying to messages sent to you about your mapping, and you don't add changeset comments to your edits either. However, to make a meaningful contribution to OSM, you must be contactable by your fellow mappers because this is a team project.
\nBefore you continue making edits to OSM, please add a statement to your profile explaining how you wish to be contacted if there are questions about your mapping, and make sure to actually read and answer such questions. Should you feel harassed by messages you receive, please contact us (data@osmfoundation.org).
\nAlso, please make it a habit to add changeset comments when you upload data. See here for an explanation why this is very useful: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hello CloseThisAccountPlease,
\nIn https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/874 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/875 you were asked to work together with other mappers, to reply to their questions and to use meaningful changeset comments.
\nAs of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36696454 you clearly haven't been doing that (the changeset comment is just \"repair work\" again), and you've continued editing rather than replying to the question there. Please immediately reply in that changeset discussion and don't use the same changeset comment over and over again.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nDear user snapping,
\nDWG had to revert an undiscussed import of several hundred thousand nodes that you've made. You are continuing to add data with changeset comments of \"Bati ENEO\" and we'd like to discuss your data sources with you before you continue adding any data to OSM. Please contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\nBest regards
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear PeterSandor,
\nyou have been deleting a lot of data from OSM, all with the same comment that in English means \"changes in mountain houses\". Do you have evidence that the objects you are deleting from the map have indeed ceased to exist? Or is this perhaps a mistake?
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hello.
\nYou have deleted the valid data [1,2,3]. Now the data are restored. Please, don't delete the data anymore.\nPlease, check your mailbox. Reply to contributors.
\nVladimir Marshinin
\nData Working Group
Dear abc26324,
\nyou are a prolific mapper and I don't doubt that you're doing a lot good for the project. A few days ago however, you chose to add a bunch of abandoned tram lines to OpenStreetMap, even though an earlier attempt of you to do so had already provoked criticism (\u200ehttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33627202). DWG has also reminded you two months ago that you should not ignore other mappers who have issues with your edits (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/862).
\nTo make matters worse, in your recent London edit you accidentally circularised one of the Crossrail tunnels.
\nThese issues have been fixed but it is extremely hard - for us and others - to follow your edits. Someone as prolific, and occasionally at odds with other community members, as you should really use changeset comments to allow others to understand what a changeset was meant to do. You don't have to write a novel - just a concise description of what the changeset does. For example: \"Add abandoned tram\". (Please no catch-all phrases like \"added data\" or \"fixed map\".)
\nFrom now on, please use meaningful changeset comments on all your non-trivial edits.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
(\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u044f)
\n\u0414\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0439 Dinamik. \u0423\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u0443\u0436\u0434\u0430\u044e\u0442 \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0438 \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0442\u044b \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a \u043d\u0430 \u0444\u043e\u0440\u0443\u043c\u0435 [1]. \u0422\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u0432\u0430\u043c \u0431\u044b\u043b \u0437\u0430\u0434\u0430\u043d \u0432\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441 \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u0443\u0436\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0438 \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a [2]. \u0412\u043e\u0437\u043c\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e, \u0432\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u0437\u043d\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043e\u0431 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u043c, \u043f\u043e\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0443\u044e \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0443. \u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0442\u0435 \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0443 \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0443\u044e \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0443 \u0438 \u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442\u044c\u0442\u0435 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043c.
\n\u0412\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u041c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0438\u043d\u0438\u043d
\n\u0420\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0430\u044f \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u0430 \u043f\u043e \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u043c
(english version)
\nDear Dinamik. A contributors discuss your changesets on a forum [1]. Also, you were asked in the discussion of changeset [2]. Maybe, you don't know about it because you don't check your email. Please, check your email and reply to contributors.
\nVladimir Marshinin
\nData Working Group
(\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u044f)
\n\u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u0439\u0442\u0435, \u041f\u0430\u0432\u0435\u043b.
\n\u0423\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u0443\u0436\u0434\u0430\u044e\u0442 \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0438 \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0442\u044b \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a \u043d\u0430 \u0444\u043e\u0440\u0443\u043c\u0435 [1]. \u0422\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u0432\u0430\u043c \u0431\u044b\u043b \u0437\u0430\u0434\u0430\u043d \u0432\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441 \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u0443\u0436\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0438 \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a [2]. \u0412\u043e\u0437\u043c\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e, \u0432\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u0437\u043d\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043e\u0431 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u043c, \u043f\u043e\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0443\u044e \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0443. \u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0442\u0435 \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0443 \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0443\u044e \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0443 \u0438 \u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442\u044c\u0442\u0435 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043c.
\n\u0422\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443\u0439\u0442\u0435, \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0445\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0448\u0438\u0435 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0438 \u043a \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0442\u0430\u043c \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a [3].
\n\u0412\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u041c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0438\u043d\u0438\u043d
\n\u0420\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0430\u044f \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u0430 \u043f\u043e \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u043c
(english version)
\nHello, Pavel.
\nA contributors discuss your changesets on a forum [1]. Also, you were asked in the discussion of changeset [2]. Maybe, you don't know about it because you don't check your email. Please, check your email and reply to contributors.
\nAlso use a good changeset comments, please [3].
\nVladimir Marshinin
\nData Working Group
Dear user fedc,
\nI am sending you this message in order to notify you of complaints that Data Working Group have received about your editing.
\nYou are not blocked from OSM and you can continue your work as soon as you have read this message.
\nHowever, many members of the Italian OSM community have issues with your mapping, and especially with the way you seem to evade any public discussion about it. You do reply to individual messages but not to public changeset comments, and you don't participate on the mailing list or forum; for a prolific mapper like yourself, it would be prudent to explain yourself publicly when questioned rather than send individual messages, so that others can take part in the discussion.
\nPeople are concerned about the way in which you often delete data from the map in order to re-trace it in a supposedly \"better\" way, but you are too careless about it and you lose information, for example you deleted a named soccer pitch here
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124198134/history
\nand then re-created it without a name
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398448795
\nYou should really only delete and re-draw things in exceptional circumstances; out of respect for the work of others, if something just needs a little geometric refinement, modify the object instead of throwing out what others have done completely!
\nHere's an instance where you removed a historic=castle designation without any comment and replaced it with building=yes:
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124206392/history
\nHere is a building you created as a multipolygon
\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5860719
\nbut you deleted seven individual buildings that were there before, and so on, and so on. And all this with a changeset comment of \"Continuo con le campiture\" which is next to worthless and does not adequately describe the edits made here.
\nYour edits are not wrong in themselves but they are so wide-ranging that you are essentially putting your mark all of the Milan area and beyond, mapping it to your personal standards and likings, and you are doing so much of that that other mappers feel you are rejecting and overwriting their efforts.
\nPlease try to see OSM as a social activity - engage in public discussion. When someone writes a changeset discussion entry to one of your changesets, answer publicly. When your work is discussed on the forum or mailing list, participate. When five other mappers tell you not to do something, then stop doing it or at least think about it for a while, as they might be right! OpenStreetMap is not your personal playground where you can do whatever you think is right.
\nThank you
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hallo fufzich,
\nmehrere Community-Mitglieder haben Dich bereits darauf hinzuweisen versucht, dass Betretungsverbote bei uns in OSM nicht durch L\u00f6schung der \"verbotenen\" Wege oder Fl\u00e4chen, sondern durch entsprechende Abbildung der Betretungsverbote (z.B. \"access=no\") dargestellt werden.
\nL\u00f6scht man die \"verbotenen\" Wege einfach, so kommt der n\u00e4chste und malt den Weg vom Luftbild wieder ab, weil er von dem Verbot nichts weiss. Eine saubere Modellierung des Verbots ist also f\u00fcr seine Einhaltung zielf\u00fchrender als der Versuch, die Existenz \"verbotener\" Wege ganz aus OSM herauszuhalten.
\nLinks zur Diskussion im Forum wurden Dir mitgeteilt, dort wird man Dir gerne weiterhelfen!
\nIch hoffe auf Deine Einsicht und weitere konstruktive Mitarbeit, weise Dich aber vorsorglich auch darauf hin, dass vors\u00e4tzliche und regelwidrige Datenver\u00e4nderung bei OSM in Deutschland als Gesetzesversto\u00df geahndet werden kann!
\nDiese Nachricht ist mit einer \"0-Stunden-Sperre\" verbunden; Du kannst sofort weiterarbeiten, wenn Du sie gelesen hast. Wir tun das, um sicherzustellen, dass Dich die Nachricht auch erreicht - da vergangene Versuche der Community, mit Dir in einen Dialog zu treten, ja leider fehlgeschlagen sind.
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe
\nFrederik Ramm
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hi rowers2,
\nI'm sending this message as a message that has to be read before continuing editing in case there's a problem with your email - I notice you've received changeset discussion comments such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36930321 but haven't replied. You'll be able to continue editing as normal as soon as you've read this message.
\nIf you are receiving the messages please do reply - we need to work together if we're going to create the best map. If you aren't, please check that your email is set to a working address on openstreetmap.org.
\nIn particular with regard to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36930321 would it be possible to explain the \"tiny buildings\" created here such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395210961 ? They don't seem to make a lot of sense to me...
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\n(Automatyczne t\u0142umaczenie)
\nHi rowers2,
\nWysy\u0142am t\u0119 wiadomo\u015b\u0107 jako komunikat, kt\u00f3ry ma by\u0107 odczytany przed dalsz\u0105 edycj\u0119 w przypadku istnieje problem z poczt\u0105 elektroniczn\u0105 - Zauwa\u017cy\u0142em ju\u017c otrzyma\u0142a uwagi changeset dyskusyjnych takich jak https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36930321 ale nie odpowiedzia\u0142. B\u0119dziesz w stanie kontynuowa\u0107 edycj\u0119 jako normalne, jak tylko czytasz t\u0119 wiadomo\u015b\u0107.
\nJe\u015bli otrzymujesz wiadomo\u015bci prosz\u0119 odpowied\u017a - musimy pracowa\u0107 razem, je\u015bli mamy zamiar stworzy\u0107 najlepsz\u0105 map\u0119. Je\u015bli nie, nale\u017cy sprawdzi\u0107, czy e-mail jest ustawiona na adres roboczej ds openstreetmap.org.
\nW szczeg\u00f3lno\u015bci w odniesieniu do https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36930321 by\u0142oby mo\u017cliwe do wyja\u015bnienia \"malutki\" stworzy\u0142 tu budynki takie jak https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395210961? Nie wydaje si\u0119, aby du\u017co sensu dla mnie ...
\nZ powa\u017caniem,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) w imieniu Grupy Roboczej danych OpenStreetMap jest.
\nHello Reno Editor,
\nRecently people have tried to contact you via changeset discussion comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37218481 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37218384 and haven't had a response. In order to create the best map we need to work together, which means answering each others' questions.
\nIn this case you've added ways such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397913820 based on http://azdot.gov/media/News/news-release/2015/12/04/interstate-11-receives-designation-in-federal-transportation-funding-bill which is just a press release - it doesn't describe the route.
\nCan you please explain your source for this particular route? If you haven't got one, and are just guessing, then please don't add \"guesswork\" routes to OpenStreetMap. Once the highway is built it'll be easy to add, and no-one will be able to drive on it until then anyway!
\nI've sent this message as one that has to be read before continuing to edit because you haven't replied to the changeset discussion comments above. This might be because you just haven't seen them, perhaps because your OSM email is misconfigured. You'll be able to continue editing as soon as you've read this message, but please do reply to the questions asked in those changeset discussions, and if there is a problem with your email, please try and fix it so that you see future comments.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nDear G Jenny.
\nYou add nonexistent objects [1,2]. Now these objects are deleted. Please, don't add nonexistent objects.
\nThe buildings added by you are very big. Please, be more exact.
\nAlso you use identical changeset comments. Use a good changeset comments, please [3].
\nVladimir Marshinin
\nData Working Group
Hello MonumentoDeIsabelle and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
\nA number of your edits have been flagged up by other users as questionable or obviously false. See for example http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37139167 , and the duplicate Boston node that you added that I myself commented on.
\nOpenStreetMap is a map of what's actually on the ground, not things we might like to be on the ground. It's not a \"playground\" for test edits.
\nIt's also important that you use meaningful changeset comments - your example at http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37139167 is not meaningful.
\nAfter reading this message you'll be able to continue editing, but please only add valid data, and only do explain when saving the changeset what the source of that data was.
\nIf you have any questions please email data@osmfoundation.org
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nBlocked for ignoring our request to discuss world-wide changes before executing them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873
\nHello Sam888,
\nA number of people have left comments in discussions on changesets and you don't appear to have replied to any of them.
\nThese include https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36323992 ,\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36604305 ,\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36605141 ,\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37089061 and\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37089948
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative community, and we have to work together to create the best map. Therefore, it's only polite to reply when other mappers ask questions.
\nIt's possible that you haven't seen these if your email is not set up properly, in which case you can go to http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Sam888/history and see where people have asked you questions. Please do reply to them, and also (if you are not receiving email notifications of changeset discussions) try and fix your email too.
\nI'm sending this as a message that has to be read before you continue editing; once you've read it you'll be able to edit OpenStreetMap again immediately.
\nAlso, could you please start using meaningful changeset comments and explain what the source of changes that you are making is? It makes it much easier for other local mappers to understand what has changed.
\nIf you have any questions please don't hesitate to contact the Data Working Group via data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nHello,
\nPlease don't ignore the requests for comments from other users that were outlined in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/896 and just carry on mapping.
\nIt's important that we all work together, and if you continue to refuse to engage with other mappers and answer their questions about things you've done that might not be correct you will be prevented from editing OpenStreetMap in the future.
\nPlease do take the time to reply to those mappers who have tried to contact you, and please do use meaningful changeset comments. You are still not adding any at all.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\ndear Marek,
\nAs noted in the changeset discussion at http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37690976 you appear to be running a mass import of buildings that has not been discussed and agreed with the local community or on the OSM imports@ mailing list.
\nI would like to remind you of the Automated Edits Code of Conduct for OpenStreetMap:\nhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
\nAs such I am applying this \"zero-hour block\" on behalf of the Data Working Group, as part of a request that you pause this editing activity until a discussion is held and conclusion is reached about the merits of the imported data.
\nJo Walsh aka zool
\nOn behalf of the Data Working Group
\nHello EzekielT,
\nThere have been a number of problems with your edits recently. People have complained about admin level changes (and I've commented on that separately over at http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37697227 ). Also, you've added a number of fictional roads in the Antarctic, which I've removed.
\nPlease do not add fictional data to OSM, whether that is a \"country\" that is not really a country, or a \"motorway\" on the Antarctic ice sheet.
\nI'm sending this as a message that has to be read before you continue editing; once you've read it you'll be able to edit OpenStreetMap again immediately. However, if you add fictional data again of any sort you will be blocked from editing OpenStreetMap.
\nIf you have any questions please don't hesitate to contact the Data Working Group via data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nDear Sebarga Shozodalaisov,
\nI am sending you this blocking message which you have to read before continuing your edits. You have added data to OSM and claimed that the source is Google. Using Google maps imagery to contribute to OSM is not allowed. Another user has told you that in changeset comments yesterday and yet you continue adding data with source=Google. Please don't do that; any data added with the help of Google will have to be removed again and hence it is a waste of time.
\nBest
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Dear Gulrukh,
\nI am sending you this blocking message which you have to read before continuing your edits. You have added data to OSM and claimed that the source is Google. Using Google maps imagery to contribute to OSM is not allowed. Other users have told you that days ago and yet you continue adding data with source=Google. Please don't do that; any data added with the help of Google will have to be removed again and hence it is a waste of time.
\nBest
\nFrederik Ramm a.k.a. woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Edits that you make update the one shared map that everyone sees. That's why it's important that only valid edits are made to the map. If you want to experiment with the editors, you can do so over at http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org (an exact copy of the main site apart from the map display).
\nI previously sent this message in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37781910 and it had no effect, so I'm sending it again as a message that has to be read before you can continue editing. Once you have read it, you'll be able to continue mapping as before - but please map only things in the real world that actually exist, not test data.
\nBest Regards,\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\n(\u0410\u0432\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0432\u043e\u0434)
\n\u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u0439\u0442\u0435 \u0438 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0440\u043e \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0432 OpenStreetMap! \u0418\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f, \u0432\u043d\u0435\u0441\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0434\u043d\u0443 \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0443\u044e \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0443, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043a\u0430\u0436\u0434\u044b\u0439 \u0432\u0438\u0434\u0438\u0442. \u0412\u043e\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0435\u043c\u0443 \u043e\u0447\u0435\u043d\u044c \u0432\u0430\u0436\u043d\u043e, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0442\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u043e \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043a\u0438 \u0441\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u043d\u044b \u043d\u0430 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0435. \u0415\u0441\u043b\u0438 \u0432\u044b \u0445\u043e\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0435, \u0447\u0442\u043e\u0431\u044b \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0441 \u0440\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043a\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430\u043c\u0438, \u0432\u044b \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0441\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u0442\u044c \u044d\u0442\u043e \u0431\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0435 \u0447\u0435\u043c \u043d\u0430 http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org (\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0443\u044e \u043a\u043e\u043f\u0438\u044e \u043e\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u0430\u0439\u0442\u0430, \u043a\u0440\u043e\u043c\u0435 \u043e\u0442\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u044b).
\n\u0420\u0430\u043d\u0435\u0435 \u044f \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0430\u043b \u044d\u0442\u043e \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0432 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37781910 \u0438 \u044d\u0442\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u0438\u043c\u0435\u043b\u043e \u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u044d\u0444\u0444\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0430, \u043f\u043e\u044d\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u044f \u043f\u043e\u0441\u044b\u043b\u0430\u044e \u0435\u0433\u043e \u0441\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430, \u043a\u0430\u043a \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0435 \u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u043d\u043e \u0431\u044b\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0435 \u0447\u0435\u043c \u0432\u044b \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0440\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435. \u041f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0435 \u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e, \u043a\u0430\u043a \u0432\u044b \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043b\u0438, \u0432\u044b \u0431\u0443\u0434\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0438\u043c\u0435\u0442\u044c \u0432\u043e\u0437\u043c\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0442\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435, \u043a\u0430\u043a \u0438 \u0440\u0430\u043d\u044c\u0448\u0435 - \u043d\u043e, \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0443 \u0442\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u043e \u0432\u0435\u0449\u0438 \u0432 \u0440\u0435\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u043c \u043c\u0438\u0440\u0435, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0430\u043c\u043e\u043c \u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435 \u0441\u0443\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u044e\u0442, \u0430 \u043d\u0435 \u0442\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0445 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445.
\n\u0421 \u043d\u0430\u0438\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0448\u0438\u043c\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0435\u043b\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f\u043c\u0438,\n\u042d\u043d\u0434\u0438 \u0422\u0430\u0443\u043d\u0441\u0435\u043d\u0434 (SomeoneElse) \u043e\u0442 \u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0438 \u0420\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0435\u0439 \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u044b \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 OpenStreetMap \u0432.
\nHello 00crashtest, welcome to OpenStreetMap!
\nI'm sending this message as one that has to be read in case you haven't been seeing the message that people have been leaving on your changesets. Most or all of your recent edits in London have had to be reverted; there have previously been similar problems elsewhere (eg. Hong Kong - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36953751 ).
\nIt can be difficult to get the hang of things with OpenStreetMap; and as you've only been editing for a few weeks it's understandable that you're still learning. However, there are a couple of things that you can do to help yourself:
\n1) One is to trying \"starting small\". Try mapping shops local to you, or things in a local park. That'll help you to get the hang of things, and understand that sometimes it can be difficult transferring what's in the real world to OpenStreetMap.
\n2) If you think that something in a particular area is wrong, (for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37778257 ) try contacting the local community and explaining the problem. If you don't know where to start when contacting anyone, try the #osm channel on IRC - see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IRC for details.
\n3) Please do always use changeset comments explaining the details of any changes and your source. Some of your changeset do have changeset comments, but some, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37801676 , do not.
\n4) When people contact you via changeset discussions such as on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36953751 please do have the courtesy to reply. OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project; we all have to work together to create the best map. If you have not seen these messages before please check that your email within OSM is configured correctly.
\nYou'll be able to continue mapping as soon as you've read this message but please do try and be a bit more careful in the future.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nHi 00crashtest,
\nIn http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/903 you were asked, among other things, to \"Please do always use changeset comments explaining the details of any changes and your source\". You've read that message and carried on with e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37836990 , with no comment.
\nYou will be blocked from editing OpenStreetMap for a short period of time. After that has expired, please do re-read what you were asked to do in http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/903 and follow those guidelines.
\nIf you would like to contact the Data Working Group, you can do so by email to data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\nThis account has been blocked for circumventing a ban placed by the OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group (\"PeterDRS\"/\"Kakaner\"). If you believe this is in error, you can contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\nDear user pavlina88,
\nyou seem to be adding lots of cycling and hiking routes, all marked \"source=survey\". You have been asked by an OSM community member about the source of these and you haven't responded, instead you continue your work today.
\n\"source=survey\" means that you have been there and surveyed the route yourself. Have you really - your routes cover quite a bit of ground! In OpenStreetMap, we only map hiking or cycling routes that are actually signposted on the ground, yet you omit any information about the names of these routes. Are you sure that the routes you are mapping are signposted on the ground?
\nPlease respond to questions by the community, and explain where your data really comes from. If you are not doing this for yourself but as an employee or contractor, please pass this message on to whoever pays you for your work. Tell them to contact data@osmfoundation.org if they have questions.
\nI am issuing a short-term block on your account in order to force you to read this message. You may continue editing immediately afterwards but please respect our rules - don't copy data from other sources, and when people ask you what you're doing, please explain, don't ignore.
\nBest wishes
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Despite the messages on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37781910 and in http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/902 , you are continuing to add test data to OpenStreetMap.
\nYou are therefore being blocked for a short period of time. Please contact data@osmfoundation.org if you believe that this block is in error.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\n(\u0410\u0432\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0432\u043e\u0434)
\n\u041d\u0435\u0441\u043c\u043e\u0442\u0440\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043e http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37781910 \u0438 \u0432 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/902 , \u0432\u044b \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0442\u044c \u0442\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0435 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 OpenStreetMap.
\n\u041f\u043e\u044d\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0412\u044b \u0431\u043b\u043e\u043a\u0438\u0440\u0443\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0432 \u0442\u0435\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043a\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0442\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0438\u043e\u0434\u0430 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0438. \u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0436\u0438\u0442\u0435\u0441\u044c \u0441 data@osmfoundation.org, \u0435\u0441\u043b\u0438 \u0432\u044b \u0441\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u044d\u0442\u043e\u0442 \u0431\u043b\u043e\u043a \u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u043e\u0439.
\n\u0421 \u043d\u0430\u0438\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0448\u0438\u043c\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0435\u043b\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f\u043c\u0438,
\n\u042d\u043d\u0434\u0438 \u0422\u0430\u0443\u043d\u0441\u0435\u043d\u0434 (SomeoneElse) \u043e\u0442 \u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0438 \u0420\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0435\u0439 \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u044b \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 OpenStreetMap \u0432.
\nThis account has been blocked for circumventing a ban placed by the OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group (\"PeterDRS\"/\"Kakaner\"). If you believe this is in error, you can contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\nThis account has been blocked for circumventing a ban placed by the OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group (\"PeterDRS\"/\"Kakaner\"). If you believe this is in error, you can contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\nThis account has been blocked for circumventing a ban placed by the OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group (\"PeterDRS\"/\"Kakaner\"). If you believe this is in error, you can contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\nThis account has been blocked for circumventing a ban placed by the OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group (\"PeterDRS\"/\"Kakaner\"). If you believe this is in error, you can contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\nThis account has been blocked for circumventing a ban placed by the OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group (\"PeterDRS\"/\"Kakaner\"). If you believe this is in error, you can contact data@osmfoundation.org.
\n(\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u044f)
\n\u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u0439\u0442\u0435, \u0434\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0439 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a.
\n\u0412\u044b \u0441\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0430\u0451\u0442\u0435 \u0434\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0442\u044b \u0430\u0434\u0440\u0435\u0441\u043e\u0432 \u0438 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u043c\u0435\u0449\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0440\u0435\u043a\u043b\u0430\u043c\u0443 \u0432 OpenStreetMap. \u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043d\u0435 \u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u0439\u0442\u0435 \u0442\u0430\u043a. \u0415\u0441\u043b\u0438 \u0432\u044b \u0445\u043e\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0444\u0438\u0441, \u0442\u043e \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443\u0439\u0442\u0435 \u0442\u0435\u0433 \"office\" (\u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440, office=company).
\n\u0412\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u041c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0438\u043d\u0438\u043d
\n\u0420\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0430\u044f \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u0430 \u043f\u043e \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u043c
(english version)
\nHello, dear contributor.
\nYou create duplicates of addresses and place advertising in OpenStreetMap. Please, do not do it. If you want to add office, then use tag \"office\" (for example, office=company).
\nVladimir Marshinin
\nData Working Group
Please don't run bots on OSM without discussing the code / algorithms you intend to run extensively on the mailing list before, in order to avoid problems.
\n(\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u044f)
\n\u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u0439\u0442\u0435, \u041a\u043e\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0442\u0438\u043d.
\n\u0412\u044b \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0434\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0442\u0435\u0433\u0438 [1]. \u041d\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u043e \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432 \u043f\u0438\u0448\u0443\u0442 \u043d\u0430 \u0444\u043e\u0440\u0443\u043c\u0435, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u044d\u0442\u0438 \u0442\u0435\u0433\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0435 [2]. \u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043d\u0435 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u044f\u0439\u0442\u0435 \u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0434\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0442\u0435\u0433\u0438. \u0422\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0448\u0443 \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u0443\u0436\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0438 \u0432\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0432, \u0430 \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0432\u043e\u0439\u043d\u0443 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a.
\n\u0412\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u041c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0438\u043d\u0438\u043d
\n\u0420\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0430\u044f \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u0430 \u043f\u043e \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u043c
(english version)
\nHello, Konstantin.
\nYou delete valid tags [1]. Some contributors write on a forum, that these tags are correct [2]. Please, don't delete valid tags. Also I ask you to participate in discussion of questions instead of to continue edit war.
\nVladimir Marshinin
\nData Working Group
OpenStreetMap\u306f\u4e8b\u5b9f\u60c5\u5831\u3092\u8a18\u8f09\u3059\u308b\u5834\u6240\u3067\u3059\u3002\n\u7de8\u96c6\u3055\u308c\u305f\u30c7\u30fc\u30bf\u306f\u3001\u4e16\u754c\u4e2d\u306e\u4eba\u3005\u306b\u3088\u3063\u3066\u5229\u7528\u3055\u308c\u3066\u3044\u307e\u3059\u3002\n\u8aa4\u3063\u305f\u30c7\u30fc\u30bf\u3092\u6295\u5165\u3059\u308b\u3053\u3068\u306f\u907f\u3051\u3066\u304f\u3060\u3055\u3044\u3002\n\u3042\u306a\u305f\u306b\u5bfe\u3057\u3001\u5225\u306e\u30e6\u30fc\u30b6\u304b\u3089\u6307\u6458\u304c\u884c\u308f\u308c\u3066\u3044\u307e\u3059\u304c\u3001\u3042\u306a\u305f\u306f\u305d\u308c\u306b\u5fdc\u3058\u308b\u3053\u3068\u7121\u304f\u3001\u7de8\u96c6\u3092\u7d9a\u3051\u3066\u3044\u308b\u3088\u3046\u3067\u3059\u3002\n\u3053\u308c\u304b\u3089\u3057\u3070\u3089\u304f\u306e\u9593\u3001\u3042\u306a\u305f\u306b\u5bfe\u3057\u3066\u7de8\u96c6\u306e\u30d6\u30ed\u30c3\u30af\u3092\u884c\u3044\u307e\u3059\u3002\n\u7de8\u96c6\u3092\u518d\u958b\u3059\u308b\u524d\u306b\u3001\u3053\u306e\u30e1\u30c3\u30bb\u30fc\u30b8\u3092\u3088\u304f\u8aad\u307f\u3001\u7406\u89e3\u3057\u3066\u304f\u3060\u3055\u3044\u3002\n\u79c1\u305f\u3061\u306f\u3001\u3053\u308c\u304b\u3089\u3042\u306a\u305f\u304c\u79c1\u305f\u3061\u306e\u30eb\u30fc\u30eb\u306b\u5f93\u3063\u3066\u632f\u308b\u821e\u3063\u3066\u304f\u308c\u308b\u3053\u3068\u3092\u671f\u5f85\u3057\u3066\u3044\u307e\u3059\u3002\n\u307e\u305f\u3001\u96fb\u5b50\u8a18\u9332\u306e\u7834\u58ca\u884c\u70ba\u30fb\u6539\u7ac4\u884c\u70ba\u306f\u3001\u6cd5\u5f8b\u306b\u3088\u3063\u3066\u7f70\u305b\u3089\u308c\u308b\u53ef\u80fd\u6027\u304c\u3042\u308b\u3053\u3068\u3092\u3054\u7406\u89e3\u304f\u3060\u3055\u3044\u3002
\nOpenStreetMap\u306f\u4e8b\u5b9f\u60c5\u5831\u3092\u8a18\u8f09\u3059\u308b\u5834\u6240\u3067\u3059\u3002\n\u7de8\u96c6\u3055\u308c\u305f\u30c7\u30fc\u30bf\u306f\u3001\u4e16\u754c\u4e2d\u306e\u4eba\u3005\u306b\u3088\u3063\u3066\u5229\u7528\u3055\u308c\u3066\u3044\u307e\u3059\u3002\n\u8aa4\u3063\u305f\u30c7\u30fc\u30bf\u3092\u6295\u5165\u3059\u308b\u3053\u3068\u306f\u907f\u3051\u3066\u304f\u3060\u3055\u3044\u3002\n\u3042\u306a\u305f\u306b\u5bfe\u3057\u3001\u5225\u306e\u30e6\u30fc\u30b6\u304b\u3089\u6307\u6458\u304c\u884c\u308f\u308c\u3066\u3044\u307e\u3059\u304c\u3001\u3042\u306a\u305f\u306f\u305d\u308c\u306b\u5fdc\u3058\u308b\u3053\u3068\u7121\u304f\u3001\u7de8\u96c6\u3092\u7d9a\u3051\u3066\u3044\u308b\u3088\u3046\u3067\u3059\u3002\n\u3053\u308c\u304b\u3089\u3057\u3070\u3089\u304f\u306e\u9593\u3001\u3042\u306a\u305f\u306b\u5bfe\u3057\u3066\u7de8\u96c6\u306e\u30d6\u30ed\u30c3\u30af\u3092\u884c\u3044\u307e\u3059\u3002\n\u7de8\u96c6\u3092\u518d\u958b\u3059\u308b\u524d\u306b\u3001\u3053\u306e\u30e1\u30c3\u30bb\u30fc\u30b8\u3092\u3088\u304f\u8aad\u307f\u3001\u7406\u89e3\u3057\u3066\u304f\u3060\u3055\u3044\u3002\n\u79c1\u305f\u3061\u306f\u3001\u3053\u308c\u304b\u3089\u3042\u306a\u305f\u304c\u79c1\u305f\u3061\u306e\u30eb\u30fc\u30eb\u306b\u5f93\u3063\u3066\u632f\u308b\u821e\u3063\u3066\u304f\u308c\u308b\u3053\u3068\u3092\u671f\u5f85\u3057\u3066\u3044\u307e\u3059\u3002\n\u307e\u305f\u3001\u96fb\u5b50\u8a18\u9332\u306e\u7834\u58ca\u884c\u70ba\u30fb\u6539\u7ac4\u884c\u70ba\u306f\u3001\u6cd5\u5f8b\u306b\u3088\u3063\u3066\u7f70\u305b\u3089\u308c\u308b\u53ef\u80fd\u6027\u304c\u3042\u308b\u3053\u3068\u3092\u3054\u7406\u89e3\u304f\u3060\u3055\u3044\u3002
\nOpenStreetMap\u306f\u4e8b\u5b9f\u60c5\u5831\u3092\u8a18\u8f09\u3059\u308b\u5834\u6240\u3067\u3059\u3002\n\u7de8\u96c6\u3055\u308c\u305f\u30c7\u30fc\u30bf\u306f\u3001\u4e16\u754c\u4e2d\u306e\u4eba\u3005\u306b\u3088\u3063\u3066\u5229\u7528\u3055\u308c\u3066\u3044\u307e\u3059\u3002\n\u8aa4\u3063\u305f\u30c7\u30fc\u30bf\u3092\u6295\u5165\u3059\u308b\u3053\u3068\u306f\u907f\u3051\u3066\u304f\u3060\u3055\u3044\u3002\n\u3042\u306a\u305f\u306b\u5bfe\u3057\u3001\u5225\u306e\u30e6\u30fc\u30b6\u304b\u3089\u6307\u6458\u304c\u884c\u308f\u308c\u3066\u3044\u307e\u3059\u304c\u3001\u3042\u306a\u305f\u306f\u305d\u308c\u306b\u5fdc\u3058\u308b\u3053\u3068\u7121\u304f\u3001\u7de8\u96c6\u3092\u7d9a\u3051\u3066\u3044\u308b\u3088\u3046\u3067\u3059\u3002\n\u3053\u308c\u304b\u3089\u3057\u3070\u3089\u304f\u306e\u9593\u3001\u3042\u306a\u305f\u306b\u5bfe\u3057\u3066\u7de8\u96c6\u306e\u30d6\u30ed\u30c3\u30af\u3092\u884c\u3044\u307e\u3059\u3002\n\u7de8\u96c6\u3092\u518d\u958b\u3059\u308b\u524d\u306b\u3001\u3053\u306e\u30e1\u30c3\u30bb\u30fc\u30b8\u3092\u3088\u304f\u8aad\u307f\u3001\u7406\u89e3\u3057\u3066\u304f\u3060\u3055\u3044\u3002\n\u79c1\u305f\u3061\u306f\u3001\u3053\u308c\u304b\u3089\u3042\u306a\u305f\u304c\u79c1\u305f\u3061\u306e\u30eb\u30fc\u30eb\u306b\u5f93\u3063\u3066\u632f\u308b\u821e\u3063\u3066\u304f\u308c\u308b\u3053\u3068\u3092\u671f\u5f85\u3057\u3066\u3044\u307e\u3059\u3002\n\u307e\u305f\u3001\u96fb\u5b50\u8a18\u9332\u306e\u7834\u58ca\u884c\u70ba\u30fb\u6539\u7ac4\u884c\u70ba\u306f\u3001\u6cd5\u5f8b\u306b\u3088\u3063\u3066\u7f70\u305b\u3089\u308c\u308b\u53ef\u80fd\u6027\u304c\u3042\u308b\u3053\u3068\u3092\u3054\u7406\u89e3\u304f\u3060\u3055\u3044\u3002
\nOpenStreetMap\u306f\u4e8b\u5b9f\u60c5\u5831\u3092\u8a18\u8f09\u3059\u308b\u5834\u6240\u3067\u3059\u3002\n\u7de8\u96c6\u3055\u308c\u305f\u30c7\u30fc\u30bf\u306f\u3001\u4e16\u754c\u4e2d\u306e\u4eba\u3005\u306b\u3088\u3063\u3066\u5229\u7528\u3055\u308c\u3066\u3044\u307e\u3059\u3002\n\u8aa4\u3063\u305f\u30c7\u30fc\u30bf\u3092\u6295\u5165\u3059\u308b\u3053\u3068\u306f\u907f\u3051\u3066\u304f\u3060\u3055\u3044\u3002\n\u3042\u306a\u305f\u306b\u5bfe\u3057\u3001\u5225\u306e\u30e6\u30fc\u30b6\u304b\u3089\u6307\u6458\u304c\u884c\u308f\u308c\u3066\u3044\u307e\u3059\u304c\u3001\u3042\u306a\u305f\u306f\u305d\u308c\u306b\u5fdc\u3058\u308b\u3053\u3068\u7121\u304f\u3001\u7de8\u96c6\u3092\u7d9a\u3051\u3066\u3044\u308b\u3088\u3046\u3067\u3059\u3002\n\u3053\u308c\u304b\u3089\u3057\u3070\u3089\u304f\u306e\u9593\u3001\u3042\u306a\u305f\u306b\u5bfe\u3057\u3066\u7de8\u96c6\u306e\u30d6\u30ed\u30c3\u30af\u3092\u884c\u3044\u307e\u3059\u3002\n\u7de8\u96c6\u3092\u518d\u958b\u3059\u308b\u524d\u306b\u3001\u3053\u306e\u30e1\u30c3\u30bb\u30fc\u30b8\u3092\u3088\u304f\u8aad\u307f\u3001\u7406\u89e3\u3057\u3066\u304f\u3060\u3055\u3044\u3002\n\u79c1\u305f\u3061\u306f\u3001\u3053\u308c\u304b\u3089\u3042\u306a\u305f\u304c\u79c1\u305f\u3061\u306e\u30eb\u30fc\u30eb\u306b\u5f93\u3063\u3066\u632f\u308b\u821e\u3063\u3066\u304f\u308c\u308b\u3053\u3068\u3092\u671f\u5f85\u3057\u3066\u3044\u307e\u3059\u3002\n\u307e\u305f\u3001\u96fb\u5b50\u8a18\u9332\u306e\u7834\u58ca\u884c\u70ba\u30fb\u6539\u7ac4\u884c\u70ba\u306f\u3001\u6cd5\u5f8b\u306b\u3088\u3063\u3066\u7f70\u305b\u3089\u308c\u308b\u53ef\u80fd\u6027\u304c\u3042\u308b\u3053\u3068\u3092\u3054\u7406\u89e3\u304f\u3060\u3055\u3044\u3002
\nHello, dear etajin.
\nYou add many Japanese names in Russia (for example, for villages) [1]. It's bad idea because Russian villages have no Japanese names. But, for example, the capital of Russia Moscow has Japanese name. In Russia there is no Japanese community which could use the Japanese names. Please, read wiki page [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names].
\nAvoid transliteration
\nTransliteration is the process of taking a name in one language, and simply changing letters from one script to another. In general we should avoid doing this with tags in the OpenStreetMap database. Everything with a name could have auto-generated transliterations, so not just city names, but every road, and every cafe! This kind of automatic augmenting with data is best left for data users. For example, Sven Geggus has demonstrated the principle of rendering with auto-generated transliterations. We want to avoid adding in tags into our database for every named object via automated or semi-automated Import.
\nInstead we only put commonly used names in other languages into the database. While we typically think of these as translations, in most cases names that fit this criteria are not literal translations, example: the lake that the city of Geneva lies on is in French (Geneva is a French speaking city) Lac Leman, in German Genfersee. These are names which have been used by people on the ground, speaking in different languages (In general we're following Good practice#Map what's on the ground)
\nFor example, small towns in England probably don't have a special Russian name, unless there is a local Russian community or something. Their names can all be transliterated into Russian script, but it's not a good idea to add lots and lots of tags to all the towns in England containing these transliterated names.
\nAlso you ignore questions and comments from Russian contributors [2,3]. Please, answer, when there are questions for you.
\nVladimir Marshinin
\nData Working Group
Hallo wischmat, vor einem Tag habe ich Dich gebeten, Deine Edits zu \u00fcberdenken, doch das hast Du ignoriert. Bitte erkl\u00e4re, was Du tust, in diesem Forum-Thread http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54166 und folge den Gepflogenheiten der Community.
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck\nOSMF Data Working Group
\n(\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u044f)
\n\u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u0439\u0442\u0435, \u0412\u0435\u0440\u043e\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430. \u0412\u0430\u043c \u0431\u044b\u043b \u0437\u0430\u0434\u0430\u043d \u0432\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441 \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u0443\u0436\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0438 \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a [1]. \u0412\u043e\u0437\u043c\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e, \u0432\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u0437\u043d\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043e\u0431 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u043c, \u043f\u043e\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0443\u044e \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0443. \u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0442\u0435 \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0443 \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0443\u044e \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0443 \u0438 \u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442\u044c\u0442\u0435 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043c.
\n\u0412\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u041c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0438\u043d\u0438\u043d
\n\u0420\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0430\u044f \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u0430 \u043f\u043e \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u043c
(english version)
\nHello, Veronika. You were asked in the discussion of changeset [1]. Maybe, you don't know about it because you don't check your email. Please, check your email and reply to contributors.
\nVladimir Marshinin
\nData Working Group
(\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u044f)
\n\u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u0439\u0442\u0435, \u0434\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0439 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a. \u0412\u0430\u043c \u0431\u044b\u043b \u0437\u0430\u0434\u0430\u043d \u0432\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441 \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u0443\u0436\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0438 \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a [1]. \u0412\u043e\u0437\u043c\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e, \u0432\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u0437\u043d\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043e\u0431 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u043c, \u043f\u043e\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0443\u044e \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0443. \u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0442\u0435 \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0443 \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0443\u044e \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0443 \u0438 \u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442\u044c\u0442\u0435 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043c.
\n\u0422\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443\u0439\u0442\u0435, \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0445\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0448\u0438\u0435 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0438 \u043a \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0442\u0430\u043c \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a [2].
\n\u0412\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u041c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0438\u043d\u0438\u043d
\n\u0420\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0430\u044f \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u0430 \u043f\u043e \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u043c
(english version)
\nHello, dear contributor. You were asked in the discussion of changeset [1]. Maybe, you don't know about it because you don't check your email. Please, check your email and reply to contributors.
\nAlso use a good changeset comments, please [2].
\nVladimir Marshinin
\nData Working Group
Dear TrafikAlarm,
\nYou have been adding lots of maximum speed information sporadically around Denmark--that looks to possibly be an import of data or a mechanical edit--with no information about the source of this data. In some cases, you have even changed the maximum speed of roads back and forth (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23000640).
\nI have placed a zero hour block on your account so that you must log in and read this message. Please get in contact with us at the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org so we can sort out the source and accuracy of this data--and if this is an import, the methodology, verification, and community response for it.
\nBest,
\nEthan aka FTA on behalf of the Data Working Group
\n(Maskinovers\u00e6ttelse)
\nK\u00e6re TrafikAlarm,
\nDu er blevet tilf\u00f8je masser af maksimal hastighed oplysninger sporadisk omkring Danmark - der ser ud til muligvis v\u00e6re en uautoriseret import af data eller en mekanisk edit - med ingen oplysninger om kilden til disse data. I nogle tilf\u00e6lde har du endda \u00e6ndret den maksimale hastighed p\u00e5 vejene frem og tilbage (eksempelvis http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23000640).
\nJeg har placeret et nul timer blok p\u00e5 din konto, s\u00e5 du skal logge p\u00e5 og l\u00e6se dette budskab. Venligst komme i kontakt med os p\u00e5 Data arbejdsgruppen p\u00e5 data@osmfoundation.org s\u00e5 vi kan sortere ud kilden til disse data - og hvis dette er en import, den metode, verifikation, og f\u00e6llesskab svar for det.
\nBedst,
\nEthan aka FTA p\u00e5 vegne af data arbejdsgruppen
\n(\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u044f)
\n\u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u0439\u0442\u0435, \u0434\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0439 luiswoo.
\n\u0412\u044b \u0432\u0435\u043b\u0438 \u0432\u043e\u0439\u043d\u0443 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a \u0432 \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0445, \u0445\u043e\u0442\u044f \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u043e\u0439 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a \u043f\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0438\u043b \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u043d\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u043a\u0440\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u044d\u0442\u0443 \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043a\u0443 [1]. \u0417\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043c \u0432\u044b \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043e \u0437\u0430\u043a\u0440\u044b\u043b\u0438 \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043a\u0438 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430, \u043f\u043e\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043e\u043d \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u043e\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0440\u0431\u0438\u043b [2,3,4]. \u041d\u043e \u0432\u044b \u0442\u043e\u0436\u0435 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u043d\u0435\u0434\u0440\u0443\u0436\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u0441\u0442\u0438\u043b\u044c \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0432 \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0445 \u0438 \u043d\u0430 \u0444\u043e\u0440\u0443\u043c\u0435 [5].
\n\u0422\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u0432\u044b \u0437\u0430\u043a\u0440\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043a\u0438 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432 \u0431\u0435\u0437 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0435\u0432 \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0441 \u043d\u0435\u0434\u0440\u0443\u0436\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u043c\u0438 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0438\u044f\u043c\u0438 [6,7,8,9]. \n\u042f \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043b \u0432\u0430\u043c \u043d\u0430 \u0444\u043e\u0440\u0443\u043c\u0435 \u043e \u043d\u0435\u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0435\u0432 \u0432 \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0445 \u0438 \u043e \u0441\u0442\u0438\u043b\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f [10,11,12].
\n\u041a \u0441\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044e, \u0432\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043d\u0430 \u044d\u0442\u0438 \u0441\u043b\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u043d\u0438\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0438 \u043d\u0430\u0447\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u0437\u0430\u0434\u0430\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0432 \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0445 \u0444\u0438\u043b\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0444\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u0438 \u043d\u0435 \u043e\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0441\u044f\u0449\u0438\u0435\u0441\u044f \u043a \u0442\u0435\u043c\u0435 \u0432\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044b, \u0430 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0431\u0435\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0437\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0438 [13,14,15,16,17,18].
\n\u041d\u0430\u043f\u043e\u043c\u0438\u043d\u0430\u044e \u0432\u0430\u043c, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0441\u043e\u0437\u043d\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0438\u0433\u043d\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0441\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0430\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 OpenStreetMap - \u044d\u0442\u043e \u0432\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0437\u043c [19].
\n\u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0439\u0442\u0435 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c\u044e Etiquette [20]. \u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u0438\u0448\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0431\u0435\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0437\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0438 \u0432 \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0445.\n\u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0431\u0443\u0434\u044c\u0442\u0435 \u0431\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0435 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0436\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u043c \u043a \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043c.
\n\u0412\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u041c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0438\u043d\u0438\u043d
\n\u0420\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0430\u044f \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u0430 \u043f\u043e \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u043c
(english version)
\nHello, dear luiswoo.
\nYou waged edit war in notes though other contributor has asked you to not close this note [1]. Then you have simply closed notes of this contributor because he has offended you [2,3,4]. But you too used unfriendly style of dialogue in notes and in a forum [5].
\nAlso you close notes of contributors without comments or with unfriendly comments [6,7,8,9]. \nI have written to you in a forum about necessity of comments for notes and about style of dialogue [10,11,12].
\nUnfortunately, you have ignored these words and you have started to write philosophical and nonrelevant questions in notes and also to write useless comments [13,14,15,16,17,18].
\nI remind you, that intentionally ignoring the consensus norms of the OpenStreetMap community is a vandalism [19].
\nPlease, read article Etiquette [20]. Please, don't write useless comments in notes.\nPlease, be more friendly to contributors .
\nVladimir Marshinin
\nData Working Group
Please don't add Chinese names to the \"name\" tag of existing objects in Switzerland. These objects will have names in German, French, and/or Italian, but not in Chinese! Use the appropriate name:xx tags (where xx is the language code).
\n\u4f60\u80fd\u89e3\u91ca\u4e00\u4e0bhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411724460\uff1f\u5b83\u4e0d\u5339\u914d\u4efb\u4f55\u4e1c\u897f\u3002
\nCan you explain https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411724460? It does not match anything.
\n\u4f60\u80fd\u89e3\u91ca\u4e00\u4e0bhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411724460\uff1f\u5b83\u4e0d\u5339\u914d\u4efb\u4f55\u4e1c\u897f\u3002
\nCan you explain https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411724460? It does not match anything.
\nHallo minamo,
\nich schreibe Dir diese Nachricht mit einer Kurzzeit-Sperrung, damit sicher ist, dass Sie dich auch erreicht - da Du auf bisherige Nachrichten anderer Benutzer offenbar nicht reagiert hast und daher unklar ist, ob Nachrichten Dich \u00fcberhaupt erreichen.
\nDeine L\u00f6schungen v.a. von Landnutzungsfl\u00e4chen in OpenStreetMap sind umstritten (siehe auch Diskussion auf https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/2016-April/008308.html). Wenn diese L\u00f6schungen \u00fcberhaupt akzeptabel sind, so bed\u00fcrfen sie zumindest einer guten Begr\u00fcndung im Changeset-Kommentar (\"Gr\u00fcnfl\u00e4chen in [Ort] gel\u00f6scht, weil [Grund]\"). Ohne eine solche Begr\u00fcndung kommen die \u00c4nderungen wie Vandalismus daher und werden von anderen wieder r\u00fcckg\u00e4ngig gemacht - u.U. inklusive anderer, wertvoller \u00c4nderungen, die Du beigetragen hast.
\nBitte verwende in Zukunft aussagekr\u00e4ftige (!) Changeset-Kommentare (s.a. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments), und bitte ignoriere es nicht einfach, wenn andere Mapper Dir schreiben und Deine Arbeit hinterfragen. Meist gibt es daf\u00fcr einen guten Grund!
\nViele Gr\u00fc\u00dfe
\nFrederik Ramm (woodpeck)
\nOSMF Data Working Group
Hello rdell.
\nWelcome to OpenStreetmap and thank you for your contributions so far.\nI note however that you're shortening many roads names to abbreviations.\nWe tend not to use abbreviations in OSM as they can be ambiguous, and information is lost.\nhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29
\nCan you please keep names in OSM as full, unabbreviated names?\nI will be reverting the ones changed for far.
\nI am sending this with a 0-hour block meaning you must read the message before you can continue editing. I am doing this because attempts by other users to contact you have not have any effect and therefore it is unclear if those messages have reached you at all.
\nPlease contact data@osmfoundation.org if you have any questions.
\nMany thanks
\n-- \nDeanna Earley, DWG
\nDear Lars Christensen,
\neven though other users have pointed out to you that data imports in OpenStreetMap have to follow our \"import guidelines\", you seem to continue to import data without following these guidelines. Among other things, you need to discuss your import plans on a suitable mailing list before you act; this will also help to avoid blatant tagging errors e.g. your inclusion of tags lke \"AREALKVAL\", \"BYGN_TYPE\", \"FEATSTATUS\" and so on.
\nI am blocking your account for a day to make sure you understand that this is a serious matter and that you don't ignore my message like you seem to have ignored previous messages by others. I will also remove the buildings that you have added.
\nBefore you try to import data in the future, please consult with either the talk-dk list or the international imports mailing list outlining your intentions, and listen to the feedback that you get.
\nBest wishes
\nFrederik Ramm aka woodpeck
\nOSMF Data Working Group
(\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u044f)
\n\u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u0439\u0442\u0435. \u0412\u0430\u043c \u0431\u044b\u043b\u0438 \u0437\u0430\u0434\u0430\u043d\u044b \u0432\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044b \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u0443\u0436\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0438 \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0442\u043e\u0432 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a [1,2]. \u0412\u043e\u0437\u043c\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e, \u0432\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u0437\u043d\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043e\u0431 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u043c, \u043f\u043e\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0443\u044e \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0443. \u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0442\u0435 \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0443 \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0443\u044e \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0443 \u0438 \u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442\u044c\u0442\u0435 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043c.
\n\u0412\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u041c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0438\u043d\u0438\u043d
\n\u0420\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0430\u044f \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u0430 \u043f\u043e \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u043c
(english version)
\nHello. You were asked in the discussion of changeset [1,2]. Maybe, you don't know about it because you don't check your email. Please, check your email and reply to contributors.
\nVladimir Marshinin
\nData Working Group
dear \u0393\u03b9\u03ac\u03bd\u03bd\u03b7\u03c2 4
\nOnce again you have been editing road networks in Greece in ways which do not correspond to the situation on the ground, are detrimental to the quality of the map, and are negatively affecting other mappers.
\nYou haven't responded in the past to repeated requests for comments, and have been blocked and reverted, resulting in no change in your mapping behaviour.
\nI am applying this 96 hour block on behalf of the Data Working Group while we look more closely at your changes and determine whether a longer block is appropriate.
\nJo Walsh aka zool
\ndear JayCBR,
\nHelping to fix OpenStreetMap is one thing, drawing phallic symbols while attempting to do so is quite another.
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative effort to make an accurate map of the world and it is not appropriate to take out your frustrations with other mappers' activities on it.
\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38822868
\nOn behalf of the DWG I'm applying this block for a cooling-off period.
\nJo Walsh aka zool
\n(\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u044f)
\n\u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u0439\u0442\u0435, \u0434\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0439 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a. \u0412\u0430\u043c \u0431\u044b\u043b \u0437\u0430\u0434\u0430\u043d \u0432\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441 \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u0443\u0436\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0438 \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043a [1]. \u0412\u043e\u0437\u043c\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e, \u0432\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u0437\u043d\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043e\u0431 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u043c, \u043f\u043e\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0443\u044e \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0443. \u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0442\u0435 \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0443 \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0443\u044e \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0443 \u0438 \u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442\u044c\u0442\u0435 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043c.
\nOpenStreetMap - \u044d\u0442\u043e \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e. \u041c\u044b \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0430\u0435\u043c \u0432\u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0435, \u0447\u0442\u043e\u0431\u044b \u0441\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043b\u0443\u0447\u0448\u0443\u044e \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0443. \u041e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043e\u0447\u0435\u043d\u044c \u0432\u0430\u0436\u043d\u043e \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043d\u0430\u0441.
\n\u0412\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u041c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0438\u043d\u0438\u043d
\n\u0420\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0430\u044f \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u0430 \u043f\u043e \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u043c
(english version)
\nHello, dear contributor. You were asked in the discussion of changeset [1]. Maybe, you don't know about it because you don't check your email. Please, check your email and reply to contributors.
\nOpenStreetMap is a community. We work together to create the best map. The communication is very important for us.
\nVladimir Marshinin
\nData Working Group
Dear TrafikAlarm,
\nYou have continued to add speed limits throughout Denmark without any indication of a source or data set used--either in the changeset comment or on the objects. Some objects have been modified multiple times by your account, changing the values each time. In addition, you have not responded to user comments or messages asking about this data.
\nI am placing a longer block on your account that will still require you to log in to read it as well. Mechanical edits or imports are not allowable without prior consultation with the community (see the import guidelines wiki and automated edits code of conduct). Further, you should not be adding unverified data by single anonymous reports.
\nPlease get in contact with us at the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org so we can sort out the source and accuracy of this data--and if this is an import, the methodology, verification, and community response for it.
\nBest,
\nEthan aka FTA on behalf of the OSM Foundation Data Working Group
\n(Maskinovers\u00e6ttelse)
\nK\u00e6re TrafikAlarm,
\nDu har fortsat med at tilf\u00f8je hastighedsgr\u00e6nser i hele Danmark uden angivelse af kilde eller data, der bruges - enten i \u00e6ndrings kommentar eller p\u00e5 objekterne. Nogle objekter er blevet \u00e6ndret flere gange af din konto, \u00e6ndre v\u00e6rdierne hver gang. Desuden har du ikke reageret p\u00e5 brugernes kommentarer eller beskeder sp\u00f8rger om disse data.
\nJeg placere en l\u00e6ngere blok p\u00e5 din konto, som stadig kr\u00e6ver, at du logger p\u00e5 for at l\u00e6se det s\u00e5 godt. Mekaniske redigeringer eller import er ikke tilladt uden forudg\u00e5ende konsultation med f\u00e6llesskabet (se retningslinjerne import wiki og [automatiseret redigeringer adf\u00e6rdskodeks] (http: / /wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct)). Endvidere b\u00f8r du ikke tilf\u00f8je ubekr\u00e6ftede data ved enkelte anonyme rapporter.
\nVenligst komme i kontakt med os p\u00e5 Data arbejdsgruppen p\u00e5 data@osmfoundation.org s\u00e5 vi kan sortere ud kilden og n\u00f8jagtigheden af \u200b\u200bdisse data - og hvis dette er en import, den metode, verifikation, og f\u00e6llesskab svar for det.
\nBedst,
\nEthan aka FTA p\u00e5 vegne af OSM Foundation data arbejdsgruppe
\nBlocked for breaking data e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3732107859/history - please don't run buggy bots on OSM.
\n(\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u044f)
\n\u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u0439\u0442\u0435, \u0434\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0439 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a.
\n\u0412\u044b \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0431\u0435\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0437\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043a\u0438 \u0432 OpenStreetMap [1,2,3]. \u042f \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043b \u0432\u0430\u043c \u043e\u0431 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u043c \u0438 \u043f\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0438\u043b \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u0431\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0448\u0435 \u043d\u0435 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0442\u044c \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043a\u0438 [4].
\n\u041a \u0441\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044e, \u0432\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u043d\u0438\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u044d\u0442\u0438 \u0441\u043b\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0442\u044c \u0438 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043e\u0442\u043a\u0440\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0431\u0435\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0437\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043a\u0438 [5,6,7]. \u041d\u0430\u043f\u043e\u043c\u0438\u043d\u0430\u044e \u0432\u0430\u043c, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0438\u0433\u043d\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043d\u043e\u0440\u043c \u0441\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0430\u0441\u0438\u044f \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430 OpenStreetMap \u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0432\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0437\u043c\u043e\u043c [8].
\n\u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043d\u0435 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0439\u0442\u0435 \u0431\u0435\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0437\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043a\u0438. \u0415\u0441\u043b\u0438 \u044d\u0442\u043e \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0438 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0441\u043e\u043d\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043a\u0438, \u0442\u043e \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0439\u0442\u0435 \u0438\u0445 \u0432 \u0441\u0432\u043e\u0451 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0441\u043e\u043d\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e, \u043d\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u0432 OpenStreetMap.
\n\u0412\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u041c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0438\u043d\u0438\u043d
\n\u0420\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0430\u044f \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u0430 \u043f\u043e \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u043c
(english version)
\nHello, dear contributor.
\nYou add useless notes in OpenStreetMap [1,2,3]. I have written to you about it and I have asked you to not add such notes anymore [4].
\nUnfortunately, you have ignored these words and have continued to add and to reopen useless notes [5,6,7]. I remind you, that intentionally ignoring the consensus norms of the OpenStreetMap community is vandalism [8].
\nPlease, don't add useless notes. If these notes are your personal then add them in your personal device, but not in OpenStreetMap.
\nVladimir Marshinin
\nData Working Group
(\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u044f)
\n\u0414\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0439 \u041d\u0438\u043a\u0438\u0442\u0430.
\n\u0412\u0430\u043c \u0431\u044b\u043b \u0437\u0430\u0434\u0430\u043d \u0432\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441 \u043e\u0431 \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0435 \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0438\u0445 \u0430\u0434\u0440\u0435\u0441\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 [1,2]. \u041a \u0441\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044e, \u0432\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0442\u044c \u0430\u0434\u0440\u0435\u0441\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 [3]. \u042f \u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0435\u043d \u0441\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u0441\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043e \u0442\u043e\u043c, \u043a\u0430\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0438\u043a \u0430\u0434\u0440\u0435\u0441\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0432\u044b \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443\u0435\u0442\u0435. \u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0448\u0438\u0442\u0435, \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0432\u0430\u0448 \u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u043e \u0430\u0434\u0440\u0435\u0441\u0443 [1].
\n\u0412\u0430\u0448\u0430 \u0443\u0447\u0451\u0442\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0437\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e \u0437\u0430\u0431\u043b\u043e\u043a\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0430 \u0438 \u0432\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u0441\u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0440\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 OpenStreetMap.
\n\u0412\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u041c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0438\u043d\u0438\u043d
\n\u0420\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0430\u044f \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u0430 \u043f\u043e \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u043c
(english version)
\nDear Nikita.
\nYou were asked about your source of address data [1,2]. Unfortunately, you have not answered and have continued to add the address data [3]. I have to ask you again about your source of the address data. Please, write your answer at the address [1].
\nYour account is blocked temporarily. Also you cannot edit OpenStreetMap data.
\nVladimir Marshinin
\nData Working Group
Hallo dkdfh,
\ndu editierst recht flei\u00dfig im Bereich von Karlsruhe, hast dabei aber einige \u00c4nderungen vorgenommen, die Fragen aufgeworfen haben. Dazu gibt es bei OpenStreetMap die sogenannten Changeset-Diskussionen, bei denen man sich zu einem Changeset unterhalten und diskutieren kann. Leider hast du auf keinen dieser Changesets reagiert. Das passiert h\u00e4ufig, wenn die angegebene Emailadresse nicht (mehr) existiert oder die Mails versehentlich in den Spamordner sortiert werden. Es w\u00e4re daher nett, wenn du deine Maileinstellungen pr\u00fcfen k\u00f6nntest und vor allem auf die Changeset-Diskussionen reagierst.
\nIch habe dir daher einen 0-Stunden-Block verpasst so dass du diese Meldung lesen musst bevor du weiter editieren kannst. Ich bitte dich aber wie gesagt zudem, auf die bisherigen Changeset-Diskussionen zu reagieren. Beispiele f\u00fcr solche Changesets sind:
\nVielen Dank f\u00fcr dein Verst\u00e4ndnis,
\nPeter Barth aka Peda
\ni.A. OSMF Data Working Group
---- en ----
\nHello dkdfh,
\nyou're quite active with editing in the region of Karlsruhe, Germany. Some of your changes did bring up some questions from other users. For such questions we have the changeset discussions in OpenStreetMap. It's a way to talk about and discuss changes. Unfortunately you did not respond to any of those. This happens mostly due to non-existing email addresses or due to a spam filter sorting these mails out. Could you please check your settings and especially react to such changeset discussions?
\nI did set a 0-hour block on you: This means, you have to read this message before you're able to continue to edit. But I'd like to ask you to not only read my block message but also to react and discuss on the changeset discussions of the past. I have added some example links of such changesets above.
\nThank you,
\nPeter Barth aka Peda
\ni.A. OSMF Data Working Group
Hello dkdfh,
\nOpenStreetMap is a collaborative project which also demands to talk to each other and discuss things. I asked you kindly to react to changeset discussions in my other block message, but for some reason you did not react at all. Instead you continued to edit and got new comments to at least one of your changesets (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39170535).
\nYour contributions are welcome, but I have to insist that you do get in touch with the community! If you have a problem commenting on a changeset discussion for whatever reason, you may also write privately to me or the DWG, but ignoring changeset discussions and block messages all together is not an option. It's also not fair to other contributors to expect them to watch and check your edits and clean up after you. We all should work together and help each other to get the best map out there and for that we need to collaborate.
\nI'll ask you once again to react to changeset discussions: Please fix errors you were noticed on, acknowledge hints, tips and errors by others or at least start a discussion if you think otherwise. In case you did not fully understand the importance of communication with the OSM community I hope you do now. Thus I did set another 0-hour block on your account that forces you to read this message before you may (technically!) continue to edit. But I'm expecting that you answer or react to at least the changesets named in this and the last block message before you continue to edit. If you do not, we would be forced to extend the block on your account. As I said above, OpenStreetMap is much about collaboration, and it's at least a matter of friendliness to get in touch with others if they note errors in your edits and want to help.
\nThank you for your understanding,
\nPeter Barth aka Peda
\non behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
Hello dkdfh,
\nI'm still not sure what your native language is. Do you prefer to write in German, Russian or another language? Do you have trouble understanding (my) English? If so, please tell me/us and we'll try to make a language choice that better suites you.
\n(Schreib mir bitte kurz, falls du Deutsch zur weiteren Kommunikation bevorzugst!)
\n(\u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0448\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043c\u043d\u0435 \u041a\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0435 \u0433\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0440\u044f, \u0435\u0441\u043b\u0438 \u0432\u044b \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043f\u043e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0440\u0443\u0441\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u044f\u0437\u044b\u043a \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0434\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0435\u0439\u0448\u0435\u0433\u043e \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f)
\nI have asked you twice to react to changeset discussions and I insisted that you comment at least on all changeset discussions named in the first and second block message. You did answer to a single changeset comment stating \"OK. Got the idea.\" while you obviously did not: You did a new change (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39183508) to a playground, changing your older edits. While it's a good idea to remove the leisure=playground tag from a swing, adding area=yes does not make it much better and keeping name=swing tag does not make sense either. The name-tag is used for giving things an official name, i.e. naming an element. E.g. a church has a name or a street has a name, but a swing is a swing and swing is not the name of the swing. So you should not use a name-tag for that. As jlcod did explain in the original changeset (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39170535) there's a quite detailed mapping scheme for playgrounds (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground) also featuring swings (playground=swing). So please make use of these tags instead!
On another note, all your changesets have a changeset comment of either \"details\" or \"Some features\", which is not very descriptive. Good changeset comments are essential and make it easier for other mappers to follow. It's a matter of courtesy to try to make them descriptive. For more details please have a look at this wiki page about \"Good Changeset Comments\".
\nAnyways, I don't necessarily want to discuss mapping practices but I used the swing as an example why changeset discussions and reacting to other members of our community is important. And this is just a single changeset where you got a comment from other users. Although I requested that you do comment on the other changesets, too, before you continue to edit, you still did continue. It's been only a few edits, but still you did.
\nSo I have to note again that this is unfair to other mappers who also try to enhance the map and who are now waiting for your response and who are watching your edits and fixing your errors. That's why I'm placing another block on your account: I'm blocking your account for 24 hours, so you can't edit for that period. This should give you the time to read the comments on your changesets, it should give you the time to think about the substance of the comments and about what you're going to reply. Btw, I'm not implying that everything that was commented on is an error on your side, but I'm expecting that you at least start a discussion if you think one of your edits was not an error.
\nSo to summarize what I/we expect from you:
\nHere's a (incomplete) list of changesets with open changeset discussions waiting on your reply:
\nI hope you don't get me wrong on that. We appreciate your edits and your participation in OpenStreetMap. But we have to make sure it's not only fun to you, but also stays fun for our other community members!
\nThanks for your consideration,
\nPeter Barth aka Peda
\non behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
Hello again.
\nOver the last few months you've received numerous messages from other mappers asking you to stop tagging forest tracks as if they were roads. You've neither stopped doing this nor have entered into any dialogue with other mappers. You've received messages from me asking you to engage in http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/874 , http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/875 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/882 . Those messages asked you not to use repetitive changeset comments, but recent ones have all been \"cali batuti pisti dealu mari\". Most recently you have failed to reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36187278 .
\nYou will therefore be blocked from editing OpenStreetMap for a period of time. If you would like to contact the Data Working Group about this you can do so by sending an email to data@osmfoundation.org .
\nEdit 20160510_0910:\nPlease don't create sock-puppet accounts to try and evade this block. I sent you a long and detailed message last night explaining how it is possible to achieve your goal (tracks appearing as unclasified roads on a Garmin map) at the Garmin map creation stage.
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\n(Traducere automat\u0103)
\nBun\u0103 din nou.
\nDe-a lungul ultimelor c\u00e2teva luni le-a\u021bi primit numeroase mesaje de la al\u021bi cartografi v\u0103 cere s\u0103 opri\u021bi etichetarea piste forestiere ca \u0219i \u00een cazul \u00een care acestea au fost drumuri. Voi nu a\u021bi \u00eencetat s\u0103 mai fac\u0103 acest lucru \u0219i nici nu au intrat \u00een nici un dialog cu al\u021bi cartografi. A\u021bi primit mesaje de la mine cer\u00e2ndu-v\u0103 s\u0103 se angajeze \u00een http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/874, http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/875 \u0219i http://www.openstreetmap.org/ user_blocks / 882. Acele mesaje pe care a cerut s\u0103 nu utilizeze comentarii changeset repetitive, dar cele mai recente au fost toate \"cali Pisti dealu mari batuti\". Cel mai recent, nu a\u021bi r\u0103spuns la https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36187278.
\nPrin urmare, v\u0103 va fi blocat de la editarea OpenStreetMap pentru o perioad\u0103 de timp. \u00cen cazul \u00een care dori\u021bi s\u0103 contacta\u021bi Grupul de lucru pentru date cu privire la acest lucru, pute\u021bi face acest lucru prin trimiterea unui e-mail la data@osmfoundation.org.
\nEdita 20160510_0910:\nV\u0103 rug\u0103m s\u0103 nu crea\u021bi conturi ciorap-marionet\u0103 pentru a \u00eencerca \u0219i de a se sustrage acest bloc. Am trimis un mesaj lung \u0219i detaliat noaptea trecut\u0103 explic\u00e2nd modul \u00een care este posibil pentru a atinge obiectivul dvs. (piste care apar drumuri ca neclasate pe o hart\u0103 Garmin) la etapa pentru crearea de h\u0103r\u021bi Garmin.
\nToate cele bune,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse), \u00een numele Grupului de lucru a datelor OpenStreetMap lui.
\nHello PeterSandor,
\nYou are being blocked from editing OpenStreetMap as a likely sock-puppet account of pitaclisausturoi , and also for not engaging with questions from the rest of the community in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37053361 and \nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37038865 .
\nIf you would like to contact the Data Working Group about this you can do so by sending an email to data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\n(Traducere automat\u0103)
\nBun\u0103 ziua PeterSandor,
\nSunte\u021bi blocat de la editare OpenStreetMap ca un cont ciorap-marionet\u0103 probabil de pitaclisausturoi, \u0219i, de asemenea, nu pentru angajarea cu \u00eentreb\u0103ri din restul comunit\u0103\u021bii \u00een https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37053361 \u0219i\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37038865.
\n\u00cen cazul \u00een care dori\u021bi s\u0103 contacta\u021bi Grupul de lucru pentru date cu privire la acest lucru, pute\u021bi face acest lucru prin trimiterea unui e-mail la data@osmfoundation.org.
\nToate cele bune,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse), \u00een numele Grupului de lucru a datelor OpenStreetMap lui.
\nHello ZoltanFarcos,
\nYou are being blocked from editing OpenStreetMap as a likely sock-puppet account of pitaclisausturoi .
\nIf you would like to contact the Data Working Group about this you can do so by sending an email to data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\n(Traducere automat\u0103)
\nBun\u0103 ziua ZoltanFarcos,
\nSunte\u021bi blocat de la editarea OpenStreetMap ca un cont ciorap-marionet\u0103 probabil de pitaclisausturoi.
\n\u00cen cazul \u00een care dori\u021bi s\u0103 contacta\u021bi Grupul de lucru pentru date cu privire la acest lucru, pute\u021bi face acest lucru prin trimiterea unui e-mail la data@osmfoundation.org.
\nToate cele bune,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse), \u00een numele Grupului de lucru a datelor OpenStreetMap lui.
\nHello cioroiuTimului,
\nYou are being blocked from editing OpenStreetMap as a likely sock-puppet account of pitaclisausturoi , and also for not engaging with questions from the rest of the community in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39122293 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39122224 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39122237 .
\nIf you would like to contact the Data Working Group about this you can do so by sending an email to data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\n(Traducere automat\u0103)
\nBun\u0103 ziua cioroiuTimului,
\nSunte\u021bi blocat de la editare OpenStreetMap ca un cont ciorap-marionet\u0103 probabil de pitaclisausturoi, \u0219i, de asemenea, pentru a nu se angaja cu \u00eentreb\u0103ri din restul comunit\u0103\u021bii \u00een https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39122293, https: // www .openstreetmap.org / changeset / 39122224 \u0219i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39122237.
\n\u00cen cazul \u00een care dori\u021bi s\u0103 contacta\u021bi Grupul de lucru pentru date cu privire la acest lucru, pute\u021bi face acest lucru prin trimiterea unui e-mail la data@osmfoundation.org.
\nToate cele bune,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse), \u00een numele Grupului de lucru a datelor OpenStreetMap lui.
\nHello DillanMaster,
\nYou are being blocked from editing OpenStreetMap as a likely sock-puppet account of pitaclisausturoi .
\nIf you would like to contact the Data Working Group about this you can do so by sending an email to data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\n(Traducere automat\u0103)
\nBun\u0103 ziua DillanMaster,
\nSunte\u021bi blocat de la editarea OpenStreetMap ca un cont ciorap-marionet\u0103 probabil de pitaclisausturoi.
\n\u00cen cazul \u00een care dori\u021bi s\u0103 contacta\u021bi Grupul de lucru pentru date cu privire la acest lucru, pute\u021bi face acest lucru prin trimiterea unui e-mail la data@osmfoundation.org.
\nToate cele bune,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse), \u00een numele Grupului de lucru a datelor OpenStreetMap lui.
\nHi,
\nOver on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39039645 I asked whether you discussed the name change with anyone living there? It's possible that you didnt see that message because your email is not configured properly, so I'll send the message this way instead. Note that although it appears as a \"block\" message you'll be able to continue editing as soon as you've read it, but please do reply on the changeset over at http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39039645 .
\nI notice since then that you have made a number of other name changes (in some cases, like http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39198772 , without any changeset comment at all). Using changeset comments (like you did in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39039645 ) helps other mappers to see and understand the reason for the change.
\nMy interest as a member of the Data Working Group is to try and make sure that as tagged the names of places match the local communities' desire - that might mean the name is in most commonly used language locally (in this case Albanian: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosovo_Polje ) or it might mean that communities that differ over a name might agree on a \"name a / name b\" version (like http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/267762522 ) - but that needs to be discussed locally. If you look at the history of the node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/448554221/history you'll see that a number of previous tags have got lost in edit wars - that's what we're trying to prevent. If there is a regularly used Serbian name for a place you can add it as \"name:sr\" (or \"name:mk\" for a Macedonian name). People who create maps based on OpenStreetMap data can use language name tags to offer names in the language of the user. As an aside, note that adding a \"name a / name b\" version where the names are in different character sets will break some data consumers (such as OsmAnd).
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group
\nHello verjinicadincuratele,
\nYou are being blocked from editing OpenStreetMap as a likely sock-puppet account of pitaclisausturoi .
\nIf you would like to contact the Data Working Group about this you can do so by sending an email to data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\n(Traducere automat\u0103)
\nBun\u0103 ziua verjinicadincuratele,
\nSunte\u021bi blocat de la editarea OpenStreetMap ca un cont ciorap-marionet\u0103 probabil de pitaclisausturoi.
\n\u00cen cazul \u00een care dori\u021bi s\u0103 contacta\u021bi Grupul de lucru pentru date cu privire la acest lucru, pute\u021bi face acest lucru prin trimiterea unui e-mail la data@osmfoundation.org.
\nToate cele bune,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse), \u00een numele Grupului de lucru a datelor OpenStreetMap lui.
\nDear Aygula,
\nThere have been a number of changeset discussion comments left on your changesets by people expressing concerns that you are not being careful in your editing, including reclassifying neighborhoods as houses, redrawing buildings incorrectly, etc.
\nYou have no responded to these messages and you continue to make these controversial edits.
\nBecause of this, I am placing this Stop Message on your account, which requires that you read this message. Please read the comments on your changesets and respond where appropriate.
\nIf you disagree with the users making the comment, you can and should engage them in a dialog, but having the conversation itself is important.
\nIf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact the OSM Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org
\nThank you,
\nSerge Wroclawski\nOn behalf of the OSM Data Working Group
\nHello nicolaieceausescu,
\nYou are being blocked from editing OpenStreetMap as a likely sock-puppet account of pitaclisausturoi .
\nIf you would like to contact the Data Working Group about this you can do so by sending an email to data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\n(Traducere automat\u0103)
\nBun\u0103 ziua nicolaieceausescu,
\nSunte\u021bi blocat de la editarea OpenStreetMap ca un cont ciorap-marionet\u0103 probabil de pitaclisausturoi.
\n\u00cen cazul \u00een care dori\u021bi s\u0103 contacta\u021bi Grupul de lucru pentru date cu privire la acest lucru, pute\u021bi face acest lucru prin trimiterea unui e-mail la data@osmfoundation.org.
\nToate cele bune,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse), \u00een numele Grupului de lucru a datelor OpenStreetMap lui.
\nBonjour hugo06,
\nPlusieurs contributeurs ont remarqu\u00e9 ce changement :\nhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39011268\ncomme \u00e9tant de l'ajout de donn\u00e9es fictives, suppression de donn\u00e9es valides. Et comme vous aviez d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9venu, dans la m\u00eame zone, il y a 9 mois ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/778 ) que \u00e7a n'\u00e9tait pas une zone de \"test\" mais la base v\u00e9ritable utilis\u00e9e d'Openstreetmap. Votre action a \u00e9t\u00e9 annul\u00e9e et vous avez \u00e9t\u00e9 bloqu\u00e9 le temps de prendre connaissance de ce message.
\nCe que vous faites est du vandalisme, merci d'arr\u00eater et d'engager la discussion avec la communaut\u00e9 Openstreetmap s'il y a quelque chose que vous voulez tester.
\nSylvain, pour le DWG ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group )
\nHello IubescRomania,
\nYou are being blocked from editing OpenStreetMap as yet another sock-puppet account of pitaclisausturoi .
\nIf you would like to contact the Data Working Group about this you can do so by sending an email to data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\n(Traducere automat\u0103)
\nBun\u0103 ziua IubescRomania,
\nSunte\u021bi blocat de la editarea OpenStreetMap ca \u00eenc\u0103 un cont ciorap-marionet\u0103 a pitaclisausturoi.
\n\u00cen cazul \u00een care dori\u021bi s\u0103 contacta\u021bi Grupul de lucru pentru date cu privire la acest lucru, pute\u021bi face acest lucru prin trimiterea unui e-mail la data@osmfoundation.org.
\nToate cele bune,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse), \u00een numele Grupului de lucru a datelor OpenStreetMap lui.
\nOver in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38693326 I said:
\nHi,\nPlease don't add test data to the live database. If you want to test API calls, you can do them with http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ .
\nYou're still doing it!
\nIt's possible that you never saw the original message because your email is broken, so I'm sending this as a message that has to be read before you can continue editing. Once you've read it you'll be able to continue editing, but please don't add test data to the live database!
\nBest Regards,\nAndy Townsend (SomeOneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group
\nHello LoveRomania,
\nYou are being blocked from editing OpenStreetMap as a likely sock-puppet account of pitaclisausturoi .
\nIf you would like to contact the Data Working Group about this you can do so by sending an email to data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\n(Traducere automat\u0103)
\nBun\u0103 ziua LoveRomania,
\nSunte\u021bi blocat de la editarea OpenStreetMap ca un cont ciorap-marionet\u0103 probabil de pitaclisausturoi.
\n\u00cen cazul \u00een care dori\u021bi s\u0103 contacta\u021bi Grupul de lucru pentru date cu privire la acest lucru, pute\u021bi face acest lucru prin trimiterea unui e-mail la data@osmfoundation.org.
\nToate cele bune,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse), \u00een numele Grupului de lucru a datelor OpenStreetMap lui.
\n(\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u044f)
\n\u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u0439\u0442\u0435, \u0421\u0432\u0435\u0442\u043b\u0430\u043d\u0430.
\n\u042f \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0438\u043b \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0442\u044c \u0432 OpenStreetMap \u043d\u0435 \u0442\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u043e \u043d\u043e\u043c\u0435\u0440 \u0434\u043e\u043c\u0430, \u043d\u043e \u0438 \u0443\u043b\u0438\u0446\u0443 [1]. \u0412\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0432\u043d\u0438\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u043c\u043e\u044e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044c\u0431\u0443 \u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 [2].
\n\u041a\u0440\u043e\u043c\u0435 \u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e, \u044f \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0430\u0433\u0430\u044e, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0432\u044b \u0431\u0435\u0440\u0451\u0442\u0435 \u043d\u043e\u043c\u0435\u0440\u0430 \u0434\u043e\u043c\u043e\u0432 \u0441 \u043a\u0430\u043a\u043e\u0439-\u0442\u043e \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u044b \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0432\u0435\u0431-\u0441\u0435\u0440\u0432\u0438\u0441\u0430. \u041d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440, \u0432\u044b \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043d\u043e\u043c\u0435\u0440 \u0434\u043e\u043c\u0430 1/1 [1]. \u042f \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u043b\u0441\u044f \u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0438\u043b \u044d\u0442\u043e\u0442 \u0430\u0434\u0440\u0435\u0441 \u043d\u0430 \u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438. \u042d\u0442\u043e\u0442 \u0434\u0435\u0442\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u0441\u0430\u0434 \u0438\u043c\u0435\u0435\u0442 \u0430\u0434\u0440\u0435\u0441 \"\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0435\u0437\u0434 \u0413\u0435\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0432\u0435\u0434\u0447\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432, \u0434\u043e\u043c 1, \u043a\u043e\u0440\u043f\u0443\u0441 1\". \u042d\u0442\u043e\u0442 \u0430\u0434\u0440\u0435\u0441 \u0437\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0432 OpenStreetMap \u043a\u0430\u043a addr:housenumber=1 \u043a1, \u043d\u043e \u043d\u0435 addr:housenumber=1/1. \u041f\u0440\u043e\u0448\u0443 \u0432\u0430\u0441 \u043d\u0435 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0438\u0437 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0445 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442 [3].
\n\u0422\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u0432\u044b \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0433\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0432\u043e\u0439 \u0434\u043e\u043c \u0441 \u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435\u043c \u00ab\u0434\u043e\u043c \u0440\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u0439\u00bb [2]. \u042f \u0438\u0441\u043a\u0430\u043b \u044d\u0442\u043e\u0442 \u043e\u0431\u044a\u0435\u043a\u0442 \u0432 \u0418\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u043d\u0435\u0442\u0435, \u043d\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u0448\u0451\u043b \u0435\u0433\u043e. \u0415\u0441\u043b\u0438 \u044d\u0442\u043e \u0434\u043e\u043c \u0432\u0430\u0448\u0438\u0445 \u0440\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u0439, \u0442\u043e \u0432\u0430\u043c \u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u0443\u0435\u0442 \u0437\u043d\u0430\u0442\u044c, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043e\u0442\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044f \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0438\u0437 Maps.me \u0432 \u0418\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u043d\u0435\u0442, \u0432\u044b \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0438\u0445 \u043d\u0430 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0443 \u043c\u0438\u0440\u0430, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0443\u044e \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0432\u0438\u0434\u0435\u0442\u044c \u043a\u0430\u0436\u0434\u044b\u0439 \u0447\u0435\u043b\u043e\u0432\u0435\u043a. \u042d\u0442\u0430 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0430 \u043c\u0438\u0440\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u0437\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f OpenStreetMap. \u0412\u044b \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0431 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u0439 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0435 \u043f\u043e \u0430\u0434\u0440\u0435\u0441\u0430\u043c [4,5].
\n\u0414\u043b\u044f \u043b\u0438\u0447\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043e\u043a \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443\u0439\u0442\u0435, \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u0432 Maps.me \u043c\u0435\u0442\u043a\u0438. Maps.me \u043d\u0435 \u043e\u0442\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442 \u043c\u0435\u0442\u043a\u0438 \u0432 OpenStreetMap.
\n\u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043e\u0431\u044a\u044f\u0441\u043d\u0438\u0442\u0435, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0432\u044b \u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435, \u043f\u043e \u0430\u0434\u0440\u0435\u0441\u0443 [1].
\n\u0412\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u041c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0438\u043d\u0438\u043d
\n\u0420\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0430\u044f \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u0430 \u043f\u043e \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u043c
(english version)
\nHello, Svetlana.
\nI asked you to add in OpenStreetMap not only number of a house, but also street [1]. You ignored my request and you continued to do also [2].
\nBesides, I believe, that you take numbers of houses from any map or web-service. For example, you added number of a house 1/1 [ 1 ]. I was not too lazy and I have checked this address on the ground. This kindergarten has the address \"\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0435\u0437\u0434 \u0413\u0435\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0432\u0435\u0434\u0447\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432, \u0434\u043e\u043c 1, \u043a\u043e\u0440\u043f\u0443\u0441 1\". We add this address in OpenStreetMap like addr:housenumber=1 \u043a1, but not addr:housenumber=1/1. I ask you to not use the data from other maps [3].
\nAlso you have added the guest house with a name \u00ab\u0434\u043e\u043c \u0440\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u0439\u00bb (\u00abthe house of parents\u00bb) [2]. I searched for this object in Internet, but I have not found it. If it is the house of your parents, then you should know, that sending the data from Maps.me to Internet, you add them on a world map, which each person can see. This world map has name OpenStreetMap. You can read about this map at the addresses [4,5].
\nPlease, use the bookmarks for personal notes in Maps.me. Maps.me does not send the bookmarks in OpenStreetMap.
\nPlease, explain, that you do at the address [1].
\nVladimir Marshinin
\nData Working Group
Hello LoveRomnian,
\nYou are being blocked from editing OpenStreetMap as a likely sock-puppet account of pitaclisausturoi .
\nIf you would like to contact the Data Working Group about this you can do so by sending an email to data@osmfoundation.org .
\nBest Regards,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
\n(Traducere automat\u0103)
\nBun\u0103 ziua LoveRomnian,
\nSunte\u021bi blocat de la editarea OpenStreetMap ca un cont ciorap-marionet\u0103 probabil de pitaclisausturoi.
\n\u00cen cazul \u00een care dori\u021bi s\u0103 contacta\u021bi Grupul de lucru pentru date cu privire la acest lucru, pute\u021bi face acest lucru prin trimiterea unui e-mail la data@osmfoundation.org.
\nToate cele bune,
\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse), \u00een numele Grupului de lucru a datelor OpenStreetMap lui.
\nHello Eugene13,
\nYou've replaced the roundabout at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418162278 with a \"oneway tertiary road\" Can you explain the reasoning behind this change? Is that really not a roundabout?
\nI'm sending this as a message that has to be read rather than a comment on a changeset discussion because previously you haven't replied to those (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38970496 ). This might happen because your email is broken and you genuinely haven't seen them (in which case, please do fix your email).
\nPlease also reply to the questions that people have asked on changeset discussions, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39321130 .
\nBest Regards,\nAndy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group
\n