Return-Path: Received: from alderaan.linagora.com (smtp.linagora.dc1 [172.16.18.53]) by imap (Cyrus v2.2.13-Debian-2.2.13-19+squeeze3) with LMTPA; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:32:39 +0200 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: from [10.31.0.199] (laf31-6-82-241-3-83.fbx.proxad.net [82.241.3.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alderaan.linagora.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12448725; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:32:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <54212214.1000407@linagora.com> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:32:36 +0200 From: Graham Crosmarie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Bailly , Laurent DUBOIS , Christophe HAMERLING , Stephen LE MAISTRE , Romain PIGNOLET , Philipp KEWISCH Subject: Re: User notification data model proposal 2 References: <541FE4A0.1010208@linagora.com> <542049D1.1080504@linagora.com> In-Reply-To: <542049D1.1080504@linagora.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040400080700060003000600" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040400080700060003000600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello, Seems complete to me... Except that the 'actions' fields is an array containing one or more URLs. So I think that the 'acknowledged' fieId corresponding to these actions being triggered is not enough, because we can only remember that 1 action has been chosen by the user. If all actions are mutually exclusive, it's ok. But if more than one action can be triggered I think that the 'acknowledged' field should be moved as a field of an action. Le 22/09/2014 18:09, Michael Bailly a écrit : > Hi, > > I posted a refine of the proposal on jira : > https://ci.open-paas.org/jira/browse/OR-552?focusedCommentId=11014&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-11014 > > The main things I added are the target, parentId, read & acknowledged > fields. > > WDYT ? > -- Signature Graham CROSMARIE R&D Engineer Linagora GSO – www.linagora.com --------------040400080700060003000600 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello,

Seems complete to me...

Except that the 'actions' fields is an array containing one or more URLs.
So I think that the 'acknowledged' fieId corresponding to these actions being triggered is not enough, because we can only remember that 1 action has been chosen by the user.
If all actions are mutually exclusive, it's ok.
But if more than one action can be triggered I think that the 'acknowledged' field should be moved as a field of an action.


Le 22/09/2014 18:09, Michael Bailly a écrit :
Hi,

I posted a refine of the proposal on jira : https://ci.open-paas.org/jira/browse/OR-552?focusedCommentId=11014&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-11014

The main things I added are the target, parentId, read & acknowledged fields.

WDYT ?


--
Signature
Graham CROSMARIE
R&D Engineer
Linagora GSO – www.linagora.com
--------------040400080700060003000600--