# Quality Checklist - R.O.C.K.E.T. Framework # 4-Level validation system for Mission → Story → Task → Agent cascade quality_checklist: version: "1.0" framework: "R.O.C.K.E.T." description: "Comprehensive quality validation for cascade workflow" # Level 1: Mission Quality Gate mission_quality: threshold: 4.0 # Minimum 4 stars required max_score: 5.0 criteria: role: weight: 1.0 description: "Clear mission role and purpose definition" checkpoints: - "Mission role clearly defined" - "Purpose statement is specific" - "Scope boundaries established" - "Accountability assigned" objective: weight: 2.0 # Higher weight for objectives description: "Well-defined goals and measurable outcomes" checkpoints: - "Objective is specific and measurable" - "Success criteria are quantifiable" - "Timeline is realistic and defined" - "Business value is clear" context: weight: 1.0 description: "Sufficient background and requirements" checkpoints: - "Business context provided" - "Requirements documented" - "Constraints identified" - "Dependencies mapped" key_instructions: weight: 1.5 description: "Actionable guidance and execution plan" checkpoints: - "Execution strategy defined" - "Resource requirements specified" - "Team assignments appropriate" - "Risk mitigation planned" examples: weight: 0.5 description: "Reference examples and benchmarks" checkpoints: - "Success examples provided" - "Benchmarks established" - "Best practices referenced" - "Lessons learned included" tone: weight: 1.0 description: "Consistent voice and communication style" checkpoints: - "Brand voice maintained" - "Tone appropriate for audience" - "Messaging consistent" - "Communication clear" # Level 2: Story Quality Gate story_quality: threshold: 4.0 max_score: 5.0 criteria: role: weight: 1.0 description: "Story role within mission context" checkpoints: - "Story role in mission clear" - "Narrative purpose defined" - "Contribution to mission obvious" - "Story boundaries established" objective: weight: 2.0 description: "Specific story outcomes and deliverables" checkpoints: - "Story objectives measurable" - "Deliverables clearly defined" - "Acceptance criteria specified" - "Definition of done established" context: weight: 1.0 description: "Story context and background" checkpoints: - "Mission context maintained" - "User perspective included" - "Technical context provided" - "Business impact clear" key_instructions: weight: 1.5 description: "Task breakdown and execution plan" checkpoints: - "Tasks properly defined" - "Execution sequence logical" - "Agent assignments optimal" - "Quality gates implemented" examples: weight: 0.5 description: "Story examples and references" checkpoints: - "Similar stories referenced" - "Success patterns identified" - "Templates provided" - "Reference materials linked" tone: weight: 1.0 description: "Story voice and narrative style" checkpoints: - "Narrative voice consistent" - "Story engaging and clear" - "Technical details appropriate" - "User perspective maintained" # Level 3: Task Quality Gate task_quality: threshold: 4.0 max_score: 5.0 criteria: role: weight: 1.0 description: "Task role within story context" checkpoints: - "Task purpose crystal clear" - "Contribution to story obvious" - "Scope appropriately sized" - "Dependencies identified" objective: weight: 2.0 description: "Specific task outputs and criteria" checkpoints: - "Outputs clearly specified" - "Quality criteria defined" - "Completion criteria measurable" - "Success metrics established" context: weight: 1.0 description: "Task context and requirements" checkpoints: - "Input requirements clear" - "Technical constraints known" - "Business rules understood" - "User needs considered" key_instructions: weight: 1.5 description: "Execution instructions and guidance" checkpoints: - "Step-by-step instructions clear" - "Agent capabilities matched" - "Tools and resources specified" - "Quality validation built-in" examples: weight: 0.5 description: "Task examples and templates" checkpoints: - "Input examples provided" - "Output examples shown" - "Templates available" - "Reference implementations linked" tone: weight: 1.0 description: "Task communication and style" checkpoints: - "Instructions clear and actionable" - "Tone appropriate for agent" - "Technical level appropriate" - "Feedback mechanisms defined" # Level 4: Agent Quality Gate agent_quality: threshold: 4.0 max_score: 5.0 criteria: role: weight: 1.0 description: "Agent role and capabilities alignment" checkpoints: - "Agent expertise matches task" - "Role boundaries respected" - "Capabilities sufficient" - "Specialization appropriate" objective: weight: 2.0 description: "Task completion and output quality" checkpoints: - "All outputs delivered" - "Quality criteria met" - "Specifications followed" - "Acceptance criteria satisfied" context: weight: 1.0 description: "Context understanding and application" checkpoints: - "Context properly understood" - "Requirements addressed" - "Constraints respected" - "Integration considered" key_instructions: weight: 1.5 description: "Instruction following and execution" checkpoints: - "Instructions followed precisely" - "Best practices applied" - "Quality processes used" - "Validation performed" examples: weight: 0.5 description: "Example usage and pattern following" checkpoints: - "Examples properly referenced" - "Patterns correctly applied" - "Templates used appropriately" - "Standards maintained" tone: weight: 1.0 description: "Communication and brand consistency" checkpoints: - "Brand voice maintained" - "Tone consistent with requirements" - "Communication clear" - "Feedback provided appropriately" # Cascade Integration Rules cascade_rules: mission_to_story: validation_required: true handoff_criteria: - "Mission quality >= 4.0 stars" - "Stories properly spawned" - "Team assignments confirmed" - "Resource allocation approved" story_to_task: validation_required: true handoff_criteria: - "Story quality >= 4.0 stars" - "Tasks properly defined" - "Agent assignments optimal" - "Quality gates implemented" task_to_agent: validation_required: true handoff_criteria: - "Task quality >= 4.0 stars" - "Agent capabilities matched" - "Instructions complete" - "Success criteria clear" agent_completion: validation_required: true completion_criteria: - "Agent quality >= 4.0 stars" - "All outputs delivered" - "Quality standards met" - "Integration verified" # Automated Quality Assurance automation: enabled: true auto_checks: - "R.O.C.K.E.T. component presence" - "Content length validation" - "Required field completion" - "Template compliance" - "Brand consistency" - "Ontology compliance" quality_gates: - level: "mission" auto_advance: false # Requires manual approval notifications: ["mission-commander", "project-lead"] - level: "story" auto_advance: true # Can auto-advance if quality met notifications: ["story-teller", "team-lead"] - level: "task" auto_advance: true notifications: ["task-master", "agent-coordinator"] - level: "agent" auto_advance: true notifications: ["quality-guardian", "completion-tracker"] reporting: frequency: "real-time" dashboards: ["quality-metrics", "cascade-progress", "agent-performance"] alerts: ["quality-failures", "cascade-blocks", "completion-delays"] # Quality Improvement continuous_improvement: learning_enabled: true feedback_loops: - "Quality score trending analysis" - "Common failure pattern identification" - "Best practice propagation" - "Template optimization" optimization: - "Criteria weight adjustment based on outcomes" - "Threshold tuning based on performance" - "Automation rule refinement" - "Checklist evolution based on usage"